Monday, May 04, 2020

Voyage to the Bottom of Emasculation


Voyage to the Bottom of Emasculation

By Julio Severo
One of the most famous and successful TV series was “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea,” with a cast of commanders and sailors 100 percent male.
The public never complained about such all-male crew in a nuclear submarine in this TV series of the early 1960s. But then the public had not been desensitized by feminist indoctrination.
Men and women just loved to watch men in a submarine fighting earthly and supernatural evil forces. But today, “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea” would not survive a greater evil: Feminism.
The 2018 movie Megalodon has a submarine with an all-female crew. As all feminist movies, it was a failure and sheer boredom.
A female crew in military submarines in fantasy and in reality makes no sense. But feminist pressure does not allow anymore all-male crews in military submarines, and this same pressure does not allow the revelation of what happens when females are in a military environment that is traditionally male.
While in “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea” only military men did daring deep trips, in “Voyage to the Bottom of Emasculation” men and women now do such trips, but only men are emasculated. Only women are entitled to masculinization.
Emasculation means castration and the loss of male power and masculinity. Masculinization means make more masculine or male.
It is not natural to emasculate men for the sake of feminism and socialism. It is not natural to masculinize women for the sake of feminism and socialism. It is not natural to put in the military women and lesbians for the sake of feminism and socialism.
While “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea” had an end, the bottom of the sea, the emasculation of men and the masculinization of women seem to have no end. It is a cultural voyage with no bottom.
In fantasy at least women escape the realities of a life among military men. But in real life, there is no escape.
In fantasy, women are militarily as strong as men as. In reality, they are not. Leaked Army document reveals 84 percent of women have FAILED the new rigorous combat fitness test.
In 1991, 36 women fell pregnant aboard the Navy ship Acadia that served in Persian Gulf.
Statistics of 2016 from the Navy reveals that 16 of 100 women serving among men fell pregnant.
Because of integration of women with men in the Navy, military ships are known as “Love Boats.”
Even in Israel, which boasts of a socialist system where women are fully integrated with men in the military, sexual realities have prevailed. The number of legal abortions rises in the Israeli Army as coexistence of male and female soldiers has increased their sexual activity.
In “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea,” with an all-male crew in the submarine, there was no sex, no pregnancy and there was much action.
In Megalodon, with an all-female crew in the submarine, there was no sex, no pregnancy, but much boredom. And if a man were introduced in such female environment, there would be another kind of action.
Even though male sailors would love to have female sailors near, not as fighting pals, but for the obvious reasons, what is the usefulness, except for sex, of a military female crew integrated with military male crew? To distract or entertain men?
If America in the early 1960s was so emasculated as she is today, “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea” would have been a “love submarine.” Yet, love means today free sex. Real love does not use women for fun. Real love protects babies from abortion and never puts women in risky situations, especially combat situations. Real love never integrates women with men in the military.
What integrates women with men in the military is not love. It is socialism. In Israel, such socialist integration has produced increased sex and abortion in the military. In the U.S., Navy ships are “love boats.”
What cost is society paying for emasculating men for the sake of socialist integration?
The pressure to conform to socialism is so trendy the Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, known for defending some conservative causes, has made a point to have as the pilot of his presidential plane the first military woman to do it. She is a captain in the Brazilian Air Force. It was a strange choice, because Bolsonaro has filled his administration with “traditionalists.” For most people, traditionalism would mean to protect men and women in their traditional sex roles. It would mean to reject women as military pilots.
Yet, “traditionalists” in the Bolsonaro administration are not connected to Christian traditionalism. They are connected to the Traditionalist School, whose most prominent member was Julius Evola, who was an adviser and guru for the Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini.
This kind of “traditionalism” does not defeat socialism and feminism. But evangelical conservatism, when it was predominant in America, defeated it.
Without Christian conservatism, how will America protect her military from becoming “love” boats and submarines of emasculated men and masculinized women?
Portuguese version of this article: Viagem ao Fundo da Emasculação
Recommended Reading on feminism:

No comments :