Showing posts with label nationalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nationalism. Show all posts

Saturday, January 18, 2020

Brazilian top culture official fired after quoting Nazi Goebbels while talking about nationalist art in a video as Hitler’s favorite composer played in the background


Brazilian top culture official fired after quoting Nazi Goebbels while talking about nationalist art in a video as Hitler’s favorite composer played in the background

By Julio Severo
Brazil’s top culture official was fired on January 17, 2020 after using phrases used by Hitler’s right-hand man, Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Germany’s minister of propaganda.
Roberto Alvim
The outrage was immediate, culminating in calls for the removal of Roberto Alvim, who was appointed, under the influence of Olavo de Carvalho, special secretary of culture by Brazil’s nationalist President Jair Bolsonaro.
“It is an unfortunate pronouncement, even with his apologies, making his tenure unsustainable,” Bolsonaro tweeted. “I reiterate our condemnation of totalitarian ideologies and genocides, like Nazism and Communism, as well as any type of allusion to them.”
Alvim’s scandal was a disappointment for Bolsonaro, who said recently about him: “After decades, we do have a real Culture Secretary.”
Roberto Alvim made the controversial comments while discussing a new art prize in a video distributed by the Bolsonaro administration. Lohengrin by Wagner, Hitler's favorite composer, played in the background.
Alvim acknowledged the similarity between his speech and the speech of Goebbels and he has even disavowed Nazism but said it was merely a “rhetorical coincidence.” When confronted by a journalist that his speech was based on Goebbels’s speech, Alvim admitted that he was aware of the similarity, but he defended its use adding that it was perfect.
The “rhetorical coincidence” of Alvim became an international scandal, with headlines in the U.S. saying:
* Washington Post: “Brazil’s culture secretary fired after appearing to paraphrase Nazi propaganda in speech.”
* New York Times: “Brazil’s Top Culture Official Fired Over Speech Evoking Nazi Propaganda.”
* Time magazine: “Brazil’s Culture Minister Fired After Quoting Joseph Goebbels in a Speech.”
In his speech Alvim said:
“The Brazilian art of the next decade will be heroic and will be national, will be endowed with great capacity for emotional involvement… deeply linked to the urgent aspirations of our people, or else it will be nothing.”
Parts of it are identical to a speech quoted in the book “Joseph Goebbels: A Biography,” by German historian Peter Longerich, who has written several works on the Holocaust:
“The German art of the next decade will be heroic, it will be steely-romantic, it will be factual and completely free of sentimentality, it will be national with great Pathos and committed, or it will be nothing.”
Alvim said in a radio interview that he chose the music himself, because the work is transcendent and stemmed from Wagner’s Catholic faith. Wagner was a Catholic who did not like Jews. This is the main reason Hitler loved him.
Speaking in a separate recorded message, with a wooden cross atop his desk, Alvim said he wants 2020 to mark a historic cultural rebirth to “create a new and thriving Brazilian civilization.”
Following release of his taped video, Brazil’s Israeli confederation Conib said in a statement: “To emulate [Goebbels’] view… is a frightening sign of his vision of culture, which must be combated and contained.” It called for his immediate removal, adding: “Brazil, which sent brave soldiers to combat Nazism on European soil, doesn’t deserve it.”
Germany’s embassy in Brazil condemned the speech in a post on Twitter, saying that it opposed “any attempt to banalize or glorify” an era that “brought infinite suffering for humanity.”
Goebbels led the Ministry of Enlightenment and Propaganda, designed to brainwash people into obeying the Nazis and idolizing Adolf Hitler and his nationalism. Its methods included censorship of the press and control of radio broadcasts, as well as control of culture and arts.
President Jair Bolsonaro made the decision to fire Alvim after a backlash from Jewish organizations, key lawmakers, political parties, artists and Brazil’s bar association.
