Indecent, Hypocritical and Opportunistic Immigrants In a Suicidal Nation

By Julio Severo

If I were Mr. Spock, the Star Trek character who sees everything from the perspective of logic, I would conclude that socialists who praise Cuba and Venezuela should move to these socialist “havens.”

But I am not Spock and the world seems very far away from genuine logic. Understand. All socialists who praise Cuba and Venezuela at the first opportunity move to the United States. Is this logic?

A conservative evangelical like me, who loves the U.S. conservative history, faces one thousand difficulties to enter the U.S. But Brazilian Marxist Protestants who hate the U.S. conservative history immigrate to the United States with the greatest of ease.

A specific case is Ronilso Pacheco, a Brazilian immigrant who lives in New York and shamelessly exalts the Marxist movement Black Lives Matter and curses Trump without the least bit of shame.

Many other Brazilian Marxists live in New York and other American cities. None of them wants to live in Cuba or Venezuela.

Are they examples or not of hypocrisy?

The immigration business is so ideologically profitable for the expansion of Marxism that even leftist billionaire George Soros has invested in Jesuit organizations that facilitate immigration in the United States. The Catholic Church has a vital role in the Marxist expansion of immigration in the U.S.

And then there is the Islamic issue: The United States, in a highly suicidal way, has been for decades importing thousands and thousands of radical Muslims who hate the United States, its Christianity and its conservative history. Islam is a guarantee of national suicide for any Christian nation.

One of the most scandalous cases is that of Ilhan Omar, who was taken to the United States as a Muslim “refugee” from Somalia. Unbelievably, she ended up becoming a congresswoman, using her position to attack the United States and Israel and praise Islamic terrorists.

Saudi Arabia, which is the world capital of the most extremist form of Islam, is carrying out all kinds of crimes and terrorism against the United States. And what does the U.S. do? They turn a blind eye and still provide all sorts of weapons for the Saudis.

I don’t know what’s worse: These ungrateful and wicked immigrants or the nation that welcomes such perfidious immigrants.

Another example of blatant hypocrisy is Olavo de Carvalho, a Brazilian immigrant self-exiled in the U.S. since 2005. Like every charlatan, he entered the U.S. as a correspondent for a Brazilian newspaper. The big problem is that this newspaper has always had very little circulation and has no money even to support a correspondent in poor Haiti, let alone in the U.S.

The fact is that, in terms of fraud and deception, Carvalho does not lose anything in comparison to any socialist. The worst thing is that he attacks and criticizes evangelical Americans (only in Portuguese, for no American to see!) as liars just because American literature is champion against the Inquisition and champion in the defense of the Jews. As a trickster, Carvalho says the Inquisition was a human rights court. Then did the Inquisition, contrary to what Jewish and Protestant historians inform, save Jews and Protestants?

In a very “smart” coup, Carvalho had founded an institute in the U.S. to facilitate immigration visas for his relatives and allies. As soon as I denounced the coup, the institute closed.

The right place for Carvalho is Spain, famous for its bloody Inquisition. However, neither Marxists nor Carvalho want Cuba or Spain. They want the U.S.!

The right place for Muslims is Saudi Arabia. But they also want the U.S.!

Too bad the United States doesn’t know how to select immigrants who love its beautiful conservative history.

Directly from New York, Brazilian immigrant Ronilso Pacheco curses Americans as racists.

Directly from Virginia, Brazilian immigrant Olavo de Carvalho curses American historians about the Inquisition as liars, but the only real diploma that Carvalho has is as a professional astrologer. Nothing else.

If the Trump administration hired me as an immigration inspector, I would be an Anthony Comstock: I would wipe out all the Marxist, Islamic and pro-Inquisition false conservatives who detest the U.S. and its beautiful conservative history.

Portuguese version of this article: Imigrantes indecentes, hipócritas e oportunistas em um país suicida

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Immigration: A Weapon of Mass Cultural Destruction in Liberal Hands

Churches Closing and Mosques Opening in The United States

George Soros Funds Jesuit Organizations

Catholic Church Paid Millions in Dollars to Facilitate Immigrant Invasion in U.S.

A Charlatan Made in Brazil Exiled in the United States

Saudi Impunity on American Soil: FBI finds Saudi Arabia helps its citizens escape the U.S. after serious crimes while U.S. officials look the other way

Brazilian Baptist minister, who is an immigrant in the U.S., calls the Trump administration “wretched administration” regarding COVID-19 and says that Trump makes clearly racist statements that incite violence

Muhammad is one of the top 10 baby names for first time in the U.S. history

By Julio Severo

For the first time in the history of the United States, Muhammad made in the 2019 list of top 10 baby names, according to the parenting website BabyCenter, which released its annual list of 100 most popular baby names for girls and boys in the United States.

The online parenting and pregnancy website compiled the names of babies born to some 600,000 registered U.S. users in 2019. Its research found a rise in Islamic names, with Muhammad for boys and Aaliyah for girls making incredibly the top 10 for the first time.

Muhammad is considered the most popular name in the world, and UK news site Independent says it is “given to an estimated 150 million men and boys.”

“Muhammad’s been rising on BabyCenter top baby name lists around the world, so we knew it would soon break into the U.S. top 10,” Linda Murray, BabyCenter’s global editor in chief, said in a press statement. “Muslim families often choose Muhammad for firstborn sons to honor the prophet and bring blessings to the child. The name also has multiple spellings, and that helps a name get into the top 10.”

In 2018 and in 2017, Muhammad ranked No. 14 on BabyCenter’s list in the United States. The name Muhammad first entered the top 100 in the United States in 2013 and has been climbing ever since. Now, there is no turning back. Muhammad will advance furiously until it reaches the number 1 in the top ten.

The increased popularity of Muhammad as a baby name in the United States is directly linked to the natural increase of Islamic families and immigrants. While U.S. families have usually two babies, Islamic families and immigrants have many more babies.

Islamic families are less likely to use birth control. Christian families are more likely to use birth control, even though there are specific verses in the Bible about large families and many children as blessings. There is even a specific God’s command to increase and be fruitful.

The consequence of U.S. Christians not increasing enough is that they are letting Muslims increase more than enough.

The increase of Islamic immigrants and Islamic babies brings other consequences. Since 2014 the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey has been showing that Arabic is the fastest growing language in the U.S. among over 60 million residents who do not speak English.

In many U.S. states, Islam ranks as the second most prevalent religion. This is a totally new reality for the U.S. While in the past Protestantism was dominant in the U.S. and Catholicism was often the second most important religion, now increasingly Islam reaches the second place and, if Americans keep rejecting babies and loving contraception and abortion, Muslims will defeat Americans just by the sheer numbers of their babies.

U.S. Christians also do not understand that the Statue of Liberty is a powerful Islamic symbol.

The name Muhammad is increasing not only among babies in the U.S., the largest Protestant nation in the world. It is very popular also among babies in Berlin, Germany’s capital, because German Christians have embraced birth control. And Muhammad nows tops as the most popular baby name in Britain, a traditionally Protestant nation.

Islamic families understand that babies are the future of a nation, civilization and religion. The more, the better. U.S. Christian families just do not understand such reality. For them, the smaller, the better. They just do not see that birth control destroys the future of families, a nation, civilization and religion.

Babies are the future. Birth control destroys the future. Muslims are just taking advantage of this reality. U.S. Christians are foolishly delivering the future of America to those who have more babies.

It is not Islam that threatens the Christian future of America. It is the U.S. rejection of babies through birth control.

If Christian Americans today had so many babies as the Pilgrims and the Americans of the generation of the Founders had — about eight children per family —, the name Muhammad would never be even in the top 100 baby names in the U.S., which would have no longer need to import millions of immigrants, including Muslims, who are defacing America in her own origins, roots and spiritual foundations.

With information from San Francisco Gate and WND.

Portuguese version of this article: Maomé é um dos 10 principais nomes de bebês pela primeira vez na história dos EUA

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Mohammed was the most popular name for boys born in Berlin in 2018

Muhammad tops as the most popular baby name in Britain

In Germany, the Catholic Church and Protestant churches lost more than 430,000 members in 2018

War between Christian Nations and Muslim Nations: A Table Talk between an American Economist and Young Muslims in Indonesia

Patheos Lambasts Julio Severo for Mentioning Islamic Origin of Statue of Liberty

Coming Soon? A More Islamic, Buddhist, Hindu and Less Christian America

Rivers of Blood: A Brazilian pro-life Evangelical writes about the contraceptive culture and prophecies in Revelation

The folly of man’s planning

In Hollywood’s Blacklist: Allah Is Loving, But Non-Acceptance of Homosexuality Leads to Violence, Sadism and Terror

Immigration: A Weapon of Mass Cultural Destruction in Liberal Hands

An Open Letter to President Donald Trump

Dear President Donald Trump

I have admired your actions against abortion and your efforts to surround yourself with pro-life leaders. These actions and efforts are especially worthy of our international applause because, before your presidency, you had no pro-life or conservative history.

I have admired your effort to surround yourself with Franklin Graham and other fine Christian advisers.

I have admired your effort, in spite of your history of non-opposition to the gay agenda, to fulfill the wish of your conservative constituents who understand that the gay agenda is harmful to American families.

Now, let me tell you what in you has especially won my admiration: your speech, during your 2016 campaign, against neocons.

You were courageous to denounce the Iraqi War, begun by Bush, with Hillary Clinton’s approval. Bush hated you for it and he did not vote for you. But your denunciation was very important because in the trail of Bush’s invasion of Iraq there was a genocide of Iraqi Christians. Bush, who protected oil interests in Iraq, did not protect Christian lives. Before the invasion, there was 2,000,000 Iraqi Christians. Now they number less than 400,000. Oil was more important for Bush than Christian blood.

Just as you, Bush was a good man in domestic policy regarding abortion and more or less good regarding sodomy. But just as you denounced, he failed in foreign policy by following the neocon agenda of wars, wars and more wars. As an evangelical Christian, he could have done better, especially by protecting oppressed Christians. But he did not do.

What is the point, conservatives ask today about Bush, of being pro-life and evangelical in America, but being pro-death through perpetual wars in other nations — wars to protect the Saudi Islamic oil at the expense of Christian blood?

American troops should first and foremost protect the U.S. borders. But they are far away often protecting the Saudi dictatorship that is responsible for unparalleled persecution of Christians in the Middle East. Bush and Obama erred by defending the Saudis.

Today your administration is repeating their errors. You are giving priority to the Saudis and their oil, not to Christians and their blood spilled by the Saudis and their fanatical Muslim allies. You made massive sales of U.S. arms to the Saudis, even knowing that they and Obama founded ISIS. These sales have produced thousands of jobs in America — at the cost of thousands of Christian lives slaughtered by Islamic groups backed, funded and armed by the Saudis.

As Obama and Bush, you are empowering Saudi Arabia, the most terrorist nation in the world.

Obama and Bush dislike you because you spoke against their errors. The Saudis were worried about you in 2016 because your speech attacked neocons. Neocons and the Saudis are old partners in wars. And the ideal machine to produce perpetual wars is Islam and its terrorists.

Your speech was a great model, unparalleled in American history. You spoke about protecting U.S. borders and staying away from the Bush’s and Obama’s meddling and errors (which, as far as Christian victims are concerned, are crimes) in the Middle East. You denounced that ISIS, which committed a genocide against Christians in Iraq and Syria, was created by Obama and Hillary Clinton.

When I look at the Middle East map, it is filled of U.S. military bases. These bases were there during Bush, Obama and now you. Many of these bases are in Saudi Arabia, protecting their oil.

When Bush and Obama looked at the Middle East map, they saw the high number of U.S. military bases as excellent opportunities to protect Saudi Arabia, which is the greatest sponsor of Islamic terrorism in the world.

When I look at the map, I see the high number of U.S. military bases as an excellent and unique opportunity to protect defenseless Christians.

How could not America protect Christians who were being slaughtered by ISIS when American bases are so near? Why should oil be more important than innocent blood?

In your first international trip, the first nation you visited was Saudi Arabia. You did exactly what Bush and Obama would have done: you gave your first fruits to the Muslim Saudis. You gave them an honor they do not deserve. Next (in second place), you visited Israel, but you did not recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. You gave exclusivity to Saudi Arabia, not to Israel.

No other nation in the world has the power to protect Israel and recognize Jerusalem as its capital as the United States has. All of this power was given by God not to a pro-abortion, pro-sodomy and neocon America, but to a Protestant Christian America, and he can take it back whenever he wants. This power should always be used to protect defenseless Christians and Israel.

Yet, homosexualist, pro-abortion and neocon barbarians have taken over America and her original Protestant Christian power in such a way that today even the State Department, which runs the U.S. foreign-affair policy, has no acknowledgment of the vital role of Protestant Christianity and its biblical values in the foundation of America. Only a pagan America could have wreaked the foreign-affair havoc done under Bush and Obama.

A nation is busy protecting its own borders. An empire is busy installing and keeping military bases around the world and seeking ways to invade other nations’ borders. Both Bush and Obama were busy running an empire. Who will run the United States as a nation?

Both Bush and Obama could not protect defenseless Christians and they had to protect Islamic Saudis because they were busy running an empire. Who will run the United States as the Christian nation envisioned by its Founders?

Pro-life Bush, who does not like you, protected the Saudi oil at the expense of Christian blood. He was inconsistent, because he was pro-life in his domestic policy, but pro-death, especially the death of Christians, in his foreign policy. To be pro-Saudi is always to be pro-death of Christians. Bush is a Protestant Christian, but he forgot Christianity and its values in his foreign policy in the Middle East.

Bush never fulfilled his conservative promise to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, and he forced Israel to get involved in his nasty neocon foreign policy that protected the Saudi oil interests at the expense of Christian blood.

By behaving this way, Bush did not respect the Protestant Christian foundation of America. I publicly supported Bush for his pro-life domestic policy, even though I am distressed, as you were in 2016, over his pro-death foreign policy. Left-wing radicals attacked me because I supported pro-life Bush.

Pro-abortion Obama, who also does not like you, protected the Saudi oil at the expense of Christian blood. He was consistent, because he was pro-abortion (pro-death) in his domestic policy and equally pro-death, especially the death of Christians, in his foreign policy. To be pro-Saudi is always to be pro-death of Christians.

Obama never fulfilled his left-wing promise to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, and he forced Israel to get involved in his nasty neocon foreign policy that protected the Saudi oil interests at the expense of Christian blood.

By behaving this way, Obama did not also respect the Protestant Christian foundation of America. I never supported Obama because I was distressed, as you were in 2016, over his pro-death domestic policy and foreign policy. Left-wing radicals attacked me because I attacked pro-abortion Obama.

Anyway, both Bush and Obama disliked you over your speech against a neocon, warmongering, pro-death foreign policy.

Why should you let your administration now follow them and their errors — indeed, foreign-affair crimes?

I liked and I like your 2016 speech.

Remember: who voted for you to be president was not neocons or liberals or progressives. Who voted for you were evangelicals, who believed in your anti-neocon speech.

Where is the 2016 Trump who scared neocons and Muslims?

Please, do not abandon your 2016 speech. Have a partnership with Russia against Islamic terrorism. This was your speech. Stick to it.

Please, do not let the U.S. foreign policy continue its tradition of forcing Israel to get involved in the nasty neocon agenda to protect the Saudi oil interests at the expense of Christian blood.

Please, recognize the whole, undivided Jerusalem as the historical capital of Israel and recognize Israeli borders just as recognized in the Bible. Both Bush and Obama were under instructions from the U.S. Congress to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, but they never did it. Surpass them.

Please, condemn Saudi Arabia for its massive sponsorship of Islamic terrorism, including ISIS. Your speech was to ban Islamic nations sponsoring terrorism. No other nation deserves more the number one position in your ban list than Saudi Arabia does.

Please, relocate to the U.S. borders the American military bases around the world. Your speech pointed out defense of U.S. borders. In no other place the U.S. military is more necessary than in the U.S. borders.

Please, protect Christians minorities who have been directly endangered by Bush’s and Obama’s unnecessary military invasions — including in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Libya. The most necessary military invasion is in the Saudi Arabia.

Please, fulfill your 2016 vision and fight neocons, whose warmongering left-wing and right-wing militants are a real threat to the America envisioned by George Washington and other Protestant Founders. Drain the swamp. Expel them from your administration.

If you cannot undo the massive foreign-affair crimes of Bush and Obama against Christians persecuted by Muslims, at least facilitate their immigration to America just as Obama and Bush facilitated the immigration of Muslims to America.

If you cannot have a conservative foreign affair policy because neocons are threatening to destroy your life or presidency to keep their warmongering machine advancing, speak out. Evangelicals who elected you can help you, through prayer and action. Prayer has much power.

My Open Letter is based in the hopes you gave in your 2016 speech. It is also based on the Christian intent of America’s Protestant Founders.

May Jesus Christ, through his Holy Spirit, guide you in the whole truth.

Sincerely,

Signed: Julio Severo, a Brazilian conservative evangelical writer

Portuguese version of this article: Carta Aberta ao Presidente Donald Trump

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Trump and Prophecies, and a New Model of National and World Leader

What Is Neoconservatism? Who are the Neocons?

It Is Official: White Evangelicals Gave Victory to Trump

Does New Immigration Law Open Brazil’s Borders to Islamic Invasion and Drug Trafficking?

By Julio Severo

Brazilian conservatives are expressing worry that Brazil is facing the threat of Islamization with its New Law of Immigration, approved by the Brazilian Senate and sent for presidential signing. This law follows the deterioration of the political landscape of Brazil with its endemic corruption.

During an Islamic conference in Chicago in 2008, an Imam described how Brazil would become an Islamic nation within 50 years. Even though the U.S. and especially Europe are facing a massive influx Muslims and their destructive religion, why would Brazil be of interest for Muslims?

In 2014 Turkey held an Islamic summit attended by 76 Islamic leaders from 40 countries. Latin America was represented by Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Suriname, Uruguay, Paraguay, Nicaragua, Panama, Colombia, Bolivia, the Dominican Republic, Guyana, Ecuador, Jamaica and Haiti. Turkey is the only Islamic nation in the NATO and a U.S. ally that is, as reported by WND, “perhaps the biggest al-Qaida base in the world.”

In the summit, Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that Islamic sailors found the New World in 1178. He said, “Muslims discovered America in 1178, not Christopher Columbus.”

He and other Islamic leaders want Latin America.

Brazil has been of interest because it is larger than the U.S. without Alaska and it is the powerhouse of South America not just due to its size but also due to the size of its economy and influence. It is said that where Brazil goes so goes South America.  Indeed.

Brazil’s contact with Islamic radicalism is not new.

During the military rule, Brazil opened the first diplomatic office of PLO, the Palestinian Liberation Organization, an Islamic terrorist organization, in 1979. Besides, the military administration was a prominent seller of arms to Islamic nations in the Middle East.

In the past decade, the socialist Lula administration helped fund the Palestinian Authority.

More recently, the mayor of São Paulo, João Doria, a Social Democrat, sold municipal assets under the excuse that he wants to improve services. Where did he go to advertise them? To the Gulf countries. He is a strong presidential candidate for the elections next year.

The prospects are not good, but the Brazilian bad example has not been worse than the American bad example. Under President Donald Trump, the U.S. government has increased its funding of the Palestinian Authority and CIA has rewarded Saudi Arabia, the main sponsor of the global Islamic terrorism, for “fighting terrorism.”

If where Brazil goes, so goes South America, where America goes, so goes Brazil.

Most of the Left in Brazil is anti-Semitic, anti-Israel and Pro-Palestinian. Add to the equation the fact that the Brazilian Left loves the U.S. Left’s infatuation with Islam. Because Brazil is the largest Catholic nation in the world, add also the inherent and historic animosity of the Catholic customs and traditions against Jews and Israel, and you have a perfect receipt for left-wingers to open the Brazilian doors to Muslims.

Since the late 1990s Saudi Arabia has been supporting the building of mosques and madrassas in Brazil, even though the number of Muslims remains small (official records mention fewer than 100,000 whereas Islamic leaders mention two million).

Saudi Arabia is the main Islamic ally of the United States in the Middle East, and this alliance has facilitated the Saudi expansion of a radical form of Islam, including in Brazil.

There has been an increase in the number of visits by Islamic leaders to government officials at municipal, state and federal levels in Brazil. There has also been increasing activity involving public safety, including the arrest of several Muslims accused of terror plots.

But Islam has not made an impact on the local population as its leaders would like. The only way for a faster growth is by fostering Muslim immigration to Brazil. There has been a concerted effort linking government officials, NGOs (including U.S. groups as the Ford Foundation, George Soros’ Open Society Foundation, etc.), Christian groups and Islamic leaders to open the doors for more immigrants and refugees. All of them have supported the New Law of Immigration, which has been criticized by Brazilian conservatives.

Why would Christian groups have an interest in Islamic immigration?

Catholic writer Cliff Kincaid said, “According to their financial statement for 2014, the latest year for which figures are available, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops received over $79 million in government grants to provide benefits to refugees.”

He added that the U.S. government gave more than $1.5 billion to several other Catholic organizations over the past two years.

So Christian groups, especially the Catholic Church, are paid millions in dollars to facilitate invasion of Islamic immigrants in the U.S.

Would Christian groups in Brazil have different interests and profits?

In Brazil, among Catholics, the most prominent institution defending the New Law of Immigration is the traditionally left-wing powerful Catholic National Conference of Bishops of Brazil. Among Protestants, ANAJURE has issued a public manifesto defending the new law.

ANAJURE’s manifesto has no mention of Christians or Christianity and, considering that its director, Uziel Santana, visited a mosque for a meeting with Islamic leaders and a partnership with Muslim groups, what is the interest in its advocacy of the New Law of Immigration?

Yet, VINACC, which was instrumental in the foundation of ANAJURE, has strongly criticized the new law.

Senator Aloysio Nunes, himself a former communist guerrilla fighter, now Minister of Foreign Affairs, is the author of the New Law of Immigration that, among other things, open Brazil’s borders.

This law, in practical terms, leaves Brazilian migration policy in the hands of international organizations, especially the United Nations, without limiting the number of immigrants coming to Brazil. As the Minister of Justice said: There may be one thousand, ten thousand, one hundred thousand per year, everyone is welcome. It turns out that Brazil cannot provide for its people, with tens of millions living in poverty. How can it provide for “one hundred thousand refugees per year”?

Brazil is facing confrontations of the worst kind. A crisis of confidence, a moral crisis, an economic crisis, unemployment with tens of millions of unemployed people, an overloading of social security, a serious crisis in its public health system, and an excessive tax burden that hampers economic prosperity. There are 60,000 murders per year, 38,000 rapes, and 7.6 million illegal weapons crossing Brazilian borders, and an undisputed level of power for organized crime and drug traffickers.

Considering that the European Union has already expressed its interest in relocating Muslim refugees outside of Europe, is Brazil in danger of becoming the Islamic sewer of the European Union?

Will the New Law of Immigration facilitate the Islamic ambitions of Saudi Arabia and Turkey?

With information from Israel, Islam and End Times.

Portuguese version of this article: Nova Lei de Migração abre fronteiras do Brasil para a invasão islâmica e tráfico de drogas?

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Immigration: A Weapon of Mass Cultural Destruction in Liberal Hands

Rising Turkish Menace: U.S. and NATO Ally Wants Islamic Advance in Latin America

CIA Rewards Saudi Arabia for Fighting Islamic Terror

Catholic Church Paid Millions in Dollars to Facilitate Immigrant Invasion in U.S.

If Brazilian Immigrants in the U.S. Are Accused of Being “Pigs,” Why Blame Trump?

Pentecostals and Evangelicals Most Persecuted Group of Christianity

By Julio Severo

Pentecostals and evangelicals are the most persecuted branch of Christianity, a new report says.

“Protestant evangelical and Pentecostal Christians are more likely to be persecuted than mainline Protestants, Catholics, Orthodox Christians or other Christians associated with ancient churches. In response to persecution, evangelical and Pentecostal Christians are more likely to engage in strategies of survival or, on rare occasions, confrontation,” reads the report by Under Caesar’s Sword.

UCS is a three-year, collaborative global research project that investigates how Christian communities respond when their religious freedom is severely violated.

In 2016, Christianity was ranked as the most persecuted religion in the world. In those same figures, Islamic State (ISIS) murders of Christians accounted for 30 percent of the persecution. ISIS has committed genocide against Christians in Syria and Iraq. According to Trump, Obama founded ISIS.

UCS gives three reasons to account for the horrific acts committed against believers.

In many countries, evangelicals and Pentecostals are comparatively recent arrivals and thus have not established patterns of relating to surrounding populations and governments to the same degree as churches with decades or centuries of history in a given region.

Evangelicals and Pentecostals are often perceived to be supported by co-religionists and allies in the West. Especially Muslims hate the connections evangelicals and Pentecostals have with Christian groups in the United States.

Evangelicals and Pentecostals tend to understand evangelism and conversion as verbal, urgent and sometimes dramatic processes and, consequently, expect and are prepared to endure persecution.

To combat the violence against Christ-followers, UCS recommends “Churches need to understand their global responsibility for Christians under persecution and achieve unity across Christian communities in supporting persecuted minorities. Particular stress should be placed on building bridges connecting traditional Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox churches with evangelical and Pentecostal groups.”

Christians have been historically persecuted by Islam.

Speaking January 2017 on Vatican Radio, Massimo Introvigne, Director of the Centre for Studies on New Religions, said that around half a billion Christians in the world are unable to express their faith completely freely — with around 90,000 Christians who were killed for their faith in 2016 alone, which is the equivalent of one Christian being martyred every six minutes.

In March 2016, the Chaldean Bishop of Aleppo reported that in just five years of conflict, the Christian population of Syria has been reduced by two thirds from 1.5 million to just 500,000, according to a Breitbart report.

Many Syrian Christians were killed by ISIS, founded by Hillary Clinton, or by Syrian rebels, funded, armed and trained by the Obama administration and now by the Trump administration. While the Syrian government was fighting ISIS, the Obama administration was helping Islamic rebels who were essentially damaging the Syrian government’s war against ISIS.

Such reality puts the U.S. behind Islamic persecution of Christians. In fact, according to the 2016 World Watch List, published by Open Doors USA, even though North Korea is the number one in Christian persecution, the other countries that ranked highest on such persecution were Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq.

This is very bad news for the U.S., which has been militarily interfering in Syria and which invaded and intervened in Afghanistan and Iraq. The results are obviously appalling, at least for Christians.

In 2014, Raymond Ibrahim, author of the bestselling book “Crucified Again,” said in his article “Confirmed: U.S. Chief Facilitator of Christian Persecution”:

Whenever the U.S. intervenes in an Islamic nation, Islamists come to power. This is well demonstrated by the other three nations to which the U.S. brought “democracy” and where Christian minorities suffer “extreme persecution”:

Afghanistan: The supposedly “moderate” Karzai government installed by the U.S. upholds many of the draconian laws enforced by the Taliban—including the apostasy law, fiercely persecuting those who seek to convert to Christianity—and, in 2011, under U.S. auspices, it destroyed Afghanistan’s last Christian church.

Iraq: After the U.S. toppled Saddam Hussein, Christian minorities were savagely attacked and slaughtered, and dozens of their churches were bombed (see here for graphic images). Christians have been terrorized into near-extinction, with well over half of them fleeing Iraq.

Libya: Ever since U.S.-backed, al-Qaeda-linked terrorists overthrew Qaddafi, Christians—including Americans—have indeed suffered extreme persecution. Churches have been bombed; Christians have been tortured and killed (including for refusing to convert); and nuns have been threatened.

Surely a common theme emerges here: Where the U.S. works to oust secular autocrats, the quality of life for Christians and other minorities takes a major nosedive. Under Saddam, Qaddafi, and Assad, Christians and their churches were largely protected.

Ibrahim then said, “Prominent indicators confirm that the U.S. is the chief facilitator of the persecution of Christians around the world today.”

During his campaign, Donald Trump said that the administration of former President George W. Bush lied about his reasons to invade Iraq. Trump said that he opposed such invasion. Christians in Iraq took a very heavy toll for Bush’s bad decision. The Iraqi Christian community, which was over 2 million before the U.S. invasion, is now less than 400,000.

Under Bush and Obama, while Muslims in Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq had facilitated immigration to the U.S., Christians were essentially banned. Oppressors in, victims out. During his campaign, Trump made many promises to correct this incredible immigratory inconsistency by favoring Christian victims, not Islamic oppressors. But until far, he has not fulfilled his promises.

On the contrary, in the first days of his administration, Trump, through his CIA director, rewarded Saudi Arabia for fighting Islamic terror, when actually the Saudi dictatorship is the main sponsor of the global Islamic terrorism.

Saudi Arabia has today more Christian blood in its hands than any other Muslim nation. Even so, in his planned trip to Israel this month, Trump intends at the same time to visit Saudi Arabia. Trump seems to have forgotten the role of Saudi leadership in the global Islamic terrorism, including that most terrorist Muslims in the 9/11 were Saudi.

The United States, founded by Christians, more specifically by Protestants, should give priority to persecuted Christians, including by helping Christian immigrants, especially persecuted by Muslims, but since some thirty years ago it has been giving priority to Muslims. The U.S. has protected Saudi Arabia and Islam, not Christians.

For his visit to Israel this month, I would have two suggestions to Mr. President Trump: Because Israel has an active military involvement in Syria, encourage Israel to bomb ISIS bases in Syria and to receive Christian refugees from Syria. The second suggestion is: Exclude Saudi Arabia and include Armenia, the first officially Christian nation in the world.

In this trip, Trump should recognize the Armenian Genocide, where almost 2 million Christian Armenians were slaughtered by Turkish Muslims 100 years ago. Such acknowledgment would send the clear message that the Trump administration is seriously worried about Islamic persecution of Christians.

While Christians are the most persecuted religious group on the earth, Muslims are the main persecutors of Christians in the world. So why has the Trump administration had an excellent relationship with Saudi Arabia, not Armenia?

With information from Charisma, CBN and ChristianHeadlines.

Portuguese version of this article: Pentecostais e evangélicos são o grupo mais perseguido do Cristianismo

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Immigration: A Weapon of Mass Cultural Destruction in Liberal Hands

Trump refuses to call genocide the mass killings of Christian Armenians by Muslim Turks during World War One

Christians’ Love of the Warfare State Is Killing Other Christians

Christian Persecution Follows US, UK and France in Kosovo, Libya, Iraq and Syria

Confirmed: U.S. Chief Facilitator of Christian Persecution

Why Does Christian Persecution Get Worse In Every Country The U.S. “Liberates”?

What Is Neoconservatism (Neocon)?

Islam, to surpass Christianity by 2070, will be only major religion to increase faster than world’s population 

Siding with the “religion of peace”: Obama, Bush, Brzezinski…

War between Christian Nations and Muslim Nations: A Table Talk between an American Economist and Young Muslims in

Indonesia

CIA Rewards Saudi Arabia for Fighting Islamic Terror

Christians Are the Most Persecuted Religious Group in the World

Armenian President Warns about Danger of Genocide Denial, Brazilian Congressman Marco Feliciano Denounces Genocide

of Armenian Christians

Armenia, the first Christian nation in the world, and the first genocide in the 20th century

Trump and Prophecies, and a New Model of National and World Leader