Wednesday, May 17, 2017

The Left-Winger, the Right-Winger and the Cake


The Left-Winger, the Right-Winger and the Cake

By Julio Severo
I wonder the vastly different left-wing and right-wing attitudes regarding the cake, or the government power.
If Barack Obama, Bill Clinton or other socialist is in power, the pack of liberal wolves demand the whole cake — and they receive it.
Yet, when George W. Bush, Donald Trump or other right-winger is in power, the pack of liberal wolves keep demanding the whole cake — and whining and growling when they receive a slice.
Right-wingers have abundant reasons to complain under Obama and Clinton: they received no slice of the cake.
But left-wingers have no reason to complain under Bush and Trump: they received and receive a slice of the cake.
Under Clinton and Obama,
Abortion measures satisfied only the left-wing greed.
Homosexual measures satisfied only the left-wing greed.
Contraceptive measures satisfied only the left-wing greed.
Sex education measures satisfied only the left-wing greed.
In comparison, under Trump,
Pro-life measures, especially the Mexico City Policy, have satisfied only the conservative wish, even though a repeal of the ultra-abortion law Roe v. Wade is not in view.
Homosexual measures have satisfied both the left-wing greed and the pro-family wish. Even though Trump has repealed a few Obama’s pro-sodomy decrees, he has essentially kept Obama’s homosexual imperialism. From the homosexual cake, a slice to conservatives and a larger slice to left-wing wolves.
Conservatives are not protesting Trump’s kind attitude of sharing the homosexual cake between right-wingers and left-wingers.
Left-wingers receive their slice of the cake whining and growling, as ever. An eternal wolfish attitude. The pack of liberal wolves want the whole cake.
But conservatives demonstrate a sheepish attitude. It seems that they think, “Clinton and Obama would never give us a piece of the cake. At least Trump gave us a slice of the cake, and we are very grateful!”
If Trump does not want give the whole cake to conservatives, there is no problem: They are satisfied with a slice.
But if he does not give the whole cake to left-wingers, there is a serious problem! The pack will whine and threaten. One slice is never enough!
Of course, Trump’s attitude of sharing the homosexual cake can be justified by the fact that he has no conservative or right-wing history.
Besides, in his campaign in 2016, he never promised to give the whole cake of homosexual issues to conservatives.
What he promised was not to give any slice of the cake to neocon wolves. Conservative evangelicals, the base that gave him the electoral victory, were elated over this promise and left-wingers, with some warmongering Republicans, whined and growled…
But now, neocon wolves are cutting the cake and “helping” Trump to share it. A large slice to Saudi Arabia, which is the main sponsor of the global Islamic terrorism and whose terrorist citizens were mostly responsible for the 9/11 Islamic attack.
Because of Trump’s promises, especially of an alliance with Russia against Islamic terrorism, we conservative evangelicals thought that he would give no slice of the cake to neocon wolves, whose warmongering greed in the Bush, Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations was broadly gratified by an U.S. alliance with Islam against Russia.
Now, again, neocon wolves have the whole cake, and there is no Trump or a conservative to confront them and their greed.
May God take the cake from the wolves. Or may God use courageous Americans to take the cake from the wolves!
Portuguese version of this article: O esquerdista, o direitista e o bolo
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

President Donald Trump Expands His Pro-Life Policy Against Surgical Abortions, But Not Against Contraception, Immoral Sex Education and the Gay Agenda


President Donald Trump Expands His Pro-Life Policy Against Surgical Abortions, But Not Against Contraception, Immoral Sex Education and the Gay Agenda

