Trump will meet with Putin before his inauguration
By Julio
Severo
In an
interview Monday with talk-radio
host Michael Savage, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump
said that if he wins in November, he might meet with Russian leader Vladimir
Putin prior to the inauguration in January.
 |
| Michael Savage and Donald Trump |
Trump
noted relations with Russia are widely regarded as worse than at any time since
the Cold War.
“You
have potentially a really catastrophic situation here. I’ll be honest with
you,” he continued.
“They
say, ‘Oh well Russia loves Donald Trump and Putin loves Donald Trump,’” Trump
told Savage. “They insult him constantly, no wonder he can’t stand Obama and
Hillary Clinton.”
In
his last debate with Hillary, Trump said, “She talks tough with Russia. She
shouldn’t be talking so tough,” Trump said. “Frankly, if we got along with
Russia and knocked out ISIS, that would be a good thing, not a bad thing.”
In
an interview in August, Trump told Savage the policies of President
Obama and Hillary Clinton toward Russia have prompted something “worse than a
Cold War.”
“Many
of his ideas came from my previous books. Everybody knows that,” Savage
told WND in an interview.
Trump
has been in
conflict with neocons’ interests. It is no wonder that he has been
reading Savage books: Savage has been exposing neocons.
See
the Ukrainian case. While Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and George Soros were
calling the Ukrainian revolution a people’s revolution, in a WND report Savage
said,
“The situation
in Ukraine has been painted as a conflict between Vladimir Putin’s Russia, the
so-called bad guys, and Ukrainian rebels, the so-called good guys who seek to
oust Russia from a position of influence in Ukraine and install a new
government that will be responsive to the Ukrainian people. Don’t believe a
word of it. The Ukrainian nationalists are fascists. Washington’s original
purpose for staging a coup in Ukraine was to move Ukraine away from Russia and
bring Ukraine into the European Union. In other words, the neocons and the
bought-and-paid-for ‘moderates’ in the Obama administration wanted to wrest
control of Ukraine from Putin’s hands and gain economic and energy control over
the country. As Dr. Stephen F. Cohen has pointed out, Western nations, with the
U.S. leading the way, have been provoking Putin for decades. We’ve expanded
NATO to include former Soviet states – Ukraine looks like the next target – and
we’ve attacked allies of Russia, including Libya and Iraq. The U.S. – along
with other Western nations – through our incursions into the politics,
economics and national security of Russia and several of its allies, has
effectively caused the situation that is now unfolding in Ukraine. Cohen is
right.”
Savage
points that Obama and his neocons, not conservatives, created a revolution in
Ukraine to draw it away from Russia and put it, eventually, into NATO’s orbit.
While
Trump has praised Russia and his
advisers were supporting pro-Russian forces in Ukraine, neocons have
openly praised the Ukrainian revolution as the best democratic example against
dictatorship. The Ukrainian revolution was the biggest Soros revolution, massively
funded by him.
Obama
and his neocons want Ukraine in NATO and are willing to go to war over it. In
contrast, Trump has shown, so far, no willingness to follow neocon passions for
war in Ukraine against Russia.
Last
month, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko invited
Trump for a meeting, but, according to DailyMail, “the Ukrainian
government says the Republican candidate blew them off.”
Yet,
Hillary Clinton met Poroshenko and promised him that she would stand with
Ukraine against “Russian aggression.”
While
Obama, Hillary and neocons want Ukraine in NATO’s orbit and they are using the
Ukrainian situation to strengthen NATO, Trump
has again been in conflict with their interests.
The
best explanation about neocons’ intent was given by Savage, who said
in WND:
“The neocons…
thrive on military conflict. When the world is at war, the neocons and the
defense contractors who work with them make enormous amounts of money. The
neocons don’t care which side you’re on, as long as they can work with you to
create a political situation that they can grow into a war from which they will
profit.”
Savage
is right. And Trump agrees with him. But neocon-minded individuals do not
agree. The Trevor Loudon blog said,
“If Trump is
elected, you will have the Russians… in the White House. Trump’s advisers are
very connected to Vladimir Putin and Russia. Trump himself has many ties as
well and is friends with Putin. This is why Putin will try to sabotage Clinton
with leaked emails, etc.”
Trump’s
approach to seek to get along with Russia and meet Putin is correct, but
despised by neocons.
Ronald
Reagan tried
Trump’s approach in the past, when Russia was the Soviet Union and
was officially atheistic and communist. In that time, America under Reagan
officially valued the Bible and Christian values. Today, the U.S. government officially
despises these values, while Russia
has officially left atheism and has embraced its Orthodox Christian Church.
It
impossible for socialists Hillary and Obama to get along with modern Russia,
especially after Russians passed
a law banning homosexual propaganda to children.
Yet,
if it was possible for evangelical
Reagan to seek to get along with Soviet atheistic leaders, why should
not Trump be commended for seeking to get along with a non-atheistic Russia?
With
information from WND (WorldNetDaily).
Portuguese
version of this article: Trump se encontrará com Putin antes de
sua posse
Source: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading:
Posts
No comments :
Post a Comment