Google’s Racial War Against Whites?
By Julio
Severo
If
the skin color is not important, why is Google giving preeminence to
Afrocentrism and black supremacism, which value its own “cultural” color as
superior to all other “cultural” colors?
If you defend “Europeancentrism,”
it is branded automatically “racist.” But if you defend Afrocentrism (which is
synonymous with “blackcentrism,” meaning everything that has the Afro or black
“cultural” color is to be in the center of everything) it just fine for the
Left and for Google. For them, European in the center is “racism,” just because
European is synonymous with white. But Afro in the center is not racism, just
because African is synonymous with black.
According
to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, racism is “a belief that some races are by
nature superior to others; also: discrimination based on such belief.”
Google has been doing it. Not
against blacks. Against whites.
Google
puts Afrocentrism as superior to others.
Google
does discrimination based on such belief.
Google
just is not severely chastised, condemned, ostracized and morally and legally
lynched by the powerful mainstream media because in the prevalent left-wing
media mindset anything done against blacks is a crime and anything done against
whites is “long overdue.” The Left believes that whites deserve persecution.
Google
and the Left despise America’s spiritual essence.
America
has produced so many inventions that America and inventions are almost
synonymous.
Since
America is mostly white due to her European roots, most American inventors are
white.
A study
reported by DailyMail gave the reason for the abundant inventiveness
in America: Protestantism. DailyMail said that American white Protestants are
incredibly creative. More creative than Catholics and Jews.
Is it
just incidental that the largest Protestant nation in the world — the United
States — is also the most creative nation in the world?
The abundant historical
creativeness and inventiveness in the United States is a direct result of its
overwhelmingly Protestant white culture.
But
Google wants you to see it differently. When you google “white inventors,” many
hits in the first page are negatively exotic. Many in the hits are not whites,
and many reports on whites in the hits are not positive. (See Google’s results
recorded here: http://archive.is/guslk)
The
pictures, which should show only white people, mostly depict black people. The
most prominent articles portray whites in an inferior and demeaning light.
It
seems that whites, in the Google universe, should be taken out of sight.
Perhaps they should not exist. Racism is rampant at Google — against whites.
In
contrast, when you google “black inventors,” hits are outstandingly positive.
Hits, in the first page, show fine reports on blacks. (See Google’s results
recorded here: http://archive.is/wq6z5)
The
pictures, which should show only black people, actually depict only black
people!
Even
when you use Google in Portuguese in Brazil, hits for black inventors (see: http://archive.is/WOmVM) are
vastly better than hits for white inventors (see: http://archive.is/xa2wq).
Google’s
behavior is perfectly consistent with AFROCENTRISM. “Afro,” relating to Africa
or blacks. “Centrism,” relating to center. According to the Oxford Dictionary
of English, the adjective “Afrocentric” means “regarding African or black
culture as pre-eminent.”
To portray European or white
culture as pre-eminent, even when it is historically pre-eminent in America and
in Europe, is “racism.” But to portray African or black culture as pre-eminent,
even when it is historically not pre-eminent in an overwhelmingly European or
white culture, is not racism. Protected racism? Protected dishonesty?
Last
week, the Washington Times reported that Bishop James E.
Dukes of Chicago’s Liberation Christian Center made headlines for calling on the
Chicago mayor to rename Washington Park and remove a statue of the first U.S.
president over his ties to slavery. Bishop Dukes, who is a Pentecostal black,
told his Facebook flock that “it’s time.”
And
yesterday the Washington Times reported that “A monument to
Christopher Columbus that was over 200 years old [in Baltimore] was smashed
with a sledgehammer Monday morning to combat a ‘culture of white supremacy.’”
Columbus was an Italian explorer
and navigator (of Jewish extraction) who discovered America in 1492. His
“crime” in an America obsessed with Afrocentrism? He was white.
If even a black Pentecostal bishop
wants a statue of white George Washington removed, what expect from Google?
So it is no wonder that whites have
been morally and culturally blacklisted by Google not only in English but
internationally, including in Brazil. A Google search for white inventors
presents dishonest results in the U.S. and internationally.
Why is Google giving preference to
Afrocentrism?
Why is Google demoting the rich American
white Protestant culture?
Why
is Google behaving in a discriminatory way?
Whether
Google recognizes it or not, America was founded by white people, who were 98
percent Protestant.
American
blacks, who are so proud of their accomplishments, were able to flourish only
in a white Protestant culture. If they had never been taken to America as
slaves and still lived in Africa, could they have flourished in the same way
they flourished in America?
In
the 13th century, when white Europe had castles and cities with impressive
cathedrals and buildings, black Africa had… almost nothing. A vast continent,
larger than Europe, without castles and impressive buildings.
Even
though Afrocentrists and black supremacists point to ancient Egypt and its
massive pyramids as an example that Africa was superior to the old European
castles and buildings, modern studies shatter the Afrocentrists’ Egyptian hope.
According to a WND
report, “In the first full genome sequencing of ancient Egyptians,
spanning a 1,300-year-period dating back to 1400 B.C., scientists have
concluded the people of the pharaonic period were more closely related to
modern Europeans.”
White
Protestant Americans have a colossal legacy of constructions and inventions. To
exterminate it from history (and Google) is racism leading, obviously, to
cultural genocide.
If
Afrocentrists and black supremacists (including Google, which has put black
inventors in the center of inventions and above white inventors) want to be
honest with themselves, they should move to Africa and live only with what
Africans created there.
If they want to be honest with
reality, they should recognize that the white Protestant culture in America was
and is the best environment for them to flourish.
Yes,
there are problems in the U.S. white culture, including racism. Every culture
is imperfect. But white Protestant churches have recognized, condemned and
fought against racism centuries before Google. And racism is not an exclusive
American issue. Even in Africa, there is racism of black tribes against black
tribes.
Slavery abolition did not come from
Africa or blacks or Google or Afrocentrists or black supremacists. It came from
Protestant whites. Even today, there is slavery in Africa — blacks enslaving
blacks —, while in the white America they are free.
Prominent whites in the anti-slavery
movement, which was white, were Protestants William Wilberforce, Charles
Finney, Abraham Lincoln, etc.
Wilberforce
created the first law, with international impact, banning slavery over 200
years ago.
The
worst kind of white racism in the world history was Nazism, which was not
defeated by Africa, or blacks, or Google or Afrocentrists or black
supremacists. It was defeated by the United States and the Soviet Union,
largely white nations, which were in military alliance against the esoteric,
white racism of Nazi Germany.
The main world leaders against
Nazism — Protestant Franklin Delano Roosevelt and atheist Josef Stalin — were
totally white. There was a difference between them — capitalism and Marxism —,
and this difference, hated and loved by blacks, was born in Europe. The
Democratic and Republican systems were also created in Europe.
Even
in South Africa, racism was defeated only after a powerful pressure from the
white America, white Europe and white Soviet Union.
So
whites are in an excellent position to speak against racism, because they have
fought racism among themselves as no other race has ever fought.
White Protestant Americans and
English Protestant Europeans banned slavery in their white nations and also in many
black nations in Africa — with no Google help and with no Afrocentric help.
White
Protestant Americans and English Protestant Europeans freed white and black
slaves — with no Google help and with no Afrocentric help.
Whites
are preeminent, as no other race, in the fight against racism and slavery. Even
when black leaders are involved in the fight against racism, their fight was
inspired and helped by whites. Protestant minister Martin Luther King Jr., who
was inspired by the American white socialist Baptist theologian Walter
Rauschenbusch, would never have had success without white support. Nelson
Mandela, who was inspired by white Karl Marx, would never have had
success without white support from Europe, America and the Soviet Union.
If,
as Afrocentrists accuse, whites have an eternal debt to blacks over black
slavery, and Google is demoting white inventors as a reparative measure, why do
not they demand reparations from Muslims nations that were chief slavers for
centuries, including selling black slaves to Europeans and Americans? Why does
not Google also demote Muslims? Muslims also sold untold thousands of white
slaves to Africa.
Why
do not Afrocentrists demand reparations from African nations that sold black
slaves to Europeans and Americans? Why does not Google also demote such nations
in its search engine?
Black
slavery would have been impossible without conquering black tribes selling
blacks from vanquished tribes to Europeans and Americans. Africa has huge
reparations to do to black Americans.
And in the past centuries when
conquering black tribes had no Americans and Europeans to sell their black
slaves from vanquished tribes, they sold them among themselves. Black selling
black. Black buying black. Slavery was too normal in Africa.
Considering that slavery is old and
traditional in Africa, could blacks have freed themselves alone without
Protestant Americans and English Protestant Europeans? If they had such power,
Africa would have no slavery even today.
Could
blacks have flourished without the predominant white Protestant culture in the
U.S.?
Ku
Klux Klan (KKK) is repugnant and should be banned and condemned. Most
Protestant whites condemn it. But do Google and most blacks condemn
Afrocentrism and black supremacism?
So Afrocentrists
and Google have no excuse to use KKK to hide, demote and undervalue factual
truths about whites and their obvious positive hegemony in the U.S. inventions.
Google has no right to use its search engine as a propaganda machine to promote
an Afrocentric ideology against whites in the U.S.,
Brazil and around the world.
Google’s
dishonesty against white inventors is as repugnant as KKK’s dishonesty against
blacks.
If
Google did to black inventors what it is doing to white inventors, it would be
considered sheer racist propaganda. It would be criminal behavior.
Google
would go bankrupt if it treated black inventors as it has been treating white
inventors.
Racism is rampant in a Google
search for white inventors, privileging an Afrocentric ideology and demeaning a
powerful American creative culture formed by white Protestants.
Recommended Reading:
No comments :
Post a Comment