By Julio Severo
CBN News is reporting that the Trump Administration will significantly expand the Mexico City Policy.
The Mexico City Policy, initiated by President Ronald Reagan in 1985, stops U.S. taxpayer funding of groups that perform and promote abortions overseas but it does not stop contraceptive and homosexual international assistance. The order ensures millions in U.S. dollars will continue to go to foreign health care and humanitarian relief that provide contraception and immoral sex education. It just will not subsidize surgical abortion overseas.
The Mexico City Policy has been cyclical in the U.S. policies, with Reagan, Bush and Trump supporting it, and Clinton and Obama revoking it. If the next U.S. president is a Democrat, or socialist, he will revoke it.
The Trump administration is modernizing the Mexico City Policy to cover all foreign health assistance provided by government agencies including the State Department, U.S. Agency for International Development, the Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator, and the Department of Defense. Previously the policy only covered family planning funds.
Only surgical abortion activity is affected. The U.S. government under Trump is likely to keep funding questionable programs and activities that advocate contraception and homosexuality as family planning and immoral sex education, even though contraception often entails micro-abortions.
In 1992, in an international meeting with the Latin American director of UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund), I met the director of the Brazilian affiliate of the International Planned Parenthood Federation, who gave me a special document on how to guide legislators and authorities to support immoral sex education for teenagers. The document had been officially printed in the U.S. Government Printing Office in 1989 during the Bush administration, when the Mexico City Policy was in force.
The document had no abortion advocacy, but had detailed instructions directed to legislators about Brazilian teenagers’ “need” of comprehensive immoral sex education and contraception. The Mexico City Policy was powerless to hinder this depraved document from being printed in the U.S. Government Printing Office at the expense of U.S. taxpayer.
The most powerful pro-abortion institutions in the world are American, including Ford Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Soros Foundation and many other foundations. The most prominent pro-abortion, sex education and contraceptive organization in the world is the International Planned Parenthood Federation, founded by American Margaret Sanger.
If Trump could treat these U.S. groups that export abortion throughout the world the way neocons treat vulnerable nations, the pro-abortion ideology would suffer destruction and death.
The Mexico City Policy is a good step to stop surgical abortions. But it does not stop population control measures, including contraception and immoral sex education. The contraceptive mindset is a population control mindset always leading to abortion.
The Mexico City Policy does not stop the powerful U.S. pro-abortion foundations from exporting abortion throughout the world and it is powerless to criminalize their murderous, criminal activities.
The Trump administration, following basically the infamous NSSM 200, will keep funding contraception and sex education programs around the world, including AIDS assistance, which funds homosexual groups. No nation in the world advocates and exports more the contraceptive culture, which is anti-family, than the U.S. does.
The State Department under Trump is announcing its expansive, even though contraceptive, Mexico City Policy under the title “Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance.”
Under secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the Obama administration, the State Department advocated abortion, homosexuality and neocon wars. Hillary was the main responsible for provoking the civil war in Syria.
With Trump, what will change in the State Department?
There will be no abortion advocacy, at least not surgical abortions. Micro-abortions provoked by contraception are not covered by the Trump policy.
Will homosexuality be a part of the Trump State Department as it was in the Obama administration? Apparently so, because the Trump administration has kept the special ambassador for global homosexual issues appointed by Obama.
A “Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance” policy in the State Department that is waging a war in Syria, initiated by Hillary Clinton, is a very strange example of being “pro-life.”
If the Trump administration is serious about being pro-life, it should discontinue Obama’s homosexual imperialism and U.S. interventions initiated by Hillary in Syria.
To be pro-life is much more than stopping surgical abortions. It is also about stopping the homosexual agenda and the neocon agenda of unending wars.
When neocons seduce a U.S. president to meddle in a nation, the result is a trail of destruction and death: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and now Syria.
Abortion kills babies. Neocons kill nations.
It is impossible for Trump to be pro-life and keep feeding Hillary’s neocon war in Syria, where Christians are suffering genocide in the hands of ISIS, created by Hillary and supported by Saudi Arabia.
With information from LifeNews.
Recommended Reading:

Monday, May 15, 2017

Why Is Israel Saving Islamic Terrorists?


Why Is Israel Saving Islamic Terrorists?

Eighty percent of wounded Syrians receiving medical care in Israel are Islamic male rebels against Christians and Assad. Just 20 per cent of Syrians treated by Israel are civilians

By Julio Severo
I have watched some propaganda videos of Israel giving medical care to wounded Syrians. Such propaganda intends to put Israel in a very positive light in the public eyes. As an evangelical Christian who supports Israel, I love every kind act of Israel.
Israeli soldiers rescuing a wounded Syrian Islamic militant
Yet, I have found some disturbing facts about Israel’s medical assistance to Syrians.
A report from the Israeli newspaper Times of Israel, headlined “Israel acknowledges it is helping Syrian rebel fighters,” said, “Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon said Monday that Israel has been providing aid to Syrian rebels” and “has been helping forces that are fighting to overthrow Syrian President Bashar Assad.”
“Ya’alon said of the Israeli medical aid to the Syrian rebels, some of whom are presumably fighting with al-Qaeda affiliate al-Nusra Front to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad,” said Times of Israel, adding, “Israel has treated over 1,000 wounded Syrians in its hospitals since the onset of the civil war in 2011.”
Another prominent Israeli newspaper, The Jerusalem Post, in a report headlined “Israel treating al-Qaida fighters wounded in Syria civil war,” said, “Israel has opened its borders with Syria in order to provide medical treatment to Nusra Front and al-Qaida fighters wounded in the ongoing civil war.”
The Jerusalem Post added, “Israel has provided medical assistance to nearly 2,000 Syrians… ‘an Israeli military official’… said that most of those treated were armed rebels fighting the regime.”
Confirming the Israeli reports, in a report titled “Heartstopping footage shows Israeli commandos rescuing wounded men from Syrian warzone — but WHY are they risking their lives for Islamic militants?” British newspaper DailyMail said that elite Israeli troops have rescued mostly wounded male Syrians from the Syrian war almost every night.
DailyMail noted, “Israel insists that these treacherous nightly rescues are purely humanitarian, and that it can only hope to ‘win hearts and minds’ in Syria. But analysts suggest the Jewish state has in fact struck a deadly ‘deal with the devil’ — offering support to the Sunni militants,” who are “members of Jabhat al-Nusra, a Syrian group affiliated to Al Qaeda that has kidnapped scores of UN peacekeeping troops in this area, and has massacred Christians deeper in Syria.”
DailyMail also said, “In the three years that Israel has been running these operations, it has saved the lives of more than 2,000 Syrians – at least 80 per cent of whom are male and of fighting age – at a cost of 50 million shekels (£8.7 million),” adding that just “20 per cent of the Syrians treated by Israel are civilians.”
There is a genocide of Christians in advanced progress in Syria. Whatever Israel’s military strategy may be, elite Israeli troops are rescuing savage Islamic militants directly responsible for the genocide of Christian Syrians.
One year ago, Chaldean bishop of Aleppo, Antoine Audo, said that the Christian population in Syria has been reduced by two-thirds in five years — from 1.5 million to only 500,000.
Speaking at a press conference at the UN headquarters in Geneva, Audo said that only in Aleppo the Christian population was reduced from 160,000 to 40,000.
According to Breitbart, these remaining 40,000 Christians are pro-Assad and fear the Islamic rebels backed by the U.S. and Israel. They fear that if these rebels gain ground, Christians will become targets, both for their faith and their support of the Syrian government.

Who Is Fighting Whom in Syria — And What Has Israel’s Stance Been on Christian Suffering?

