“Homosexuality is Unnatural”: The Last Great Message of Myles Munroe on the Gay Agenda
By Julio
Severo
Two
months before being killed in a plane crash November 9, the motivational preacher
Myles Munroe wrote a press release against a gay parade in his home country,
The Bahamas — a so powerful message that the English secular media have
mentioned it in their reporting about his death. In an article entitled “Myles Munroe: Preacher who outraged many
with his views on women and gays,”
the British paper The Independent said,
In September
Munroe again stirred controversy at home, following a gay pride event. In a
statement entitled “Homosexuality – Phobia or Principle,” people, he said, have
“hijacked” and “raped” the civil rights movement with their fight for LGBT
rights.
Some
homosexualist individuals called his position on homosexuality “hypocritical”
in light of Munroe’s then-recent visit with polygamist South African President
Jacob Zuma.
I do
not know if Munroe was critical of the Marxist ideology of Zuma or his depraved
lifestyle or his pro-sodomy and pro-abortion ideology.
 |
| Myles Munroe |
I do
not know what could have prompted its disappearance or if it happened before or
after his death. Was the leftist pressure too much on him and his ministry?
I
remember that in 2008 Munroe praised Obama’s victory. While he was looking only
at the color of Obama’s skin as a reason for pride, I saw the color of Obama’s
character — pro-abortion, pro-sodomy, pro-Islam and Marxist. Of course,
Munroe’s last message was a hard blow on the Obama administration’s ideology.
Could
this message have suffered a demise from all Munroe’s official channels because
the powerful political elites who liked him hated his last and most powerful
message to this world?
Munroe
knew that if you want to change something, you need to confront it. He said, “You can never change
what you don’t confront and transform what you avoid.” So changes against the
gay agenda will only come when we confront it. No transformation will come if
we avoid this wicked agenda.
And
confront he did! When Pope Francis and his Council were irresolute on
homosexual issues, he said,
“The Pope and his council seem to be taking a soft line on gays and
homosexuality. Perhaps this is the test of his scriptural infallibility.”
I
only think that he should have been equally forceful about Obama and his fake,
progressive “christianity” which embraces abortion, homosexuality, Islam and
socialism.
Be it
as it may, he understood that the gay agenda that has been attacking the family
threats the survival itself of humans. He said,
“The purpose of the family is to secure society. The sanctity of the family is
the bedrock for human survival.”
“Homosexuality
– Phobia or Principle” talks about the gay agenda in the gay parades and its
threat to the human family. Munroe did not avoid it. He confronted it.
Why
did God have want such last message from Myles Munroe, who was one of the most
prominent advocates of the theology of prosperity?
I do
not know. I only know that it is one of the best articles I have ever read on
the homosexual agenda and gay parades. Read Myles Munroe’s incredible text:
Press Release: “Homosexuality: Phobia or Principle”
By Dr. Myles Munroe
August 31, 2014
In
the guise of “Civil Rights” and “Human Rights” the LGBT minority community have
decided to ‘celebrate’ the civility of their very uniquely chosen lifestyle and
sexual preference publically. I am not sure what their mission or goals are in
this effort, but obviously they have received enough incentive and motivation
to attempt something that 90% of The Bahamas and Bahamians consider
unacceptable and violates their collective convictions, moral standing and
values.
Perhaps it may be helpful to first
ask a simple yet profound question: “Is it civil, right, reasonable, logical,
sane to promote a cause, lifestyle or practice of a behavior that could in its
ultimate conclusion cause the extinction of the human race? It is insanity to
demand the ‘celebration’ of your own extinction.
I am
not sure what role is being played by Government, Government Leaders, Ministry
of Tourism, or other parties that may have provided, if any, the incentive for
this defiant social act, but I believe this must be addressed from the
perspective not from any religious position, but rather from the concern for
our very small fragile social fabric being held together by values and moral
standards that provide the framework for a healthy Bahamian society.
Concern
is also raised concerning the assistance, support and promotion of these efforts
by international organizations and in individuals including travel agencies and
tourism promotion entities such as gaytravel.about.com. The citizens of the
Bahamas have a legitimate right to be and express their concerns in these
matters.
I
think it is dangerous, inappropriate, immature and disingenuous to accuse
anyone with a deep concern about any attempt to impose, force or establish a
set of values, standards, moral trends or lifestyle that could and would
drastically change and in a very real way destabilize the foundations of a
society, as have a phobia – or fear.
THE BLESSING OF PHOBIA
One of the greatest natural
competent of human mechanism for survival and safety is the element of fear.
Without the ability to embrace ‘fear’ or ‘panic’ the human species cannot
protect himself against threats. The beauty of fear is that is an in inherent
human quality that protects against danger and extinction. Phobia is inherently
good.
HOMOPHOBIA MISCONCEPTION AND DECEPTION
There
is no greater harm to human dignity than deception. Throughout history the
power of deception has ruined millions of lives, started world wars and even
changed the climate of nations. In our postmodern world there is a massive
deception invading the very moral fabric of nations and dismantling the very
core of the natural existence of humanity. As matter of fact this deception is
threatening the extinction of mankind. What is amazing is that this deception
is not a new one, but it emerged in the context of human existence on the planet
as long ago as five thousand years. However, despite the reality of its
existence, it has historically always kept its place at the fringes of
mainstream society.
What is this deception? It is the
unnatural attraction and relations between human species of the same sex or
gender attempting to normalize the unnatural under the guise of being normal.
Even though this unnatural behavior disguises itself under many labels, it is
generally described as Homosexuality. The word itself incorporates its basic
premise and that is, it is primarily sex driven. Those who have decided to
embrace, practice, encourage, and surrendered and succumb to its passions, and
they desire to dignify, promote and civilize this “lifestyle” over the past
generation have become more aggressive even to the point of violence in some
instances. This strategy seem to be one of fear mongering, psychological
battery, and the selling of self-pity and abuse. Terms like bigot, hate crime,
closed minded, conservative, anti-human, anti-civil, bulling, and the most
common, phobia, are used to isolate the mainstream of humanity painting them as
unloving, insensitive, ungodly, human haters, unsympathetic and uncivilized.
It is
my view that this accusation of ‘homo-phobia” is the greatest deception of all.
Its intent is to make those who are considered ‘normal’ feel guilty for being
normal. This deception is unfair, dishonest and dangerous. Its affect is to
make the majority of humanity feel guilty for not accepting, glorifying and
dignifying this ‘unnatural’ human behavior.
I am sure the question will arise,
“What is ‘unnatural’ and who defines ‘natural’?” It is essential to understand
that natural cannot and does not need to be defined. Natural is simply the
normal state of creation which manifests itself by its natural essence. In
other words, nature defines itself. What is defined by nature is also what is
considered as ‘normal’. Normal is that which is the result of the natural
course of life as nature or creation works in sustaining itself. Therefore the
source of ‘natural’ or ‘normal’ is creation itself and any opinion of attempt
of human genius cannot change what is natural.
Perhaps
at point is it may also be important to note that the root word from which we
derive our modern word ‘Law’ is the word ‘norm’. The obvious implication is
that all nature is the source of natural law and therefore defines what is the
reference for the creation of any human law that attempts to interfere with
nature itself? It is also important to
note that any law made by man is ignored by nature.
Human
sexuality is a product of natural creation and is rendered as normal, thus does
not need definition. Any deviation from the natural is generally considered as
‘unnatural’ or ‘abnormal’. In nature there will always be exceptions and these
must be recognized as such. But even exceptions must be properly defined, for
even in nature there is a natural inherent response to safe –guard its survival
by minimizing the impact of the exception. All exceptions in nature are natural
and not by choice.
In
light of this natural reality why should homosexuality be considered
‘unnatural’ and perhaps ‘abnormal’? Perhaps the answer is in the very
description of homosexuality as ‘a lifestyle’. Being an heterosexual is not a
lifestyle but a natural by-product of nature and not by choice. Lifestyles are
‘chosen’ or a result of ‘circumstances’ but never a product of nature. We can choose lifestyles but never our
nature.
The natural definition of
‘unnatural’ is that which is not a product of nature itself is, and that which
cannot naturally reproduce in creation naturally. Perhaps this is the greatest
challenge of the great deception of homosexuality, the natural fact that
members of the same sex can come together, live together, express intimacy, and
even be deeply emotionally involved with each other, but the reality and truth
is they can never naturally reproduce after their kind. It is this fact, truth
and reality that renders this lifestyle ‘unnatural’.
It is
this simple truth that make those who wish to perpetrate this unnatural
‘lifestyle’ of ‘orientation’ dishonest and deceptive. I am not against nor will
attempt to prevent any human deciding to practice a specific ‘lifestyle’ or are
inclined to follow a certain ‘un-normal’ behavior, but my concern and
contention is their attempt to impose that decision on those who by nature are
considered normal.
THE LIE OF HOMOPHOBIA
It is
amusing that when the majority of the human community respond, express their
disagreement with, or their deep honest concern about the attempt of those who
embrace and practice this lifestyle to impose this ‘unnatural’ human lifestyle
on society response this is interpreted a Phobia or fear.
If
this accusation was levied by ignorant, uninformed persons perhaps it would be
laughable, but one when intelligent individuals make this claim of phobia to a
responsible intelligent person, one must take personal offence. Maybe the real
fear is that one I would call ‘truthphobia’ or ‘realityphobia’. Could it be that those who wish be
considered normal, acceptable, natural, and civil, fear that self-evident truth
that what they are claiming, demanding, promoting and fighting for is by nature
unnatural and abnormal?
However,
I agree with their accusation from one perspective; and that is yes, I am afraid of any lifestyle, orientation,
preference or behavior that threatens that very survival of the human race.
Could it be that the homosexual harbor an unspoken heterosexualphobia?
Heterosexual never attempt to impose itself on society nor does it need to
fight for or recognition any defense.
THE HIGHJACKING OF CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENTS
The
lifestyle of homosexuality and all the other names and labels it has come to be
described as, is as old as the biblical character Abraham, and was practiced by
members of communities of his contemporary over four thousand years ago. Many
of the minority who are still involved in this lifestyle seem to act as if this
is a new cause for which they were born to fight for. In the early sixties some
individuals in high profile positions in society began to venture out of what
they called ‘the closet’ to expose themselves to the larger community as if to
test the waters. The reaction from that time by the majority of the population
was one of resistance and discomfort which still exist today despite the claims
to the contrary.
This
resistance has been so strong that those involved in the LGBT lifestyle changed
their strategy for social acceptance from
imposing by exposure demanding their social rights, and resorted to making the
issue one of civil rights. It is interesting to note that after over 4000
years of the recorded existence of the this lifestyle and unnatural behavior
the social resistance still exists and I'm sure will continue, no matter how
social and so-called civic society attempts to disguise it socially acceptable
attire. Nature will never disagree with
itself and common or legislative law can ever change natural law.
I have
with great disappointment stood on the balcony of history and watched with
horror and shock the high-jacking and raping of what we have come to know as
the Civil Rights Movements. What made it more distressing was to see many
individuals who were actively involved in these historic resistance movements,
abandoning the sacrifice of many who died for the noble causes of human dignity
for the majority who were being abused, to use their blood to cover the demands
of minority sectors of society to justify and civilize their selfish and unnatural
preferences.
I
have tasted the negative impact of civil oppression by a regime that devalued
my humanity, but this was not because of a lifestyle I chose, or a behavior
that was by orientation, or a disposition preferred, but rather a reality that
was ‘natural’. I was as victim of by inherent pigmentation……I was born black
and had no choice in the matter. In The Bahamas I and my family along with the
majority of the Bahamian population were discriminated against, devalued as
humans, disenfranchised, and oppressed by a minority regime.
I
have with all my logic and sought to understand, but still cannot equate the
Philosophy, ideology or purpose for the Civil Rights movements with the agenda
of the Homosexual LGBT community. I
think the attempt to equate the historical Civil Rights movements with the
demands for the right to dignify, glorify and accept as normal the practice of
a lifestyle that could render the human race for which they sacrificed extinct,
is illogical, dishonest, and is the abuse of the blood and imprisonment of
many. It’s a high jacking of the gains paid for by the blood of honorable
men and women for an unnatural human-destroying behavior.
THE OPPRESION OF THE MAJORITY
The fundamental principle of the
Civil Rights movements was the freedom and restoration of the dignity and value
of the Majority of an oppressed humanity. As a matter of fact, historically it
was usually the imposition of the values, prejudices and inhumane ideology of
the minority on the majority that was the context and source of oppression and
devaluation of humanity. The context of the present LGBT movement could be
considered in the same light where a small percentage and minority segment of
the population are attempting to impose their unnatural ideology, values,
morals and personal sexual preference on the common culture, moral convictions,
standards and values of the Majority.
Perhaps, this could be considered
the new 21st century regime of oppression. This idea seem to be further enforced
by the encroaching influence and demands of globalization, the United Nations
and other world bodies and agencies who have now conditioned their offer of
national economic assistance to national social and cultural conformity that
embraces moral and values-based compromises.
THE MEDIA AGENDA
The
most powerful and dangerous partner to deception is perception. The world of
media is really about the business and management of perception. The power of
the media cannot be calculated and must not be miscalculated or minimized in
its impact for creating perception. This is why throughout history anytime
there was a need to control the mental environment or to create a perceived
reality, the use of the media has always
been engaged as the critical tool in exporting, importing and disseminating
deception. It is therefore important that in our modern democracy the
demand for truth, transparency and objectivity in the media be a primary
concern to all responsible citizen.
We
must always be on our guard as civilly minded citizens to watch for the
collective agenda and bias in the media. It has been my observation that in
recent times the print and electronic
media both nationally and internationally seem to favor the prominent and
multiple placement, and preoccupation with stories that promote or glorifies
this lifestyle. There seem to be many times and Imbalance of opinions and views.
It is my hope that all media would make an effort to also publish the views of
the majority.
INTELLECTUAL AND ECONOMIC BLACKMAIL
There also seem to be the increase
use of economic and political blackmail in the area of manipulation by the LGBT
minority forces, which also includes an intentional smear campaign of the
majority as bigots, human haters, intolerant, and bullies. This is a dishonest
and grave misrepresentation of the facts. There is also the misuse of
un-substantiated claims by the minority regarding changing trends and attitude
to boost their own positions. This is incredible. In fact, there seem to be
massive plague on intellectual, social and physiological and logical
dishonesty. There is no conclusive scientific confirmations that verify claims
that the minority who practice this lifestyle, that their condition is matter
of biology or genetics rather than a habitual learned behavior which become a
lifestyle they prefer.
Let
us reiterate once again that the majority of the population in most countries
throughout history and in our contemporary society, are not ignorant of the
existence of abnormal behavior or unnatural preferences of the homosexual
lifestyle. This lifestyle and behavior is really an old story with a new twist.
What the majority does not appreciate is the dishonesty and deception that have
been engaged by those who wish to impose their will on them. Every human has
the right to choose his or her unnatural lifestyle, but must not demand that we
accept it as natural. They are free to prefer any unnatural sexual orientation
they desire or crave, but they must not, cannot and should not require that we
the majority dignify it by promoting or glorifying it as normal. All the
majority want are Honesty and the Freedom to express our concerns, opinion and
positons without being labeled ignorant, intolerant, unsophisticated, or homophobic.
Portuguese
version of this article: “A
homossexualidade é contra a Natureza”: A última grande mensagem de Myles Munroe
sobre a agenda gay
Source: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading:
Posts
