Presidential Candidacy of Leftist Pentecostal in Brazil Shoots Up After Suspicious Plane Crash And Bolsters Globalist Interests
Pro-business socialists versus anti-business socialists
By Julio
Severo
Wayne Madsen, an
investigative journalist whose research on security issues I first knew in my
favorite conservative website WND,
tackles the skyrocketing rise of Marina Silva, a radical environmentalist,
socialist who is the most likely candidate to defeat the socialist incumbent,
Dilma Rousseff, in the Brazilian presidential election.
Well, why would
progressive Obama want to eliminate his progressive counterparts in Latin
America? The standard, according to Madsen, seems to be “pro-business” versus
“anti-business” — and the U.S. champions business. So if a progressive
president in Latin America is opposed to the big businesses of the progressive
U.S. president, he will be opposed by the U.S. government. On the other side,
if a Latin American progressive president advocates abortion and homosexuality,
he will face no opposition from his counterpart in the White House. The avid
pro-sodomy and pro-abortion policies of Rousseff have never faced any
opposition from the U.S. government. She is facing it only over business issues.
Madsen also
seems to think that “socialist” and “pro-business” are strange bedfellows.
If “pro-business”
does not qualify a socialist to be a socialist, then China, with its thousands
of American factories, certainly is not socialist in this definition. But the
truth is, China is rabidly socialist and a great and privileged commercial U.S.
ally.
Socialists in
Brazil may have varied nuances to address economics, but their approach to
fundamental moral issues is basically equal. In words and political actions, they
have advocated, in a greater or lesser degree, abortion and the gay agenda,
especially gay “marriage,” the way the Western socialists do.
Madsen says that
Marina Silva is “pro-Israeli.” What is his basis for such statement? He seems
to dislike Israel. Al Jazeera, a Muslim news site not known for sympathies for
Israel, has reported
sympathetically about Silva. No mention about “pro-Israeli” stances of Silva.
The apparent
anti-Israel stance of Madsen makes no sense, because George Soros, denounced by
him as behind of the rise of progressive individuals like Silva and,
consequently, the “destabilization” of the Brazilian election, is equally investing
in the destabilization of the traditional evangelical support of Israel. He
successfully invested
in the destabilization of Ukraine. Such is his power. As usually leftists
do, Soros puts his anti-Israel socialist ideology above his Jewish heritage.
Similarly, Silva puts her socialist ideology above her Christian faith.
I talked to
Midnight Call in Brazil, the biggest pro-Israel group in Brazil, and they know
nothing about a “pro-Israeli” Silva. Besides, her political allies are
anti-Israel socialists.
Perhaps Madsen
supposed that because Marina Silva is a member of a Pentecostal church — the
Assemblies of God —, it follows that she is naturally pro-Israel as are most of
the Brazilian Pentecostals. Yet, her original religious roots come from most
popular form of Catholicism in Brazil: Liberation Theology, which is
anti-Israel.
This theology is
very common among Catholics in Brazil, which is the largest Catholic nation in
the world. But it is not common among Pentecostals. Usually, people who have a
conversion in the Assemblies of God are required to abandon their past life,
including Catholicism and Liberation Theology. There is no explanation for what
happened in Silva’s case and why her popular Catholic Marxism has been allowed
to survive her religious conversion to Pentecostalism.
My e-book “Theology
of Liberation versus Theology of Prosperity” says, “Marina Silva, who today
is a member of the Assembly of God in Brasília, brags that she knew the ‘living
Gospel’ in Liberation Theology that she learned from Leonardo Boff, one of the
most important propagandists of that theology in Brazil. Boff and his theology
were officially condemned by the Vatican during the papacy of John Paul 2nd,
but that official condemnation didn’t keep Silva from following the man and his
theology” (p. 12). Boff is her counselor.
Marina Silva
complained about the “wave of conservatism” that almost defeated Dilma Rousseff
in the 2010 presidential election. The conservative wave was the expression of
strong Christian feelings against abortion and homosexuality. Instead of a
staunch stance against the blatantly pro-abortion and homosexualist history and
positions of Rousseff and the Workers’ Party, Silva, in her “Open Letter to
Presidential Candidates Rousseff and Serra”, criticized openly what she saw as
“that obstinate conservatism that colonizes the Brazilian politics and
sacrifices any Utopia on behalf of a limitless pragmatism” (p. 16).
Her political
background is the same as Rousseff’s: the ruling socialist Workers’ Party. She
would qualify to be a Brazilian female version of Jim Wallis.
Madsen’s
analysis has just one conclusion: the U.S. will only support “pro-business”
(a.ka. pro-U.S.) progressives.
My opinion is
that Brazil should get rid of both (pro and anti-U.S.) progressives. And
America should also get rid of her progressive occupier in the White House.
About CIA
killing individuals who are an inconvenience to the interests of the U.S.
government, I recommend the book “Target:
Patton: The Plot to Assassinate General George S. Patton,” which shows how
the CIA predecessor may have been the responsible for the murder of Patton, who
wanted the overthrow of the Soviet Union. In fact, this book shows CIA and its
predecessor killing many other (innocent or not) enemies of the interests of
the U.S. government.
Don’t get me
wrong: I am not opposed if the U.S. government and the CIA kill the bad guys.
There is information that when the military overthrew communists in Brazil in
the 1960s, the U.S. government helped them. But the
current U.S. administration is betraying the anti-communist military and
helping only Brazilian progressives to bolster the interests of “pro-business” American
progressives.
Now the war is
not about communists versus conservatives. It is pro-U.S. progressives versus
anti-U.S. progressives. It is “pro-business” American progressives against “anti-business”
foreign progressives.
Interestingly,
Madsen makes no mention of the massive and unified socialist obsession for the
promotion of abortion and homosexuality. Do economic issues matter more for him
than moral and ethical issues? Obama and Rousseff have no disagreement about
imposing their progressive abortion and homosexual ideologies. Their
disagreements are just economic. In other respects, they are “family” — a
progressive family.
Now read the
Madsen analysis having in mind what the Bible says:
“Test everything. Hold on to what is good.” (1
Thessalonians 5:21 GWV)
All factors point to CIA aerially assassinating Brazilian presidential candidate
Wayne Madsen
The plane crash
that killed Brazilian presidential candidate Eduardo Campos, who was running in
second place behind incumbent President Dilma Rousseff, has severely harmed
Rousseff’s chances for re-election. Campos’s successor on the ticket, former
Green Party leader Marina Silva, a George Soros puppet, now stands a very good
chance of unseating Rousseff in an expected run-off election. Rousseff’s defeat
would signal a victory for the Obama administration’s covert activities to eliminate
from the scene progressive presidents throughout Latin America.
A review of
post-World War II history reveals that of all the many ways intelligence
services have used to eliminate political and economic threats, murder by plane
crash rank in second place, just ahead of automobile accidents and poisoning,
and only behind the use of firearms and munitions, as the Central Intelligence
Agency’s favorite modus operandi for political assassination.
The aerial
assassinations of United Nations Secretary General Dag Hammarskjold, Rwandan
President Juvenal Habyarimana, Burundian President Cyprien Ntaryamira,
Portuguese Prime Minister Francisco sá Carneiro, Pakistani President Muhammad
Zia Ul-Haq, prospective Indian Prime Minister Sanjay Gandhi, American United
Auto Workers’ Union President Walter Reuther, former Texas Senator John Tower,
and Minnesota Senator Paul Wellstone all bore the markings of the involvement
of one or more U.S. intelligence agencies in putting ends to political careers
that threatened the underpinnings of Imperial America.
Latin America,
in particular, has been plagued by plane crashes that have killed two leaders
who were determined to pull away from American political influence, President
Jaime Roldos Aguilera of Ecuador and President Omar Torrijos of Panama. Both
leaders died in 1981, with Roldos dying just a few months before Torrijos. John
Perkins, the author of «Confessions of an Economic Hitman» and a former member
of the U.S. intelligence community, fingered the United States in both plane
crash assassinations.
This background
of U.S. involvement in aerial assassinations makes the August 13 crash of the
Cessna 560XLS Citation aircraft in Santos, Brazil, which killed pro-business
Brazilian Socialist Party presidential candidate Campos, his aides, and the
crew, all that more suspicious, The timing of the crash, during an election
campaign that had favored an easy victory for Rousseff, has raised significant
questions among Brazilian investigators and the general public.
Since its introduction
in 1996, the Cessna 560XLS Citation model has enjoyed a perfect safety record.
The sudden death of Campos upended the Brazilian presidential election campaign
in a manner that may benefit the United States and the Central Intelligence
Agency's long-range agenda for Latin America.
Disturbing
questions are being raised about the ownership of the aircraft bearing the tail
number PR-AFA. The plane's murky record of owners and registration, along with
the lack of cockpit voice recordings thanks to an apparent malfunction in the
plane's cockpit voice recorder, has a number of Brazilians wondering whether
the plane was sabotaged by the United States. Rather than having the recording
of the conversations of Campos's flight crew, the recorder only had the voice
recordings from a previous flight.
The plane was
flying en route from Rio de Janeiro-Santos Dumont Airport to Guaruja when it
crashed in a residential area of Santos.
The plane was
operated by AF Andrade Enterprises and Holdings, which is based in Ribeirão
Preto in Sao Paulo state, but leased from Cessna Finance Export Corporation, a
division of Textron, a major U.S. defense and intelligence contractor. Cessna
is a division of Textron. The malfunctioning cockpit voice recorder was
manufactured by another U.S. defense and intelligence contractor, L-3
Communications. AF Andrade's business is centered on its ownership of a
distillery. A spokesman for AF Andrade said the $9 million aircraft had not
been recently inspected but stressed that it had a perfect maintenance record.
However, the
spokesman for AF Andrade could not specifically state who owned the aircraft
but admitted that it, but likely only the lease, was up for sale and had
recently been purchased by a group of «factory owners and importers» from Pernambuco.
Campos was a former governor of Pernambuco.
The purchasers
turned out to be a consortium that included Bandeirantes Tires, Ltd. The tire
company said that negotiations on transferring ownership were ongoing when the
plane crashed and that Cessna Finance Export Corporation had not yet approved
the final leasing rights. Brazilian observers believe the Cessna that crashed
was a «ghost plane», with murky ownership in order to cover up the plane's use
for covert operations involving the CIA. Similar planes with spotty ownership
and registration records were used by the CIA to rendition kidnapped Muslims
for interrogation and imprisonment at American «black sites» around the world.
The U.S.
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) sent a team to Brazil to
investigate the plane crash. However, if the NTSB’s performance on such crashes
as TWA 800 and American Airlines 587 is any indication, the agency only excels
at cover-ups of criminal actions.
Campos was
replaced on the ticket by Silva, who is a darling of the Soros-financed and
directed globalization and «civil society» movement. Silva, who is a
pro-Israeli adherent of the Assemblies of God Pentecostal church, is much more
pro-business and pro-American than Rousseff of the left-leaning Brazilian Workers'
Party. Recently, Rousseff, along with her fellow BRICS leaders from Russia,
India, China, and South Africa, created a new development bank that challenges
the supremacy of the U.S.-run World Bank. The creation of the bank infuriated
Washington and Wall Street.
Silva, who may
be enjoying more than a mere sympathy vote, recently gained in polls against
Rousseff. The Brazilian president is seen by Washington as an adversary,
especially after details were leaked by Edward Snowden of massive National
Security Agency surveillance of the Brazilian president.
If Rousseff were
forced into a run-off with Silva as either first or second-place finisher in
the first round, Aecio Neves, of the conservative Social Democratic Party has
stated he would endorse Silva if he comes in third. The political arithmetic
could then spell trouble for Rousseff, who would have likely glided to victory
had it not been for Silva's advancement to the head of the Socialist Party
ticket. Silva's vice presidential running mate is Beto Albuquerque, whose
«civil society» credentials in consumer and human rights protection indicates a
Soros «upbringing».
The current
polls for the October 5 first round is Rousseff with 36% of the vote, Silva
with 21%, and Neves with 20%. However, with Neves out of the race in the
scheduled October 26 second round, some polls show Silva beating Rousseff 47%
to 43% while others show Silva defeating Rousseff by a staggering 9%. Of
course, opinion polls are no longer independent but corporate and Western intelligence
agency contrivances used to sway public opinion and engage in the «predictive
programming» of entire populations.
The favorable
outcome for Silva as a result of the possible aerial assassination of Campos
and his aides has many suspicious about the CIA's role in the plane crash,
especially after CIA fingerprints were discovered on presidential aerial
assassinations of Torrijos and Roldos in 1981. Just this past February, the
presidential helicopter normally used by Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa, a
strong opponent of Washington's policies and an ally of Rousseff, crashed in
the mountains on a flight from Guayaquil to Quito. Correa's personal pilot was
killed in the crash. Correa, who was addressing a campaign rally at the time of
the crash, stressed that he was not scheduled to be on the flight of the
Indian-made Dhruv helicopter. However, the suspicion of CIA sabotage could not
be suppressed among the Ecuadorian population.
Silva is being
touted as Brazil's «Third Way» candidate. Third Way is an international
movement that has been used by corporate politicians, many of them financed by
Soros, to infiltrate and take over historically pro-labor, socialist, and
progressive parties. The Third Ways' most notable politicians include Bill
Clinton, Tony Blair, Germany’s Gerhard Schroeder, Canada's Justin Trudeau,
French Prtesident Francois Hollande, French Prime Minister Manuel Valls,
Italy's Prime Minister Matteo Renzi and former Prime Minister Romeo Prodi,
Portugal's Jose Socrates, Israel's Ehud Barak, and officials of the Brazilian
Socialist, Green, and Social Democratic parties, including Silva, Neves, the
late Eduardo Campos, and former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso. However,
when it becomes advantageous to assassinate one Third Wayer in order to promote
another, there is no problem to eliminate someone like Campos in order to make
way for a more popular (and controlled) politician like Silva, especially when
the interests of Israel and Wall Street are at stake.
The Cessna
carrying Portuguese Prime Minister Sá Carneiro, which crashed while the prime
minister was flying to a re-election rally in Porto, destroyed the leftist
Democratic Alliance’s future prospects because the two Sá Carneiro loyalists
who succeeded him lacked his charisma. Eventually, Mario Soares, a Third Way
and pro-NATO «socialist-in-name-only», a «SINO», became prime minister and
ushered Portugal down the path of «Third Way» subservience to a united Europe
and globalization. The ambassador to Portugal at the time of Sá Carneiro’s death
was CIA officer Frank Carlucci, whose fingerprints were on the 1961
assassination of former Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba in the Congo. Carlucci
became deputy director of the CIA, and National Security Adviser and Defense
Secretary under President Ronald Reagan. Carlucci is also the chairman emeritus
of the CIA-connected Carlyle Group. The suspicious death of Campos in Brazil
appears to be a carbon copy of the CIA’s quick dispatch of Sá Carneiro, with
Rousseff the ultimate target of the action and Silva and her globalist backers
as the beneficiaries.
Source: Strategic
Culture Foundation, via Julio
Severo in English
Portuguese
version, with Severo’s commentary, of this article: Acidente
suspeito de avião dispara candidatura presidencial de pentecostal socialista e fortalece
interesses globalistas
Recommended Reading:
Posts
No comments :
Post a Comment