For six bitter years, the Syrian civil war has been raging less than a mile from Israel.
Israel has significant interests at stake in the Syrian war. Most obviously, Israel is concerned about Hezbollah’s role in the Syrian conflict. Because ISIS and Syrians rebels are enemies of Hezbollah, Israel supports them. From an Israeli viewpoint, it’s a case of “my enemy’s enemy is my friend.”
Yet, Hezbollah’s enemies are committing genocide against Syrian Christians.
Below is a summary of the main military actors in Syria, and what each one means for Christians and Israel.
Assad’s troops: The Syrian Army is significantly pro-Christian and, with the help of Russian air support, has been fighting ISIS and Syrian rebels. Israel sees more problems with Assad than with ISIS and Syrian rebels.
Hezbollah: The Shia Lebanese guerrilla organization works hand-in-glove with Iran in Syria. Hezbollah has been fighting ISIS and Syrian rebels, and Syrian Christians have faced no genocide from Hezbollah. Yet, Hezbollah is one of Israel’s most deadly enemies, having kidnapped a number of Israeli soldiers and fought several debilitating conflicts with the Jewish State.
Russia: Officially on friendly terms with Israel, Vladimir Putin has supported Assad. Conservative news site WorldNetDaily has said that the Russian presence in Syria is fighting terror and protecting Christians. Raymond Ibrahim, author of the best-selling book “Crucified Again” on Islamic persecution of Christians, has praised Russian efforts in Syria to protect Christians, but he has condemned U.S. efforts to help Christian-murdering Syrian rebels.
In a cover story of Decision magazine, Franklin Graham, son of the famous evangelist Billy Graham, said,
I have never heard Putin quote the Bible, but during his 2012 election campaign, he met with church leaders in Moscow and vowed to protect persecuted Christians around the world. That is one justification for his support of the Assad regime in Syria.
Syria, for all its problems, at least has a constitution that guarantees equal protection of citizens. Around the world, we have seen that this is essential where Christians are a minority and are not protected. The radicals in Syria want an Islamic constitution based on sharia law.
Christians have lived in Syria since the time of Christ. The Apostle Paul was on the road to Damascus when he met Christ. Christians in Syria know that if the radicals overthrow Assad, there will be widespread persecution and wholesale slaughter of Christians.
ISIS: The brutal jihadi group, which has become the number one enemy of Christians in Syria and Iraq, controls areas of Iraq and Syria which is home to five million people and is thought to earn more than $2billion a year.
Saudi Arabia: The Saudi Islamic dictatorship is the principal financial backer of the Sunni militants, including Islamist rebels linked to al-Qaida, who are fighting Assad. ISIS is also a Sunni group. Saudi Arabia is engaged in a long-term struggle for supremacy with Iran. It is understood that Saudi Arabia and the other Gulf states have a working relationship with Israel against Assad.
Shia militia: Iran has mobilized a multinational network of Shia militias in Syria to fight the Sunni networks of ISIS and al-Qaida. Israel sees Shia threat as a bigger than the ISIS threat. But for Syrian Christians, the ISIS threat is bigger than the Shia threat.
Al-Qaida: Various al-Qaida affiliate groups are fighting Assad in Syria, including the feared al-Nusra Front, also known as the Syrian al-Qaida.
Syrian rebels: A range of Islamic militants opposed to Assad are referred to generally as the Free Syrian Army. They have no immediate desire to fight Israel, but share the general hatred of the Jewish state that dominates in Syria. They have also been slaughtering Syrian Christians. They receive support from the United States and Europe.
United States: As a secretary of State under Obama and a staunch defender of the military-industrial-intelligence complex, Hillary Clinton helped to spread violence stretching from Libya to Afghanistan.
Perhaps her crowning disaster was her relentless promotion of CIA-led regime change in Syria. With CIA support, which gave and gives arms and training to Islamic rebels, Hillary wanted to overthrow Bashir al-Assad and she said that it would be quick, costless, and surely successful. In August 2011, Hillary led the U.S. into disaster with her declaration Assad must “get out of the way,” backed by secret CIA operations.
Six years later, no place on the planet is more ravaged by unending war. The Syrian Christian population has been virtually decimated, more than 10 million Syrians are displaced, and Syrian refugees are undermining the political stability of the European Union. Into the chaos created by the secret CIA-Saudi operations to overthrow Assad, ISIS has filled the vacuum, and has used Syria as the base for worldwide terrorist attacks.
Trump seems to have learnt no lessons from Hillary’s disasters in Syria and he has been buying into the CIA propaganda that Assad should be deposed. As the Obama administration, the Trump administration has not done anything to rescue Syrian Christians from Hillary’s and Obama’s violence in Syria.
This is the chaotic picture in Syria and U.S. interventions, with Saudi assistance, are not helping Christians.
Israel is absolutely right in fighting for its Promised Land, especially against the Palestinian aggression. But Israel is absolutely wrong in helping Islamic radicals.
Israel should use its high military capabilities, and its elite troops, to rescue Christian victims in Syria. But by helping Islamic terrorists who are committing genocide against Christians, Israel is backsliding from God’s purpose.
God is absolutely right when he says about Israel: “My people are bent to backsliding from me.” (Hosea 11:7 Authorized Version)
The United States has received thousands of Islamic Syrian refugees and granted them visas, housing, food and jobs. Israel has treated thousands of wounded Islamic Syrians. Could not they do much more for Syrian Christians? Cannot they receive thousands of Christians in their lands? Why not?
Both Israel and the United States could use their commandos to rescue Christians from the genocide ISIS and al-Qaida are committing against them. Why do not they do it?
With information from the Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, DailyMail, Breitbart, Decision magazine and Huffington Post.
Portuguese version of this article: Por que Israel está salvando terroristas islâmicos
Recommended Reading:

