U.S. Embassy in
Brazil Celebrated LGBTI “Pride” Day
By
Julio
Severo
On
June 28, 2020, the official page of the U.S. Embassy in Brazil said,
“Happy
LGBTI Pride Day! This month, we celebrate the LGBTI community in our homes and
affirm that all human beings deserve to be treated with dignity. We condemn
violence, detention and murder of people based on sexual orientation and gender
identity. Human rights are universal.”
To celebrate a day and a month only
for gay “pride” has everything to do with the gay agenda.
It is deplorable that when
left-wingers address the subject of gays and violence, they never mention that
homosexuality is also a cause of oppression and violence, especially against
boys. Now even conservatives imitate this left-wing omission.
Why not address the subject of boys
being raped and murdered by homosexuals? Why eternally portray homosexuals as
innocent victims and systematically hide boys who are victims of predatory
homosexual rapists?
Todd
Chapman, U.S. Ambassador to Brazil, said
on Twitter on June 29, 2020:
“The
U.S. is committed to protecting #LGBTI and other marginalized communities
around the world. All human beings deserve to be treated with dignity and
respect and have the same inalienable rights. #EqualProtection”
“What
does the American government’s protection of the world’s gays include? Freedom
to do what they do in the U.S., including indoctrinating children? What has the
Trump administration done to protect children in the U.S. and the world from
gay propaganda and indoctrination?”
“Obama
and Hillary had this goal of protecting gays and with Trump we conservatives
hoped that the focus would shift to protecting children from the huge gay
propaganda and indoctrination reigning in the UN and the U.S.”
Ambassador
Chapman and State Secretary Mike Pompeo are considered “devout” evangelicals.
In the Obama administration, conservatives would call them devout liberals and
left-wingers. But today, conservatives just go silent while the Trump
administration and its embassies continue doing exactly what the Obama
administration was doing: promoting the gay agenda.
This
article stems from my conviction, as a devout evangelical Christian, in the
Bible that homosexuality should never be granted any status of normalcy. If
governments and their officials can talk about violence against homosexuals as
an excuse to advance normalcy of homosexuality and other items of the gay
agenda, why not to talk also about violence by homosexuals, including the
psychological violence of homosexual propaganda and indoctrination to children
and physical violence against boys who are victims of predatory homosexual
rapists?
Planned
Parenthood, the largest network of abortion facilities in the U.S., recognized decades
ago that homosexuality is one of the most effective forms of population
control.
The
most drastic policy of population reduction ever promoted by the U.S.
government was not made by a socialist Democratic administration, but by a
“conservative” Republican administration in the 1970s. Its name is NSSM 200,
which specifically mentions Brazil and other nations as special targets for
population control measures through birth control or “family planning” to
advance U.S. interests.
I do not know if the Trump administration
and its embassies are continuing Obama’s homosexualist policies or the
traditional population control policies of Republicans. I only know that such policies
are detrimental for children.
In a new video, published on June 21, 2020
(https://youtu.be/yn8ZjEkJKmI),
Carvalho asks his adherents to write many articles against me, so that those
articles can back legal actions. Thus, he has been inciting all kinds of
attacks against me, whether through government actions, legal actions or
articles or even films, if that is possible.
His main accusation in the video is that
he had to shut down the Inter-American Institute (IAI) because of me, because I
sent my articles to IAI members and that my articles became the center of
attention at IAI, according to Carvalho’s accusation, who asked his adherents
now to take all my articles to use as a basis for attacks against me. He said:
“For example, take all the reports that
Julio Severo distributed to people, especially here in the United States,
especially to the people at the Inter-American Institute. Every week he
invented something and distributed it to all the members of the Inter-American
Institute. Until a point came where I had to close the Inter-American Institute
because it no longer made sense. Only this was being discussed at the
Inter-American Institute. Then it lost its meaning.”
He added that the closing of the
Inter-American Institute because of my articles was undoubtedly some type of
action by the São Paulo Forum (For de São Paulo). He said in his accusation:
“Of course, this is the São Paulo Forum, folks.”
It’s unbelievable. He faces a single
evangelical — who prays and has a prayer book published in the United States —
and thinks he is facing a large army or some gigantic force.
If the members of the Inter-American
Institute wanted to read my articles, they — who were educated men — knew what
they wanted.
The discussions took place in an email
group led by John Haskins, an apostate Calvinist who was the real founder of
the institute, but who for some reason gave the foundation to Carvalho. I say
apostate because today Haskins does not attend any church and thinks that all
(or almost) are heretical.
After almost 10 years in the group, I
asked to leave, but evidently the information I gave them — translations of
Carvalho’s comments available only in Portuguese — were very useful. Americans
are analytical readers. Carvalho’s habit of making himself and his supposed
merits great is something that appeals to Brazilians who are not analytical
readers. But Americans liked to read the information I made available.
Americans were and are free to read and
interpret Carvalho’s texts. They are also free to read and interpret texts by
Carvalho that I translated into English. It makes no sense to wish to take away
such freedom from readers. Only cult leaders do that.
It also makes no sense to deprive American
readers of everything Carvalho says against evangelicals in Portuguese. Because
Carvalho never had the courage to translate these attacks, I did it.
What Americans did not know about
Carvalho:
* They did not know that he uses profanity
and foul and immoral language daily on his Facebook.
* They did not know that he is the
greatest Brazilian advocate of the Inquisition.
* They did not know that he was a
professional astrologer for many years.
* They were unaware of his past and
present occult connections.
* They did not know that he has mocked and
attacked evangelicals and Protestantism in general.
Haskins claimed that Carvalho has nothing
anymore to do with astrology because he allegedly fought with other astrologers
decades ago and proved that astrology is a fraud, although Carvalho never said
it in Portuguese. The problem is that Haskins tried to defend Carvalho without
understanding anything of Portuguese, the language most used by Carvalho, who
also claims that he fought with occultists.
But fights and confusions, which are
frequent problems among occultists, are frequent problems in Carvalho’s
trajectory. MÃdia Sem Máscara, his website, is closed because Carvalho fought
with most of the columnists, including Heitor de Paola and Graça Salgueiro, who
were the site’s main writers. He fought with the webmaster. He also fought with
me on October 2013 because he wanted to force me, even cursing and slandering
me, to accept the advocacy of the Inquisition that he does with much passion.
As an evangelical who defends Israel and the Jews, I can never defend the
Inquisition and the Holocaust.
If then a fight of Carvalho with
astrologers and occultists is sufficient evidence that he has no involvement
with astrology and the occult today, then is the fight he had with the biggest
columnists at MÃdia Sem Máscara sufficient evidence that he doesn’t have today
any involvement with conservatism?
“Now for half a century there was no
conservative media, no conservative opposition, no conservative radio station,
no conservative speech, there was nothing, there was only left… If in a nation
with a conservative majority you didn’t have a conservative newspaper, you
didn’t have a conservative party, you didn’t have a conservative radio and you
didn’t have a conservative church.”
In 1978, the old Tupi TV channel
broadcast, every day, from Monday to Friday at 11 am, The 700 Club show, by Pat
Robertson. This show often exposed the evils of Marxism. Even though not
successful, Robertson ran for President of the United States for the Republican
Party in the 1988 campaign.
Years earlier, there was the show of Rex
Humbard, a conservative televangelist.
In 1979 the Jimmy Swaggart Ministries also
started its TV shows in Brazil, often attacking Marxism, communism, socialism,
the gay agenda, the abortion agenda, etc.
All of them were reaching the general
public, as TV was by far the largest channel of contact with the population.
With their TV shows, American televangelists brought information to millions of
people in Brazil.
I learned to admire Ronald Reagan with the
help of American televangelists, who presented all the good things he did. It
was a positive propaganda showing that Reagan was Protestant and did many
Protestant things.
The influence of American televangelists
was so great in Brazil that in 1978, Globo TV Network’s “Fantástico” show presented
a special report against Billy Graham, Pat Robertson and Rex Humbard. For its
attack, “Fantástico” interviewed Rev. William Sloane Coffin, a liberal
Presbyterian minister who was against televangelists. “Fantástico,” broadcast
on Sundays, was the largest show on Brazilian TV.
Even if there were no single evangelical
TV shows, there were evangelical publishers and magazines that were largely
conservative.
To some extent, it is good that Carvalho
suffers from hallucinations, caused by his own inflated ego, that he is the
cause of Brazilian conservatism. Thus, he has no time to accuse evangelicals of
being CIA products.
Simply ignoring the reality that
evangelicals are the greatest conservative force in Brazil, Carvalho said:
“In other words, we got out of
totalitarianism, you didn’t fuc*ing understand yet? And who did that? Was
[Brazilian President Jair] Bolsonaro? No. It was me. I did it alone. So, folks,
I’m sorry to say, but the central character of this whole story was me.”
It is natural that a person who sees
himself as, and demands, the attention of the universe has a trajectory of
fights. He will fight with anyone who opposes the cult of his personality.
There is very little time left for him to
say that he was the first astronaut, or that the Earth is flat.
But Carvalho, ignoring this force and even
overlooking all the work of the CIA promoting the conservative evangelical
movement in Brazil, said:
“I opened the doors for there to be a
conservative movement.”
I just didn’t know that it was Carvalho
who introduced The 700 Club show on Brazilian TV in 1978. I also didn’t know
that he had launched Jimmy Swaggart’s show in Brazil in 1979 and guided this
and other televangelists to praise Reagan. There is only one problem: In the
1970s, Carvalho was very busy teaching astrology classes. And even in the 1980s
he was very busy with his involvement in occult groups.
Carvalho then appeals for his adherents to
give priority to defending him, especially against me, writing articles against
me. He said:
“You have to do it. Brazil’s future
depends on it. As a central victim of the biggest smear and slander campaign
ever carried out in Brazil and perhaps in the world. I have been suffering for
at least 25 years. For you to have an idea of the problem, if you take only one
episode of this, the Julio Severo episode, just what Julio Severo did is about
200 pages of narrative.”
Victimism is the standard tactic of communists,
and Carvalho makes use of this tactic in abundance.
In his exaggerated victimism, he puts
himself as the center of the attacks not only in Brazil, but even worldwide. Yet,
it is not quite so. All members of the Traditionalist School are criticized, as
this school is an occult cult that houses famous fascist right-wing occultists.
The most criticized during history was Julius Evola, the Antonio Gramsci on the
right. Then Steve Bannon. In fact, the main modern book against the
Traditionalist School is “War for Eternity,” published by HarperCollins in 2020
and written by the American Jewish writer Benjamin R. Teitelbaum.
The focus of this book is not, even by
far, Olavo de Carvalho, who worldwide is an unknown and strange figure. The
focus is Steve Bannon, who is mentioned 269 times. Julius Evola is mentioned
103 times. And Olavo de Carvalho? He is cited only 19 times, as an example of a
traditionalist who became Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro’s guru. The attention he received, although small, was exclusively at the expense of the attention that Bolsonaro has granted him, just as Rasputin received a lot of fame at the expense of the attention that the Russian tsar granted him. If it were not for Bolsonaro, it is doubtful that he would even be mentioned by Teitelbaum or any other American writer or journalist.
Although there are major
parallels between Julius Evola and Olavo de Carvalho,
Evola is followed by esoteric fascists from Europe, the U.S. and the whole
world, while Carvalho is followed only by Brazilian esoteric fascists. But, in
his mind, he thinks he’s much more famous now than Steve Bannon, Julius Evola
and other members of the Traditionalist School.
Outside Brazil, Carvalho is largely
unknown, despite the fact that he has lived as a self-exiled Brazilian
immigrant in the U.S. since 2005.
That is why the educated members of the
Inter-American Institute found it so interesting to read my articles, which
revealed his obscure views, available only in Portuguese, that Carvalho refused
to show to the American public.
I showed it to the American public.
Result: The Inter-American Institute,
which only worked to inflate Carvalho’s ego and deal with immigration visa
issues for his family, was closed.
The history of the Inter-American
Institute is then summarized by John Haskins founding it, Olavo de Carvalho
taking on its foundation and presidency and, later, closing its activity —
restricted to the internet — because of a Brazilian evangelical, myself, Julio
Severo, who was able to identify the dangers of the Traditionalist School.
It seems that the members of the
Inter-American Institute came to understand that the function of the IAI was
only to serve as a facade for Carvalho's hidden, egocentric and occult goals.
U.K.
Conservatives Celebrating Their Own Destruction? Boris Johnson Celebrates June
as Gay “Pride” Month
By Julio Severo
U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson published
in his Facebook page a post on June 27,
2020, celebrating June as gay “pride” month. He said,
“While nothing can properly mirror the joy
of [gay] Pride celebrations in our towns and cities, [gay] Global Pride is a
unique opportunity for people to connect with one another, in unity, across all
nations. I send my best wishes to all in the LGBT community celebrating today.”
June as gay “pride” month was invented to
promote the gay agenda in all its aspects, with campaigns to represent
homosexuality as normal, including to children. People, including Christians,
opposing such propaganda are portrayed as “bigots” and even “criminals.”
Gay
propaganda to children should be considered a crime, but when insane individuals
are allowed to turn society into an asylum, normal people opposed to the
homosexual abnormality are criminalized.
Christians are misled into thinking that
they can elect conservatives to defend and protect conservative values. Often,
this is sheer deceptive propaganda.
Boris Johnson was elected in the United
Kingdom on a conservative platform to defend conservative values. But is his
conservatism sick or fake? Or was his conservatism parasitized by socialism?
If Christians want to elect a candidate to
celebrate June as gay “pride” month, they do not need to choose Boris Johnson.
They can choose a socialist candidate.
Yet, pandering to homosexuality is not the
only problem of Johnson and his administration.
In 2019, he
blessed an Islamic holiday. Incredibly, while gangs of Islamic immigrants in
U.K. rape 12-year-old British girls, whom they call “white trash,” Johnson is pandering
to Muslims.
I
am a conservative evangelical. So if I were in Johnson’s Conservative Party, I
would be expelled for criticizing Islam. I wonder what Johnson and his
Conservative Party would do to me if I mentioned to them what God says about
celebrating an abomination. God says in His Word:
“You shall not lie with a male as with a
woman. It is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22 NKJV)
Boris Johnson should know it much better
than I do, because the United Kingdom gave the world the famous King James Bible.
Why not celebrate June of each year as “King James Bible Month”?
A left-winger celebrates June as a gay “pride”
month. A fake conservative does similar celebration. What would a real conservative
U.K. prime minister do? He would celebrate the “King James Bible Month” or
children as special gifts from God in need of protection, including from
homosexual propaganda.
„Wir wollen kein Westen sein“
-
„Wir wollen kein Westen sein“ Internationaler Familienkongreß in Moskau:
Kämpferische Worte für die traditionelle Ehe und gegen die Homolobby
*Thomas Fas...
Will Israel nuke the Iranian Balrog?
-
According to an increasing number of pundits, World War III has already
begun with this or that global event, but so far none of the governments
embroiled ...
When Cancer Surprised Me...
-
Dear Friends,Mike and I are just back from Central America. Normally, we
are there on mission trips; reaching out and serving others. This time, I
was serv...
How the Big Tech cabal is killing WND
-
Note: This column by WND founder and CEO Joseph Farah first was published
March 7, but its urgency still applies today. For more than two years, I’ve
tol...
Posts
