Nelson Mandela: Israel Is Terrorist and Islamic Arabs Are Innocent

By Julio Severo

If you believe the leftist Christian press, Nelson Mandela was… a Christian! Sheer indoctrination by the mainstream secular media? No doubt. The secular press has portrayed Mandela as a hero.

A major Protestant news site in Brazil published a list of nice quotes by Mandela. By reading exclusively these nice quotes, you could say that he was a hero and even a Christian.

Yassir Arafat and Nelson Mandela

Yet, what about the other quotes?

Since the mainstream media and even the Christian press will not show you his quotes which are not nice, I will do it. Here is a list of some of these quotes by Mandela:

1) “But we know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.” (Address by President Nelson Mandela at the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, December 4, 1997, Pretoria.)

Comment by Julio Severo: The World Conference against Racism held by the United Nation in South Africa in 2009 was used as a platform against Israel, whose government boycotted it.

2) “I believe that there are many similarities between our struggle and that of the PLO.” (1990)

Comment by Julio Severo: PLO, or Palestine Liberation Organization, was a terrorist Islamic group responsible for many terrorist attacks against Israeli citizens, including children.

3) “We identify with the PLO because, just like ourselves, they are fighting for the right of self determination.”… “Arafat is a comrade in arms.”

4) “If one has to refer to any of the parties as a terrorist state, one might refer to the Israeli government, because they are the people who are slaughtering defenseless and innocent Arabs in the occupied territories.” (1990)

5) “If there is a country that has committed unspeakable atrocities in the world, it is the United States of America. They don’t care for human beings.”

Comment by Julio Severo: Mandela had bad feelings about America under Ronald Reagan. Under Obama, the praises were mutual. Mandela praised Obama, and Obama has praised him too.

Fidel Castro and Nelson Mandela

6) “Long live the Cuban revolution. Long live comrade Fidel Castro … Cuban internationalists have done so much for African independence, freedom and justice. We admire the sacrifices of the Cuban people in maintaining their independence and sovereignty in the face of a vicious imperialist campaign designed to destroy the advances of the Cuban revolution. We too want to control our destiny. … There can be no surrender. It is a case of freedom or death. The Cuban revolution has been a source of inspiration to all freedom-loving people.”

7) “[T]he people of Asia and Africa have seen through the slanderous campaign conducted by the USA against the socialist countries. They know that their independence is threatened not by any of the countries in the socialist camp but by the USA, who has surrounded their continent with military bases. The communist bogey is an American stunt to distract the attention of the people of Africa from the real issue facing them, namely, American imperialism.”

Comment by Julio Severo: Understand that Mandela’s complaints are applicable only to America under Reagan. The US government without Reagan sees Mandela as a hero and espouses his socialist agenda.

8) “Under a Communist Party government, South Africa will become a land of milk and honey.”

Comment by Julio Severo: This “land of milk and honey” is a reversal of the Bible imagery. Since Mandela, the rate of sexual violence in South Africa has been among the highest in the world. An estimated number of 500,000 rape cases take place in the country every year and children, including babies, comprise 41 percent of all rape victims. South Africa is believed to have more people with HIV/AIDS than any other country in the world. Even a son of Mandela has died of AIDS. A significant contributing factor for the escalation in sexual violence against children and even babies is the widespread myth among South African Blacks that having sex with a virgin will cure a man of AIDS. South Africa is now considered the world’s rape capital. It has also a very high rate of murders and assaults. In all of its history, South Africa has never seen so much rampant violence. This is just one of the Mandela legacies. Other legacies are: under his administration, South Africa legalized abortion and homosexuality.

9) “Yasser Arafat was one of the outstanding freedom fighters of this generation, one who gave his entire life to the cause of the Palestinian people.”

10) “The cause of communism is the greatest cause in the history of mankind!”

Nelson Mandela and Fidel Castro

11) “There’s one place where (Fidel Castro’s) Cuba stands out head and shoulders above the rest — that is in its love for human rights and liberty!”

12) “The victory of socialism in the U.S.S.R., in the People’s Republic of China, in Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland and Rumania, where the living conditions of the people were in many respects similar and even worse than ours, proves that we too can achieve this important goal.”

13) “Communists everywhere fight to destroy capitalist society and to replace it with socialism, where the masses of the common people, irrespective of race or color, will live in complete equality, freedom and happiness. They seek to revolutionize society and are thus called revolutionaries. Those who support capitalism with its class divisions and other evils and who oppose our just struggles to end oppression are called counter revolutionaries.”

14) “In our own country, the struggles of the oppressed people are guided by the South African Communist Party and inspired by its policies.”

These policies led South Africa directly into the embrace of the culture of death.

In 1996, Mandela endorsed one of world’s most liberal abortion laws.

The same year, Mandela’s new constitution made, according to LifeSiteNews, South Africa the first country in the world to place “sexual orientation” alongside race and religion as a restricted grounds for discrimination — something that was instrumental for the legalization of homosexual “marriage” a decade later.

These policies led South Africa also directly into the embrace of the culture of violence.

There was no skyrocketting epidemic of white on Black rapes in South Africa before Mandela. But is it any wonder that since Mandela, South Africa has a skyrocketting epidemic of Black on white violence, including rapes? Dave Jolly says,  

 “In the cities, whites became the preferred targets for assaults, burglaries and rapes. My friends’ teenage daughter feared for her safety and modesty every day she traveled to and from school.  Their daughter had classmates that were raped and robbed by blacks and the police, which were almost all black, and did nothing about it. These are only a few of the many racial horror stories that have been happening to many of the whites in South Africa. Conditions have become so dangerous that many whites are leaving the country.”

Marxism makes any nation violent.

About “nice” quotes of Mandela, do I need to say anything else? The man has said everything, and it is not nice or Christian.

With information from WND and Al-Jazeerah.

Portuguese version of this article: Nelson Mandela: Israel é terrorista é árabes islâmicos são inocentes

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Recommended Reading:

Anti-Israel Activist Speaks at Open Doors Brazil

Archbishop Tutu: Rather Go to Hell Than Go to a Homophobic Heaven

Globalization “Elders” want female ordination as ministers, priests and rabbis

Anti-Israel Activist Speaks at Open Doors Brazil

“Bishara Awad is interestingly silent about Muslim persecution of Christians in Palestine. There were large numbers of Christians in Palestine just a few decades ago, but they are disappearing. Will Awad say that the culprit is ‘Israeli occupation’?”

By Julio Severo

In early May 2013, Palestinian Christian author Walid Shoebat warned that “Jesus at the Check Point” would soon be speaking at a church near you. “Jesus at the Check Point,” which is a “Christian” organization with a socialist twist, is touring the United States to muster support to alleviate “Christian Persecution.”

According to Shoebat, “The main dynamo and sponsoring agent of these tours is Bethlehem Bible College in Bethlehem, Israel.”

While the warning of Shoebat, published on WND last May, was being directed to Americans, Bishawa Awad, founder and president emeritus of Bethlehem Bible College, was visiting churches in Brazil, including as a keynote speaker in a major conference commemorating the 35th anniversary of Open Doors Brazil in the same month of May.

Brazilian Leader Shaken by Awad Speech

He was also a keynote speaker at a major SEPAL meeting of progressive ministers in Brazil. The ministers’ meeting commemorated the 50th anniversary of SEPAL, a Brazilian organization which trains and empowers Brazilian evangelical leaders and ministers. Ezion Geber, who attended it, told that after hearing Awad’s speech he would have to abandon many paradigms. He said (as recorded originally here in his blog in Portuguese: http://archive.is/rRsPM),

Dr. Bishara Awad came from Bethlehem, in the West Bank. He is a Palestinian, Christian, founder and director of Bethlehem Bible College. He began his speech on Psalm 11:3: “If the foundations are destroyed, What can the righteous do?” (NKJV) He spoke about his story… his family. His father died in the 1948 war, and his mother, with her children, was sheltered by Muslims, in Jerusalem. He spoke about Israelis occupying the land… Just as Romans did in the past… Today, Jews are the ‘oppressors.’”

I thought in my paradigms which made me see Palestinians as hindrances for Israel. I thought in the education that indoctrinates me to see a triumphant Israel… and I read the biographies of the founders of Israel, as Golda Meir, Moshe Dayan, Ythzak Rabin… and I was moved by each victory of Israel in the wars in 1948, of Sinai in 1956, the Six-Day War in 1967 and the Yom Kippur War in 1973.

Now I am hearing a Palestinian Christian talking about the love of Jesus…

It is a big clash, I have now many paradigms to renounce… God help me…

Bishara Awad, Ezion Geber and Marco Cruz of Open Doors Brazil

King David, the beloved author of the Psalms (most of them, at least), was from Bethlehem. I can hardly imagine David returning today and be told by Awad, “Bethlehem is under occupation.”

David asks, “Who is occupying my city?”

Awad’s answer: “Your Jewish people, of course!”

Clash Between Awad and James Dobson

Awad is better known for attacking Dr. James Dobson in 2002. Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, is a prominent pro-family and pro-Israel Christian leader. He had denounced Palestinian activist Dr. Hanan Ashrawi and her speech in an American college. Dobson denounced:

1. Ashrawi had association with Yassir Arafat and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).

2. Feminist Mother Jones magazine has described Ashrawi as “a wealthy, Christian, feminist, ex-Marxist.”

3. Dr. Ashrawi’s non-profit organization, MIFTAH, received $850,000.00 a year directly from Yassir Arafat.

4. In 1998, Ashrawi told Al-Hayat Al-Jadeeda, an official newspaper of the Palestinian Authority, that the Holocaust is “a deceitful myth which the Jews have labeled ‘the Holocaust’ and have exploited to get sympathy.”

Dr. James Dobson

Dobson was completely correct in his denunciation, because Arafat was a prominent Islamic terrorist trained and supported by the defunct Soviet Union. For such necessary denunciation, Bishara Awad chastised him publicly, saying that Dobson was “an instrument of hate and division” and that Dobson’s denunciation was tantamount to “the hate propaganda and deceitful ways of the enemy of righteousness.” American liberals supported Awad’s complaint against Dobson.

What did Awad want in Brazil?

Brazilian Government: Pro-Palestinian Occupation of the Promised Land

If his mission was, among other things, convert people and institutions to a pro-Palestininan stance, Awad had no need to meet representatives from the Brazilian government, which blatantly supports Palestinians and their cause of occupation of the Promised Land. In 2010, the socialist Lula administration donated more than 10,000,000.00 dollars to the Palestinian Authority.

The Lula administration made Brazil one of the first nations in the world to recognize “Palestine” as a state — a state occupying the land God promised to Jews, not to other peoples.

And under this intense political climate of support for Palestine, Brazil hosted last year the world’s biggest pro-Palestine event, officially supported by major liberal theological figures and the World Council of Churches, an anti-Israel organization supported by the defunct Soviet Union.

Leonardo Boff, the most prominent Liberation Theology advocate in Brazil, showed the same support for the event. He said, “It is our duty to be on the side of the Palestinians.”

Why was Bishara Awad in SEPAL, which represents many Brazilian churches, when his cause is largely supported by powerful socialists in the Brazilian government and media? Brazilian churches have been the last pro-Israel bastion in face of the massive leftist pro-Palestine forces in the secular society in Brazil. Does Awad align Brazilian churches with these forces?

Anti-Israel Boycotts

Was Awad’s tour in Brazil a beachhead for “Jesus at the Check Point”? “Jesus at the Check Point” participants (secular and Christian socialists) have one consensus: Israel should be boycotted because Palestinians are victims and Bethlehem is under Jewish occupation!

Speakers at “Christ at the Checkpoint” conferences have called for boycotts against Israel for a long time. On April 1, 1933, just one week after taking power in Germany, Nazi leader Adolf Hitler ordered a boycott of Jewish shops, banks, and businesses.

Over the past few years a number of Reformed denominations and ecumenical organizations have issued statements condemning the alleged Israeli “occupation” of Bethlehem and other lands historically and biblically belonging to Jews, and have chosen either to support campaigns to boycott Israeli goods and divest from multinational companies operating within Israel, and/or to denounce support to Israel as a “heresy.”

In a letter to the Archbishop of Canterbury Dr. Rowan Williams (June 2011), Naim Ateek, whose Palestinian Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center (‘Sabeel’) was represented at the Christ at the Checkpoint Conference, described Jewish and Christian Zionists as “a greater threat to us [Arab Christians] than the extremist Islamists.” (Paul Wilkinson, Church at Christ’s Checkpoint, p. 5.)

This stance is especially espoused by the World Council of Churches.

The motto of “Jesus at the Check Point” is “non-violent resistance against the Israeli Zionist occupation.” “Zionism is the obstacle to peace,” they write, and they want to “educate evangelical Christians” to “understand the Bible from a Palestinian liberation theology perspective,” which openly supports a “divided state” as the solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Its “Christ at the CheckPoint,” held March 2012, was led by Bishara Awad and his family. Several Christian groups expressed opposition to this conference. According to the Jerusalem Post, Dr. Jürgen Bühler, executive director of the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem (ICEJ), said in a statement ahead of the event that the conference’s theological stance “can easily lend itself to anti-Semitism and anti-Israel propaganda, as some of the Checkpoint speakers have proven in the past.”

Jerusalem Post reports that “Among the speakers was Rev. Stephen Sizer, a British minister who has spoken out harshly against Israel and met with radical Muslims, including Hezbollah.” Stephen Sizer is not alone in championing the cause of Palestinian liberation theology throughout the Muslim world. Two of his closest friends and colleagues within the movement are Gary Burge and Donald Wagner, both of whom are ordained ministers within the Presbyterian Church (USA), the world’s biggest pro-abortion and pro-homosexuality Presbyterian denomination, which has called for boycotts against Israel. They have been very active in the Evangelical Christian-Muslim Dialogue, and the work of Sizer has received praise from Tony Campolo, Hank Hanegraaff and the late John Stott. (“Prophets Who Prophesy Lies In My Name”, Christian Palestinianism and the anti-Israel Crusade, pages 14,16)

In spite that “Jesus at the CheckPoint” is involved in the Palestinian liberation theology, Awad freely preached his “Palestinian” gospel in several Brazilian churches last May.

A Socialist Speaker at Open Doors Brazil

His most important opportunity in Brazil was to speak in the 35th anniversary of Open Doors Brazil. Jeff Taylor, president of Open Doors International, was also one of the speakers.

I am not surprised at a socialist Palestinian Protestant speaking at Open Doors Brazil. Ariovaldo Ramos, one of the most prominent socialist evangelical leaders in Brazil, has already spoken in some Open Doors events. Ramos has praised socialist dictator Hugo Chavez and he is an influential Brazilian advocate of the Theology of Integral Mission, an evangelicalized version of the Marxist Liberation Theology. (You can find more information on it by downloading my free e-book here: http://bit.ly/15AJmMC)

Ariovaldo Ramos

Ramos’s socialist profile was never a hindrance for him to minister at Open Doors Brazil in the administration of former Secretary General Carlos Alfredo de Sousa, where Ramos delivered speeches, devotionals and even wrote articles in the Open Doors website.

One year ago, I exposed an article by Open Doors Brazil supporting Marxism revolutions as a solution to destroy persecution against Christians in Muslim nations. I challenged them to correct it and show the reality: Marxism and Islam are mostly behind Christian persecution. They refused it. Their secretary general was eventually removed.

Talking to the Current Open Doors Brazil Secretary-General

Talking days ago by phone to Marco Cruz, the new Secretary-General of Open Doors Brazil, he has made it clear that he is not familiar with the Palestinian Liberation Theology. About the Awad case, he said that his visit as a key-note speaker at Open Doors Brazil had been scheduled several months earlier, during the administration of the former Secretary-General. The main responsible for this schedule was Open Doors International.

I explained to him the involvements of Awad and that everything he represents is a deviation of the Open Doors’ mission, which is to help the persecuted church. Cruz made it clear to me that in his administration, as far as it is possible for him the focus of Open Doors Brazil will be Jesus and the persecuted church. This is more encouraging news. Yet, what about Open Doors International?

Has Open Doors International Lost Its First Love?

In 2004, Awad said, “Brother Andrew comes to see us at least two or three times a year, and he was our keynote speaker at the graduation and the 25th anniversary of the Bethlehem Bible College of this year. He is a close friend.”

I find strange that Open Doors International, which began its ministry by helping Christians persecuted by Marxists, now is willing to have an alliance with socialist “Christians,” including Bishara Awad.

Muslim Persecution of Christians

Awad is interestingly silent about Muslim persecution of Christians in Palestine. There were large numbers of Christians in Palestine just a few decades ago, but they are disappearing. Will Awad say that the culprit is “Israeli occupation”?

According to CBN News, the U.S. State Department’s International Religious Freedom Report for 2012 shows persecution against Christians and Jews is on the rise, especially in Muslim countries.

Christians are fleeing Palestine, for example, not because of “Israeli occupation,” as Awad would have us believe. Christians fleeing Muslim nations is a universal trend, because of Muslim violence.

Why would this reality be different in Palestine, which is mostly Muslim today? Why would radical Muslims be willing to tolerate Awad and his family? Surely, they are helpful for anti-Israel propaganda and disinformation among Christians.

