Luiz Mott saves Catholic Church from suffering mega pedophilia scandal 

By Julio Severo 

A seminarian left a Catholic seminar because he thought it was not the ideal place for him. He ended up finding in Marxism most of the answers for his sexual “needs.” 

Today, the former seminarian is not only an open homosexual, but also the most prominent homosexual leader in Brazil. He is also accused of defending pedophilia. See here: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/jul/07073011.html

It is not easy for you to hide for a long time homosexuality and pedophilia in an environment where there are Christian moral restrictions. 

But inside of Marxism and the movement homosexual, you can leave the closet, and receive due protection, because illusions and lies are a part of the homosexual and Marxist game. 

So there are no daily pedophilia scandals coming directly from the homosexual movement or from the Marxist movements. It is as if there were no sexual threat to boys in their midst. It is as if these movements were a paradise of sexual purity, the ideal place for babies and boys. 

However, that is in no way the reality. In 2007, I exposed to Brazil in my blog Dr. Denilson Lopes, a Brazilian university professor that published the article “Loving Boys: Pedophilia and the Contemporary Intolerance” in a homosexual website. To see his full article in Portuguese saved in my blog, follow this link: http://juliosevero.blogspot.com/2007/07/pedofilia-and-homossexualismo.html

After 3 years, no authority has taken any action. But I wonder that if I had referred to the pedophilia advocate as “Father Denilson Lopes”, in less than 3 days the national and international media, prosecutors, federal police agents and a group of other creatures would appear in a hurry to denounce “another scandal of pedophilia in the Catholic Church”, omitting the obvious fact that, above all, Lopes is homosexual. By the way, Lopes is very well sheltered and protected in the Marxist academic environment. 

With university professors like Lopes and Mott, who now will write the “Pedophilic Collective” to open the secrets of that Marxist and homosexual closet? 

Mott’s option for Marxism and the homosexual movement was an issue of mere survival then. 

However, on one side it would have been good if he had become priest or bishop. Only this way his scandals would forcedly be unlocked from the closet to the public by a media always ready to cover up pedophilia inside of Marxism and in the movement homosexual, but that it never loses an opportunity to denounce priests who abuse boys. But, of course, without never mentioning their homosexuality, because it compromises fatally the homosexual movement. 

For the leftist media, in that dirty game the only immorally valid attitude is to compromise the Catholic Church and her stances against abortion and homosexuality. 

Certainty if Vatican embraced totally Marxism, promoting abortion and officially ordaining  homosexual priests, bishops and cardinals, the pedophilia scandals involving the Catholic Church would disappear mysteriously on the news media. After all, friends protect friends. 

If the Catholic Church made that official change, the Marxist media would be forced to seek another scapegoat: conservative evangelical churches. The show then would begin: daily scandals of pedophilia of ministers and other leaders bursting wildly before the public. 

The homosexual movement and the Marxist elite, which control the mainstream press, know very well what they do when they “report” cases of homosexual abuse of boys inside of the Catholic Church, using her as a scapegoat of the consequences of the conduct that they so much stimulate at schools and in society. 

But a homosexual is a homosexual, whether in the Catholic Church, in evangelical churches, in Marxism or in the movement homosexual. 

The vast majority of the pedophilia scandals in the Catholic Church involves boys’ sexual abuses, that is, homosexual priests abusing underage males. 

But why to think that only inside of the Catholic Church homosexuals commit sexual abuses against boys? Why to think that in Marxism and in the homosexual movement they automatically become sexual saints and protectors of children? 

Around world, nobody today is seeking more the children’s sexual liberation than homosexual groups. And, believe it or not, because of their fight for children’s sexual “liberation” they are considered children's advocates. In that sense, it seems that Luiz Mott just wants to be a pioneer in Brazil of that noble “liberation.” 

Even with those clear signs, see the special treatment that the Marxist media would grant Mott, depending on his choice: 

1. As a priest or bishop, Mott would be exposed as a demon of pedophilia inside of the Catholic Church. The media would use him to lead the public to understand that men’s sex with boys has everything to do with the Catholic Church and her moral values, but absolutely anything to do with homosexuality. He would be presented as a pedophilic scandal produced by the Catholic Church. They would say, “What a hideous and criminal thing: Father Mott involved in pedophilia!” 

2. As a Marxist and leader of the Brazilian gay movement, he is portrayed as an angel, having been awarded by former Brazilian president Fernando Henrique Cardoso and by the current Brazilian president Lula for having founded the Gay Group of Bahia, which wearisomely chatters that Brazil is having a “homocaust”. Even with his pro-pedophilia declarations, nobody in the mainstream press in Brazil calls him a “pedophilia scandal produced by the homosexual movement”. In fact, they would say, “What a beautiful thing: Dr. Luiz Mott, a professor in the Federal University of Bahia, advocating the children’s sexual rights!” 

While Mott stays in Marxism and in the homosexual movement, he will be protected and enjoying all the kinds of privileges from the press and the government. But woe to him if he wants to be a priest or bishop. The media won’t forgive him. 

Moral lesson? If one wants to hide his sexual perversions, he should not do it in the Catholic Church and any other Christian church. Marxism and the homosexual movements are the ideal closet to hide dirty secrets. 

How can the Catholic Church in Brazil face that media dishonesty suported by the homosexual movement and Marxism? 

By radically closing herself to the “liberation” theology and by radically opening her up to the Holy Spirit and his gifts. When Mott studied in a Catholic seminar, it was an excellent opportunity for him to receive deliverance. 

According to Mark 16, Jesus Christ’s follower has the power and the authority to minister healing and deliverance for the oppressed, and undeniably Mott entered the seminar oppressed by homosexuality. But Catholic seminaries were infected by liberation theology and by a sickening liberalism. Homosexuality is not an uncommon addiction among liberals, whether Catholics or not.

To avoid boys’ sexual abuse, the Catholic Church and all of the Christian churches should make a rigorous selection to hinder closed homosexuals from being ordained. And they should get ready, under the power and anointing of the Holy Spirit, to work with all those that enter in their seminars with homosexual problems. In fact, that apostolic approach should be rule for all those that enter in Christian churches. 

The answer to prevail over the biased media, the homosexual movement and the Marxist movements is the Holy Spirit. No power on the earth, under the earth or in the spiritual spheres is mightier than the Holy Spirit. 

The Holy Spirit is also the answer for homosexuals who, as Luiz Mott, enter in the seminar in search of spiritual solutions, but they find only liberalism and more homosexuality. The Holy Spirit delivers from the worst homosexual addictions, including sex with boys. 

Actually, by leaving the seminary, Mott saved the Catholic Church from a mega scandal. But if somebody there had helped him to know and experience the Holy Spirit, instead of saying today that Christianity is oppressive, Mott would be testifying that he was delivered from a big oppression. 

Now, who will save him who saved the Catholic Church?

Portuguese version of this article: Luiz Mott livra Igreja Católica de sofrer mega-escândalo de pedofilia

Source: http://lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Leader of Brazil Homosexual Movement Under Investigation for Pedophilia

A Satanic Joke

Brazilian Homosexual Leader Posts Home Addresses of Pro-Family Activists

Brazilian President Will Seek to “Criminalize Words and Acts” against Homosexuality

The lie that got asylum

Brazilian homosexual is granted asylum in the US by putting Brazil in the stranger category of one of the world champions in violence and murders against homosexuals

By Julio Severo

Since 2003, the Lula administration has been promoting and imposing the gay agenda, not only in Brazil, but also in the world. Under Lula, Brazil was the first country to introduce, in 2003, a resolution in the UN classifying homosexuality as an inalienable human right. The same kind of resolution was introduced by the Brazilian government in the Organization of the American States.

Under the Lula administration, there is an increasing political and legal apparatus to scare and gag Brazilian citizens that disagree with the homosexual behavior. Federal campaign “Brazil without Homophobia” requires the government’s pro-homosexuality interference in every sphere of the Brazilian society.

Even so, Brazilian homosexual Augusto Pereira de Souza, 27, was granted asylum by the Barack Obama administration. His allegation? Persecution. He alleged that he cannot return to Brazil because Brazil is one of the most violent countries against homosexuals. In fact, the argument for his asylum request, as “Queerty” blog says, puts Brazil as one of the biggest murderers of homosexuals in the world, “with 180 reported LGBT murders in 2008 alone.”

The biggest propagandist of the numbers of homosexuals murdered in Brazil is Gay Group of Bahia (GGB), whose founder is Luiz Mott, who has been accused of advocating pedophilia. GGB, which was the first major militantly homosexual organization in Brazil, says that between 1980 and 2005 2,511 homosexuals were murdered throughout Brazil. GGB has no doubt: Brazil is the most homophobic nation in the world.

Souza’s defense was made by Suzanne Goldberg, professor at Columbia Law School’s Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic, together with their students. Goldberg used data from GGB to defend asylum for Souza.

According to the Columbia University website, “The grant, issued by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, comes at a time when conditions for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) individuals in Brazil are becoming more dangerous”. Yes, you have read it correctly: Columbia University is saying indeed that under the Lula administration’s strong pro-homosexuality policies, conditions for homosexuals in Brazil are becoming “more dangerous“. With that paranoia coming directly from the Columbia University, we wonder if conditions for homosexuals are becoming “safer” in Iran and Saudi Arabia.

If Brazil became “more dangerous”, so why did not Souza request asylum in Iran or Saudi Arabia?

Between 1980 and 2005, were only homosexuals murdered in Brazil? Official data shows that in that exact period of time over 800,000 men, women and children were murdered in Brazil. Today over 50,000 men, women and children are murdered in Brazil each year.

“Wait one minute”, a homosexual activist could say. “The government says that we are more than 10% of the population. Therefore, the number of murdered homosexuals should be 80,000!”

If the Gay Group of Bahia were the Hetero Group of Bahia, then the reaction would be totally different, “2,511 is a totally homophobic, prejudiced and discriminatory number, because it doesn’t achieve even 1% from 800,000. We demand at least 10% of the share of that high number. We want equality! If the Brazilian population is suffering a high rate of murders, we demand the same right!”

What about the 50,000 Brazilians murdered each year?

“We want 10% of this too. It is our right! We do not accept this homophobic, insignificant and mediocre number of just 180 homosexuals murdered each year!”

I don’t also understand why the number of murdered homosexuals is not larger, because of the dangers they choose to be exposed to. Oswaldo Braga, president of the Gay Movement of Minas, declared that transvestites are most of the murdered homosexuals in Brazil. He said, “They are homosexuals that are more involved in criminality, as prostitution and drug trafficking, being more exposed to violence”. (Tribuna de Minas, 09/03/2007, page 3.)

The number of 800,000 murdered Brazilians shows that Brazil lacks security. And there is a huge need of police patrols. Because of the government favoritism toward the homosexual agenda, will the few patrols available for the population have to be transferred to protect prostitution and drug trafficking zones frequented by homosexuals?

I was born in São Paulo, the same city Souza says that he suffered “persecution”. I remember that 25 years ago a friend and I, who we were very young, were going to the church service. We passed close to the Republic Square — an old homosexual point right in the downtown São Paulo —, and a group of about 6 homosexuals ran after us shouting lascivious words. It was a scary experience for two young men. This kind of bizarre homosexual behavior was common in the Republic Square and, of course, had the potential of attracting violent reactions from those that were not willing to run.

I should fear more than Souza does. Increasingly, shopping centers and other places in Brazil are being shamelessly used as prostitution points — right in the men’s bathrooms. And, maybe for fear, men look and ignore. I have already witnessed homosexuals that, inside of the shopping center bathroom, remain stationed as anal-sex cannibals, looking at each man entering, waiting an attack opportunity. What would happen if I were recognized as Julio Severo in a shopping center bathroom?

Based on data from the Gay Group of Bahia, Columbia University says, “In Brazil, police routinely fail to investigate violence committed against GLBT individuals.”

The Brazilian police have immense difficulty of investigating all the 50,000 murders a year, where heteros are victims. If the US wants to grant asylum to all of the victims of violent crimes in Brazil, the asylum requests will increase by at least 500,000 a year. Why to think that only Brazilian homosexuals are victims of violence and murders in a socialist system where strongly armed criminals are free to attack strongly unarmed victims? The whole Brazilian population is a victim of this cruel system.

While I am writing this article, Brazil has been shaken by the disappearance and murders of six teenagers (Diego, 13; Paulo Victor, 16; George, 17; Divino, 16; Flávio, 14; and Márcio Luiz, 19). The case received national repercussion this week with the arrest of the murderer, Admar de Jesus, a homosexual. He had served a four-year prison sentence for pedophilia in Brasília, but as soon as he was freed, he began to rape and murder boys. There are thousands of Brazilian boys victims of homosexual rapists each year. Will Columbia University fight for them to be granted asylum in the US too?

However, the grant of asylum to Souza may be part of a major political scheme between Brazilian gay activists and their American counterparts — and the presence of the Gay Group of Bahia is evidence of the involved activism. A strong anti-homophobia law has already been passed in the US and Souza’s asylum may give the Obama administration the perfect excuse to press Brazil to approve a law to “protect” homosexuals that up to now Lula and his administration were not able to pass, because of the Christian resistance.

That “protection” will, of course, protect, promote and impose even more the gay agenda in Brazil.

Most of the 800,000 murdered Brazilians were not in prostitution and drug trafficking zones. They also were not entitled to asylum in the US.

But many Brazilian homosexuals prefer to die than leaving their Republic Squares. With the asylum route opened by Souza, they may now have a second option: the “safe” prostitution and drug trafficking zones in the US.

So in a sense Brazil should be very grateful to Columbia University: If all Brazilian homosexuals follow the Souza route, Brazilian boys will nevermore suffer disappearances, rapes and murders by gay rapists, and Brazil will be free from gay activists, their lies and tyranny.

Portuguese version of this article: A mentira que ganhou asilo

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Will the United States become a magnet to attract homosexuals of other countries?  

Asylum for homosexual perverts U.S. policy

Gays, persecution and lies: the eternal soap opera

The day sex between men and boys is no longer offensive

Leader of Brazil Homosexual Movement Under Investigation for Pedophilia

Will the United States become a magnet for foreign homosexuals?

By Peter LaBarbera

Homosexual websites are celebrating that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has granted asylum to 27-year-old Brazilian homosexual Augusto Pereira de Souza, who claims he would face torment and violent attacks if forced to return to his country.

I wonder what would happen if Julio Severo (right), the outspoken Brazilian Christian advocate who fled his country due to escalating oppression against critics of homosexuality, were to apply for applied for U.S. asylum. An article in the “Queerty” blog claims that Brazil is “one of the world’s most violently anti-gay countries … with 180 reported LGBT murders in 2008 alone.” I do not know the accuracy of this information. But here is the problem: already Queerty and other pro-homosexuality activists are citing the case of Souza (whose asylum claim was secured by three students at Columbia Law School’s Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic,” Queerty reports) as good news for Ugandan homosexuals who might want to make similar claims.

Is the United States of America under President Obama going to become the magnet for foreign homosexuals and “queer” activists the world over? AFTAH has condemned draconian punishments against homosexuals (such as “solutions” prescribed by radical Islamists). However, America and the West have no right to impose their decadent, perversion-celebrating values on the rest of the world, and other countries certainly have the right to criminalize homosexual behavior just as it was criminalized in the United States prior to the Supreme Court’s activist Lawrence v. Texas decision. (Anti-sodomy laws remain on the books in many states and laws that do not solely ban homosexual sodomy have NOT been struck down; here is a Wikipedia article which — despite that website’s strong pro-homosexual bias — describes the sodomy law situation in all 50 states.)

Here in America, we realize that sodomy may never be criminalized in San Francisco, where men are allowed to walk the streets fully naked. But if more conservative locales or states choose to do so according to their local community standards, that SHOULD be their prerogative (ditto for legislative attempts to ban abortion or “partial-birth” infanticide). And if liberals are concerned about the death penalty being imposed against homosexuals, and rightly so, they should also be concerned about public policy that promotes homosexual behavior with all its attendant, even life-threatening, consequences.

A good place for America to start “re-criminalizing” would be to ban all bathhouses and sex clubs were sex is allowed to go on in a commercial establishment. “Gay” and straight. See this AFTAH article about ex-”gay” Christian advocate James Hartline’s successful campaign in San Diego to close down a local homosexual bathhouse.

For more on Brazil: go HERE to read a LifeSite article about the socialist Brazilian President’s “hate speech” plans. And go HERE to read Julio Severo’s blog. To subscribe to LifeSiteNews’ daily news feed, go HERE, and to subscribe to OneNewsNow’s daily news brief, go HERE. — Peter LaBarbera, www.americansfortruth.org

Source: Americans for Truth

Asylum for homosexual perverts U.S. policy

Charlie Butts — OneNewsNow

A homosexual from Brazil has been granted asylum in the United States because he fears mistreatment in his home country over his sexual orientation.

According to LifeSiteNews.com, 28-year-old Augusto Pereira de Souza — as a result of the ruling — will be allowed to work and receive Social Security benefits in the U.S., and eventually will be permitted to apply for permanent residency. De Souza had submitted testimony that he had been verbally harassed by a policeman and, on a separate occasion, been chased by “skinheads” who were armed with baseball bats.

Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality finds the case astounding because Brazil, he notes, is one of the most pro-homosexual countries on the map. He says Christians are the target of animosity in Brazil if they speak out against homosexuality.

“I happen to have a friend, Julio Severo, who left Brazil in fear for being prosecuted as a Christian under the anti-homophobia mechanisms that are being set up in that country,” he explains.

The Americans for Truth spokesman admits he finds it hard to believe that de Souza had anything to fear in Brazil over his choice in favor of homosexuality.

“It’s not becoming a friendly place for people who believe homosexuality is wrong,” he says, “and so this is just preposterous that the United States is accepting a Brazilian homosexual on that basis.”

LaBarbera adds that since Brazil is becoming “a homosexual dream country,” it is a perversion of U.S. asylum policies to grant Brazilian homosexuals the privilege of coming to America over fears of persecution for their lifestyle.

Source: OneNewsNow     

Divulgation: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Homosexual Brazilian Gets Asylum in US After Claiming 'Persecution'

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent

SAO PAULO, April 1, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A homosexual man from the city of São Paulo has been granted asylum in the U.S. after claiming he suffered "persecution" in Brazil for his homosexuality.

As a consequence of the ruling, Augusto Pereira de Souza, 28, will enjoy the right to work and receive social security benefits in the United States, and will soon be able to apply for permanent residency, according to the Terra news service.

The verdict was rendered despite the fact that Brazil has one of the most homosexualist governments in the world.

The Brazilian government funds the world's largest "gay parade" (http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/may/08052806.html) in Pereira's home town of São Paulo every year, and operates a massive national campaign called "Brazil Without Homophobia." 

The government has also announced that it will censor all programming (http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/may/09051502.html), including religious programming, in which negative opinions of homosexuality are expressed.

Homosexuals are also allowed to adopt children (http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/nov/06112402.html).

Pereira de Souza was awarded asylum after submitting testimony that he had suffered verbal harassment from a policeman on one occasion, and was chased by "skinheads" in a park armed with baseball bats on another occasion, although he admits that he was not actually hit by any of them.

Source: http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/viewonsite.html?articleid=10040116

Divulgation: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Brazilian Couple Receive Criminal Conviction for Homeschooling

Verdict given despite sons passing law school entrance exams -- at ages 13 and 14

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent

MINAS GERAIS, BRAZIL, March 26, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Despite the fact that his children passed difficult government imposed tests, and even qualified for law school at the ages of 13 and 14, homeschooler Cleber Nunes and his wife Bernadeth have been slapped with fines equivalent to a total of $3,200 for refusing to submit their children to the Brazilian school system.

However, Nunes told LifeSiteNews.com (LSN) that he has no intention to pay the fine, although he says that he might have to spend 15-30 days in jail if he does not.

Although homeschooling is common in many countries, including the United States, and is associated with higher levels of academic achievement, it is completely prohibited in Brazil, the government of which has become increasingly intrusive in recent decades following the establishment of a socialist regime in the 1990s.

Since Nunes began to homeschool his two oldest children four years ago, his family has been subject to repeated threats of fines, imprisonment, and loss of custody.  However, he has resisted steadfastly and his case has gained national attention.

The guilty verdict in the criminal case against Nunes, which follows two negative verdicts in a parallel civil case that ended over a year ago, was given despite the fact that David and Jonatas Nunes had passed a difficult set of tests imposed by the criminal court.

"They had asked the kids to do the tests to check their level of knowledge, and also psychological tests to check their mental health," Nunes told LifeSiteNews (LSN).  "It seems that the only valid result they expected was the failure of the kids."

The tests imposed by the court on Nunes' children were so difficult that one of the teachers who had designed it reportedly admitted that she herself could not pass it.  However, David and Jonatas Nunes both passed the exams by margins of five and eight percentage points.

Despite his sons' performance, however, the government has again ruled against Nunes, this time in criminal court, and ordered a fine.  The total amount in fines owed by Nunes as a result of the decisions against him has mounted to over $3,200 in US dollars.

"If they impose tests it means that two possibilities should be considered.  They could be suffering intellectual abandonment, or not," Nunes told LSN.  "In other words, they were trying to prove they were victims. But they passed and they kept saying we were criminal."

Nunes says that despite his success, the judge ruled against him because of his style of home schooling, in which the children direct their own learning, with Nunes overseeing the process.

"The judge said we left the children to learn by themselves," said Nunes.  "He recognized that they passed the university entrance examination and the tests, but said that it was by their own efforts," he added, calling that a "joke."

"They want to take control of them, of their minds"

Nunes says he has decided not to appeal the ruling, because Brazil's Supreme Court has already refused to hear the appeal of his civil case.  Although he has paid his wife's fine to spare her jail time, he says he will not pay his own fine.

"The natural thing to do is appeal, but I don't trust the Brazilian judges," Nunes told LSN. "They already showed who they are and what they want. They are not interested in protecting our kids....They want to take control of them, of their minds, they want them out of their home."

Although he has refused to comply with the rulings against him, Nunes currently faces no more legal difficulties stemming from the homeschooling of David and Jonatas, because they are now beyond the age of mandatory schooling.

However, his daughter could soon be subject to compulsory schooling in Brazil.  She will soon turn four, the age at which compulsory schooling begins in Brazil.

Contact Information:

Cleber Nunes (he speaks English) can be contacted at: cleber@andradenunes.org

To contact the Brazilian Embassy:

Embassy of Brazil in the USA

3006 Massachusetts Avenue, NW

Washington, DC

20008-3634

Phone: (202) 238-2700

Fax: (202) 238-2827

Email: ambassador@brasilemb.org

Embassy of Brazil in Canada

450 Wilbrod Street

Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6M8

Phone: (613) 237-1090 or (613) 755-5160

Fax: (613) 237-6144

E-mail: mailbox@brasembottawa.org

Embassies of Brazil to other Nations: http://www.embassyworld.com/embassy/Brazil/Brazil1.html

Previous LifeSiteNews coverage:

Homeschooling Showdown in Brazil: Children to be Tested by Court in Battle Over Educational Rights of Parents

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/aug/08081802.html

Shock: Brazilian Homeschooling Parents Face Arrest Even after Early-Teen Sons Pass Law School Exams

Family appeals case to Brazilian Supreme Court

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/apr/09040112.html

Brazilian Court Convicts Homeschooling Family Despite Evidence of Success

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/dec/08122308.html

Brazilian Homeschoolers Score Surprise Victory in Showdown Against Government

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/sep/08090207.html

Brazilian Homeschool Couple May be Jailed if Their Children Fail Harsh Government Tests

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/aug/08082207.html

Homeschooling Showdown in Brazil: Children to be Tested by Court in Battle Over Educational Rights of Parents

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/aug/08081802.html

Brazilian Government Prosecutes Homeschooling Family, Threatens to Remove Children

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/mar/08030610.html

Source: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/mar/10032601.html

Divulgation: http://lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com/

Lula humiliates Israel 

Brazilian president refuses to lay down flowers on the grave of the founder of the modern State of Israel 

By Julio Severo 

I wonder what would happen if, in visit to Brazil, an Israeli government official declared in the Brazilian Congress gaffes humiliating Brazil. 

Israelis would not be capable of that discourtesy. They are so polite and civilized that they allowed Lula, as a demonstration of affection for the Brazilian people that represents a large portion of the tourists visiting Israel, to make his speech in the Parliament of Israel. 

No retribution for the affection. Lula took advantage of the opportunity to criticize Israel. 

That was the only visit that Lula made to Israel. That, in fact, was the only visit that a Brazilian president made to Israel. The marks left are of a sickly ideology — which tolerates everything that communist Cuba does against her own people, but criticizes Israel for defending her people and her land. 

As if it were little humiliating for a foreign president to humiliate Israel in her own Parliament, Lula went beyond. He refused to do what all of the presidents that visit Israel do: to lay down flowers in Theodor Herzl’s grave, considered the founder of the modern State of Israel. 

Evidently, Lula must have been aghast, because different from his friend Fidel Castro, who has his hands dirty of innocent blood, and different from many of his own assistants, linked to communist terrorist groups that shed innocent blood in the past, Theodor Herzl had never shed blood of anybody. 

Don’t ask him what he thinks about Herzl having the idea of helping the State of Israel get up from the debris of History… 

Today, Lula laid flowers in Yasser Arafat’s grave, considered the founder of the modern State of Palestine, established in Israeli lands. He did it as a demonstration of his respect and affection.

Very different from Herzl, the hands, the feet, the head and everything else of Arafat are dirty of blood. In his terrorist attacks, Arafat didn’t spare anybody, even children in school buses, which were exploded by the bombs of the terrorist group PLO, founded by Arafat. 

However, Lula knows how to dissimulate. In Israel he visited the Museum of the Holocaust, laid down flowers and said: “Never more, never more, never more!” Two months from now, he will be visiting Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, which denies the Holocaust, “What never more, comrade Lula? That never happened!”

Ahmadinejad wants at all costs to make nuclear weapons. And he makes no secret of his objective: To destroy Israel. To kill Jews. 

In Lula’s agenda, there is not any speech in the Parliament of Iran criticizing Ahmadinejad or the bomb to destroy Israel. They are friends, and friends deserve respect and affection. Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez are witnesses of the fidelity to Lula to his friends. 

If in his several visits to Cuba Lula never criticized the Cuban government, why would he make that now to comrade Ahmadinejad? 

If Ahmadinejad is able to fulfill his dreams, Lula will have the opportunity to dissimulate again and lay flowers in the 2nd Museum of the Holocaust, which will have to be built away from the lands of Israel, which will be then polluted by a strong radioactivity. 

Lula will repeat again, “Never more, never more, never more!” And Ahmadinejad will join him, adding, “Israel never more, never more! Israel never more, never more!”

Portuguese version of this article: Lula humilha Israel

Spanish version of this article: Lula humilla a Israel

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Lula, the meddler  

What every Christian should know about Israel

Lula, the meddler 

Cuba, Israel and the forsaken black 

By Julio Severo 

No, the Fidel Castro dictatorship has never considered Lula a meddler. In fact, in his recent visit to Cuba, Brazilian president Lula preferred not to defend a black that, after years of unjustified prison and torture, also died from a hunger strike. Lula had no pity and mercy on him. After all, he was guilty of a horrible crime: to disagree with the Cuban communist paradise. Have you already seen crime worse than that? 

Additionally, it was a mistake — in Lula’s modest opinion — for the man to appeal to a hunger strike, stopping eating the beggar ration kindly granted by the Cuban government. The correct thing was for him to remain alive to keep suffering tortures. In the past, Cuba used the paredón a lot, but probably because of the shortage of bullets, tortures are more economical. However it may appear bad, the Cuban striker just was one of the dozens of thousands of innocent men annihilated by the Cuban government, which only wants the “well-being” of its own people.

Evidently, if Lula were not socialist, the socialist media would never forgive him, “Racist Lula! False human rights advocate!” But his friendship with Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez guarantees immediate and automatic pardon and closed eyes by the press, which don’t also care about blacks and others that perish under communist governments.

Blacks and other minorities are very useful for the socialist ideology, but they are disposable when they riot against the slavery imposed by socialist governments on their populations. This is why Lula took the decision of not interfering in the Cuban “internal affairs”. 

The case of the wretched Cuban black didn’t move black-rights Brazilian activists, nor did it lead them to yell complaints against the alleged supreme benefactor of their cause in the Brazilian presidency. After all, Lula has the zealous commitment of supporting Castro’s communist cause and the black militants’ cause, providing that they don’t interfere in the supreme cause — “May Karl Marx’s kingdom come. May his will be done!” 

In Lula’s utopian socialist vision, Fidel Castro and his government are victims of the tyranny of the free speech from Cuban citizens that refuse to see the benefits of a life subdued under the socialist collar. Real oppression is a government suffering resistance by a stupid people against the “sovereign right” of the State of controlling citizens by any means. For Lula, that is the worst kind of oppression. So, what if he thought the black’s death in the rotten communist prison was the death of one more “oppressor” against the wonderful liberating forces of the secular State?

So far as it depends on Lula and Castro, every anti-socialism citizen should make a permanent hunger strike, without any right to breaks.

Undeniable admirer of the gay agenda, Lula would have just a paraphrased saying by Oscar Wilde to blacks, Christians and others oppressed by Castro’s paradise, “The best way to defeat the Castro communism is surrendering to it!” 

Lula would apply that saying to many other examples. 

However, he would never do that to Israel.

The Brazilian government, which has been systematically voting against Israel in the UN Security Council since Lula took office in 2003, has never condemned the most severe human-rights violations in Sudan, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, etc., where hundreds of thousands of Christians have been tortured and murdered. Philosophy of Lula: For friends, everything. For “enemies”, nothing.

If the poor black were Palestinian and he had been victim of Israel, Lula would certainly appeal for more drastic reactions. (“Hey, comrade Ahmadinejad, why so much delay? Are you going or not to make the bomb?”) 

Certainly, Lula would never be silent on a Palestinian black’s death. But because the poor black “chose” to be victim of Lula’s Cuban friend, the only solution was the hunger death indeed. 

Now, Lula is visiting Israel and Palestinians in the Jewish territories occupied by them. Ah, at last, the man recognized — after almost one decade visiting the countries enemies of Israel without touching the land of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob — that he also needs to travel at least once to Israel. 

It is not a courtesy visit, although Shimon Perez, the president of Israel, is as socialist as Lula. Actually, the Brazilian president hopes to obtain in some way the position of a peace “mediator” between Israelis and Palestinians. He wants, in short, a significant role in the international pressures that want to force Jews to hand over to the Palestinian Arabs half of the land God gave in promise to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. 

Hey, don’t judge Lula. He does it because he has no faith in God and his promises. Is there free will, isn’t there? Everybody has a right to fight against what God promises. Lula is just exercising his right of secular interference in the internal affairs of Israel. In addition, he just wants to change the Brazilian scale, where crowds of evangelical Brazilians visit Israel yearly as a gesture of support to the Jewish people. 

Lula’s visit represents the shadiest side of Brazil. He will be representing Brazilians that don’t accept by any means the alliance of God with the Jewish people. 

I am not sure what can happen to a man that wants to be a meddler right in the middle of an issue that God have already fully decided. The land of Israel has already been handed over. That decision, which is final, came from God, not man. If Lula wants to give lands to Palestinians, let him give his personal properties. 

However, I know what could have happened if Lula had used his gift of meddling between Fidel Castro and a poor dark-skinned Cuban subject. Yet, nobody defended the man, who died in a horrible way. Lula was there, in his comfortable presidential skybox, watching, with popcorn and coke (euphemism for rum) in his hands, the last minutes of a lonely Cuban citizen’s show against communist tyranny. In the end: unhappy end — for the black. At least, Lula was able to consume his popcorn and coke. 

In the case of Israel, Lula’s pretension of being a “peace mediator” between Israelis and Palestinian is just an euphemism for “meddler”, a term that according to the Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) means, “One who meddles; one who interferes or busies himself with things in which he has no concern; an officious person; a busybody”.

Before dictators, Lula’s necessary interference disappears while the oppressed die. Hundreds of thousands of tortured and murdered Christians in Sudan, Cuba, Iran and North Korea do not appear to have some effect on Lula’s conscience (or conscienceless).

Before God and his promises, Lula, with his nose in the air, says, “Nobody will hold me back from entering in this issue! I do what I please and I travel where I want with the money from my subjects!” 

In the trip agenda of Lula this year, there is also a scheduled visit to the president of Iran, comrade Ahmadinejad, who is always promising to destroy Israel and Jews.

Would Lula be able to consider paying a visit to Ahmadinejad or calling him a friend if the Islamic leader had promised to destroy dictators Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez?

Chavez is a friend of Ahmadinejad, and both have friendship with Lula. Both also support terrorist groups against Israel.

Yet, you will see who will prevail in the end. 

I only fear for Brazil, because although Lula has a right of playing the role of comrade of the anti-Israel and anti-Jewish modern Haman, a whole nation may suffer the consequences from a bibacious and irresponsible man’s decisions.

Portuguese version of this article: Lula, o intrometido

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

What every Christian should know about Israel

Socialism, Islam and Hell

Muslim suicides surpassed by Protestant and Jewish suicides

Brazil’s Lula, the friend of Iran’s Ahmadinejad

Iran, hatred of Jews and the schizophrenic Lula administration

World amazed by unprecedented address by President Lula at the UN Human Rights Council

The cost of the high popularity of Lula

The great Brazilian miracle