U.S. newspapers suggested that the guiding force of Alvim’s radicalism was evangelicalism. The Washington Post said, “Alvim has been one of the most militant cultural warriors in the Bolsonaro government… he converted to evangelicalism after a nearly fatal cancer diagnosis.”
The Associated Press said that Alvim “is a born-again Christian who found renewed faith while recovering from cancer.”
“Born-again” is a term associated with evangelicalism. But Alvim is not an evangelical or even Protestant. In an interview with the Brazilian newspaper Gazeta do Povo, he said he had a tumor in his belly and permanent fever. He was healed after the evangelical babysitter of his son asked to pray for him. But his connection with evangelicalism ended in this point. After this dramatic and miraculous experience, instead of looking for an evangelical church, he got involved with Olavo de Carvalho and his movement that includes syncretic Catholicism. He began to attend the Catholic Church every day.
So the effort of the Washington Post, the Associated Press and other U.S. media to associate Alvim to evangelicalism is not realistic. The radicalism they saw in him does not stem from evangelicalism, but exclusively from Carvalho and his syncretic Catholicism.
On May 11, 2019 Alvim said on his Facebook:
“Given how much Professor Olavo de Carvalho has done for all of us, in view of the magnificent books that he has with so much sacrifice and care bequeathed us, the least we can do is to support him unconditionally.”
And on November 15, 2019, Carvalho, who is a self-exiled Brazilian in the U.S. since 2005, said on his Facebook:
“I repeat the warning: From my courses and books, whoever is smart gets smarter, whoever is stupid goes crazy.”
Bolsonaro had appointed Alvim not because evangelicals recommended him. He appointed by Carvalho’s recommendation.
So how can the Washington Post and the Associated Press suggest that Alvim and his crazy radicalism are evangelical? They are 100 percent Carvalho’s Catholicism.
On Twitter, Alvim regularly uses the hashtag DeusVult, echoing the traditional Catholic battle cry of Middle Ages crusaders. Carvalho has also a fixation on the Middles Ages, especially the Inquisition, which he defends passionately.
If Carvalho and his adherents can defend the Inquisition, which persecuted, tortured and killed multitudes of Jews, why cannot he and his adherents also defend Nazism, which likewise persecuted, tortured and killed of Jews?
If an intelligent man enrolls in Carvalho’s courses, he will easily see Carvalho’s crazy advocacy of the Inquisition against the Jews. If he does not see, Carvalho’s prophecy is fulfilled in him: the idiot ends crazy.
Because of massive backlash, Carvalho disavowed his former pupil Alvim.
Yet, Carvalho, who is considered Bolsonaro’s Rasputin, recommended Alvim to Bolsonaro not because Alvim is an idiot. On the contrary, Carvalho recommends only his best pupils. And his best pupil showed all the crazy culture he learned from his master.
Even though Carvalho disavowed Alvim, the Nazi connections are real. For years, Carvalho was the biggest propagandist in Brazil of the Islamic occultist René Guénon, whose most prominent disciple was Julius Evola, who wrote books advocating occultism and the right-wing ideology. Evola was a guru of the Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. Evola’s books were also used by Nazis.
Evola and Guénon have been praised by Steven Bannon, a friend of Carvalho. Evola and Guénon have also been praised by Brazilian Foreign Minister Ernesto Araújo, an adherent of Carvalho.
Occultism has crazy connections and confusions. How could not Alvim reveal such religious traits?
The case of Alvim is a symptom of what may happen if the Bolsonaro administration fails. Newspapers around the world, ignoring the fact that Rasputin-guided Bolsonaro has filled his administration with inept adherents of Carvalho, will blame innocent evangelicals who voted for Bolsonaro.
With information from DailyMail, Washington Post, BBC, New York Times, Associated Press and Antagonista.
Recommended Reading:
Recommended Reading about the Inquisition:

Monday, August 08, 2016

Former CIA director endorses Hillary Clinton, supports Muslims in CIA and characterizes Trump as Putin’s agent


Former CIA director endorses Hillary Clinton, supports Muslims in CIA and characterizes Trump as Putin’s agent

By Julio Severo
Donald Trump has become a pawn of Russian President Vladimir Putin, presenting “dangers” to American national security that would only grow if he obtains the White House, said a former CIA director who also explained that Muslims do not present dangers to America.
Michael Morell, a CIA officer under Republican President Bush and Democratic President Obama, said Friday in a New York Times op-ed that he is endorsing Hillary Clinton in the presidential race because she is “highly qualified” and Trump is not. 
And if you ask why the U.S. has experienced remarkable failure in its war against terror, Morell unintentionally explains it in his praise of a Muslim serving as the director of the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center. He said that the Center was directed by this Muslim for nearly a decade, during the presidency of Bush and Obama. Morell said that he cannot name the director of this CIA agency, but he highly praises him as the Muslim “most responsible for keeping America safe since the Sept. 11 attacks.”
If in the War against Terror (and this is Islamic terror) CIA has an Islamic director to fight Islamic terror, what had CIA in the Cold War? A Soviet Russian director in the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center? Sorry, but it is very hard not get a fit of laughter over CIA and its blunders. “Get Smart” is smarter than this.
“Mr. Trump has taken policy positions consistent with Russian, not American, interests — endorsing Russian espionage against the United States, supporting Russia’s annexation of Crimea and giving a green light to a possible Russian invasion of the Baltic States,” Morell writes.
Trump has responded in kind and called Putin a “great leader,” he said.
Trump is “damaging our national security,” he argues, and he’s fraternizing with Putin.
Morell warned in the op-ed that Putin, who has been accused by the Obama administration of killing and jailing journalists and political opponents, is manipulating Trump, who has not cared about what Putin has done in Russia, while Morell has not cared about what Muslims have done in America. Only in the 9/11 terrorist attack, approximately 3,000 Americans were killed. Even so, Muslims occupy high-ranking posts in CIA. What about if Russians had been responsible for the 9/11 attack? Would Morell warmly welcome a Soviet Russian as CIA director? Would he praise Soviet Russians in high-ranking posts in CIA? So why is he praising Muslims in CIA?
In spite of the fact that the greatest threat today is Islam, Trump has been heavily criticized by right-wing and left-wing Americans for wanting friendly relations with Putin and Russians and for not wanting such relations with Muslims.
U.S. nationalistic interests, supported by both right-wing and left-wing Americans, see Islam as an ally and Russia, which is the largest Orthodox Christian nation in the world, as eternal enemy.
It is a suicidal nationalism that embraces Muslims as allies. Allies against whom? Russia.
Right-wing and left-wing Americans are united in an anti-Russia nationalistic fanaticism that is willing to embrace Islam and its adherents.
How exactly, according to Morell, is Hillary “highly qualified” and Trump is not?
Morell’s support of Hillary is in harmony with CIA’s politics. Former CIA agent Osama bin Laden created al-Qaeda in the late 1970s to unite Muslims in Afghanistan against Soviet Union. Why does Morell think other Muslim agents in high-ranking posts in CIA could not imitate bin Laden?
In the WND report “Declassified docs: Hillary aided rise of ISIS,” Jerome R. Corsi said, “More than 100 pages of previously classified Department of Defense and Department of State documents implicate the Obama administration in a cover-up to obscure the role Hillary Clinton and the State Department played in the rise of ISIS.” The report mentions shipments of weapons to ISIS.
Another WND report says that CIA has directly been delivering weapons to Syrian Muslim rebels. Many of these rebels, who have connections to al-Qaeda and ISIS, have been raping, torturing and slaughtering multitudes of Orthodox Christians in Syria.
Certainly, Hillary is “highly qualified” to support Islamists against Christians. In contrast, Trump is highly qualified to support Orthodox Christian Russia against Islamists.
So why are right-wing and left-wing Americans willing to go along with Islam, not Russia?
Why are these Americans, including CIA directors, warmongers against Russia, but not warmongers against Islam? Why are they very comfortable with Islam and its adherents, but not comfortable with an Orthodox Christian Russia?
Because Trump is going along with Russia, not Islam, they are indignant.
So America had a Muslim as director of the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center for ten years. Now she has Muslim John Brennan as CIA director. And she is besieged by Islamic terror. And what is the concern of right-wing and left-wing Americans? Russia!
Michael Morell wants a Trump against Russia, not against Islam. And because Trump does not fit his neocon mentality, Morell prefers endorsing Hillary, who has proven her high qualities by helping ISIS and supporting the Obama boycotts and sanctions against Russia over a Russian law banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents, even though the official excuse by the Obama administration is that Russia annexed Crimea, which for centuries belonged to Russia.
When he was asked on ABC whether he would support the Crimea annexation, Trump said: “I’m going to take a look at it. But, you know, the people of Crimea, from what I’ve heard, would rather be with Russia than where they were.”
In the time of Soviet Union, it made sense to fight this evil empire. This is why I fervently supported Ronald Reagan in that time. But Soviet Union is 25 years gone and the greatest threat today is Islam and it makes sense now to support an American candidate against Islam. Trump is such man. Trump challenges the nationalistic paradigms that favor Islam against Russia.
Americans who endorse Hillary do not care about Christians being raped, tortured and slaughtered by ISIS and other Islamic groups supported by her. Certainly, the Muslim director of the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center did not care. And does current Muslim CIA director care?
Trump’s campaign dismissed Morell’s criticism, linking the ex-CIA director to the Obama administration’s public response defending Hillary after the September 2012 Islamic attacks in Benghazi, Libya. Obama administration officials tried to play down the role of Islamist militants in the attacks.
In his Twitter account, Trump responded to Morell’s op-ed by saying: “Wow, folks! Former CIA chief Michael Morell calls me Putin’s Agent. Endorses Clinton. A TOTAL & COMPLETE DISASTER!!”
Clinton’s campaign subsequently posted a video to her Twitter account drudging up Trump’s past statements about Putin, whom he invited last week to hack her emails.
Alongside the video was a statement that said: “We don’t know why Trump and Putin praise each other so much and share many foreign policies. We’ll let you guess.”
With his vast experience as a former CIA director, Morell is resolute and he promised, “On Nov. 8, I will vote for Hillary Clinton. Between now and then, I will do everything I can to ensure that she is elected as our 45th president.”
He will be not alone. If Hillary intends to support Islam, keep the Obama sanctions against Russia and promote abortion and sodomy ideologies, she has already a major ally: The Communist Party USA, which officially nominated Hillary Rodham Clinton as their undisputed candidate for president of the United States.
Pro-Islam nationalism is a disaster.
With information from DailyMail, WND and Reuters.
Recommended Reading:

Monday, December 01, 2014

Are Conservatives and Socialists ‘Brothers’? George W. Bush Calls Bill Clinton His ‘Brother’


Are Conservatives and Socialists ‘Brothers’? George W. Bush Calls Bill Clinton His ‘Brother’

By Julio Severo
George W. Bush has described Bill Clinton as a ‘brother from another mother’ in a gushing interview about their surprising friendship, according to Daily Mail.
Clinton and Bush
He added that his own father ‘serves as a father figure’ to Clinton, who pushed the elder Bush out of office in 1992.
The Daily Mail reported that after becoming president, Clinton frequently sought Bush Sr.’s advice, just as Bush Jr. did with Clinton when he was elected America’s 43rd president.
Did these mutual advices include abortion and homosexuality? After all, before Obama, Clinton was the most prominent pro-abortion and pro-sodomy U.S. president. In contrast, Bush was generally pro-life and pro-family.
Did their friendship involve moral clashes? I have never heard about it.
In fact, I have never heard Bush openly criticizing Clinton’s pro-abortion and pro-sodomy policies. And even now that the U.S. government has been championing, through its State Department and USAID, the promotion of the homosexual agenda around the world, Bush’s voice of protest has been heard nowhere.
In 2007, in his visit to Brazil, Globo, the largest TV network in Brazil, contacted me for an interview, because, according to its journalist, I was one of the few Brazilians supportive of Bush. My support was based on pro-life and pro-family values.
I honored Bush because of these values.
Bush could honor these same values and his alleged Christian convictions by exposing and denouncing the leftist wickedness of men like Clinton and Obama. Why does he never have done it?
They are not brothers in the abortion and the sodomy issues. But, apparently, in the U.S. foreign policy there are higher interests. Clinton funded the Venezuelan Marxism in the 1990s by letting his country to buy the Venezuelan oil, thereby helping Venezuela fund Marxism in Latin America, including Foro de São Paulo. Bush never criticized Clinton for this funding. On the contrary, he did the same thing in the 2000s. So Clinton and Bush were brothers in the funding of the Venezuelan Marxism.
They were also brothers when they supported Saudi Arabia and Turkey, two foremost Muslim nations involved in international Islamic terrorism.
It seems that the message of their ‘brotherhood’ is:
It does not matter if you are conservative or socialist, support America, which has everything you need, whether conservatism or socialism. America can satisfy your ideological preference if you support her.
America can satisfy you even religiously. If you are (conservative or liberal) Christian, America has top liberal and conservative Christians to your liking. If you are Muslim, America has a Muslim as director of CIA and Muslims even in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). As you, DHS labels conservative Christians as “terrorists”!
America can satisfy you in the pro-life and pro-abortion issue. But as far as pro-life stances are concerned, America can satisfy you only in the private setting. Satisfaction about the U.S. government promoting and imposing an ideology is guaranteed only to pro-abortion and pro-sodomy activists, as the U.S. government is committed only to this cause.
Bill Clinton is socialist, and he has a pro-abortion and pro-sodomy record to confirm it.
George Bush is conservative and he has a pro-life and pro-family record to confirm it.
Yet, apparently, when the subject is U.S. supremacy, both disregard their “irreconcilable” moral and ethical differences and become “brothers.”
Another factor uniting them and making them brothers is the U.S. politics of imposing on Israel a two-state solution. This is, even though God wants only the Jews in the land of Israel, the U.S. wants Jews and Palestinian Arabs in that land. Both Democrats and Republicans are determined in this plan against Israel. Both Bush and Clinton and now Obama wanted and want to impose a Palestinian nation in the land of Israel.
For Clinton, it is easy to defend a U.S. supremacy with a government eagerly promoting the gay agenda, including by threatening developing nations with aid cut if they do not submit themselves to the U.S. homosexualist impositions.
Yet, how can be easy for Bush to be with his “brother” in this?
In fact, if the Christian conservatism of a man, American or Brazilian, matters less than nationalist interests and ambitions, just as the nation is in grave sin and threatening to turn the world into Sodom, what is the use of being a conservative?
If the Christian conservatism of a man, American or Brazilian, forms an easy alliance with socialists in a nationalist brotherhood, what is the use of being a conservative?
God-oriented conservatism makes a country strong. Socialism, which distorts and attacks God, leaves people weak.
Conservatism and patriotism is good. But when God-oriented conservatism is sacrificed on the altar of nationalism, conservatives and socialists become “brothers,” and the nationalist supremacy makes socialism a winner and pro-family and pro-life values generally big losers.
An example of the nationalist supremacy’s negative effects is the criticism from U.S. homosexual activists, feminists, leftists and rightists directed at the International Forum of the Large Family and the Future of Humanity, held in Moscow last September and attended by fine pro-family leaders from other nations, including the U.S. American leftists attacked it because it was a conservative event. U.S. homosexual activists attacked it because it opposed the gay agenda. American feminists attacked it because it was pro-life. American rightists attacked it because they think that Moscow is not entitled to hold pro-family events. All of them, even though from antagonistic ideological spectrums, were moved by nationalism.
The Moscow event was conservative. I was there. Conservative American-Jewish author Don Feder was there, attacking the culture of death and cultural Marxism. And there were other Americans, who were under threat from their homosexual, feminist, leftist and rightist ultra-nationalist compatriots.
In the past few decades America has produced Clinton, Bush and Obama. Their nationalism, marked by military interventions with a trail of suffering and death for countless Christians around the world, has been strongly accompanied — excepting Bush — by anti-family and anti-life impositions in the United Nations and around the world. The Obama administration is the most pro-Islam and anti-Christian administration in the U.S. history.
Increasingly in this terrifying nationalism, there is no place for respect for life and family. Even during the Bush administration, pro-life and pro-family values never were a top priority as sodomy and abortion have been now in the U.S. foreign policy. Even so, Bush and Clinton are ‘brothers.’ Even so, Bush have never criticized this wicked policy and sodomitic nationalism. He has never criticized the Islamic promotion by the U.S. government.
What is the use of being a pro-life and pro-family Christian conservative when the U.S. nationalism allows his values no priority or even a place of honor?
The fact the U.S. has a sodomitic top priority in its foreign policy, military interventions facilitating Islamic expansion and persecution of Christians around the world and a destructive two-state solution for Israel confirm a destructive nationalism at the service of oligarchic interests and ambitions.
If the two-state solution for Israel unites U.S. presidents in a nationalistic ‘brotherhood,’ Clinton, Bush and Obama are ‘brothers.’ And if promotion of Islam also strengthens this ‘brotherhood,’ then while Obama is the guy who is promoting Islam today, Bush was the guy who immediately after 9/11 said that Islam is a ‘religion of peace.’
After a Nazi attack in 1940, would a Clinton, Bush or Obama have said that Nazism is an ‘ideology of peace’? Why then is Islam, whose adherents love Hitler, afforded a title of peace when its ideology fosters terror and death?
Why was not Bush ashamed of misrepresenting the ideology that violently attacked his country and has been slaughtering thousands of Christians every year?
As a Christian, is he aware that one of the Ten Commandments orders us not to give false testimony? Sadly, even the Pope has broken it by saying recently that “equating Islam with violence is wrong.”
The strange nationalistic ‘brotherhood’ of Clinton, Bush and Obama does not have brought benefit for Christianity and its values. On the other hand, it has been advancing socialism, Islam, abortion and sodomy around the world in a babylonic orgy.
In his autobiography “Decision Points” (Crown), George W. Bush said that he had a spiritual conversion through Billy Graham. He said, “As I read the Bible, I was moved by the stories of Jesus’ kindness to suffering strangers, His healing of the blind and crippled, and His ultimate act of sacrificial love when He was nailed to the cross.”
About his pro-life values, he explained, “The abortion issue is difficult, sensitive, and personal. My faith and conscience led me to conclude that human life is sacred. God created man in His image and therefore every person has value in His eyes. It seemed to me that an unborn child, while dependent on its mother, is a separate and independent being worthy of protection in its own right. When I saw [my daughters] Barbara and Jenna on the sonogram for the first time, there was no doubt in my mind they were distinct and alive. The fact that they could not speak for themselves only enhanced society’s duty to defend them.”
Yet, he added, “Many decent and thoughtful people disagreed, including members of my family.”
One of these people is his wife, Laura Bush, who in her autobiography “Spoken from the Heart” (Simon and Schuster), said, “I have always believed that abortion is a private decision.”
Can the killing of an innocent child be a ‘private’ decision?
To defend life, Bush had to disappoint his wife and a multitude of pro-abortion activists.
Why not disappoint a larger number of pro-death and pro-unjust war radicals? Why not disappoint the oligarchic forces ruling in the U.S. in administration after administration?
A spiritual conversion puts you in a new family.
I would like my article to reach Bush and challenge him to commit himself more to his Christian brotherhood, with international Christians suffering on the trail of the U.S. military (mis)adventures that facilitate Islamic expansion, than to his nationalistic ‘brotherhood.’
Can Clinton and Obama become Bush’s brothers? Yes. Under Christ, they can enter the new family — which has nothing to do with the promotion of socialism, Islam, abortion, sodomy and destructive oligarchic interests and ambitions.
This new family is about knowing Christ as a Savior and Lord, living with Him and seeking and expanding His Kingdom (His Government) and His righteousness.
Recommended Reading: