Showing posts with label Abraham Weintraub. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abraham Weintraub. Show all posts

Friday, May 29, 2020

Brazilian education minister with Jewish roots in the Bolsonaro administration was criticized by the Israeli government and Jewish groups for comparing police investigation raids against allies to Nazi persecution against Jews


Brazilian education minister with Jewish roots in the Bolsonaro administration was criticized by the Israeli government and Jewish groups for comparing police investigation raids against allies to Nazi persecution against Jews

By Julio Severo
Brazil’s education minister drew criticism from the Israeli government and Jewish groups in the U.S. and Brazil for likening Federal Police raids against allies of the Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro to Kristallnacht — the beginning of the Nazi persecution against Jews.
Abraham Weintraub
“Today was the day of infamy, national shame, and it will be remembered as the Brazilian Night of the Broken Glass,” tweeted on May 27, 2020, Abraham Weintraub, whose Jewish paternal grandparents fled the Nazis.
“They desecrated our homes and are suffocating us. Do you know what the great oligarch/socialist press will say? SIEG HEIL!” continued the minister in his tweet, adding a picture that shows the boycott to Jewish stores in Germany in 1933.
Kristallnacht, or the Night of Broken Glass, refers to the 1938 Nazi persecution marking as the beginning of the Holocaust.
Weintraub was born to a Catholic mother and a Jewish father whose family members were killed in Nazi concentration camps. He is usually mistaken as Jewish due to his name, but, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, he does not identify as a Jew.
Jewish organizations in the U.S. and Brazil harshly criticized his comments.
“The comparison is totally unreasonable and inopportune, unacceptably minimizing those terrible events, the beginning of the Nazi march that culminated in the death of 6 million Jews,” said Fernando Lottenberg, president of the Brazilian Israelite Confederation, the most important Jewish organization in Brazil.
“Enough is enough! The repeated political weaponization of Holocaust language by Brazilian government officials is profoundly offensive to world Jewry and an insult to the victims and survivors of the Nazi terror. It needs to stop immediately,” tweeted the American Jewish Committee, the most important Jewish organization in the U.S.
Even though the Bolsonaro administration is an ally of Israel, especially because evangelicals, Bolsonaro’s most important political base, are traditional supporters of Israel, the Israeli government also criticized Weintraub’s comparison.
The consul general of Israel in São Paulo, Alon Lavi, said:
“The Holocaust, the greatest tragedy in modern history, where 6 million Jews, men, women, elderly and children were systematically murdered by Nazi barbarism, is unprecedented. This episode can never be compared to any political reality in the world.”
With the same critical tone, the Israeli Embassy in Brazil issued a statement:
There was an increase in the frequency of use of the Holocaust in public discourse, which unintentionally trivializes its memory and also the tragedy of the Jewish people, which ended with the extermination of 1/3 of our people out of hatred and ignorance of the Nazis and their collaborators.
In the name of the strong friendship between our countries, which has grown more and more for 72 years, we demand the question of the Holocaust as well as the Jewish people or Judaism to be left out of the daily political dialogue and the disputes between the sides in the ideological game.
This is the first time that Israeli diplomats have publicly criticized the Bolsonaro administration. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Brazil to participate in the inauguration of the Brazilian president in 2019. At the time, Netanyahu said: “We have no better friends in the world than the Evangelical community, and the Evangelical community has no better friend in the world than the State of Israel.”
In January 2020, Brazilian top culture official Roberto Alvim, an adherent of Olavo de Carvalho, was fired for imitating a Nazi speech. At the time, Israel’s ambassador to Brazil, Yossi Shelley, spoke directly with Bolsonaro to express Israel’s concern about Alvim’s speech, who had published a video in which he made use of excerpts from a speech by Joseph Goebbles, minister of propaganda in Hitler’s Germany. Soon after, Alvim was fired.
There were also other conflicts between Jewish groups and the Bolsonaro administration. In April 2020, the American Jewish Committee demanded an apology from Foreign Affairs Minister Ernesto Araújo, who compared social isolation to contain COVID-19 to Nazi concentration camps. It was an unreasonable comparison, as even Israel used social isolation to contain COVID-19.
Weintraub’s comparison was made after on May 27, 2020 Brazil’s federal police held search and seizure warrants against several allies of President Bolsonaro as part of an investigation about threats to Supreme Court’s ministers and the spread of fake news.
Were the political allies worthy of Weintraub’s comparison? The actions of the Brazilian federal police affected several individuals, including Sara Winter, Allan dos Santos and Bernardo Kuster.
Sara Winter became internationally known after LifeSiteNews, the most important international Catholic pro-life website, published a 2015 report on her, presenting her alleged conversion to Catholicism. The report said,
Sara Fernanda Giromini first made herself known to Brazil and to the world under the alias “Sara Winter” in 2012, when she became the founding member of Femen Brazil, and led a trio of girls in a number of topless protests that garnered much media attention. However, only three years later, the young activist has done an about-face and has declared war on feminism and abortion, and is apologizing to Christians for her offensive behavior.
She continues using her nickname, Sara Winter, which is the Portuguese form for “Sarah Winter,” a British Nazi supporter and member of the British Union of Fascists.
In a May 27, 2020 video, Sara said that she would like to “exchange punches” with a Supreme Court minister and stated that this minister “will never again have peace in his life.” She said:
You wait for me, Mr. Alexandre de Moraes. You will never have peace in your life again. We are going to make your life hell, we are going to find out the places you go to, we are going to find out who are the maids who work for you… We are going to find out everything in your life until you ask to leave. Today you made the worst decision of your life.
Sara Winter is the leader of the self-titled group “300 do Brasil” (300 of Brazil), who camped in front of the Brazilian Supreme Court. The group, whose members wear camouflage clothing similar to Army clothing and carry weapons, has already been called an “armed militia” by the Federal Prosecutor’s Office of the Federal District and Territories. It resembles a paramilitary group.
Sara Winter
In an interview with the BBC’s Portuguese news service in London, Sara said the presence of weapons in her camp is “for the protection of the members themselves.” The BBC said:
Sara Winter likes to publish photos holding guns and says on social media that she “shoots very well.”
She has given several versions for the “300 of Brazil.” She says it was Olavo de Carvalho’s idea, who is her guru. She also says, perhaps to please different groups, that the name was chosen based on the “300 of Gideon,” from the Old Testament in the Bible. She also says it was based on the “300 of Sparta.”
Sara has also given other explanations for a tattoo on her shoulder of an Iron Cross, a Germanic symbol that became popular during the Nazi regime and was the main Nazi decoration of war. Sara says that the tattoo was a tribute to the “Knights Templar of the Middle Ages,” but German researcher Carina Book has confirmed that it is the Iron Cross.
About the “300 of Brazil” camp in front of the Supreme Court, she said: “Who asked me to do all this was Professor Olavo.”
It is no surprise then that on May 28, 2020, Olavo asked for the death penalty for the minister who requested the Federal Police’s action against Sara and others. But if he defends the death penalty for the minister who seeks to take away Sara’s right of speech, then why is he the greatest denier of the Inquisition in Brazil? The Inquisition took from its victims not only their right of speech, but also their property and lives.
On some occasions Sara Winter has stated that she received training in Ukraine and that she wants to “Ukrainize” Brazil, a stance difficult for conservatives to understand, as the Ukrainian revolution was largely funded by George Soros, the Obama administration and the neocons.
In the training sessions promoted by Sara for her “300 of Brazil,” photos and videos are prohibited and adequate clothing is required for physical combat training.
Sara Winter with her skull mask, according to the journalist website A Publica
In a photo of “300 of Brazil,” Sara Winter appears with other militants, wearing a skull mask. The mask is very popular in Europe and the United States among neo-Nazis. “The skull mask has become a universal fascist aesthetic,” journalist Jake Hanrahan wrote on Twitter.
Neo-Nazi group Atomwaffen Division and its skull masks
In the film “A Vida de Sara” (Sara’s Life), a biographical documentary produced by the Lumine platform, dubbed “Conservative Netflix,” Sara Winter says that FEMEN sent money so she could be trained in Ukraine and take this training back to Brazil.
The movie was produced by Matheus Bazzo, who also produced the documentary about Olavo de Carvalho, “The Garden of Afflictions.”
In the movie, Sara says that she has already prostituted herself and she appears shooting and handling firearms.
Such a picture seems problematic for the image of conservative Christians who fight against the abortion and homosexuality agenda.
Among the supporters of “300 of Brazil” are Terça Livre journalist Allan dos Santos and psychiatrist Ítalo Marsilli, who declared in one of his videos that women should not be allowed to vote because they are easy to seduce. He said:
“In Greek democracy, the only one in the world that worked, women were not expected to vote. When the vote becomes full, that is, women and everyone else can vote, you see that there is a crisis in the state’s governance. It is very easy for you to convince a woman to vote, you just have to seduce her.”
As for Bernardo Kuster, who together with Sara and Santos was also targeted by the Federal Police, he abandoned the Evangelical Church to follow Carvalho’s syncretic Catholicism. Today Kuster promotes the idea that the Inquisition was a court of mercy — a stance strongly contested by the Israeli government and the Jews. In fact, in 2013, on a visit to the Vatican, Netanyahu gave Pope Francis a copy of a massive book against the Inquisition written by his father.
On Netanyahu’s next visit to Brazil, he should give a copy of this book to each member of the Bolsonaro administration. Some of them, who follow Carvalho, believe that the Inquisition was a lie, although it also tortured and killed Jews in Brazil.
What stops Olavo and his adherents, who make a shameless revisionism of the Inquisition, from someday also making a revisionism the Holocaust? After all, the main victims of both were precisely the Jews.
It is impossible to understand this chaotic situation without understanding that Olavo de Carvalho, who has an occult history, is a member of the Traditionalist School. Recently, American Jewish writer Benjamin R. Teitelbaum released the book “War for Eternity,” published by HarperCollins. The book maps the Traditionalist School and its main representatives in several countries. The representative for Brazil is Olavo. Teitelbaum presents the Traditionist School as an occult cult.
By its very nature, the occult brings chaos.
Despite reprimands from the Israeli government and Jewish organizations in the U.S. and Brazil, Education Minister Abraham Weintraub did not back down in his comparison. In fact, he defended it, in the name of free speech. He said in a tweet of May 28, 2020:
Do not speak on behalf of all Christians or Jews in the world. I SPEAK FOR ME! I had Catholic grandparents and surviving grandparents from the Nazi concentration camps (photo). All were Brazilian. I HAVE THE RIGHT TO SPEAK ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST! I don’t need any more people attacking MY FREEDOM!
Yes, he has a right to talk about the Holocaust. But since he has grandparents who survived the Holocaust, why doesn’t he condemn the signs of fascism in the movement he is supporting?
Olavo de Carvalho is the greatest Brazilian defender of the Inquisition, which tortured and killed thousands of Jews. Carvalho’s Catholic supporters support and spread his radical stance that the Inquisition was myth and legend.
If Weintraub knows how to confront Israel and the Jews in his stubborn stance comparing the Holocaust with the actions of the Federal Police against Sara Winters and other Carvalho supporters, why does he not know or cannot confront Carvalho about the Inquisition? Why doesn’t he know how to confront the signs of fascism and occultism in Carvalho and his adherents?
For example, the Brazilian Foreign Minister openly praises Olavo de Carvalho, René Guénon and Julius Evola. Guénon is the Islamic occult master followed by members of the Traditionalist School, whose most prominent member was Evola, guru of the Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. Evola was radically against Marxism and wrote books defending the right-wing ideology, the occult and black magic.
Why doesn’t Weintraub question and confront this?
And regarding his defense of free speech, is this defense total or limited? In 2019, using lies and slander, Olavo de Carvalho, considered Bolsonaro’s Rasputin, called for the Federal Police to investigate me, in a blatant desire to see the state machine silencing my voice and my evangelical articles against the occult and the Inquisition. You can check everything here: http://bit.ly/2CPK0tX
At the time, Weintraub said nothing against Carvalho’s dictatorial desire to censor me.
But today Weintraub, confronting Israel and Jewish groups, speaks out against the Federal Police acting against an activist who has a Nazi surname and was trained in Ukraine by groups funded by George Soros.
Weintraub also defended Terça Livre, a channel that defends the Inquisition and has already attacked, cursed and defamed me.
Is the free speech that Weintraub advocates for everyone or only for those using Nazi nicknames and for those cursing and slandering?
How would an evangelical writer be in this defense? I don’t know, because when Carvalho called for the Federal Police against me, I didn’t see Weintraub defending free speech. But his brother, Arthur Weintraub, who also has an important position in the Bolsonaro administration, when he came across my tweet criticizing Carvalho, blocked me on Twitter.
For them, even Israel can be confronted. But criticizing Carvalho, the advocate of the Inquisition, is unacceptable.
Weintraub seeks to defend against the Supreme Court Sara and others in the pure logic of free speech, but are not the armed behavior of Sara’s group and her use of symbols so linked to fascism enough red flags that her threats may eventually become violent?
There are three phases in Sara’s history over the past ten years. She was linked to FEMEN in the early 2010s. By the middle of that decade, she was already apparently changed, becoming a pro-life Catholic personality on LifeSiteNews. And there is the most recent Sara, who is connected to Olavo and training a group that has paramilitary characteristics. This is a Sara who wears a fascist mask, swears, uses weapons and threatens ministers of the Supreme Court.
How does not Weintraub confront this, but confronts the Israeli government and Jewish organizations? How does he view this as mere opinion, not as danger signs?
With information from Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Notícias R7, Istoé, Yahoo, CONIB, Correio Braziliense, Estado de Minas, A Publica, BBC, LifeSiteNews, Revista Forum and UOL.
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, July 16, 2019

Brazil’s Ministry of Education launches astrology campaign for students on the internet, but it deletes posts shortly after criticism from readers that such a campaign was born of the influence of Olavo de Carvalho, who has a history of astrologer, on the Minister of Education


Brazil’s Ministry of Education launches astrology campaign for students on the internet, but it deletes posts shortly after criticism from readers that such a campaign was born of the influence of Olavo de Carvalho, who has a history of astrologer, on the Minister of Education

By Julio Severo
Brazil’s Ministry of Education (known by its acronym MEC) deleted from its official account on Twitter posts of an astrology campaign showing who is “the student of each sign,” published on July 14, 2019.
In the 12 images, one for each sign, MEC tried to create a relation between the profile of students and the characteristics traced from the interpretation of zodiac. However, the repercussion on the internet of the astrology campaign faced criticism from Internet users about the reason for MEC to present so favorably astrology, which is based on the reading of the present and the future by observing the stars in outer space. The controversial images were deleted one day later.
In addition to linking horoscopes to studies, MEC encouraged students to get other students involved in its astrology campaign. In one of the posts about the sign of Aquarius, MEC asked: “Who are you in the study horoscope? Enjoy and tag your friends!”
For the Virgo sign, MEC said that the “education stars” indicate an organization-oriented personality, with studies planned according to the days of the week.
MEC astrology campaign was criticized by different Internet users who associated it with Olavo de Carvalho, considered the Rasputin of President Jair Bolsonaro and with Education Minister Abraham Weintraub, who is an adherent of Olavo. Some of the criticisms:
“Probably this nonsense will be introduced in the National High School Exam.”
“Does study have a horoscope? I think this is something borne by the astrologer living in the USA. It’s a pity the education ministry has made that choice.” (Carvalho is a self-exiled Brazilian immigrant in Virginia.)
“What the hell is this? Does that charlatan want to make our children and students into occultists? @PastorMalafaia is this government that the evangelical caucus is giving support to?”
“Stop this pseudoscience, value national science.”
“Astrology and signs are the total denial of science. So I find it totally inconsistent for the Ministry of Education to publish something related to this.”
Although Olavo de Carvalho denies involvement with astrology today and often hides his past and books on astrology, everything he touches becomes astrological.
The Ministry of Education, which for the first time in its history has promoted this outrageous campaign of astrology, is run “coincidentally” by an adherent of Carvalho.
In 2017, there was the equally scandalous case of a Protestant teacher who, without the consent and knowledge of their parents, gave astrological indoctrination to her students, teaching them how to make astral maps. Usually, no Protestant gets involved with astrology, much less to impose it on students against the will of their parents. But the teacher in question, Ana Caroline Campagnolo, is Carvalho’s adherent.
In addition to denying or hiding his astrological issues, another subterfuge that Carvalho uses to explain away his astrological connections is to accuse others of what he does. Earlier this year, when he was called an astrologer by Silas Malafaia, Brazil’s greatest televangelist, Carvalho countered by saying that Luther and his assistant Philip Melanchthon believed much more in astrology than he does.
It was a strategic evasion, easily refuted by me in this article: “Olavo de Carvalho accuses Philip Melanchthon of being a greater astrologer than he is.”
Yet, whether he denies it or not, the fruits always emerge through his own students, be it a classroom teacher or a minister of education.
Despite Carvalho’s occult influence, President Jair Bolsonaro, a syncretic Catholic who was elected mostly by evangelicals, has insisted on appointing for his administration individuals strongly influenced by Carvalho. He already did this with the Ministry of Education, blindly appointing an anti-Trump olavist (Olavo’s adherent), who was eventually replaced by the current minister who launched the astrology campaign. And he did this with the Foreign Office, appointing an adherent of Carvalho, René Guénon, and Julius Evola, whose writings in defense of the right and witchcraft helped Nazism and fascism.
With information from MEC and O Globo.
Recommended Reading:

Thursday, May 02, 2019

Brazilian Minister of Education Abraham Weintraub and His Right-Wing Socialism or Right-Wing Statism


Brazilian Minister of Education Abraham Weintraub and His Right-Wing Socialism or Right-Wing Statism

By Julio Severo
The new Brazilian Education Minister Abraham Weintraub has promised that in the Bolsonaro administration there will be many more daycares than in the former administrations of socialists Luiz Inácio “Lula” and Dilma Rousseff in Brazil.
He said: “Our government plan seeks basic education as a priority and this is what we are going to follow. More daycares and more schooled children.”
The concept of daycare — to move the child away from the mother as early as possible — is a concept embraced, defended and widely practiced in socialism.
When I heard Lula and Rousseff talking about expanding the number of daycares — to keep children away from their mothers — I sought to warn. With Lula and Rousseff, Brazil had a great and horrific increase in the number of daycares.
However, I expected from a supposedly right-wing government that there would be incentives for mothers to stay with their children at home to care for and educate them. So it was a complete surprise to read that Weintraub intends to increase even more what Lula and Rousseff had already increased.
In the Lula and Rousseff administrations, increasing the number of daycares represented the implementation of a socialist ideal. For Weintraub and the Bolsonaro administration, who think themselves as right-wingers, increasing daycares means what? Right-wing socialism? Right-wing statism? Not to mention that all kinds of abuse, including sexual, happen in daycares.
I voted for Bolsonaro, for example, to eliminate Lula’s law that forces 4-year-olds to attend school. In making this law, Lula announced that he was using Communist China’s model. But neither Weintraub nor the Bolsonaro administration have said they will eliminate this communist law.
In the case of Weintraub, it is an even more problematic issue because he has been presented by the media as a man who detests socialism. He said: “Socialist is AIDS; and communist is the opportunist disease.”
For a man who hates socialism, any effort to further alienate children from their mothers would be seen as “AIDS or opportunistic disease.”
The genuine right-winger against socialism would do exactly the opposite from a socialist: Implement initiatives to bring and solidify contact between children and parents.
American writer Mary Pride, who is a leader in the homeschooling movement in the United States, quoted Plato, in presenting the ideal socialist society, as saying:
“In the ideal city… there is no domestic role such as that of the traditional housewife. Since planned breeding and COMMUNAL CHILD REARING minimize the unpredictability of pregnancy and the time demanded of mothers, maternity is no longer anything approaching a full-time occupation. Thus, women can no longer be defined in their traditional roles.” (Pride, Mary. The Way Home Home Life, Inc.)
The International Planned Parenthood Federation, which is the world’s largest abortion organization and supported by the UN, proposed the following strategies to reduce the size of the world’s population and for couples to have fewer children: Increased homosexuality; establishment of daycares; laws pushing women into the workforce.
All of this is socialism. For over 30 years I have been able to identify these and other socialist strategies because I have had an excellent conservative background. I read American evangelical conservative books (in defense of homeschooling, the Bible, Reagan and against communism) since the 1980s.
Why then did Abraham Weintraub fail to identify that increasing the number of daycares means increasing the power of socialism? What is his background? The Intercept classifies Weintraub as “a disciple of Olavo de Carvalho.” This training seems to have given him little insight into how to identify socialism in practice.
In fact, he was not appointed Minister of Education for having experience in this area, but because he is a disciple of Carvalho and because President Jair Bolsonaro, for whom I voted, chose Carvalho as his personal Rasputin. Following Rasputin has brought some government disasters. Firstly, by indication of Carvalho, Bolsonaro informed last November that he would appoint Ricardo Vélez as minister of Education.
At the time, I warned that Vélez had strange views, including that he was against Trump and supported Hillary Clinton. Vélez filled the Ministry of Education with confusions and chaos, especially after hiring Rasputin supporters. The consequence was that Velez lasted only three months in office. He was fired for incompetence.
Bolsonaro seems to have learned nothing from this disaster. Now he has appointed an anti-communist who loves communist daycares. It is a chaotic contradiction.
Bolsonaro’s reasoning seems to be: If an adherent of Carvalho in the Ministry of Education caused disasters, bring another of his adherents to try everything again.
And Weintraub’s reasoning seems to be: If socialists Lula and Rousseff made socialist daycares to indoctrinate children in socialism, I will do more right-wing socialist daycares to indoctrinate children in right-wing socialism.
Recommended Reading: