After Pressure, Google Restores Blog Julio Severo in Portuguese

By Julio Severo

With no explanation or notification, Google made my blog in Portuguese (http://juliosevero.blogspot.com/) disappear in the first minutes of Thursday, October 23.

After 24 hours of pressure from international readers, with no notification, Google made my blog reappear.

People in Brazil and other nations began to question Google in social networks and also by contacting the company: “Why to suspend Blog Julio Severo in Portuguese on the height of the Brazilian presidential elections in the exact time Severo published an article instructing the Brazilian public that both candidates support the gay agenda?”

One of the many pressures came from Rev. Alberto Thieme, who contacted Google headquarters and Google in Brazil.

Ultimately, the company explained to him that probably my blog “was found to violate Blogger’s policies.” What violation? No explanation.

Hours later, with no explanation, Google restored my blog.

International Pressure

The only explanation is massive pressure. Even in Italy people protested the Google censorship against my blog, in an Italian article entitled “Google censura un sito prolife: siamo in campagna elettorale!” (Google censors pro-life website in the height of the electoral campaign!)

Rev. Michael S. Heath, Helping Hands Ministry, U.S., commented to my blog:

“This morning I read Newsweek magazine's excerpt from Julian Assange’s new book, ‘When Google Met Wikileaks.’ The article concludes, ‘If the future of the Internet is to be Google, that should be of serious concern to people all over the world—in Latin America, East and Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa, the former Soviet Union and even in Europe—for whom the Internet embodies the promise of an alternative to U.S. cultural, economic, and strategic hegemony.  A “don’t be evil” empire is still an empire.’ While Google’s decision to shut Julio’s blog yesterday suggests that the empire’s Force may indeed be evil, it is most certainly gay. Other than responding to complaints from sodomites why would Google have had any interest in turning off the blog?  Julio is an honest broker of information critical of America’s global effort to normalize sodomy.  I suspect his blog would be ignored by America’s force-channeling Yodas at Google, were it not for his relentless patriotic defense of family, faith and freedom.”

The last time my blog was shut down was in 2007, when many people, including philosopher Olavo de Carvalho and a federal prosecutor, took action, Olavo denouncing, and the prosecutor getting in contact with Google. In that time, Google told the prosecutor that my blog promoted hate and discrimination against homosexual activists. He answered them that he had never seen any of it in my articles. Before this Brazilian official, Google gave way and restored my blog to me.

In 2008, under pressure from homosexual groups, Brazilian federal prosecutors requested Google to shut down my blog for “homophobia.” Google’s official answer was that because Brazil has no anti-“homophobia,” they could not block my blog. Only after such law is passed, Google will be free to comply and definitively shut it down. (I had access to the exchange between Google and federal prosecutors through a Brazilian attorney.)

People vs. Big Government and Big Business

Of course, Google prefers to side with the gay agenda. But even with all is power, money and influence, it knows that most people reject homosexuality. A leftist polling institute in Brazil found five years ago that “99% of Brazilian citizens were ‘homophobic,’ and therefore should be reeducated.”

Conversely, perhaps 99% of the Brazilian socialist government and Google are homosexualist.

So the “homophobia” issue is People versus Big Government and Big Business.

I have successfully resisted, for years, Big Government and its steamroller against Christians who oppose homosexual perversions and dictatorship.

But the homosexualist steamroller from Big Business poses another big threat. In 2011, PayPal closed my account definitively, after an international campaign by AllOut, a U.S. homosexualist organization intent on persecuting Christians. In a communication to AllOut, PayPal explained that they closed my account because “We take very seriously any cases where a user has incited hatred, violence or intolerance because of a person’s sexual orientation”.

Now, I can no longer receive donations from my international friends through PayPal.

In a listing of the top ten anti-Christian acts in 2011, the Christian Anti-Defamation Commission ranked the gay pressure on PayPal as fourth top anti-Christian act, as reported by Charisma magazine.

Covering my case, WorldNetDaily run the headline: “PayPal blacklists Christian writer.”

Google and Free Speech

About the hard times of my blog in Google, I began to use its service in 2005, because Google had chosen freely to offer to the international public a free speech platform. So I do not need to respect Google’s homosexual views and Google does not need to respect my Christian views. But Google needs to respect its own free speech advocacy.

If Google thinks that free speech is a threat to the homosexual agenda, it should ban free speech and be honest to the international community: “Our Blogspot service is available only to the supporters of the gay agenda.”

Google services should be clear: “We do not accept Christian users from Brazil, U.S., Russia, Uganda, etc.”

It is known that many of my articles do not please everybody — especially socialists, pro-abortion and pro-homosexuality activists and other antifamily militants. But freedom for dissenting voices is a part of democracy.

Voting Freedom

My latest Portuguese article, which had supposedly provoked the shutdown of my blog, was about the Brazilian presidential elections that will happen next Sunday. I have supported no candidate, because they promote the gay agenda, viewed by Christians as anti-family.

Even in this inflamed season of Brazilian elections, I have a right to speak out against the two candidates, and this right should not be violated for the benefit of the parties and candidates who were criticized with adequate civility.

Many Brazilians have chosen to vote for Dilma Rousseff (an anti-U.S. socialist, but only in economic, not moral, aspects) or Aécio Neves (a pro-U.S. socialist in everything, both economically and morally), but both are radically pro-gay agenda.

While Brazilians, who are obliged to vote by Brazilian antidemocratic laws, will make their political choices based only on economy, I have made my choice not to vote, based on the intent by both candidates to disfigure, for the benefit of the gay agenda, family, which is, before the State, the first institution established by God. Therefore, family has precedence and absolute priority over the State and economy. It is based on this absolute priority that I reject both Brazilian candidates.

Portuguese version of this article: Depois de pressão, Google restaura Blog Julio Severo

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Another article about the Brazilian election:

Blog Julio Severo in Portuguese arbitrarily shut down by Google in Brazil

Inflamed by American Prophecy, Brazilian Evangelicals Want a Woman for Brazil Presidency

US wants to combat anti-homosexuality movement worldwide

“Study” in the Brazilian newspaper O Globo: 99% Brazilians do not accept homosexuality

PayPal implicated in criminal activity

Gay Pressure on PayPal Named as Fourth Top Anti-Christian Act of 2011

PayPal blacklists Julio Severo

My strange visitors: United States Army Information System Command headquarters visiting my pro-family blog?

Homeland Security surveillance detected on Julio Severo’s website

The power of a single blogger and his faith: the story of Julio Severo and his fight against anti-“homophobia” bills in Brazil

World’s biggest gay magazine and Julio Severo

A Gulag of Your Own Making

State-Sanctioned Homosexuality Causes More Harm

Catholic TV on PayPal vs. Julio Severo

Blog Julio Severo in Portuguese arbitrarily shut down by Google in Brazil

By Julio Severo

In the first minutes of Thursday, October 23, Blog Julio Severo, established by me, Julio Severo, in 2005 to reach Brazilians with information usually unavailable to them, disappeared from the Internet, with no hacking attack involved. All that was evident, from my careful verification, is that such disappearing was provoked and decided by the owner of the Blogspot service, Google, which freely offers to the international public a free speech platform.

The traditional address of my Portuguese blog is: http://juliosevero.blogspot.com/

The address is now completely off-line, with no approval from me or communication from Google. I have never been notified about some alleged violent or pornographic post that might have caused Google to suspend my blog for supposedly violating its policies. Now, only my blogs in other languages, including English, continue active.

So I ask the public to get in contact with Google to reestablish my Portuguese blog, which has a history of about ten years in Brazil.

It is known that many of my articles do not please everybody — especially socialists, pro-abortion and pro-homosexuality activists and other antifamily militants. But freedom for dissenting voices is part of democracy.

My latest Portuguese article, which may supposedly have provoked the shutdown of my blog, was about the Brazilian presidential elections that will happen next Sunday. I have supported no candidate, because they promote the gay agenda, viewed by Christians as anti-family.

Even in this inflamed season of Brazilian elections, I have a right to speak out against the two candidates, and this right should not be violated for the benefit of the parties and candidates who were criticized with adequate civility.

Many Brazilians have chosen to vote for Dilma Rousseff (an anti-U.S. socialist, but only in economic, not moral, aspects) or Aécio Neves (a pro-U.S. socialist in everything, both economically and morally), but both are radically pro-gay agenda.

While Brazilians, who are obliged to vote by Brazilian antidemocratic laws, will make their political choices based only on economy, I have made my choice not to vote, based on the intent by both candidates to disfigure, for the benefit of the gay agenda, family, which is, before the State, the first institution established by God. Therefore, family has precedence and absolute priority over the State and economy. It is based on this absolute priority that I reject both Brazilian candidates.

The Brazilian presidential election will happen next Sunday, and the voice of my blog, which offered a glimpse of information in the thick darkness of the Brazilian antifamily politics, has been silenced by force, leaving the Brazilian public with no access to a Christian viewpoint that does not support any of the anti-U.S. and pro-U.S. pro-sodomy candidates.

The last time my blog was shut down was in 2007, when many people, including philosopher Olavo de Carvalho and a federal prosecutor, took action, Olavo denouncing, and the prosecutor getting in contact with Google. In that time, Google told the prosecutor that my blog promoted hate and discrimination against homosexual activists. He answered them that he had never seen any of it in my articles. Before this Brazilian official, Google gave way and returned my blog to me.

How could you help now?

1. Spread this alert.

2. Get in contact with Google. Here is its contact address:

Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
USA
Phone: +1 650 253 0000
Fax: +1 650 253 0001

http://www.google.com/intl/en-US/contact/

3. Let the public know about the violation of the free speech rights of Julio Severo.

4. Get in touch with officials who could intervene.

Today, it is my right being arbitrarily violated. Tomorrow, others’ rights, including yours.

I ask your involvement so that I may, as I have always done, keep supplying, with no charge, the Brazilian public with information that is mostly unavailable in Portuguese.

If you have suggestions or assistance, here is my contact email: juliosevero@outlook.com

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Another article about the Brazilian election:

Inflamed by American Prophecy, Brazilian Evangelicals Want a Woman for Brazil Presidency

Christian Persecution Follows US, UK and France in Kosovo, Libya, Iraq and Syria

Murad Makhmudov and Lee Jay Walker

Modern Tokyo Times

Recent interventions by America, France and the United Kingdom equates to Christian persecution and enormous instability. This reality would appear to be a constant Western policy because the same scenario keeps on happening. Of course, in terms of numbers then Muslims have been killed in vast numbers based on sectarianism and political motives. However, for minority Christian communities in Kosovo, Libya, Iraq and Syria it is clear that Western meddling is creating a nightmare for Christians.

Indeed, it is ironic that in Syria it is the mainly Muslim members of the armed forces that are protecting Christians from brutal Takfiri sectarians, Islamist terrorist groups and an array of mercenaries. Like usual, these brutal forces in Syria are being supported by America, France and the United Kingdom based on Gulf petrodollars and the intrigues of Turkey. Therefore, even when opposition terrorist and sectarian forces kidnap Christian nuns, attack churches and threaten to cleanse the Christian minority this doesn’t worry America, France and the United Kingdom. Instead, these three Western powers just prepare more spin and hide behind language. Yet all three nations know what happened in Kosovo, Libya and Iraq.

The latest massacre against Christians happened in Libya whereby seven Egyptian Christians have been executed by suspected Islamists. Of course, during the rule of Colonel Gaddafi in Libya the Christian community wasn’t singled out. However, Western and Gulf powers utilized terrorists and mercenaries in order to defeat Gaddafi in Libya therefore not surprisingly today this nation faces growing Islamist militancy.

In Kosovo after the ending of this conflict it is clear that many Orthodox Christian have been killed, churches destroyed and many Christian areas have been written off the map. Indeed, even today Orthodox Christians can’t fully travel around Kosovo because of the fear of being attacked. Also, many ancient Orthodox Christian monuments have been destroyed and now the indigenous Orthodox Christian community resides in ghettoes in Kosovo.

In Iraq it is clear that Saddam Hussein was both anti-Shia and anti-Kurd but Christians did not face persecution under his watch. Yet when Iraq was invaded then soon this would be followed by sectarianism, terrorism and anti-Christian attacks. This reality led to the majority of Christians fleeing their homeland because at no time were the various Christian communities deemed to be worthy of being protected by Western troops. Instead, just like the Orthodox Christians of Kosovo, the Christians of Iraq would soon be in disarray after being abandoned by allied forces based on the political whims of Western political elites in America and the United Kingdom.

The government of Syria is now fighting for its survival therefore the various Christian communities fear another Iraq.  At the moment, Christians can still worship freely in Syrian government controlled areas. Yet, in areas under various terrorist and Takfiri groups, it is clear that Christians are being pressured to convert to Islam, cleansed, murdered and other barbaric realities. Despite this, political elites in America, France and the United Kingdom are supporting feudal Gulf nations and the whims of Turkey. Therefore, the survival of Christianity currently depends on the government of Syria because clearly the majority of Christians will flee if Western and Gulf sectarian backed terrorists win.

In Libya the recent brutal execution of seven Egyptian Christians is following the same pattern.  Fox News in January 2014 says: “Libya’s Coptic Christians, who number about 300,000, or 5 percent of the population, were allowed to practice their faith under dictator Muammar Qaddafi. But since the strongman was ousted from power, and ultimately killed, Muslim fundamentalists have increasingly filled the power void. Last month, the national assembly voted in favor of making Koranic law, or Shariah, the basis of all legislative decisions, meaning Islam will shape all future banking, criminal and financial cases.”

Further down in the same article Fox News says: “The emerging political and legal system’s orientation, combined with the rise of militants in the oil-rich nation, has left Christians feeling like the promise of democracy in the wake of Qaddafi’s fall has been broken.”

The massacre of Egyptian Christians in Libya sums up the usual realities following on from the meddling of America, France and the United Kingdom. Can this reality in Kosovo, Iraq, Libya and Syria be a coincidence — or, does it mean that an anti-Christian agenda is at the heart of major Western powers? The East Timorese witnessed the same reality just like the Biafrans in Nigeria. Likewise, today Papuans in West Papua face Islamization and Javanization in Indonesia but Western powers care little. It would appear that Christians are expendable when it comes to geopolitical concerns and appeasing the anti-Christian and anti-Shia state of Saudi Arabia.

Orthodox Christians fear to walk openly in Kosovo despite this land being the cradle of Serbian Orthodox Christianity. Likewise, Christians fear to walk in Libya, Iraq and Syria because of the meddling of Western powers.

Source: Modern Tokyo Times, via Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Confirmed: U.S. Chief Facilitator of Christian Persecution

Why Does Christian Persecution Get Worse In Every Country The U.S. “Liberates”?

ISIS Praises John McCain For Helping Them Invade Iraq

Presbyterian Church USA Criticizes Israel, Ignores Christian Persecution

Interview with Don Hank: Interpreting What is Happening in the U.S., Europe and Russia today

Main threat to U.S., Russia: Radical Islam, not each other

Religious Freedom Advocate: Saudi royal family will not allow Obama to defeat Sunni ISIL militants

Why do we hate Putin more than Islamic terrorists?

Blowback! U.S. trained Islamists who joined ISIS

Tom Parker: the Biggest Threat to Abortion in this Generation, According to Pro-Abortion Critic

By Julio Severo

Pro-abortion activist Nina Martin has labeled an Alabama judge as a man who “has figured out how to dismantle Roe v. Wade.”

In her piece in New Republic, she also said, “Tom Parker’s writings fuel the biggest threat to abortion rights in a generation.”

Yet, before nailing him to her cross, she points his “malevolent” credentials.

She says that in 2005, Justice Parker spoke to a group of homeschool students at a retreat of the Witherspoon School of Law and Public Policy. She proved that Witherspoon was a project of Vision Forum, a Texas-based Christian ministry.

Driven by the same motivation, she could disqualify the U.S. Constitution by proving the Christian connections of each of its framers.

She also thinks that Parker is not fit because he supported the Ten Commandments monument in the Alabama Supreme Court building.

She then quoted an “abominable” statement by him: “The very God of Holy Scriptures, the Creator, is the source of law, life, and liberty.”

What did she expect from a judge of a nation whose founders were Christian? If she wanted Parker to praise abortion, she should show him George Washington and other original Americans defending baby-killing.

Justice Tom Parker

Other Parker’s statements that annoyed her:

“It’s the judges who have legalized abortion and homosexuality ... They are shaking the very foundation of our society.”

“We have to stand for what’s right.”

“Because God, not the state, has granted parents the authority and responsibility to govern their children, parents should be able to do so unfettered by state interference.”

Parker’s words remind original Americans’ words, including Washington’s. If Nina wanted to hear what they would say today, Parker is the answer. But if Nina were to return to that time, they would surely ask her: “Are you sure that you are an American? All of us here are Christian, pro-life and pro-family.”

What is most annoying about Parker to Nina is what she calls “his relentless campaign to undermine legal abortion.” She complains, “He argues for full legal status for the unborn.”

She added an opinion of Justice Harry Blackmun: “If this suggestion of personhood is established, [Roe’s] case, of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed.”

Parker believes that an unborn baby is entitled to life, as just original Americans did. But Nina is completely angry about Christianity and its pro-life values in America.

While the right to life of unborn babies is not recognized, more than one million of them are murdered in legal abortions in the United States every year under Roe v. Wade, a law that protects baby killing and their killers since 1973.

Again, Nina complains: “Step by step, Parker lays out his evidence: laws that give inheritance rights to unborn children, laws that ban pregnant inmates from being executed, laws that give fetuses legal guardians for the purposes of protecting their interests, laws that allow parents to sue for damages if fetuses are injured or killed as the result of negligence or some other wrongful act.”

Nina adds a comment by Parker: “Today, the only major area in which unborn children are denied legal protection is abortion and that denial is only because of the dictates of Roe.”

“What Justice Parker has done,” said Lynn Paltrow, executive director of the nonprofit National Advocates for Pregnant Women, “is explicitly lay out the roadmap for overturning Roe v. Wade.”

Parker has called on the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve the matter of full rights for the unborn babies once and for all.

Pro-abortion advocates, including Nina, are deeply worried about Parker’s writings influencing the justices in Washington.

Nina Martin has correctly identified the Alabama judge as the best chance for the U.S. pro-family movement to defeat Roe v. Wade.

It seems a too big challenge: Tom Parker facing the legal Goliath and his pro-abortion armies.

Yet, did not God use a young man called David to defeat a giant called Goliath in the past?

He is the same today.

This article was based on Nina Martin’s piece “This Alabama Judge Has Figured Out How to Dismantle Roe v. Wade Tom Parker's writings fuel the biggest threat to abortion rights in a generation.”

Portuguese version of this article: Tom Parker: A maior ameaça à agenda do aborto nos EUA, de acordo com escritora pró-aborto

Source: Last Days Watchman

Other articles on Justice Tom Parker:

Alabama Supreme Court Opinion Rules that “Child” Includes “Unborn Child”

US Supreme Court Genocidal Law Confronted by Major Pro-Life Decision of Alabama Supreme Court

Inflamed by American Prophecy, Brazilian Evangelicals Want a Woman for Brazil Presidency

By Julio Severo

The most important events for Brazil in 2014 are the World Cup — where the Brazilian team suffered its worst and most shameful defeat in such football event — and the presidential election.

Prophecy said Brazil would win the World Cup

From a rational standpoint, the election will bring another shameful defeat, because the main contenders — incumbent Dilma Rousseff and Marina Silva and Aécio Neves — are socialists. This week, these three major candidates have, joined by homosexual activists and federal prosecutors, condemned and attacked Levy Fidelix, a Catholic candidate with minimal chance to win the election. Fidelix was accused of “homophobia” after defending that homosexual relations are dirty and that a homosexual couple is never a family.

Yet, Brazilian evangelicals, stirred up by a prophecy of an American minister, have massively backed Marina Silva for president. In a tour of conferences in Brazil in 2011, Bob Hazlett prophesied:

“I heard the Lord say that even in the next two years ‘I will begin to raise up women in power in this nation and I am going to put a woman with the Spirit of God within her, who will kneel before Me, like Esther knelt before the king, because I am removing the Mordecai spirit that tries to controls the women in this nation and I am going to raise up a woman after My heart and I am going to shake this nation, but I am going to lead this nation to a season of prosperity even though other nations are in crisis. I am going to release Christ in this nation.’”

This prophecy made headlines in August in GospelPrime and GospelMais, the two main Protestant websites in Brazil, after a mysterious plane crash killed Brazilian presidential candidate Eduardo Campos, of the Brazilian Socialist Party. Marina was his vice and, with his death, she became the presidential candidate of the Brazilian Socialist Party.

In this point, Marina grabbed international headlines too, including in Reuters and Associated Press.

You can watch Hazlett’s prophecies here: http://youtu.be/3BhbUiOPTGs

According to investigative journalist Wayne Madsen, the plane crash was an operation of the Obama CIA to help Marina get the presidential candidacy.

The Obama opposition to incumbent Dilma Rousseff is explained by the fact that she is a socialist who is anti-U.S. economic interests. For example, in her administration Brazil is a member of BRICS, which wants to de-dollarize trade affairs, which would potentially be a disaster for the U.S. economy. In contrast, Marina Silva — who, according to Madsen, is a George Soros puppet —, is a socialist who is pro-U.S. economic interests.

Apparently, these socialist differences affect only economic issues, because the U.S. gave full support to a Brazil-sponsored homosexual resolution approved in the U.N. last week.

I am sure that God can see these and many other political maneuvers by anti-U.S. or pro-U.S. socialists. But many Brazilian evangelicals are backing Marina because they are blindly following Bob Hazlett’s prophecy.

I want in no way to disqualify the life and ministry of Hazlett. But, whether in his case or other cases, the Apostle Paul explains that Christians are free to prophesy in a meeting, and everyone else should evaluate whether a prophetic message is correct or not (see 1 Corinthians 14:29).

So Christians are instructed by God to evaluate prophecies made by other Christians.

The World Cup and the presidential election are the two main subjects for Brazilians in 2014, and Hazlett’s prophecies addressed both subjects. What did he prophesy about the World Cup?

He said in 2011,

“The Spirit of the Lord says: Four years from now, I will bring back the World Cup to this nation and I will anoint this nation to fill the Cup of prayer and pour out to the world, for the day when the Brazil team holds the World Cup, will be the day that I begin a revival that will cause Brazil bring revival to the world.”

Contrary to Hazlett’s optimistic prediction, there was no victory for the Brazilian team. There was no worldwide revival stemming from a Brazilian revival as a result of a Brazilian victory in the World Cup.

Besides, socialist Rousseff took advantage of the Cup euphoria to pass a law banning spanking, effectively criminalizing Christian parents who, in obedience to God’s Word, discipline their children. This was a massive defeat — not victory — to the Brazilian family. In fact, the Brazilian team had its worst defeat ever.

Hazlett’s prophecy was far away from perfection.

Why then are a multitude of Brazilian evangelicals using his another prophecy to vote for the Soros-backed socialist Marina Silva?

Hazlett’s prophecy said: “I am removing the Mordecai spirit that tries to controls the women in this nation and I am going to raise up a woman after My heart and I am going to shake this nation.”

The most important mission of Esther was to protect her people and their interests. In this mission, she was under the influence of Mordecai. Was his influence positive or negative? Positive. Mordecai was a man of God. Without him, Esther would never have defended God’s people the way she did.

If Hazlett had prophesied that God was going to remove the Karl Marx spirit that controls men and women in Brazil, including Catholics and evangelicals, I would understand. The Marxist influence is negative. This influence is an important component of the political militancy of Marina Silva, seen by Brazilian evangelicals as their “messiah” because of Hazlett’s prophecy. In an interview with Caio Fábio in 2010, Marina said that the Marxist Liberation Theology is the “living gospel.”

Caio, formerly the greatest Presbyterian minister in Brazil, was supportive of Silva in 2010 and 2014, including as an adviser. Caio, who disgraced himself in financial and sexual scandals years ago, was the strategic evangelical leader who in the 1990s connected the evangelical population with the socialist Workers’ Party, where Marina had her militancy and became an environment secretary during the Lula administration.

Marina left the Workers’ Party when the 2010 presidential candidacy of her party was given not to her, but to Dilma Rousseff.

Now the current prophecy-inflamed, Marina Silva campaign has been championed by Valnice Milhomens, a female apostle who, in 1994, hosted, with Caio Fábio, an evangelical TV show introducing socialist Lula to the evangelical population.

Caio’s intent, as reported by him later, was to connect evangelicals with Lula — a successful project, because in his first election to the Brazilian presidency Lula was supported by all the major evangelicals leaders in Brazil, equally stirred by strange prophecies and visions that his administration would bring advances to Brazil. Actually, in the first year of the Lula administration, Brazil introduced in the United Nations the first resolution classifying homosexuality as an unalienable human right. Milhomens was unable to see prophetically Caio’s intent, but she is sure that, prophetically, Marina is now God’s intent.

Hazlett’s mentions of a puppet president and strings have been interpreted as applying only to Rousseff and Lula. By the interpretation of Mordecai as a supposedly “negative” influence, deserving removal, you could also include Esther as a “puppet.” In fact, Hazlett’s prophecy treated the “Mordecai spirit” as if it were a harmful spirit to women, when this “spirit” brought wisdom and strategy to Esther.

But what about Marina Silva and Karl Marx? What about her and Caio Fábio? What about her and George Soros? Are there no strings in all of this? Is there no puppet in these relationships? Why to remove a Mordecai spirit, but not a Marx, Caio and Soros spirit?

Esther’s submission to Mordecai was a blessing, not curse.

Immediately connected with the prophetic behavior in the Christians meetings is Paul’s teaching about female behavior in these meetings:

“Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others weigh what is said. If a revelation is made to another sitting there, let the first be silent. For you can all prophesy one by one, so that all may learn and all be encouraged, and the spirits of prophets are subject to prophets. For God is not a God of confusion but of peace. As in all the churches of the saints, the women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says.” (1 Corinthians 14:29-34 ESV)

Paul explains that Biblical submission is protection:

“For this reason, and because the angels are watching, a woman should wear a covering on her head to show she is under authority.” (1 Corinthians 11:10 NLT)

“Because of the angels” — my understanding is that without Biblical submission, there are spiritual breaches for intrusions of demonic forces, also known as fallen angels.

With Biblical submission, God’s angels watch over the obedient.

Surely, Esther was a blessed woman, truly protected by God’s angels, because she lived according to this principle.

Now, what about Hazlett’s prophecy being used to portray Marina Silva as a Brazilian Esther, deserving the Brazil presidency — but “delivered” only from Mordecai, not from Marx, Caio and Soros? His prophecies — just as the prophecies of all other Christians — should be evaluated, as commanded by Apostle Paul.

What about Marina as Esther?

Perhaps she might win the election and become president of Brazil.

Perhaps she might eventually become an Esther too.

But first, she needs to let God remove the Marx, Caio and Soros spirits, and any other spirits, including Liberation Theology.

Yet, how do she and Hazlett expect her to be successful and a woman after God’s heart if they want to remove Mordecai — the positive influence of a man of God — from her life?

Portuguese version of this article: Inflamados por uma profecia americana, evangélicos brasileiros querem uma mulher na presidência do Brasil

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Recommended Reading:

Brazilian Nightmare: World Cup, Spanking and Abortion

Presidential Candidacy of Leftist Pentecostal in Brazil Shoots Up After Suspicious Plane Crash And Bolsters Globalist Interests

Brazilian Pentecostals: Church Growth Endangered by Socialist Embrace

Liberation Theology and Neo-Pentecostalism: A Leading Challenge to the Evangelical Churches in Brazil

The Perfect Revival?

A Charismatic Response to “The Growing Crisis Behind Brazil’s Evangelical Success Story”

R.C. Sproul: There Is No True Prophecy Today