The gay use and abuse of the word prejudice
Gay militants demand special laws. According to their view, those laws are necessary “to protect them” from violence. The great problem is, “What is the ‘test’ that they will use to define and interpret what is violence?” Of course whichever the definition may be, the cases of boys raped by gays are never mentioned, even though they are one of the worst crimes and homosexuality is its main abuse factor.
By the experience of countries that allowed laws against homophobia, we know that interpretations of violence against people involved in homosexuality put in the category of “homophobia crime” even sermons against the homosexual sin. If approved a law against homophobia, there would be persecution and injustice against those not accepting homosexuality. If discrimination is to be against homosexuality, then the Bible and its Author may be placed in that category by a society that worries more about protecting sin than protecting the well-being of its population. Sadly, even some evangelicals are unable to realize what a law against “discrimination” may bring as consequence.
Some time ago, a Brazilian evangelical magazine published an excellent article on the homosexual movement. Yet, it made a comment without considering properly its implications. The magazine commented:
Some demands are more than fair, such as to punish more rigidly absurdities as beatings and even murders of homosexuals, and to curb embarrassments in public places and work places.
Everyone is equal before law — except for homosexuals, that deserve more?
There are several snares involved in the acceptance of those demands. Current laws treat fairly all cases of citizens’ beatings and murders, homosexual or not. There are not episodes where the law allows an aggressor or murderer to go unpunished only because the attacked or murdered individual practiced homosexuality. A judge or court doesn’t have authority to interpret the law that way, for no law leaves unpunished a murderer or aggressor just because the victim practiced homosexual perversion. Such situation is unreal in
The law fulfills its role justly to all the citizens, whether homosexual or not. If there are cases of impunity, it is not because the law fails to protect exclusively men involved in homosexuality. It is a well-known fact that there is a lot of impunity in
Some youths in the
What the Brazilian government should do is to correct its proverbial incompetence and to eliminate the death penalty that murderers apply on the whole POPULATION. Why to select individuals involved in homosexuality as special “victims” when overwhelmingly the most of the population, forced to live in a violent social context because of the negligent security politics of the State, does suffer incomparably more and has not a dozen, but dozens of thousands of victims a year, not mentioning a great number of children raped and killed?
An exclusive law to address cases of beatings and murder of homosexuals could not do more than the law has already been doing. Then, what would the objective of such a law be? Probably, just to prevent everything that is interpreted as “violence”, “discrimination” and contrariety to homosexuality. How to prevent specifically? Identifying the sources of the so-called “homophobia” and of any aversion to the homosexual acts. It is exactly in this point that the glances and the ideological machine guns would turn their attention to Christians that mention Bible passages condemning homosexuality. Would the law have interest in doing the distinction that biblical opposition to homosexuality is not the same like hate and violence against individuals in homosexuality? For those struggling to introduce gay bills, all opposition to homosexualism leads to discrimination and aggression against homosexuals.
More than fair demands?
Then are we supposed to pass laws against homophobia, laws protecting homosexuals from being “embarrassed” in public places? Let us think seriously about the implications of such measure. Homosexuals free to kiss each other and make obscene gestures in public places, before children, under the total protection of the law? Why to grant them such freedom and privilege?
Should we pass laws against homophobia, laws protecting homosexuals from being “embarrassed” in the workplaces? Let us think seriously about the implications of such measure. What if an evangelical or Catholic school discovers that one of its teachers or another employee is addicted to homosexual practices? What would happen then? In our simplicity, we may think the children’s protection is priority, above the interests of the gay groups, but it is not on the base of simplicity, innocence and fairness that many lawyers and judges today act. In that case, a law against homophobia would be interpreted entirely “to protect” individuals in homosexuality against “prejudice” and to hinder the school from protecting the children!
If everyone is convinced that those laws are more than fair demands, what will happen to Christians if those laws turn into reality? Laws allegedly made up to combat “homophobia” always eventually privilege and protect the homosexual sin and they always eventually endanger those who do not accept that sin, including Christians.
One of the aims of the homosexual movement is actually to lead the whole society to see their demands as human rights issues. However, if we consider closely, we will see that their demands are not more than fair, but more than cunning. We may, by God’s grace, understand well those and other issues “for we are not ignorant of his devices”. (
Distorting the reality
In the voting of homosexual issues in the National Congress in Brasília, speeches equaling opposition to homosexuality as violence is so repetitive and insistent that Christian politicians feel often intimidated, threatened, constrained and forced into a defensive position and into explaining that their stand has no connection with violence, while gay militants never need to suffer the inconvenience and legitimate embarrassment of being charged for the natural connection that exists between homosexuality and sex with boys.
The homosexual movement learned how to corner the opposition, without accepting any charge and accusation. Such attitude reminds greatly PT (Partido dos Trabalhadores — the Workers’ Party, of President Lula) that, when it was in the opposition, it wanted parliamentary investigation for everything and for everybody without fear of confronting nobody, but when it began to govern Brazil with Lula as president it fought with all its strength to suffocate that investigative procedure, even in the most severe cases of corruption involving individuals of its protected government. Coincidentally, the great majority of bills favoring homosexuality and abortion are from politicians of that Socialist party.
In fact, the Lula administration has been trying to promote homosexuality at international level, introducing in the United Nations a pioneering resolution defending sexual orientation as an inalienable human right. If the Brazilian government’s concern with cases of torture, violence and even murder at international level were really legitimate, Lula and his companions would remember Christians.
No human group today has so many victims of murders and tortures as Christians. Every Muslim and communist country is theater of unimaginable cruelties against Christians. More than 150,000 Christians are martyred each year [
However, the Lula administration understands persecution in another way. When two gays kiss one other scandalously in public, offending people and attacking the close children’s innocence, some might have the courage of complaining against the public indecent gay acts. That attitude of not accepting the public gay immorality is, for the Lula administration and for the gay activists, homophobia, prejudice and persecution.
With the help of morally bankrupt governments, that flatter the homosexual movement and treat the faithful Christians as third-class citizens, the arrogant Brazilian gay activists demand rights and special privileges for alleged social persecution. What they call “brutal” persecution, even comparing it to the Nazi persecution of the Jews, it is nothing else than largely cases interpreted as insults and affronts, as in the cases in which they feel offended when the public does not accept their public kisses and other obscene gestures. Of course they also take much advantage of the dozen of murders of homosexuals a year within the violent Brazilian society where all, homosexual or not, run serious and constant risk of being murdered. While they shout and provoke the largest confusion because of minimum issues in order to achieve privileges and maximum rights above the rights that the ordinary citizens enjoy, Christians in hostile countries don’t want anything special — only the right of existing.
Lula has friendship with dictators of communist and Muslim countries, but he doesn’t open his mouth on behalf of the Christians persecuted in those places. His government prefers to open its mouth on behalf of his communist and Muslim friends. His government prefers to open its mouth to defend gays kissing one another in public.
The Lula administration has no desire to protect and guarantee the right of former homosexual Christians to give public testimony about their past-depraved life. Thus, what homosexuals do in public deserves attention and respect, but the public Christian testimony on homosexuality does not.
Promoting unjust prejudice and discrimination politics
The whole society should then ask: Why is the Lula administration privileging individuals involved in homosexual acts? Why does the Lula administration want laws to give special protection to certain categories of individuals, especially on the base of their option for the homosexual lifestyle? Doesn’t the Constitution of Brazil itself establish that all are equal before the law? If a human being is attacked (whether Black, homosexual or even a disgusting neo-Nazi), the law punishes the aggressor. But an antidiscrimination law, for instance, comes to guarantee that some people are more important than everybody else is. That kind of law foments the true racism, prejudice and a great deal of planned and deliberate inequality, putting the race or behavior of certain people as more deserving of state privileges.
It is not incidental that gay activists have been also engaged in the fight of the Black movement. However, the fight to defend and impose the Afro-Brazilian culture (term that often is a camouflage for several Afro-Brazilian occultist practices) may bring unexpected collateral effects. That “culture”, with everything that it represents spiritually, should not be imposed on the citizens or on schoolchildren, because it attacks frontally the spirituality of the most Christians. In the name of an alleged fight against prejudice, the black and homosexual issues are used for the establishment of a minority dictatorship against the majority, when actually the laws have already been protecting very well individual rights. So antidiscrimination laws are unnecessary and dangerous — in fact, they are abuse tools to promote the political interests of the State and of groups alleging to defend minorities.
Laws against the discrimination are a politically correct fad (imported directly from the liberal cultural imperialism of the US) whose noxious effects will be felt in a fulminating way in the close future, where, among another measures, any expression or comment contrary to homosexuality and the practices of African witchcraft will simply be treated as crime, exposing many evangelicals to the threat of lawsuits, sufferings, state persecution and even prison. Besides, that kind of law would promote two “cultures” that embrace each other, for it is known that the African religions and their spiritual entities welcome the homosexual practices.
It is not then mere coincidence that a great defender of the black “culture” is Mr. Luiz Mott, considered the leader of the homosexual movement in
Curbing the Christian testimony in the society
Because of that fight, the black “culture” has now special privileges even against evangelicals. TV shows that present people’s testimony that formerly practiced Afro-Brazilian religions and today live in the Gospel have been targeted for prejudice from the State and black groups. That is the only kind of prejudice that the State officially authorizes and supports.
Those public testimonies, although under harassment by the antidiscrimination shock troops, are a part of Christianity from its early times, as the Bible itself proves: “And many who had believed came confessing and telling their deeds. Also, many of those who had practiced magic brought their books together and burned them in the sight of all. And they counted up the value of them, and it totaled fifty thousand pieces of silver. So the word of the Lord grew mightily and prevailed”. (Acts
We need then to question whether the State is entitled to suffocate those public testimonies in the name of a cultural plurality or diversity. If we do not make such questioning now, later the State will think it is also entitled to suffocate the testimony of people who were delivered from homosexuality, so that the mere attitude of telling that there is, in Jesus Christ, hope and escape for those who want to leave homosexuality may eventually to be treated as disrespect and discrimination against a sexual behavior that is now accepted, protected and respected by the new social mores.
Therefore, while there is time, Christians need to fight for the right to preach the Gospel and give assistance to men and women who want to leave the oppression of the homosexual lifestyle, before the merciless Gay Inquisition, in the name of the fight against prejudice and with total state complicity, achieves exclusive rights to commit every kind of intolerance against the testimony and the assistance of Christians in the society.
Julio Severo is author of the book O Movimento Homossexual (The Homosexual Movement), published by the Brazilian branch of the Bethany House Publishers.
Julio Severo English blog: Last Days Watchman
His Portuguese blog: