Capitalist South Korea and socialist Argentina legalized abortion in the late 2020, but only one of these nations got special focus from right-wingers

By Julio Severo

Most right-wingers make appear that abortion is an ideology exclusively connected to socialism. So when Argentina, a socialist nation in South America, legalized abortion in the late 2020, no one of them was surprised and all of them condemned socialism in Argentina for sacrificing their babies on the altar of feminism. The condemnation was absolute.

Yet, when South Korea in Asia legalized abortion in the late 2020, there was no special focus. There was condemnation, but it was small in comparison to the Argentinian tragedy. After all, right-wingers know that South Korea has been for decades embracing comprehensive capitalism and battling the communist threat from North Korea.

Why did not right-wingers condemn massively, as they did in the Argentinian case, abortion legalization in South Korea?

Argentina is known by its socialism and rampant poverty. In contrast, South Korea is known by its capitalism and rampant prosperity.

Regardless if a socialist or capitalist nation is legalizing abortion, conservative Christians should not follow right-wingers who target and politicize abortion in socialist nations, but “forget” abortion in capitalist nations.

In fact, the abortion radicalism in North Korea is not different from abortion in the United States, the most capitalist nation in the world. Both the communist nation and the capitalist superpower are known by imposing abortion on babies during every month of pregnancy.

South Korea was known by its strong Christian and anti-communist stances. But after abortion, South Korea will have a hard time to defend both stances.

If it is a shame for a socialist nation to legalize abortion, what is it when a capitalist Christian nation does it?

Portuguese version of this article: Coreia do Sul capitalista e Argentina socialista legalizaram o aborto no final de 2020, mas apenas uma dessas nações recebeu atenção especial dos direitistas

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Who Will Blame America for Genocide?

Who Cares About Babies’ Lives?

Far-Leftist Female Pastor Says Christmas Is about a Woman Leading a Feminist Revolution

Lesbian Minister Becomes President of National Abortion Federation

Protestant Church Founded by George Washington Rejects Him and Embraces Feminism and Liberation Theology

Lesbian who murdered her former lover’s daughter, 2, and attempted to kill her son, 10, left a note explaining she was inspired to do it by a sermon in a homosexual church

Two Brazilian lesbians stab a boy one year after cutting off his sex organ to make him a “girl,” but the press and psychologists refuse to link the crime to homosexual behavior

First case of criminal activity in space: Lesbian astronaut is accused of accessing the bank account of her estranged lesbian “wife” from the International Space Station during their messy divorce

Number of legal abortions rises in the Israeli Army as coexistence of male and female soldiers has increased their sexual activity

Disney Threatens to Boycott Georgia Over Abortion Ban

Abortion, the Inquisition and Revisionism in the Encyclopedia Britannica

Pope Francis compares abortion to “hiring a hitman” and he says it can never be condoned

Trump suggests pro-lifers have gone too far in Alabama with near-total abortion ban as he says he is pro-life but believes in abortion for babies conceived in rape and incest

Conservative televangelist Pat Robertson says Alabama “has gone too far” in its “extreme” anti-abortion law because it does not include capital punishment for babies conceived in rape and incest

Everyone Should Remember the Holocaust

Leading Causes of Death in the United States, and Gun Homicides Are Not One of Them

Anti-Baby Vegans Preach It’s Morally Wrong for People to Have Babies and Revile Those Who Disagree with Them

The folly of man’s planning

Exposing the Global Population Control Agenda

Anthony Comstock: the first pro-life activist in the modern history

Blood in the Rivers: the Contraceptive Culture and Prophecies in Revelation

Trump Has Broken His Promise of Defunding the American Abortion Holocaust

Abortion in Israel: Why Is There No Public Outcry from Pro-Life Christians?

Holocaust, Abortion and Sodomy

Tom Parker: the Biggest Threat to Abortion in this Generation, According to Pro-Abortion Critic

 

An Empire Launched by U.S. Socialists

By Julio Severo

World War 2 was beginning, and for patriotic and conservative reasons Republicans did not want any involvement of their nation with foreign problems, but President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his Democratic Party were desperate to involve the United States in this bloody war.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Josef Stalin

Republicans thought that the United States should mind its own national problems and let other nations mind their own problems. And there are authors who think that the Pearl Harbor attack was allowed by Roosevelt to “force” the U.S. to enter the war. It worked. Republican conservatives did exactly what socialist Roosevelt wanted.

Yet, Roosevelt was looking not only at the war, but also at ways to use it to advance his personal project of a global organization ruling the world — the United Nations.

Roosevelt was a socialist very different from the socialists in the modern Democratic Party. His neocon speeches had plenty of words of patriotism, God, prayer, etc. He seemed much more conservative than modern Republican conservatives, even though his conservatism was purely strategic. But his dream of a United Nations was fulfilled — with bloody dictatorships like the Soviet Union and China getting permanent seats, by the courtesy of the United States.

In his book “New World Order The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies,” author William T. Still said,

“Support for both secret societies and Marxism has run in FDR’s family. His ancestor, Clinton B. Roosevelt, a New York assemblyman, was a noted American Socialist, He authored The Science of Government Founded on Natural Law where he outlined his plan for setting up a world government.”

Still showed that in his book, Clinton B. Roosevelt said,

“There is no God of justice to order things aright on earth; if there be a God, he is a malicious and revengeful being, who created us for misery.”

Still said that “Roosevelt’s Lend Lease policy of the early 1940s” to help Soviets face Nazis “rebuilt the Soviet war machine into the dominant force.”

So the first significant intervention of the U.S. neocon empire in the great world war helped the communist empire — the Soviet Union. And whenever the U.S. neocon empire makes its military interventions, it strengthens socialism and Islam.

As a socialist project from Roosevelt’s neocon mind, the United Nations has also been fundamental for the expansion of socialism and Islam.

Even though modern conservatives have no difficulty to see the United Nations as socialist, many of them, perhaps influenced by neocons, have a very hard time to see that the role of an empire that the United States plays today was consecrated and “patriotized” by Roosevelt in World War 2.

The socialist dream of Roosevelt created the United Nations and gave the United States his calling of an empire. Today, the United States has over 800 military bases around the world. Not to call it an empire is to deny reality itself.

It is a contradiction and shame that a nation with thousands of soldiers in other nations is unable to protect its own borders, which are open to drug and human traffickers.

So Roosevelt forced the U.S. to enter a bloody war that Republican and patriotic conservatives did not want to enter.

He created a global organization to defend human rights granting permanent seats to bloody dictatorships that systematically violated these rights.

And he took the U.S. from its patriotic and national realm to put it into the orbit of an empire.

Today, forgetting their past patriotic feelings, many Republicans have joined the neocon camps and if a modern Roosevelt wanted to enter any war, Republicans would enthusiastically help him without any need of a Pearl Harbor. Patriotism was defeated by neoconservatism.

The socialist United Nations owes gratitude to socialist Roosevelt.

The neocon America owes gratitude to socialist Roosevelt.

If America is today an empire with over 800 military bases around the world, she owes gratitude to U.S. socialists.

It is not only conservatives who get confused by the socialist and conservative nature of modern America. Socialists around the world usually accuse the United States of being a capitalist empire without noticing that America’s role of an empire is a tragedy created by socialists themselves.

So when Republican conservatives embellish their speeches with plenty of words of patriotism, God and prayer to excuse military interventionism and wars in other nations they are not doing anything that a shrewd Democrat could not do. Roosevelt is just an example.

America fulfilling a neocon and imperialistic mission of military interventions and endless wars just shows that Roosevelt and socialism put the ideological nature of America in an utter state of moral and spiritual confusion.

Portuguese version of this article: Um Império Lançado por Socialistas dos EUA

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

The Transcendent Power of Neoconservatism in the U.S. Media and among Left-Wingers and Right-Wingers

What Is Neoconservatism? Who are the Neocons?

Conservative Babylon in “Persecuted”: Hybrid Televangelist Framed by Pagan Neocon, and the Free Speech or Patriotic or Equality “Gospel” Replacing the Gospel of Jesus Christ

God Is Good to Israel: How Providence Hindered Franklin Roosevelt from Hindering the Birth of the Modern State of Israel

Mike Pompeo: Chinese Communism is “the Central Threat of Our Times”

Manifest Destiny in the Bible? America Is Modern Babylon, Said David Wilkerson

 

George Soros Funds Jesuit Organizations

By Julio Severo

“In the past four years, Jesuit institutions have received at least $1.7 million in donations from the Open Society Foundations (OSF) that are funded by plutocrat George Soros,” said Catholic website ChurchMilitant.

Its report, titled “Billionaire Atheist Funnels Cash to Jesuits,” also said,

“By examining documents recorded on the internet, it's evident that the Jesuits' biggest recipient of Soros’ largesse is the U.S.-based Jesuit Worldwide Learning. In 2016, the organization received $890,000, while, in 2018, it garnered another $410,000. This was the only one of the three Jesuit institutions to recognize the Soros Foundations as a ‘partner.’”

To be a partner of George Soros is a great tragedy, because Soros is a left-wing billionaire engaged in multiple Marxist revolutions around the world. Even though his organizations were expelled from Russia, he and especially his money have been welcomed among Jesuits. The Church Militant said,

“In 2018, Jesuit Refugee Service received $176,452 in support of migrants from Latin America and the Caribbean region. For its part, Jesuit Service to Migrants (Servicio Jesuita a Migrantes) received $75,000 in 2016 and another $151,125 in 2018, according to ACI Prensa.”

It is no wonder that Soros is funding Catholic Jesuit organizations that help immigrants from Latin America. Most of these immigrants are Catholic, and Catholic Latin America is the cradle of Liberation Theology. In a way or another, Latin American Catholics support several items of Liberation Theology. So to import such immigrants is to help socialism in America.

Yet, Church Militant seems to be surprised that Catholic groups are helping Soros and socialism. There should be no surprise. Brazil, the largest Catholic nation in the world, has a massive presence of Liberation Theology in the Catholic Church.

Besides, Catholic support for Marxist ideas is not a new thing and has been a reality since the late 1800s.

The current pope, Francis, is a supporter of socialist ideas. Even though I support the pro-life stances of Francis, his stances against conservative Christians fighting the gay activism are horrible. But even “Catholic” right-wingers who want to overthrow the pope because of socialism have suspicious stances on homosexuality.

While the left-wing pope seems to appreciate left-wing homosexuals, suspicious Catholic right-wingers seem to appreciate right-wing homosexuals, not perceiving that both stances are wrong because regardless their political ideological preferences, any individual practicing or defending homosexuality is disqualified by the Christian standards.

The homosexual issue has left left-wing Catholics and right-wing Catholics in a state of confusion.

The left-wing pope is a Jesuit who works against capitalism. But this is not the first time Jesuits work against capitalism.

In the early 1600s, Dutch Protestants colonized Northeast Brazil, where they formed the first society with religious tolerance in Brazil. Under their rule, the Jews built the first synagogue in the Americas. The Dutch Protestants built what Brazil had not: Massive theaters, bridges and many other buildings that, after four centuries, remain today.

The Northeast Brazil, traditionally poor, never had so beautiful and stately buildings. Under Dutch rule, this was also the first capitalist society in Brazil.

In the Dutch colony, Jews and Protestants were protected from the Inquisition, which was active in other parts of Brazil, persecuting, torturing and killing Jews.

Yet, Jesuits poisoned the minds of Portuguese Catholics throughout Brazil, portraying the Dutch Protestant settlers as dangerous “heretics” who should be destroyed. After several battles, the Jesuits won and the Dutch had to leave Brazil. As the Jews would be persecuted by the Inquisition if they remained in Northeast Brazil, they chose to follow the Dutch and moved to New York, which belonged to the Dutch in that time.

The first banking system in New York was established by these Brazilian Jews under protection of Dutch Protestant capitalists.

So Jesuits expelled Dutch Protestants, Jews and Dutch capitalism and its progress. And the label “heretic” was so strong against Dutch capitalist Protestants that some Brazilian school books of the 1970s still recorded Dutch as heretic invaders.

Because of the Jews and Dutch Protestant capitalists in Northeast, Brazil could have become a capitalist power, but the Jesuits “saved” Brazil from such capitalist destiny and instead let New York occupy the post of capitalist power.

So Brazil, instigated by Jesuits, has in its history the horrible stain of rejecting and fighting against capitalism.

If Jesuits four centuries ago were persecuting capitalists, why are Catholics today surprised that Jesuits are partners of Soros?

It is not surprise also that Jesuits have a history of persecuting Protestants, who are historically more capitalist. The Catholic Encyclopedia by Charles G. Herbermann (1914 edition) says,

“As the object of the [Jesuit] society was the propagation and strengthening of the Catholic faith everywhere, the Jesuits naturally endeavored to counteract the spread of Protestantism. They became the main instruments of the Counter-Reformation.”

The Counter-Reformation was very successful in Brazil, where Jesuits destroyed the presence of Dutch capitalist Protestants and Jews and established again the Inquisition and total religious intolerance to protect their Catholic non-capitalist non-progress.

What are Jesuits doing today that is different from what Jesuits did in the past? The same Jesuits who were anti-capitalist troublemakers in the past continue committed to their old mission. The traditional anti-capitalist spirit of the Jesuits naturally led to Jesuit support of socialism. In this sense, Pope Francis is not to blame for being a socialist pope who attacks capitalism. After all, he is a Jesuit.

So if in the past Jesuits were persecuting and expelling capitalists and today they are helping George Soros and other socialists, why should any conservative Christian be appalled?

Portuguese version of this article: George Soros financia organizações jesuítas

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Left-Wing Billionaire George Soros and His Plan of Global Chaos

Immigration: A Weapon of Mass Cultural Destruction in Liberal Hands

Pope Francis compares abortion to “hiring a hitman” and he says it can never be condoned

Pope Compares Politicians Opposed to Gays, Jews To Hitler

The Hijacking of Homosexuality by the Right, a Challenge for Christians

In his effort to produce a film exposing homosexuality in the Vatican to make Pope Francis renounce, Steve Bannon caused backlash from conservative Catholic leaders and was exposed for his own involvement with two notorious pedophiles

The Religious War between CIA and KGB in Latin America

End of communism not good for Catholicism?

Martin Niemöller, the anti-Nazi Lutheran minister who warned how Christians should speak out when people are persecuted. But how valid was his advice?

By Julio Severo

Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) was a German Lutheran theologian and minister who criticized Nazism and was imprisoned by Nazis in 1937. He is more known for his famous declaration:

“First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out — because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out — because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me.”

By “they,” he meant Nazis, who came after socialists, trade unionists and Jews. All these groups were basically socialists in Germany. Trade unionists are mostly socialists, and one example is former Brazilian socialist president Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva, who has a history as a trade unionist. And the Jewish preference for socialism has been a historical fact.

So what Niemöller meant was: Nazis were persecuting socialists.

What he meant is that many Germans did not care if Nazis were persecuting, imprisoning and killing socialists, trade unionists and Jews. But such indifference, as he pointed, would eventually bring persecution to Christians.

The Encyclopedia Britannica says about Niemöller:

“As founder and a leading member of the Bekennende Kirche [Confessing Church] within the larger Evangelical Church (Lutheran and Reformed) of Germany, Niemöller was influential in building opposition to Adolf Hitler's efforts to bring the German churches under control of the Nazis and the so-called German Christians. The resistance of the Confessing Church was openly declared and solidified at its Synod of Barmen in 1934. Niemöller continued to preach throughout Germany and in 1937 was arrested by Hitler’s secret police, the Gestapo. Eventually sent to the concentration camps at Sachsenhausen and then Dachau, he was moved in 1945 to the Tirol in Austria, where Allied forces freed him at the end of World War II. He helped rebuild the Evangelical Church in Germany.”

From his experience seeing Nazis persecuting, imprisoning and killing socialists, trade unionists and Jews, Niemöller understood that Christians could not be indifferent when such groups are persecuted.

Visitors stand in front of the quotation from Martin Niemöller that is on display in the Permanent Exhibition of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

He is seen as a good Christian example. His name and especially his famous declaration “First they came…” stand permanently in the Holocaust Museum in the United States. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, his declaration was also said in stronger terms than socialists:

“First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out — because I was not a communist…”

So it is no wonder that Niemöller received in 1967the Lenin Peace Prize, the Soviet Union’s equivalent of the Nobel Peace Prize. And from 1961 to 1968, he was president of the World Council of Churches, a socialist Protestant organization.

He was courageous for speaking out against Nazism, but because he saw the extremism of an anti-socialist and anti-communist political system, he fell into the polarization trap, and he chose the other extremism. Even so, his famous declaration “First they came…” is used today by left-wingers and right-wingers.

His declaration dispels confusion today among those who did not live in that time and try to see Nazism as a socialist movement. In fact, both Nazism and Italian fascism, which are identified by Jews as right-wing movements, received inspiration from a famous right-wing writer, Julius Evola, who was the guru of Benito Mussolini.

Francisco Franco, the dictator in Spain and one of the most prominent right-wing leaders in Europe in that time, received military assistance from Nazism in Germany. The Encyclopedia Britannica says that the main influence in his life was that he was “close to his mother, a pious and conservative upper middle-class Roman Catholic.”

According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, Franco, who followed the military career, was so intelligent that “In 1915 he became the youngest captain in the Spanish army” and “In May 1935 he was appointed chief of the Spanish army's general staff.”

The Encyclopedia Britannica also says Franco’s support was “derived mainly from the antileftist middle classes” and that he was “one of the world’s leading anticommunist statesmen.”

Modern right-wing readers just do not understand how Nazis militarily helped Franco and his anticommunism.

The problem with Nazism is that it was inspired by occultism, and Evola was also an occultist. And occultism always brings confusion.

One of these confusions was a very brief treaty between the Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in 1939. Even though this treaty lasted less than six months, often it is used as an “evidence” that both were two kinds of socialism. Yet, if such short-lived union to the Soviet Union is an evidence that Nazi Germany was socialist, what would the same critics say about the U.S.-Soviet alliance, which lasted from 1941 to 1945 during the World War 2, for much more time than the short Soviet-Nazi alliance did?

And because the Soviet Union fought against Nazism, the U.S. put the Soviet Union in the foundation of the United Nations. This is the polarization trap.

You fall into the polarization trap only when you do not understand that there were higher forces operating in Germany. These forces were occultist, with its many pitfalls of confusion.

Martin Niemöller was unable to understand the political and spiritual tensions of this trap and these pitfalls.

And today people do not care if Niemöller had embraced socialism. For them what matters is that he embraced anti-Nazism, which was an anti-socialist and anti-communist system, as Niemöller saw with his own eyes.

What did Niemöller miss that he did not understand that socialism was so destructive as Nazism? He lacked the anointing of the Holy Spirit and his supernatural gifts, which could have helped him see realities he was unable to see with his human eyes.

He embraced socialism because he saw the horror that socialists in Germany suffered from Nazis. But he never saw that socialists in the Soviet Union committed the same and bigger horrors.

So Niemöller’s famous declaration is spiritually wrong. Christians have no calling to defend communists and socialists. And they should be careful with groups using extreme anti-communism as a flag. Such flag was used in the past by groups, including Nazis and fascists, which got inspiration from Evola. The same flag is used today by groups with the same occult inspiration.

The calling of Christians is to preach the Gospel to communists, socialists, Nazis, right-wingers and left-wingers. Every sinner needs to hear the Gospel.

While you are busy with the preaching of the Gospel and are open to the Holy Spirit and his gifts, you will never fall into the polarization trap and occult pitfalls in this polarization.

Portuguese version of this article: Martin Niemöller, o pastor luterano anti-nazista que alertou como os cristãos precisam abrir a boca quando as pessoas são perseguidas. Mas até que ponto o conselho dele é válido?

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Nazism: Nationalism and Socialism at the Service of Occultism

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro said that Nazism was a left-wing movement after he visited the Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem. But the museum, which is a memorial of the Jewish victims of Nazism, says that Nazism was a right-wing movement. What about now?

Jewish Perspective: Hitler and Socialism

Hitler’s Strident Anti-Marxism

Olavo de Carvalho and Julius Evola, parallels of two prominent right-wing occultists of the Traditionalist School

Billy Graham and The Forgotten Factor in the Overthrow of Soviet Communism

Rev. Larry Christenson, a Charismatic Lutheran Pioneer

Putin Fires New Broadside against Western Liberalism, But Trump Does Not Understand that the Gay Ideology Is Part of the Liberal Ideology

By Julio Severo

Russian President Vladimir Putin fired a new broadside against Western liberalism, saying that policies such as welcoming Islamic immigrants have hurt people’s interests and that the LGBT propaganda aggressively enforces its point of view on others, proselytizing children.

Speaking after the Group of 20 summit in Osaka, Japan, Putin said that Donald Trump’s victory in the 2016 U.S. presidential election is rooted in growing public dismay with mainstream liberal policies.

He said Trump’s election victory was driven by growing disenchantment with liberal policies.

“The liberal idea has started eating itself,” Putin said at a news conference. “Millions of people live their lives, and those who propagate those ideas are separate from them.”

He also charged that the influx of Islamic immigrants to Europe has infringed on people’s rights. “People live in their own country, according to their own traditions, why should it happen to them?” Putin said.

The Russian leader added that while “liberal ideas remain attractive as a whole” for ideologists, election results show that people want change.

Putin hailed his meeting with Trump on the sidelines of the G-20 summit as “business-like and pragmatic.”

“We addressed almost the entire list of issues of mutual concern,” he said. “Of course, we talked about the situation in various parts of the world. Overall, these consultations were useful.”

He also responded to criticism from gay singer Elton John, who accused Putin of duplicity after he offered a critical view of the Western emphasis on LGBT rights.

“I deeply respect him, he is a musical genius and we all love his performance, but I believe he’s mistaken,” Putin said.

John and the filmmakers of his biopic “Rocketman” have sharply criticized a Russian distributor’s decision to remove scenes from the new movie featuring gay sex and drug use.

Putin argued that Russia’s ban on LGBT propaganda among children is aimed at protecting them from aggressive proselytizing by the LGBT activism.

“Let a person grow up first before making a choice,” Putin said. “Let the children in peace.”

He said that “our attitude to the LGBT community is absolutely calm and unbiased,” but added that “this part of community aggressively enforces its point of view on others.”

When the Russian law banning gay propaganda was approved in 2013, U.S. left-wing President Barack Hussein Obama attacked Russian resistance against the gay ideology and U.S. homosexual groups complained that such law would make impossible for homosexual indoctrination in Russian schools.

Putin’s broadside against Western liberalism was understood by conservatives around the world, but Trump’s response during a press conference after the G-20 Summit showed that the president was apparently unaware of what the phrase “Western liberalism” means.

One question, posed by Peter Baker of the New York Times, referenced a recent interview Putin gave the Financial Times, in which the Russian president said the “liberal idea” has “outlived its purpose” and “become obsolete.” Baker asked Trump if he agreed with Putin that “western-style liberalism” is obsolete and no longer relevant to today’s world.

Trump said he hadn’t seen Putin’s comments, but noted that he “may feel that way” because he sees what’s going on in cities, such as Los Angeles and San Francisco, that are governed by liberal administrations.

Evidently, Los Angeles, San Francisco and other U.S. cities are suffering the devasting economic effects of liberal policies. But as far as the homosexual ideology is involved, this is not a problem only of these cities. It is a problem pervasive throughout the U.S. society.

However, Trump seemed not have to understood that Putin’s broadside against Western liberalism included also a broadside against the gay ideology. In fact, Trump did not understand that the gay ideology is an inseparable part of Western liberalism.

I could add that Trump has a lot to learn from Putin about the gay ideology as a liberal plan to destroy the family in America and around the world. But this is not necessary. Long before Putin, America has the finest Christian leaders fighting against this ideology.

Scott Lively, Peter LaBarbera, Mike Heath and other Americans can help Mr. Trump understand how entrenched the gay ideology, which involves the homosexual indoctrination of children, is in the Western liberalism.

While Trump saw nothing wrong in Putin’s comments against liberalism and conservative Christians appreciated the positive points, more politically-minded individuals were suspicious of everything Putin said. Author Diana West said, “No, for the billionth time, he’s NOT a conservative. Can you say #Deception? Putin revels in everything multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) has done to ruin US, much of it originating in Moscow. Putin Says Multiculturalism is ‘No Longer Tenable.’”

People who see Russian communist conspiracies all the time use to charge that rampant immorality in America today it is because of Moscow.

Yet, such charges are not based on reality. For example, according to a DailyMail report, Washington D.C. in 1890s had a reign of prostitution. This was the capital of the most Protestant nation in the world, when Protestantism was much higher than today in the American nation. And there was no Soviet Union.

The DailyMail report said, “The White House’s neighbors in 1890s included 108 brothels and 50 saloons.” Prostitution was rampant around the White House more than one century ago.

From 1873 to 1915, Anthony Comstock fought against pornography, abortion and birth control in America, when there was no Soviet Union.

Comstock also fought against Margaret Sanger, the founder of the modern abortion movement in the U.S. and around the world, when there was no Soviet Union.

In 1915, when there was no Soviet Union, in the book edited by R. A. Torrey, “The Fundamentals — A Testimony to the Truth,” Professor Charles R. Erdman said,

“The sudden rise of Socialism is the most surprising and significant movement of the age. A few years ago the term suggested a dream of fanatics; today it embodies the creed and the hope of intelligent millions. For example, in America the Socialistic vote increased from 20,000, in 1892, to 900,000 in 1912.”

The Soviet Union was born in 1917, aided by American capitalists who wanted to overthrow the Russian czar, according to the book “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution: The Remarkable True Story of the American Capitalists Who Financed the Russian Communists,” by Antony C. Sutton, published in 1974.

In 1918, Bernard Baruch, chairman of the National War Industries Board under President Woodrow Wilson during World War I, said,

“We are living today [in the United States] in a highly organized state of socialism. The state is all; the individual is of importance only as he contributes to the welfare of the state.”

So when the Soviet Union was born in 1917, American officials were already aware that socialism was dominant in the U.S. society.

Nevertheless, there is a right-wing mania today to blame Russia for all American problems, as if America by herself were completely incapable of sinning. What happened to the Total Depravity Doctrine believed by the Pilgrims?

In fact, even conservative Republican administrations cause massive global problems. In 1974 the U.S. government under conservative Republican Gerald Ford produced, under CIA and USAID direction, the most destructive population control document ever devised by any government: NSSM 200.

NSSM 200 was inspired in Planned Parenthood, founded by Sanger. Who is to blame for the most destructive antifamily paper produced by a Republican administration? The Soviet Union?

In any case, in my answer to Diana West I tweeted,

“There is the stupid left-wing victimism, which blames society for all evils. And there is the parallel stupid right-wing victimism, which blames Russians for all evils in America, which had already a robust Social(ist) Gospel since the 1860s. Sadly, both victimisms are robust.”

Victimhood is a better word than victimism, but the reality remains: Putin has raised a very good point by attacking the gay ideology and Trump showed that he does not understand anything about the homosexual implications of the liberal ideology.

Perhaps this is the reason Trump has launched his recent campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world. He just does not understand that by doing this he is also advancing the liberal ideology.

I hope Mr. Trump may invite to the White House Scott Lively, Peter LaBarbera and Mike Heath, who can teach him that the gay ideology has everything to do with the liberal ideology and nothing to do with real conservatism.

I also hope, according to his 2016 plan of a partnership with Russia against Islamic terrorism, he may add a partnership with Russia against the homosexual propaganda to children and teens around the world.

With information from the Associated Press and Newsweek.

Portuguese version of this article: Putin dispara ataques contra o esquerdismo ocidental, mas Trump não compreende que a ideologia gay é parte da ideologia esquerdista

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Making Sodomy Great Again: Trump becomes first Republican president to celebrate LGBT Pride Month as he launches campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world

Largest U.S. Gay Magazine Furious Over Evangelical Protest Against U.S. Government Effort to Decriminalize Homosexuality Around the World

Trump Administration Pushing LGBT Agenda on Country of Georgia, But the People Fight Back

Who Is Bothered that I Asked More Conservative Energy from the Family Research Council against the Gay Agenda? Right Wing Watch, of the left-wing group People for the American Way!

Family Research Council: Serving Conservatism or Serving the Republican Party?

Trump Supports Gay “Marriage” While His Conservative Christian Supporters Remain Silent

Trump Administration Seeks Legalization of Homosexuality Around the World While Children and Other Victims of Homosexuality Are Forgotten

For Second Year, Trump’s State Department Recognizes June as LGBTI Pride Month

What Will America Gain by Making Sodomy Great?

U.S., European Union, Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Israel Pressure Romania to Embrace Homosexual Activism

Trump Delivers Historic Pro-Life Speech But Goofs As He Congratulates Homosexual Republicans

Trump’s State Department Recognizes June 2017 as LGBTI Pride Month

Ivanka Trump posts message of support for LGBTQ Pride Month

U.S. Embassies Under Trump Advance LGBT Agenda

Trump Continues Obama’s Homosexual Imperialism and Frustrates Christian Conservatives

Trump and Obama: What Has Changed Between Them on Homosexuality and Saudi Arabia?

Trump Administration Shows Progressive Response to the Gay Agenda

The Left-Winger, the Right-Winger and the Cake

Trump and Prophecies, and a New Model of National and World Leader

An Open Letter to President Donald Trump

Exposing the Global Population Control Agenda