Finnish parents lose custody of their daughter for refusing sex change treatment to transform her externally into a young man

By Julio Severo

A Finnish couple has lost custody of their 15-year-old daughter after they refused to allow her to undergo hormone therapy to transform her externally into a man.

In 2017, when the family had moved from Finland to another country in the European Union, the teenage girl told her parents that she thought she was in the wrong body and demanded hormone therapy.

“She was only fifteen years old. We couldn’t agree that she started using hormones,” said the mother.

After her parents refused to bow to their daughter’s demand, she became angry and just a few weeks later one of her friends contacted the police and filed a criminal report against the mother and the father. Shortly after, the government of the unnamed European Union country decided to take away the parent’s custody of the young girl.

“From having dressed very provocatively and feminine just a few months before, she had now started to use more masculine clothes just like the others in her new gang of friends,” the mother said.

“She said she wanted to start hormone therapy right away and later remove her breasts,” she added.

“Obviously, it felt bad that one’s own daughter was doing this, but the worst thing was that the authorities agreed. We were naive and thought that the doctors and the authorities would see sense. It was a big mistake,” the father told.

The parents say their teenage daughter, who now identifies as a young man, rarely speaks to them.

After watching a video clip of their daughter after she had undergone six months of hormone therapy, the father said, “Without over-dramatizing, you can say that when the voice, appearance, and personality change, it is as if they had killed our child.”

The number of kids being referred to undergo gender reassignment treatment has exploded since the extremist, culturally Marxist media began pushing transgender ideology and marketing it specifically to kids a few years ago.

Because of massive propaganda in the media and indoctrination in the schools, the number of cases of children being sexually “changed” in the U.K. has risen from 94 in 2010 to 2,519 by 2018, with the youngest victim being just three-years-old.

It is medicine, psychology and government at the service of Marxism and the homosexual ideology.

About a week ago, a Scottish couple known as Britain’s first transgender family sparked controversy when they announced that they would begin to change the sex their 5-year-old son.

First, homosexual activists popularized their actions of outing themselves. Now they are strategically forcing children to be changed contrary to their biological and natural sex.

Even though homosexual activists are just a tiny part of the 1 or 2 percent of the population who choose homosexuality, their influence in society, especially through the media, has been massive.

Russia under Putin did very well by criminalizing homosexual propaganda to children and teens, because it is a real crime to brainwash children and teens into thinking that they can change their biological sexuality.

If governments do not criminalize homosexual propaganda, homosexualists will make governments criminalize parents who protect their children from homosexual indoctrination and, worse, from homosexual “therapies” to transform them in tools and pawns in the hands of homosexualists.

With information from the Voice of Europe.

Portuguese version of this article: Pais finlandeses perdem a custódia de sua filha por recusarem tratamento de mudança de sexo para transformá-la externamente em rapaz

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Church Vandalized After Opposing Predatory Homosexual Show to Children

Answering a gay activist and his nonsense on Saudi Arabia, slavery, women’s rights and the deity of homosexuality

Spotlight: Exposing Pedophilia Scandals and Hiding Homosexual Scandals in the Catholic Church

Pedophilia By Any Other Name is Still Homosexuality

Finnish politician who shared a Bible verse on Facebook is investigated for “hate crime”

Brazil’s Mackenzie Presbyterian University and Its Gender Ideology Professor

By Julio Severo

Brazilian news website UOL, in its section of child issues, addressed the gender ideology in the report titled “Nome neutro não basta para uma criação sem estereótipo de gênero, mas ajuda” (A Neuter Name Is Not Enough for an Upbringing Without Gender Stereotype, But It is Helpful).

The title opens no room for doubt that, for the homosexual militancy, to develop names’ neutrality for children is a first, insufficient step, by acknowledging a need for a broader fight. The article was also published by the Patrícia Galvão Institute, a Brazilian institution notorious for its pro-abortion advocacy.

The first paragraph in the text is excessively sentimental and clearly seeks to seduce readers, by saying: “Mica is a two-year old child and only the caregivers, as the biological parents prefer to be addressed, and the child know his sex. One day, Mica wears a pink flounced dress and, in the other day, he wears a blue Bermuda shorts. Except for the appearance, even his name does not betray his birth gender, because [the caregivers] chose a name sounding neuter.”

The child, who suffered the imposition of a neuter name, was called Mica, by parents who prefer equally the neuter names “caregivers,” instead of parents.

By the imposition of confused parents, the child is adapted and indoctrinated to greater sexual confusions, including regarding sex roles.

UOL also presents another couple who was ideologically indoctrinated into imposing sexual neutrality on their small son. The mother says, “Every day, when he goes to school, I need to talk to him again on how boy’s and girl’s toys do not exist. There are only children’s toys.”

Perhaps the worst part in the report was the official seal from a professor in the most important Calvinist university in Brazil.

According to UOL, Marcelo Moreira Neumann, a professor of psychology at the Mackenzie Presbyterian University, in São Paulo, Brazil, and one of the authors of the study “Homophobic Bullying and School Performance,” said that neutrality in the registry would effectively facilitate the lives of people not identifying themselves with their birth gender.

“The individual would not have to go through a juridical process if he is a transgender and he would not face shameful situations regarding his name,” said the specialist.

A neutrality in the registry would effectively facilitate the homosexual activism’ objectives.

Neumann’s sheer presence as professor at a Protestant university is a sign of victory for homosexual militants and defeat for evangelicals, who should evangelize, not hire, propagandists of the gender ideology.

When Neumann chose the designation in the UOL report of “Mackenzie professor,” he fatally compromised the institution, which, because it is openly confessional (Mackenzie PRESBYTERIAN University), chose to hire a professor who is a gender agenda militant. The case is not that he deserves to be fired from Mackenzie. He never deserved to be hired.

The hired individual is not to blame. The contractor, which has poorly chosen its job applicants, is to blame.

Actually, Mackenzie has a big name in Brazil, and this name has been flaunted by pro-abortion, Marxist and homosexualist professors advocating their ideological evils.

What is fascinating is that Mackenzie, with all its Calvinist confession, and Calvinist leaders who have decision power to stop all this mess, are very fast and sharp to attack the conservative growth produced by neo-Pentecostals in Brazil, as reported recently by the Islamic news website Al Jazeera, where a Mackenzie professor criticized the neo-Pentecostal growth leading the Brazilian politics to the Right. But they have not the same power against real threats in their own institution.

What expect from a Calvinist institution that puts to shame the Christian witness with professors who attack conservatism, praise the gender ideology, abortion and Marxism?

Portuguese version of this article: O Mackenzie e seu professor de ideologia de gênero

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading on the Mackenzie Presbyterian University:

Financial Times: Brazil’s Evangelicals Push Politics to the Right

Brazil’s Mackenzie Presbyterian University and Its Marxist Professor

Mackenzie Presbyterian University and Its Pro-Abortion Professor

Gay militant Jean Wyllys at Brazilian Presbyterian University

A Charismatic Response to “The Growing Crisis Behind Brazil’s Evangelical Success

Spotlight: Exposing Pedophilia Scandals and Hiding Homosexual Scandals in the Catholic Church

By Julio Severo

Recently, I watched Spotlight, a 2015 movie that exposes abundant cases of pedophilia in the Boston archdiocese. The profile of most victims, male children, is indicative of abundant cases of homosexuality, but the word homosexuality was mildly and rarely used in the movie.

Spotlight

What is the reason for such mild and frivolous treatment? You can watch a trailer here: http://spotlightthefilm.com/

The scandals in the Boston archdiocese were exposed when American Jew Marty Baron, a new editor of The Boston Globe, led an investigative team of journalists who began, in 2001, to research and publish about pedophile priests covered by their superiors.

Baron discovered that bishops in the Boston area moved abusers from parish to parish instead of defrocking them or letting police and courts take charge of these cases. Similar scandals have since been discovered around the world.

According to the Associated Press, Australian Cardinal George Pell, the highest-ranking Vatican official to testify on systemic sexual abuse of children by clergy in the Roman Catholic Church, said senior clergy lied to him to cover up abuse in the 1970s. He said that he was deceived about why abusive priests were moved from parish to parish.

Spotlight, a movie based on actual events, reports that “249 priests and brothers were publicly accused of sexual abuse within the Boston Archdiocese.”

“The number of survivors in Boston is estimated to be well over 1,000,” says Spotlight.

The Boston cardinal responsible for overseeing these cases and for moving abusive priests from parish to parish was, according to Spotlight, promoted to Rome in 2002, right in the midst of the public scandal, to lead one of the high-ranking Roman Catholic churches in the world.

The candid movie reports that similar major abuse scandals have been uncovered in many other U.S. cities.

Officially, the Catholic Church has never said that the exposed scandals by Spotlight are lies.

There is no doubt that the way bishops and other overseers have managed the cases of pedophile (especially pederast) priests was a monumental disaster.

Yet, it is an equally monumental disaster to cover up the homosexual connection. Since The Boston Globe and its talented Jewish editor had no interest to investigate this connection, perhaps the pro-life movement, which is a significant force in the U.S. Catholicism, could research and publish about it, firstly in the Catholic setting.

The pro-life movement has had a high ability to record and expose abortion clinic scandals through undercover agents. They do it because they love children and they want to protect them.

Many Catholic pro-life groups focus their attacks on gender ideology, which harms children. But pedophilia (especially pederasty) in the church equally harms children, particularly because it is committed in a place that should offer protection and high spiritual and moral authority.

Pro-life groups and leaders, not the secular media as The Boston Globe, should be the first to expose crimes against children. Not only abortion and gender ideology are a threat to children, but pedophilia (especially pederasty) too.

Hollywood, abortion clinics and homosexual groups are places of rampant depravity. Depravity and cover-up are expected from them. But Christian institutions should have a higher standard and transparency, which is light, according to Christian ethics.

The Boston Globe did a necessary job by exposing pedophile priests and superiors covering them up. But the missing link was tritely treated. Pedophilia is the broad term for rape of female and male children. The proper term for rapists of male children, pederast, was never mentioned in Spotlight. This omission is troubling.

The Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary and Thesaurus (2009 Kindle edition) defines “pederast” as “one who practices anal intercourse esp. with a boy,” explaining the original Greek term, paiderastēs, literally means “lover of boys.”

The Oxford Dictionary (2010 Kindle edition) defines “pederasty” as “sexual activity involving a man and a boy.”

The 1913 Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary defines “pederasty” as sodomy and “pederast” as sodomite, a term traditionally used to designate homosexuals.

So where there is pederasty, there is always homosexuality, and where there is homosexuality, pederasty is inevitable. It is included in the packet.

Yet, the audiences would have the impression, by watching Spotlight, that boys are usually abused by priests, not homosexuals.

The Spotlight movie should have included the missing link. Yet, what to expect from liberals? They want to promote the gender agenda to children and protect them not from homosexuality but from Christianity, which, thanks to the Catholic leadership’s failure, they are pairing with pederasty, a term that is being separated from its only natural and traditional partner: homosexuality.

Why the Catholic Church has been so negligent in this matter, I do not know. Why during decades or more she gave no harsh treatment to homosexuals and their scandals in the clergy, protecting them from prosecution and jail, I do not know.

The pro-life movement, a protector of children, should have under its spotlight not only abortion and the gender agenda but also the massive scandal of homosexual, pederastic priests. This would give them moral authority to expose covered pederastic scandals of leaders and groups that treat Christian values in the same sewer of sexual perversion they live or tolerate in their midst. They would have authority to say the obvious: pederasty and homosexuality walk together wherever they are, whether in a church, school or other place.

Perverted priests should be denounced and jailed, even though only jail is a very small punishment to child-rapists. If pro-life Catholics do not move fast to protect children from perverts in their own Catholic midst, Hollywood and other liberal forces will continue to use the Catholic Church’s homosexual scandals to disparage all the conservative Christians and their values.

Portuguese version of this article: Spotlight: Expondo escândalos de pedofilia e escondendo escândalos homossexuais na Igreja Católica

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Trump and the Pope: a Right-Wing Populist (Today) Clashing with a Left-Wing Populist

Bible Ignorance, Clergy Corruption and the Inquisition in England before the Reformation

The 50 Most Violent Cities in the World Are Mostly Catholic

Can a Pro-Life Activist Defend The Inquisition?

Catholic Church Paid Millions in Dollars to Facilitate Immigrant Invasion in U.S.

The Pope and the Vatican Should Be Confronted about Traditional Catholic Stances against Israel

Luiz Mott saves Catholic Church from suffering mega pedophilia scandal

Mauricio Macri and Gender Ideology in Argentina

By Julio Severo

Patricia Bullrich, National Security minister in Argentina, has appointed transsexual Mara Pérez Reynoso, leader in a homosexual group, as National Coordinator of Diversity.

Mauricio Macri

Bullrich’s aim, who serves under the administration of President Mauricio Macri, is to address as a national security problem gender and diversity issues.

As soon as Macri won the presidential election last November, U.S. State Secretary John Kerry congratulated Macri, saying that the U.S. continues to be grateful for Argentina’s leadership at the United Nations on the advancement of homosexual issues, and looks forward to greater U.S.-Argentina cooperation to expand those issues.

The Macri administration is unlikely to disappoint the U.S. government’s wishes.

Argentina lacks a Christian mindset to understand that the homosexual problem is profoundly destructive, since the times of Sodom.

Some Brazilian pro-life leaders had celebrated Macri’s victory. They, who fight gender ideology in Brazil, celebrated a man who is promoting this same ideology in Argentina. While they celebrate Macri, all leftist media in Latin America celebrate the first transsexual in a government post in Argentina.

Is Mauricio Macri, the new president of Argentina, conservative? I had not an answer to this question. So immediately after his election, I made contact with several Catholic pro-life leaders in Argentina. One of those contacts was Dr. Jorge Scala, author of the Brazilian book “IPPF: A Multinacional da Morte” (IPPF: The Multinational Company of Death).  

My questions: The Brazilian media have been saying that the new Argentinian president is conservative. Please, could you confirm if he is really a pro-life and pro-family conservative? Has he fought abortion and homosexual “marriage”?

Answer from Dr. Jorge Scala, directly from Argentina:

The adjective “conservative” is very ambiguous. I do not know very well what meaning it could have in the U.S. Yet, I can give clear information about the elected Argentinian president in regard to abortion and homosexual unions. As the mayor of the City of Buenos Aires, Mauricio Macri promulgated a so called “non-punishable abortion protocol” legalizing abortion on demand to any women only with a signed sworn declaration that the pregnancy had been a product of rape. Evidently, he is not “pro-life.” As to homosexual unions, Mayor Macri personally made the first homosexual civil union in the City of Buenos Aires, despite that in that time there was no legislation authorizing it. Evidently, he supports the gay lobby. Probably, the qualificative “conservative” is a reference to the fact that Mr. Macri is the son of a wealthy businessman and that he will have economic politics favoring capitalism.

Brazilian pro-life leaders should be careful. They were so excited about Macri that they wanted a Macri also in Brazil. They had thought that he was good just because he had defeated a socialist candidate supportive of gender ideology. What they do not understand is that left-wing activists and businessmen are not often necessarily enemies as far as gender ideology is concerned.

Gender ideology promotion is now a priority in the Macri administration.

There is no reason to celebrate this kind of administration.

Portuguese version of this article: Mauricio Macri e a ideologia de gênero na Argentina

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Will the U.S. Use Argentina Against Brazil?

U.S. Promotes Homosexual “Marriage” Around the World, But as Disguise Uses Argentinian Case