Professors at Presbyterian University Mackenzie

This propaganda went unchallenged in Brazil. Open Doors Brazil opened many doors for Awad in Brazil. Awad spoke also at an “apologetics meeting” in the Trinity Christian Church, led by Paulo Romeiro, who is a professor in the Presbyterian University Mackenzie in São Paulo, Brazil.

Romeiro, in his turn, opened his online TV show for Awad to impart his Palestinian vision to Brazilians. According to a Brazilian witness, Awad told his Brazilian audience that the source of oppression against Palestinian Christians is Israel — the same language he used in SEPAL.

Romeiro is a former director of the Christian Research Institute in Brazil. This institute was connected and founded by its American counterpart, Christian Research Institute, led by Hank Hanegraaff. Might Romeiro have been influenced by Hanegraaff, who considered support for Israel a “heresy”?

Just because he is a professor at Mackenzie, you cannot say that Romeiro has all of these leftist proclivities. But some of his Mackenzie friends have, especially Ricardo Bitun, a professor whose students in this prominent Brazilian Presbyterian university say that he teaches that “Liberation Theology can change the church.”

Coincidently or not, on the called “Palestinian cause” Liberation Theology and the Theology of Integral Mission have stances similar to Awad’s: Israel is the oppressor. Ricardo Bitun was one of the main speakers at the recent “Conferência Missão na Íntegra” (Integral Mission Conference), the biggest event advocating the Theology of Integral Mission in Brazil.

In its turn, Mackenzie hosted the biggest Protestant youth meeting in Brazil last November, under the leadership of Ariovaldo Ramos and other leaders of the Theology of Integral Mission. It was the biggest leftist Protestant youth event in Brazil.

Mackenzie has also been denounced in my blog for its rabid cessationists. See my article A Charismatic Response to “The Growing Crisis Behind Brazil’s Evangelical Success Story.”

Palestinian Liberation Theology

So I would not be surprised at apologists serving interests of anti-Israel propaganda. Nowadays, most Brazilian apologists have served, in a way or another, socialist causes. Liberation theology, and its evangelicalized version Theology of Integral Mission, has been the main inspiration for many Brazilian Protestant leaders and publications taking a stance against Israel to support a Palestinian occupation of the Promised Land.

Liberation theology has marred the Gospel and God’s plan for the Jewish people and their Promised Land.

In Israel, the same theology, embraced by Palestinian Protestants, has provoked the same havoc. Palestinian liberation theology purportedly focuses on the humanity of Jesus of Nazareth, misrepresenting Him as a Palestinian living under occupation.

Identifying Jesus as “a Palestinian living under an occupation” has become normative for Christian Palestinianists, and a powerful propaganda weapon in their anti-Israel crusade. This identification was most evident in the Easter message which Naim Ateek preached in Jerusalem on April 9, 2001:

“Here in Palestine Jesus is again walking the via dolorosa. Jesus is the powerless Palestinian humiliated at a checkpoint, the woman trying to get through to the hospital for treatment, the young man whose dignity is trampled, the young student who cannot get to the university to study, the unemployed father who needs to find bread to feed his family … In this season of Lent, it seems to many of us that Jesus is on the cross again with thousands of crucified Palestinians around him. It only takes people of insight to see the hundreds of thousands of crosses throughout the land, Palestinian men, women, and children being crucified. Palestine has become one huge Golgotha. The Israeli government crucifixion system is operating daily. Palestine has become the place of the skull.” (“Prophets Who Prophesy Lies In My Name”, Christian Palestinianism and the anti-Israel Crusade, page 7.)

But Palestinian liberation theology “Christians” are not alone in their mission to misrepresent Jesus Christ. Palestinian Muslims are their powerful allies. According to a Palestinian Media Watch article of December 24, 2010, “One of the ways the Palestinian Authority attempts to create a Palestinian history is to deny the Judean/Jewish nationality of Jesus, and misrepresent him as a ‘Palestinian.’” (“Prophets Who Prophesy Lies In My Name”, Christian Palestinianism and the anti-Israel Crusade, page 8.)

In fact, as Dr. James Dobson denounced, Palestinian “Christian” feminist Hanan Ashrawi, through her group MIFTAH, received $850,000.00 a year directly from Yassir Arafat. Muslims are willing to make extraordinary sacrifices do advance their anti-Israel propaganda, even by funding “Christians,” even by supporting Palestinian gay activists, provided that they fulfil their mission of anti-Israel propaganda.

Only “Spiritual Israel” Entitled to the Promised Land?

Why would Open Doors be willing to have Awad, an ally of Palestinian liberation theology advocates, as the key note speaker in its most important conference in Brazil? Does not Open Doors believe that the Jewish people are entitled to their Promised Land?

According to WND, Open Doors subscribes to Calvinist author and pastor John Piper’s views of Israel. Piper’s views are as follows:

The promises made to Abraham, including the promise of the land, will be inherited as an everlasting gift only by true, spiritual Israel, not disobedient, unbelieving Israel.

Therefore, the secular state of Israel today may not claim a present divine right to the land.

So Open Doors has a “spiritualized” answer for its stance not supporting the modern state of Israel and the Jewish claim over the Promised Land. But at the same time, Open Doors has no hard time supporting Bishara Awad, who has a strange alliance with Palestinian liberation theologians and Muslims to defend a divided Promised Land. This alliance is necessary, because Bethlehem is under occupation by their common enemy: Israel.

I think that if David were supernaturally brought to life again, he would be able to judge this case. I am unable to see him siding with Muslims or Palestinian liberation theologians. This theology just uses the true Gospel as a platform for Marxism and its deceitful “liberation.”

Of course, David would cry to God over the condition of modern Jews, but never betray his posterity by delivering the Promised Land to Muslims and liberation theologians.

Yet, we have no David to decide the case. What about a truly spiritualized answer? If, as Piper and other Calvinists see it, the true Israel is the spiritual Israel, then are we, the spiritual Israel, under the responsibility to occupy Israel and expel Muslims and the heretical liberation theology “Christians” from the Promised Land?

I fear that both solutions — David’s and the spiritualized answer — would not satisfy Awad and Open Doors.

For the sake of the truly persecuted Christians, Open Doors would be wise to not get involved in Awad’s liberation theology sympathies and messes and a cultural and spiritual war that it is unable understand.

Portuguese version of this article: Ativista anti-Israel faz palestra em Portas Abertas do Brasil

Spanish version of this article: Activista anti Israel ofrece conferencia en Puertas Abiertas de Brasil

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Recommended Reading:

Brazil to Host World’s Biggest Pro-Palestine Event

Palestinian Gays Want World Boycotts against Israel

What every Christian should know about Israel

Luiz Mott: Homosexuals Are Eunuchs

“If your sexual organ causes you to sin, cut it off.”

By Julio Severo

“Homosexuals are modern eunuchs,” said Luiz Mott, considered the father of the homosexual movement in Brazil.

In what sense exactly are eunuchs and homosexuals equal, according to Mott? Did eunuchs only want men?

Luiz Mott and statue of a naked baby

Eunuchs were castrated men who worked in the palaces of some countries. Daniel, the prophet in the Bible, had been brought as a young man to the palace of Nebuchadnezzar in Babylon. There, he was castrated to work as a eunuch.

Perhaps these peoples thought, at the time, that a man castrated would be less busy with sex and free to focus on governmental affairs.

Eunuchs were also used as guards of harems. It was a role in which they were fully trusted-worthy. They could be close of the most beautiful women, even if they were stripped naked, without feeling an ounce of sexual attraction.

Eunuchs neither have sex nor sexual desires. They don’t occupy their time and minds with sexual interests.

Then, it is not known why Mott compared homosexuals to eunuchs. Men addicted to homosexual practices occupy their time and minds in anal and fecal lewdness. Different from a eunuch, they are unable to be in front of another man without having lewd thoughts. In the case of Mott, he has said that he has had sex with over 500 men.

Almost all the problems of the addicted homosexual revolve around his addiction. If he were a eunuch, he would certainly have a much more peaceful life: without orgies, with unknown homosexual men, in dirty public restrooms; without pornography; without diseases that accompany fecal sex; without the constant pursuit of pleasures in gay bars; without exposure to risks in zones of homosexual prostitution and without the vices of alcohol and drugs that often accompany the vices of fecal sex. And without the danger of suffering aggression and murder by gay lovers.

Although the comparison of Mott is unreal, is it impossible for a man addicted to homosexuality to be a eunuch? Of course not.

Everything that he would need is an operation of castration.

I can hear some politically correct voices saying, “Oh, what horror! Cut our sex? This is unethical, it is against the Bible, it is a crime, it is insanity, it is animalistic, it is wild!”

Do you hear the same hysterical cry when a homosexual activist, in a TV talk-show, calmly advocates that men addicted to homosexuality should have a sugary right to “sex change”?

This change involves much more than just castration. It involves mutilation, disfiguration and perversion of sexual organs. It is a sacrifice for the sake of perversion.

But did you know that there are sacrifices that can be made for the sake of the Kingdom of God? These sacrifices move you away from the sin and vice of a specific perversion. Jesus said,

“And if your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life crippled than with two hands to go to hell, to the unquenchable fire.  And if your foot causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life lame than with two feet to be thrown into hell.  And if your eye causes you to sin, tear it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into hell, ‘where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched.’” (Mark 9:43-48 ESV)

“You can’t do this that Jesus told. This is crazy!” shout many. Shout it to gay militants who require expensive operations of sexual mutilation, for the sake of perversion, funded by Brazilian tax-payers.

To remove a sexual organ as a sacrifice against sin is better than to mutilate it to dive into sin. This is a helpful advice to the followers of Luiz Mott. If the father of their movement believes that those addicted to homosexuality would be best as eunuchs, I just agree.

In the case of Mott, the problem is much more complex. He has been accused of defending pedophilia. There is even an indecent video produced by Mott in which he, almost embraced to the statue of a naked baby, exalts the “wonders” of an erotic museum. If the charges against him are proved, this is not a case for castration.

Castration is for those who feel strong desires for sins, but have not yet come to commit acts of pedophilia or prostitution. For a man who rapes children, the Bible prescribes heavy sentences.

I want to make it clear publicly that I support the pretension of Mott that those addicted to homosexuality are entitled to be eunuchs. Better this than to get to the point of defending and practicing pedophilia. I just cannot afford to pay for their operations of castration, but I invite everybody to help Mott and his followers on this noble pretension.

My piece of advice then, following the suggestion of Mott that homosexuals should be eunuchs and following the pretension of many gay militants who require the Brazilian population to pay expensive operations of sexual mutilation, is castration.

It is a strong advice because the consequences are much stronger. Homosexuals, with other serious sinners, are prevented by determination of God from entering into the Kingdom of God:

“Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.” (1 Corinthians 6:9-10 ESV)

However, the next verse makes it clear that some people who had these aberrant practices had abandoned them. “And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.” (1 Corinthians 6:11 ESV)

Jesus delivers us from all sins. But sometimes some sacrifice may be necessary.

If people in sin can make great sacrifices for the sake of their sin, including mutilation and perversion of their sexual organs, why could not they follow the eunuch idea suggested by Mott?

The warnings of God for homosexuals are that their vice closes the door to enter the Kingdom of God.

In contrast, God has a special affection for eunuchs:

“Let not… the eunuch say, “Behold, I am a dry tree.” For thus says the LORD: “To the eunuchs who… choose the things that please me and hold fast my covenant, I will give in my house and within my walls a monument and a name better than sons and daughters; I will give them an everlasting name that shall not be cut off.” (Isaiah 56:3-5 ESV)

Another version is even clearer:

“’Make sure… no physically mutilated person is ever made to think, ‘I’m damaged goods. I don’t really belong.’ For GOD says: ‘To the mutilated who… choose what delights me and keep a firm grip on my covenant, I’ll provide them an honored place in my family and within my city, even more honored than that of sons and daughters. I’ll confer permanent honors on them that will never be revoked.’” (Isaiah 56:3-5 The Message)

Daniel is a beautiful example of a eunuch blessed by God! Today, he is in the Kingdom of God. On earth, he lived as a eunuch — a sober, pleasant and faithful life to God.

Mott wants homosexuals as eunuchs, but gay activists propose sexual mutilation to sin more and more. The proposal of Jesus is mutilation of a sex organ to stop sinning.

With their sexual organs cut off, individuals who practice homosexual acts will never again make propaganda of their disgusting anal and fecal sexual practices. They will also stop their frequent persecutions of pro-family leaders that denounce the harmfulness of those practices.

In 2007 the Brazilian Association of Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transvestites and Transsexuals (ABGLT) had lodged a criminal complaint against me for “homophobia.”

The complaint was made because regularly I denounce homosexual behavior as immoral, and because I oppose the goals of the homosexual movement.

Mott rejoiced then at the news. “We are all proud of the ABGLT for filing charges against our archenemy, Julio Severo,” he was quoted as saying in a Yahoo homosexual email list. “I hope that he is condemned to perpetual imprisonment in Sodom and Gomorrah.”

Mott is the most prominent promoter of the “gay rights” agenda in Brazil and an ally of the socialist Brazilian government. He is also a promoter of the legalization of pedophilia and pederasty, a fact that I had helped to expose internationally years ago (see LifeSiteNews coverage at: http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/jul/07073011.html).

The influence of Mott has been instrumental even in the United Nations system, leading it to press Brazil to criminalize “homophobia” — which includes views contrary to homosexual practices.

With castration, his followers would lose interest in the gay agenda, including an obsessive determination to impose homosexual indoctrination on school-children.

Hopefully the followers of Mott, who still do not advocate and practice pedophilia, might cut their sexual organs in order to follow the excellent example of Daniel! The path is open, with the blessing of Jesus, who said (paraphrasing):

“And if your sexual organ causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life crippled than with your sexual organ to go to hell, to the unquenchable fire.” (Mark 9:43-44 ESV)

Portuguese version of this article: Luiz Mott: Homossexuais são eunucos

Spanish version of this article: Luiz Mott: Los homosexuales son eunucos

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Recommended Reading:

Luiz Mott helping UN to criminalize “homophobia” in Brazil

Luiz Mott saves Catholic Church from suffering mega pedophilia scandal

Luiz Mott, the Top Homosexual Leader in Brazil and One of the Founders of ABGLT, Posts Home Addresses of Julio Severo and Other Pro-Family Activists

Luiz Mott Under Investigation for Pedophilia

ABGLT Files “Hate” Charges Against Julio Severo and Other Brazilian Christians

No Respect for Family and Nations: US Government Spends Millions on Training Gay Militants Around the World

Comment by Julio Severo: In 1992, I translated into Portuguese the most important excerpts of NSSM 200 (National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests), prepared by the United States National Security Council in 1974.

As its title implies, NSSM 200 has a number of secret strategies for population control exclusively to serve the US government’s interests. This document, which cites abundantly the strategic role of USAID in this massive project, shows that the US has maneuvered UN and other international agencies to integrate population-control politics into the international health care system, including in Brazil. Sadly, its goals have been amply achieved, after decades of massive investments and disinformation. By this pressure, now the family planning ideology, with its perverted sex education and abortion propaganda, is sacred in Brazil.

Today, the US pressure, which is increasing its international controls, is directed to homosexual acceptance. In view of the huge US success for the “acceptance” of the family planning ideology around the world, is there any doubt that the US government will fail in its efforts to export and impose gay “marriage” and the gay agenda? Please read the below article by Family Research Council:

If the President doesn't respect America's views on marriage, what makes us think he would respect other countries'? Certainly not his latest USAID project. In April, to relatively little fanfare, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) embarked on one of the most shocking abuses of taxpayer dollars in the last five years. With help from the Levi Strauss Foundation and millionaire liberal Tim Gill, the U.S. government is spending $11 million to train homosexual activists in other countries.

The Washington Blade, D.C.'s gay newspaper, praised the Obama administration for creating an army of international lobbyists for same-sex "marriage," anti-discrimination laws, and homosexual "rights" around the world. According to USAID, the first phase of the program is focused on countries with a strong Catholic influence: Ecuador, Honduras, Guatemala, and other developing nations that oppose homosexuality.

This week, the first in a series of USAID "gay trainings" took place in Colombia, a nation specifically targeted for its rejection of same-sex "marriage." The goal, an agency spokesman says, is to teach people how to infiltrate the political process and advocate for laws that a majority of Americans, who are paying for the program, object to. "It can be a real game-changer in the advancement of LGBT human rights," she insisted. In essence, U.S. taxpayers are being forced to groom the next generation of the world's Human Rights Campaigns — a stunning exploitation of Americans' money, and more importantly, their trust.

For the Obama administration, this is just another part of its strong-arm strategy to bully other nations into compliance. Whether it's through the United Nations, U.S. embassies, or the State Department, President Obama is leading the effort to bribe and coerce poor countries into accepting his pro-homosexual agenda. Our friends at Family Watch International are urging people to get involved. They've released a shocking new documentary highlighting the President's dark world of "Cultural Imperialism." Click over to their website to see a five-minute clip or the full feature. Be prepared to be outraged.

Portuguese version of this article: Sem respeito pela família e pelas nações: governo dos EUA gasta milhões em treinamento de militantes gays no mundo inteiro

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Recommended Reading:

Leading the world by evil example: Obama and gay “marriage”

United States: between Gayland and Mohammedland

Homosexual “Marriage” and the Last Days