Showing posts with label gay pride march. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gay pride march. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 11, 2019

Trump administration bans gay flag on embassies’ flagpoles, but it does not reverse Trump’s campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world


Trump administration bans gay flag on embassies’ flagpoles, but it does not reverse Trump’s campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world

By Julio Severo
After the backlash of evangelical leaders condemning the declaration of U.S. President Donald Trump endorsing LGBT Pride Month, his administration decided to defuse the bad repercussion by banning the gay flag on the embassies’ flagpoles.
U.S. Embassy in Nepal celebrating Gay Pride Month
Since the left-wing U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama, the gay flag was flown on flagpoles in the U.S. embassies. Even during the Trump administration, the flagpoles had the gay flags.
By the new directive, diplomats are allowed to display the gay symbols and flag elsewhere, including on embassy walls and inside buildings. The only exclusion is the flagpoles. LifeSiteNews said, “the directive appears to be less about rejecting the homosexual agenda than it is about reserving the official flagpole for the nations being represented.”
Several U.S. embassies are finding other ways to show the gay flag.
“The President’s recognition of [Gay] Pride Month and his tweet encouraging our decriminalization campaign gives me even more pride to once again march in the Berlin [Gay] Pride parade, hang a huge banner on the side of the Embassy recognizing our pride, host multiple events at the Embassy and the residence, and fly the gay pride flag,” U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell, a homosexual “conservative” married to another homosexual, said. A spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Germany added, “the pride flag will be on as many places as it can at the Embassy.”
U.S. diplomats at several embassies, including in South Korea and India, have draped LGBT flags over their building facades, while the U.S. ambassador in New Delhi illuminated the building in rainbow lights, and several other ambassadors released photos and videos of staffers themselves demonstrating for homosexual “pride.”
Ambassador Randy Berry, an open homosexual married to another homosexual, tweeted,
“Today, along with the U.S. Mission in Nepal community, I join people around the world in celebrating Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, & Intersex #PrideMonth, and reaffirm the U.S. commitment to defending human rights for all. #Pride2019.”
So Trump’s decision, even though barring the gay flag on flagpoles, does not bars embassies from using their other spaces to celebrate homosexuality.
His decision in no way revokes his declaration endorsing LGBT Pride Month and launching a global campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world.
Trump has a mixed record on LGBT issues. He has defended religious freedom, opposed gender ideology in the military, public schools, and staffed his administration with various pro-family leaders.
On the other hand, Trump has nominated a variety of homosexualist figures to judgeships and other government posts, and continued a number of Obama-era pro-LGBT policies. He also declared after the 2016 election that the Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling forcing all fifty states to recognize homosexual “marriage” was “settled law.”
More recently, Trump saw no problem in the open homosexuality of Pete Buttigieg, who is a homosexual married to another homosexual and aspirates to be the first homosexual president of the United States.
This “new” attitude of Trump is barely new. His history reveals a man who always sought to please both sides. For many years he donated to conservative and Christians groups and, at the same time, to homosexualist groups.
Yet, his attempt to please both sides can backfire. In political terms, he gets nothing by compromising to homosexualists. And he can lose everything if he advances his campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world, because his re-election is dependent on evangelicals who do not accept legal sodomy, not on homosexualists who hate him for banning their flag from the embassies’ flagpoles.
Sodomy is reigning so powerfully in the U.S. that even when homosexualists are allowed to put their symbols and flags in all spaces of the U.S. embassies, they will be not happy if they are not given the flagpoles. Christians would rejoice if the U.S. embassies gave to them the freedom to put Christian symbols and flags in all spaces of the U.S. embassies even if not given the flagpoles.
Trump’s decision is not hindering homosexualists from flying their flags on the flagpoles. LGBTQNation run the headline, “Embassies worldwide are defying Trump & flying the Pride flag without permission.”
When left-wing Obama supported the homosexual agenda, he led the world in a very bad example, and he was supported by left-wingers around the world and opposed by conservative Christians.
Now right-wing Trump supports the same agenda and leads the world in the same bad example by launching his campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world. Whether homosexualists and left-wingers will accept or not Trump’s policy of pleasing both sides remains to be seen.
And it remains to be seen also if conservative Christians will oppose or not his effort to make legal what God has clearly condemned.
With information from LifeSiteNews and LBGTQNation.
Recommended Reading:

Friday, June 22, 2012

World’s ‘biggest’ gay pride march shrinks dramatically: politicians abandon


World’s ‘biggest’ gay pride march shrinks dramatically: politicians abandon

by Matthew Cullinan Hoffman
June 20, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) — With financial and moral support from the country’s highest authorities, Brazil’s “gay pride” marches have long been billed as the largest in the world, with the city of Sao Paulo boasting the number one spot. Generous estimates by the government’s Military Police offered the seemingly impossible figures of between 2.5 and four million participants at the annual event, a figure enthusiastically seconded by parade organizers and dutifully repeated by the international media.
However, this year’s parade offered a starkly different picture. Following a study commissioned by the Datafolha Institute by the Folha de Sao Paulo newspaper in 2011, which exposed the wildly-inflated nature of last year’s attendance figures, the Military Police are refusing to give any estimate of the attendance for this year’s parade. The Datafolha Institute, however, says that the 2012 LGBT Pride Parade brought in only 270,000 people, a number that represents a small fraction of previous and current estimates by organizers.
But conflicting estimates aside, the Brazilian media and the Military Police are in agreement on one fact: this year’s parade was much smaller than last year’s. Although the “Gay Pride” organizers are ultimately claiming the physically impossible figure of 4.5 million attendees this year, after initially hesitating to give an estimate, the Military Police had a different view. “There were a lot fewer people than in 2011,” Colonel Marcelo Prado told Veja magazine.
“With less financing, better behaved, and highly monitored, the 16th LGBT Pride Parade shrank,” noted Veja. “For the first time in the history of the event, the organizers did not officially publicize the attendance on Paulista Avenue in the afternoon this Sunday. For the Military Police and the public that was present, the event attracted far fewer people than in previous years.”
The lower attendance was also reflected in the number of medical interventions for drunkenness and other causes. Although the licentiousness characteristic of homosexual demonstrations, including public sex acts, was still a problem, the number of medical cases dropped from 500 the year before to only 100 this year.
The parade has also seen a substantial cut in funds. Although it has been generously subsidized in years past by sympathetic government officials and businessmen, this year’s budget dropped the equivalent of USD 60,000, from $220,000 to $160,000.

Abandonment by politicians follows controversy

Notably absent from the march were politicians and candidates for office, who in previous years have been much more eager to associate themselves with the event. According to the news service Brazil 247, this year only two candidates for public office marched in the event, and only one sat on the stage with organizers: Fernando Haddad, a former Minister of Education whose claim to fame is the creation of “homophobia kits” for schools that included videos so obscene that President Rousseff was forced to publicly repudiate them and order a revamping of the program.
“The candidates who were not at the Parade or didn’t interest themselves in make contact and get to know us, are people who do not have a broad vision of politics, or don’t want to diminish discrimination and prejudice,” complained Fernando Quaresma, president of the Gay Pride Parade Association.
The sparse attendance of both the public and politicians at this year’s Gay Pride Parade reflects a growing opposition in Brazilian society to the homosexual movement, which has for years sought the passage of laws that would outlaw criticism of the homosexual lifestyle.
The 2011 march only served to accentuate the conflict between gay activists and the Catholic Church, which denomination the majority of Brazilians belong to. Marchers mocked images of Catholic saints openly, despite laws prohibiting disrespectful treatment of religious beliefs. When Protestant televangelist Silas Malafia denounced the desecrations, he was threatened with prosecution by officials of the regime of Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff, a member of the country’s ruling gay-friendly Worker’s Party.
Rousseff narrowly prevailed in the 2010 elections after dropping in the polls due to her pro-abortion, pro-gay advocacy. She eventually signed a declaration promising not to initiate legislation to legalize abortion, nor to prohibit criticism of the homosexual lifestyle.
Recent polls have indicated that, despite ongoing promotion of the homosexual agenda by the ruling Worker’s Party, a strong majority of Brazilians continue to oppose homosexual marriage and civil unions.
Source: LifesSiteNews, via Julio Severo in English: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com
The power of a single blogger and his faith: the story of Julio Severo and his fight against anti-“homophobia” bills in Brazil