Friday, May 05, 2017

Trump will visit Israel, the Vatican and Saudi Arabia on his first international trip


Trump will visit Israel, the Vatican and Saudi Arabia on his first international trip

By Julio Severo
U.S. President Donald Trump will travel to Israel, the Vatican and Saudi Arabia this month as part of his first foreign trip.
His trip will also include a NATO meeting in Brussels on May 25, even though he said in his campaign that NATO is useless. Actually, NATO has been completely useless to hinder the biggest threat to Europe: Islamic invasion. By strengthening useless NATO, Trump has torpedoed his excellent campaign vision.
Trump has made forging peace between Israel and Palestine and fighting Islamic State a focus of his administration’s foreign policy.
Yet, his visit to Saudi Arabia thwarts his intent to fight ISIS and Islamic terrorism, because Saudi Arabia is the main sponsor of global Islamic terrorism.
Even though Trump complained in an interview with Reuters last week that Washington is losing a “tremendous amount of money” defending Saudi Arabia, one of the first acts of his administration was to reward Saudi Arabia for fight terrorism, when actually Saudis promote it.
The usual U.S. policy to Islamic nations, as exemplified by Iraq and Afghanistan, is to invade or, as exemplified by Libya and Syria, to wreak havoc. All of these nations were not U.S. allies. Saudi Arabia has been an extraordinary exception because the Saudi dictatorship has its wealthy guarded in U.S. banks. So regardless what Saudis may do, the U.S. overlooks. But an invasion of Saudi Arabia is long overdue and highly deserved. Just remember 9/11, whose terrorists were mostly Saudi Muslims.
Again, Trump has torpedoed his excellent campaign vision.
Saudi Arabia’s powerful Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman met Trump in Washington in March in a visit hailed by a senior Saudi advisor as a “historical turning point” in U.S.-Saudi relations.
Trump, who met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in February, has assigned his son-in-law Jared Kushner, who is Jewish and formerly a registered Democrat, to oversee efforts to broker a peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians.
Trump met with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at the White House on Wednesday for peace talks. Different from Trump, conservative President Ronald Reagan never invited Palestinians for meetings in the White House or other place. It is not possible to fight Islamic terror by hosting Muslims who support terrorism.
Trump will meet Pope Francis at the Vatican probably on May 24 as part of his first international trip. Reagan met Pope John Paul 2 for an anticommunist alliance. But such alliance with Francis is impossible, because the current pope is fond of socialist ideas. Besides, Francis criticized Trump during his campaign for his intent of building a wall. Francis seems to understand that Mexicans have a natural right to invade the U.S. Why does Trump need to honor a left-wing pope?
Again, Trump has torpedoed his excellent campaign vision.
His visit to Israel had been reported by the Israeli media that said Trump’s first foreign journey will also include a stop in Saudi Arabia, a strategic U.S. ally where the Trump organization has a business history.
Yet, while the contacts of U.S. presidents have no pressure to divide Saudi lands with Palestinian Muslims, Israel has always been under U.S. pressure to divide its lands with Palestinian Muslims.
Trump delved into thorny Israel-Palestinian issues, including the “two-state solution” at the time when he declared, “I’m looking at two-state and one-state.” But if U.S. peace is dependent on a “two-state solution,” there will never be peace. The Promised Land was given by God only to Jews, not to Palestinians and other Arab Muslims.
Trump is wise to visit Israel. In His Word, God says that “the nation and kingdom that will not serve Israel shall perish; those nations shall be utterly laid waste.”
He will be wiser if besides a visit, he serves Israel.
Yet, what will Trump will gain by visiting at the same time Israel, the Vatican and Saudi Arabia? Does he intend to serve these three nations and their antagonistic interests? This is not wise, because the Vatican and Saudi Arabia have always been hostile to Jews’ interests.
If Trump wants really to serve Israel, as God commands him to do, he should:
1. Move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem and recognize the whole Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
2. Stop all “two-state solutions” in the U.S. foreign policy and pressure Saudi Arabia to form a Palestinian state in Saudi territory. Muslims have an obligation to help their Muslim brothers. In fact, the U.S. should invade Saudi Arabia, dispossess it and divide it with Palestinians. Fairer than this impossible.
3. Stop the U.S. pressure on Israel regarding to ISIS, so that Israel may destroy ISIS in Syria. This is important for Christians, because ISIS is devastating Christian populations in Syria and Iraq.
If Israel was created to be served by other nations, the United States was created to serve Jesus and Israel. Certainly, the U.S. founders, including the Pilgrims, would be overjoyed to help the U.S. fulfill this noble mission.
The U.S. was not created to serve Saudi Arabia and the Vatican and their interests.
The U.S. was not created to use Israel for the U.S. interests.
The U.S. was created to serve Israel.
Trump’s first international trip should reflect it.
With information from the DailyMail.
Recommended Reading:

Monday, May 01, 2017

Pentecostals and Evangelicals Most Persecuted Group of Christianity


Pentecostals and Evangelicals Most Persecuted Group of Christianity

By Julio Severo
Pentecostals and evangelicals are the most persecuted branch of Christianity, a new report says.
“Protestant evangelical and Pentecostal Christians are more likely to be persecuted than mainline Protestants, Catholics, Orthodox Christians or other Christians associated with ancient churches. In response to persecution, evangelical and Pentecostal Christians are more likely to engage in strategies of survival or, on rare occasions, confrontation,” reads the report by Under Caesar’s Sword.
UCS is a three-year, collaborative global research project that investigates how Christian communities respond when their religious freedom is severely violated.
In 2016, Christianity was ranked as the most persecuted religion in the world. In those same figures, Islamic State (ISIS) murders of Christians accounted for 30 percent of the persecution. ISIS has committed genocide against Christians in Syria and Iraq. According to Trump, Obama founded ISIS.
UCS gives three reasons to account for the horrific acts committed against believers.
In many countries, evangelicals and Pentecostals are comparatively recent arrivals and thus have not established patterns of relating to surrounding populations and governments to the same degree as churches with decades or centuries of history in a given region.
Evangelicals and Pentecostals are often perceived to be supported by co-religionists and allies in the West. Especially Muslims hate the connections evangelicals and Pentecostals have with Christian groups in the United States.
Evangelicals and Pentecostals tend to understand evangelism and conversion as verbal, urgent and sometimes dramatic processes and, consequently, expect and are prepared to endure persecution.
To combat the violence against Christ-followers, UCS recommends “Churches need to understand their global responsibility for Christians under persecution and achieve unity across Christian communities in supporting persecuted minorities. Particular stress should be placed on building bridges connecting traditional Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox churches with evangelical and Pentecostal groups.”
Christians have been historically persecuted by Islam.
Speaking January 2017 on Vatican Radio, Massimo Introvigne, Director of the Centre for Studies on New Religions, said that around half a billion Christians in the world are unable to express their faith completely freely — with around 90,000 Christians who were killed for their faith in 2016 alone, which is the equivalent of one Christian being martyred every six minutes.
In March 2016, the Chaldean Bishop of Aleppo reported that in just five years of conflict, the Christian population of Syria has been reduced by two thirds from 1.5 million to just 500,000, according to a Breitbart report.
Many Syrian Christians were killed by ISIS, founded by Hillary Clinton, or by Syrian rebels, funded, armed and trained by the Obama administration and now by the Trump administration. While the Syrian government was fighting ISIS, the Obama administration was helping Islamic rebels who were essentially damaging the Syrian government’s war against ISIS.
Such reality puts the U.S. behind Islamic persecution of Christians. In fact, according to the 2016 World Watch List, published by Open Doors USA, even though North Korea is the number one in Christian persecution, the other countries that ranked highest on such persecution were Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq.
This is very bad news for the U.S., which has been militarily interfering in Syria and which invaded and intervened in Afghanistan and Iraq. The results are obviously appalling, at least for Christians.
In 2014, Raymond Ibrahim, author of the bestselling book “Crucified Again,” said in his article “Confirmed: U.S. Chief Facilitator of Christian Persecution”:
Whenever the U.S. intervenes in an Islamic nation, Islamists come to power. This is well demonstrated by the other three nations to which the U.S. brought “democracy” and where Christian minorities suffer “extreme persecution”:
Afghanistan: The supposedly “moderate” Karzai government installed by the U.S. upholds many of the draconian laws enforced by the Taliban—including the apostasy law, fiercely persecuting those who seek to convert to Christianity—and, in 2011, under U.S. auspices, it destroyed Afghanistan’s last Christian church.
Iraq: After the U.S. toppled Saddam Hussein, Christian minorities were savagely attacked and slaughtered, and dozens of their churches were bombed (see here for graphic images). Christians have been terrorized into near-extinction, with well over half of them fleeing Iraq.
Libya: Ever since U.S.-backed, al-Qaeda-linked terrorists overthrew Qaddafi, Christians—including Americans—have indeed suffered extreme persecution. Churches have been bombed; Christians have been tortured and killed (including for refusing to convert); and nuns have been threatened.
Surely a common theme emerges here: Where the U.S. works to oust secular autocrats, the quality of life for Christians and other minorities takes a major nosedive. Under Saddam, Qaddafi, and Assad, Christians and their churches were largely protected.
Ibrahim then said, “Prominent indicators confirm that the U.S. is the chief facilitator of the persecution of Christians around the world today.”
During his campaign, Donald Trump said that the administration of former President George W. Bush lied about his reasons to invade Iraq. Trump said that he opposed such invasion. Christians in Iraq took a very heavy toll for Bush’s bad decision. The Iraqi Christian community, which was over 2 million before the U.S. invasion, is now less than 400,000.
Under Bush and Obama, while Muslims in Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq had facilitated immigration to the U.S., Christians were essentially banned. Oppressors in, victims out. During his campaign, Trump made many promises to correct this incredible immigratory inconsistency by favoring Christian victims, not Islamic oppressors. But until far, he has not fulfilled his promises.
On the contrary, in the first days of his administration, Trump, through his CIA director, rewarded Saudi Arabia for fighting Islamic terror, when actually the Saudi dictatorship is the main sponsor of the global Islamic terrorism.
Saudi Arabia has today more Christian blood in its hands than any other Muslim nation. Even so, in his planned trip to Israel this month, Trump intends at the same time to visit Saudi Arabia. Trump seems to have forgotten the role of Saudi leadership in the global Islamic terrorism, including that most terrorist Muslims in the 9/11 were Saudi.
The United States, founded by Christians, more specifically by Protestants, should give priority to persecuted Christians, including by helping Christian immigrants, especially persecuted by Muslims, but since some thirty years ago it has been giving priority to Muslims. The U.S. has protected Saudi Arabia and Islam, not Christians.
For his visit to Israel this month, I would have two suggestions to Mr. President Trump: Because Israel has an active military involvement in Syria, encourage Israel to bomb ISIS bases in Syria and to receive Christian refugees from Syria. The second suggestion is: Exclude Saudi Arabia and include Armenia, the first officially Christian nation in the world.
In this trip, Trump should recognize the Armenian Genocide, where almost 2 million Christian Armenians were slaughtered by Turkish Muslims 100 years ago. Such acknowledgment would send the clear message that the Trump administration is seriously worried about Islamic persecution of Christians.
While Christians are the most persecuted religious group on the earth, Muslims are the main persecutors of Christians in the world. So why has the Trump administration had an excellent relationship with Saudi Arabia, not Armenia?
With information from Charisma, CBN and ChristianHeadlines.
Recommended Reading: