Pro-Family Warmongers, Pro-Sodomy Neocons and Pro-Sodomy Non-Neocons: What Is Worse for Christians?
By Julio
Severo
I was
watching Franklin Graham, son of the evangelist Billy Graham, on the left-wing
CNN (https://youtu.be/_2-ycehCnuM)
wisely answering questions as the host pressed him to condemn Russian
intervention in Syria. For her, this intervention was responsible for
massacres, but she never mentioned that Russia was fighting Muslim rebels
funded, trained and armed by the Obama administration. She never mentioned that
before the Russian intervention, these rebels were torturing, raping and
slaughtering Christians. She never mentioned that the real objective of the
Obama intervention in Syria, especially through the U.S. State Secretary
Hillary Clinton, was never to fight ISIS, but help rebels to overthrow the
Syrian President Assad, who is supported by Russia.
The
fact is, with Hillary, the U.S. State Department was a war machine making wars
against Christians in Syria, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, etc. There is evidence
that the State Secretary Clinton created and armed ISIS, which slaughtered
thousands of Christians. The U.S.
created a terrible mess in Iraq, in Libya, in Afghanistan and in Syria.
Also,
while Muslims have represented a clear majority of immigrants being welcome and
relocated in the U.S. by the State Department, Christians victims account for
less than 5 per cent.
Other
war fomented by the Obama State Department was the culture war on behalf of the
homosexual agenda. It
funded and trained homosexual activists around the world. It
actively and peremptorily promoted their interests, including by naming
the first global envoy for the homosexual agenda.
Hillary
was a pro-sodomy neocon at the State Department.
What
to expect from a Trump State Secretary? Firstly, consistency with his discourse
in the campaign confronting neocons, known for their partnerships
with Islamic terror against Russia, and for their openness to Islamic, not
Christian, immigrants.
When
Trump was considering Mitt Romney for State Secretary, it was hard not to think
that the spirit of Hillary would not be continuing her mission through him,
because under former Governor Romney Massachusetts was the first U.S. state to
legalize homosexual “marriage.” Besides, he wanted to confront Russia in Syria
and Ukraine, just as Obama was doing and just as Hillary wanted to do in her
dream of a presidency.
Then Trump
chose Rex Tillerson, CEO of Exxon Mobil, for State Secretary. Tillerson
has a history of good relations with Putin and Russia, but not with ISIS. And
he does not seem to want wars, but good relations. This is very good sign.
Different
from Hillary, who was killing Christians in Syria through Muslim rebels and
ISIS and in Iraq through ISIS, Tillerson seems to understand that there is no
point in supporting such unfair war and chastise Russia for its pro-Christian
involvement.
Different
from Hillary and Obama, hopefully Tillerson may understand that persecuted
Christians, not Muslims, should be given priority for immigration.
Yet,
there is a concern. Tillerson was a board member of Boy Scouts and approved its
infamous decision to allow gay scout leaders. This equals him to Hillary.
However,
what if Trump chose Ted Cruz? Cruz’s pro-family and pro-Israel stances are
excellent. In foreign policy, he would not use the State Department to promote
the homosexual agenda. But regarding Russia, he and neocons like Marco Rubio
equal to Hillary: Cruz wanted a confrontation with Russia in Syria and Ukraine
over Crimea, a region traditionally Russian for hundreds of years and which
Russia has repossessed in 2014. His policy would be a continuation of the
Hillary policy.
So,
all the choices are hard. Yet, while Hillary and the Obama administration
mocked and antagonized the Russian law banning homosexual propaganda to
children and eventually imposed sanctions against Russia by using as an excuse
the Crimea repossession, Tillerson has spoken out against such sanctions.
If he
were so fixated on the gay agenda as Obama and Hillary are, he would probably
speak out on behalf of such sanctions.
How
to assess the differences? Christians like Ted Cruz are very good in defending
life and family. They deserve to be commended for their pro-family efforts. But
their neocon efforts to fight Russia while Russia fights ISIS and helps
Christians in the Middle East put them on par with Hillary, whose anti-Russian
policies were anti-Christian and pro-ISIS and pro-Islamic rebels.
Ted
Cruz, Marco Rubio and others are pro-family warmongers. Christians persecuted
by Muslims in Syria and other nations would barely have some hope of being
helped by their policies, and their pro-family views would be helpful only to
pro-family Christians outside of zones of Islamic wars.
Romney
would be a continuation of Hillary, with no benefit to pro-family Christians in
the U.S. and Christians persecuted by Muslims in other nations.
Tillerson
does not seem to be a warmonger. He has no history of wars, but of friendships
and deals. This is real change, because the State Department has had too many
warmongers for too long.
Tillerson
would be perfect if he were a pro-family Christian against the gay agenda — as
Ted Cruz would prefect if he were not warmonger and confrontational in a time
Russia is looking for peace and partnership against the Islamic terror. Russia
has the exact wish Trump showed in his campaign.
In
fact, Trump said last week that only
stupid people fools would see good ties with Russia as bad. This is
in consistency with his campaign and with the history of Tillerson.
If
Tillerson were a homosexualist militant, there would be a confrontation between
him and Putin, because while he approved gay scout masters to teach homosexual
propaganda to children, Putin has approved a ban against such propaganda.
As
Trump, Tillerson is open to the gay agenda, but both, different from Hillary
and Obama, are open to dialogue.
Yet,
when assessing between pro-family warmongers, pro-sodomy neocons and pro-sodomy
non-neocons, what is important? The lives of Christians persecuted by Muslims
in Syria are as important as the lives of unborn babies defended by good
pro-family Christians.
Any
State Secretary willing to support the Russian efforts, or at least not
interfere negatively as Obama and Hillary did, in Syria is helping save lives,
especially Christians victimized by ISIS. In this respect, Tillerson seems to
be the only hope for the State Department to stop its pro-Islamic meddling
against Christians in Syria.
I
hope to be right: Tillerson does not seem a neocon.
Portuguese
version of this article: Belicistas
pró-família, neocons pró-sodomia e não-neocons pró-sodomia: o que é pior para
os cristãos?
Source: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading:
Posts
No comments :
Post a Comment