Big American tech companies are defeating conservative presidents

By Julio Severo

When Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other American social networking platforms boast that they’ve destroyed President Donald Trump’s reelection, no one is safe.

The only president of a major power that reacted was Vladimir Putin, who created a law to censor and block American platforms that censor and block. It’s fair. These big companies deserve to take their own medicine.

Will Putin succeed in facing the technological dictatorship of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other American platforms? I don’t know, but at least he’s trying and he deserves praise for confronting virtual tyrants.

Not every president has that strength. Although he has some conservative stances, Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro have little or no hope of confronting Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other American platforms. Without nuclear weapons, Brazil is unable to confront anyone.

In addition, under the advice of Rasputin Olavo de Carvalho and his adherent Ernesto Araújo, who is now Brazil’s Foreign Minister, Brazil has made many agreements with the United States under Trump. Now, all of these deals are in the hands of American Socialist President Joe Biden. Without any intelligence and strategy, Araújo handed Brazil over to Biden, one of the most dangerous socialists in the world.

Araújo, who is a great admirer of Julius Evola (right-wing adviser to the Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini) and adherent of the Islamic occultist René Guénon, ruined Brazil’s diplomatic future by following Rasputin’s disastrous advice. In the middle of the socialist Biden era, Araújo’s thoughtless policy made Bolsonaro a mere lame duck in international politics.

Now, as a “reward,” Biden ordered the U.S. government, in a true imperialist attitude, to impose the gay agenda around the world. In Brazil, it will be easy to make any imposition, because if Brazil does not accept, there will be all kinds of retaliation. Inspired by Rasputin, Ernesto Araújo condemned Brazil to Biden’s homosexual hell.

If Bolsonaro does not follow the Biden line, with the stroke of a pen Biden can revoke some agreements. So Bolsonaro is tied hand and foot in Biden’s diplomatic dungeon.

And if Bolsonaro seeks more independence, he will suffer the same retaliations and sanctions that Russia habitually suffers.

The only Americans I trust are conservative evangelicals, who don’t have Biden’s wicked socialist mentality. I have admired Joseph Farah for over 20 years and have learned a lot from him. I also admire Scott Lively, Mike Heath (without catholicism), Paulie Heath, William Murray, Peter LaBarbera and Pat Buchanan.

I don’t admire Joe Biden, Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton in any way for their pro-abortion and pro-sodomy fanaticism.

Putin is trying to escape the dictatorship of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and other American platforms that defeated Trump. I hope he can survive the internet vampires.

However, I feel very sorry for Bolsonaro. How can he, whose Rasputin’s foreign minister handed Brazil over to Biden, manage to survive?

How will Bolsonaro, who has neither Putin’s strength nor Putin’s nuclear weapons, manage to escape the same American forces that destroyed Trump’s reelection?

Putin is doing everything he can to stop the censorship and blockade of big American dictatorial companies. But alone he will have little chance. If he loses, the world will never again know what freedom of speech is.

All countries should unite and stop the virtual dictatorship of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other American platforms that unfairly defeated Trump. All countries should censor and block American platforms that think they have the right to censor and block anyone. It’s time to revolt against American imperialism led by neocons and the owners of Facebook, Twitter, Google and other major U.S. capitalist companies.

Portuguese version of this article: Grandes empresas americanas de tecnologia estão derrotando presidentes conservadores

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Global Virtual Dictatorship “Made in US”

Censorship and termination of my account, the Facebook answer to my Christian conservatism

Putin signs law enabling sanctions on Facebook and other U.S. social media that restrict and censor Russian content

The Transcendent Power of Neoconservatism in the U.S. Media and among Left-Wingers and Right-Wingers

Left-Wing and Right-Wing Collusion against Trump’s Original Plan of Partnership with Russia against Islamic Terror

What Is Neoconservatism? Who are the Neocons?

Biden Inaugural Prayer Service Included Several Gay Religious Leaders

Biden is not God’s will for the United States, but what can Americans expect by distancing themselves from God and the Bible?

An Empire Launched by U.S. Socialists

Challenges for Conservative Brazil in the Face of a U.S. Government Under the Possible Presidency of Far-Leftist Biden

 

Left-Wing Rampage against Conservatives Because of a Handful of Occult Right-Wing Radicals. How Occultists Pose a Threat to the Conservative Movement

By Julio Severo

Donald Trump was watching on TV a rally of thousands of thousands of his supporters marching in Washington DC on January 6, 2021. But what should be a peaceful event was marred by a handful of radicals who stormed the U.S. Capitol.

QAnon Shaman invaded the Capitol to show support for Trump

Even though, in their wishful thinking, conservatives would like to see these radicals as BLM or Antifa, the truth is that there were QAnon radicals in the mob.

One of the radicals was Jake Angeli, 32, known as the QAnon Shaman. QAnon is a suspicious movement that eventually marred one of the greatest demonstrations of Trump supporters. Shaman is a kind of witch.

Regardless if the mob was Antifa, BLM or QAnon, Trump, who was watching everything on TV, had the obligation to call immediately a reinforcement of federal agents to protect the Capitol. He had also the responsibility to condemn immediately and strongly the mob and their invasion of the Capitol. But he did not do it.

If the mob was Antifa or BLM (Black Lives Matter) or QAnon, why did not Trump condemn them immediately?

Trump’s inaction or inability to denounce swiftly the destructive mob was harmful to most of his evangelical supporters. His lack of swift and strong condemnation brough many negative consequences.

Instead of attacking only the mob of radicals, the left-wing media labeled all the pro-Trump protestors as radicals. This is, the majority was used as scapegoat to pay for the crimes of a radical minority, even though many in the multitude of Trump supporters tried to hinder the radicals from invading the Capitol, as Brian Brown showed.

According to Peter LaBarbera, who mentioned Ben Shapiro, the invaders were QAnon and alt-right, a radical right-wing movement connected to Steve Bannon, whom Trump had fired from the White House for opportunism.

For years, I have exposed the danger of occultists to the conservative movement, and now this danger has become reality.

Now, the left-wing media is more emboldened to attack all conservatives as radicals because of a minority of real radicals whom Trump refused to condemn immediately.

Facebook has banned Trump indefinitely and Twitter has banned him permanently. Several other platforms have also suspended him.

Now, no conservative or Christian is safe on Facebook and Twitter. It is open season to hunt conservatives and Christians.

The giant tech companies censor and ban with no reason. If some conservative gives them some reason, they will use and abuse it.

My official personal account was permanently banned by Facebook just before the 2020 U.S. election. My content is especially conservative evangelical. I have no connection to QAnon or other occult movements. And my support of Trump was balanced, not radical. Often, I criticized him for his global campaign to make sodomy legal around the world. Even so, Facebook banned me permanently as if I were a radical.

Trump was wrong for not condemning immediately the mob that invaded the Capitol, but those attacking him, including left-wing politicians and media, never attacked BLM and Antifa mobs when their rioters attacked federal property, looted shops and houses and killed people. In fact, the media did not call these radicals rioters, but just “protestors,” ignoring all their destructive acts and rampages.

Facebook, Twitter and other U.S. platforms have not banned permanently or even blocked BLM and Antifa, Marxist movements that have a history of terror, vandalism and rampages.

So if U.S. platforms grant total free speech to BLM, Antifa and other terrorist groups, why do they deny it to Trump?

Trump was wrong for not condemning immediately a handful of radicals and QAnon that brought infamy to him and his millions of supporters. Yet, U.S. giant tech companies also are wrong for protecting BLM, Antifa and other Marxist and Islamic radicals in their platforms.

When we conservative make no mistakes, left-wing radicals, including their minions in the media, attack us. If we make mistakes, especially a big mistake, they think that they can do against us whatever they want. Yet, BLM, Antifa and other Marxist extremists are entitled to make any mistakes they want.

In this evil generation, we conservative Christians should behave as Jesus warned:

“Behold, I am sending you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves.” (Matthew 10:16 ESV)

We conservative Christians should remember that our main mission is not political, but spiritual. If we forget it, we will be held accountable to Him who gave us the mission.

We should never let politicians use us, but we should use everything to proclaim and demonstrate the Gospel of the Kingdom of God.

Portuguese version of this article: Baderna esquerdista contra conservadores por causa de um punhado de radicais direitistas ocultistas. Como ocultistas representam uma ameaça ao movimento conservador

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Global Virtual Dictatorship “Made in US”

Censorship and termination of my account, the Facebook answer to my Christian conservatism

Putin signs law enabling sanctions on Facebook and other U.S. social media that restrict and censor Russian content

Fraud in The U.S. Presidential Election and the Inaction of the U.S. Armed Forces

In his effort to produce a film exposing homosexuality in the Vatican to make Pope Francis renounce, Steve Bannon caused backlash from conservative Catholic leaders and was exposed for his own involvement with two notorious pedophiles

While black lives are lost in abortion and broken homes, “Black Lives Matter” movement preaches Marxism, which fuels the destruction of the black family through abortion and broken homes

 

Donald Trump is BANNED from Facebook for 24 hours and Twitter for 12 hours as his tweets are deleted for the first time ever and YouTube removes video where he praised the thousands of patriots who protested against fraud in the U.S. election

By Julio Severo

Twitter has suspended Donald Trump’s account for 12 hours and for the first time deleted his tweets after he praised the thousands of patriots who protested against fraud in the U.S. election.

YouTube and Facebook also followed suit in removing the posts, with Facebook also blocking Trump from their platform for 24 hours.

One of the deleted tweets read:

“These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!”

In the deleted video, he complained the election was stolen and telling the marchers that he loved them.

“I know your pain. I know you’re hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us,” he said, adding,

“It was a landslide election, and everyone knows it, especially the other side, but you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don’t want anybody hurt.”

Trump said it was “a very tough period of time,” and emphasized his own personal loss. He said,

“There’s never been a time like this where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can’t play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You’re very special. You’ve seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel. But go home and go home at peace.”

To justify its censorship against Trump, Twitter said,

“The account of @realDonaldTrump will be locked for 12 hours following the removal of these Tweets. If the Tweets are not removed, the account will remain locked.”

To justify its censorship against Trump, a Facebook spokesman said,

“We’ve assessed two policy violations against President Trump’s Page which will result in a 24-hour feature block, meaning he will lose the ability to post on the platform during that time.”

To justify its censorship against Trump, Farshad Shadloo, YouTube spokesperson, said in an email to Insider,

“We removed a video posted this afternoon to Donald Trump’s channel that violated our policies regarding content that alleges widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S.”

Twitter, Facebook and YouTube have previously labeled content posted by the president with warnings over the last year, in particular his claims about election fraud and COVID-19.

Throughout the 2020 presidential election, Twitter placed labels on dozens of Trump’s tweets that denounced voter fraud.

Even though most patriots who marched in Washington DC against voter fraud in January 6, 2020 were pacific, there was a small number of individuals who took advantage of the demonstration to invade the U.S. Congress to do exactly what Antifa and BLM do. Analysts think that they were infiltrators.

Twitter, Facebook and YouTube used this isolated case to block Trump’s accounts.

Yet, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube have not banned or even blocked BLM and Antifa pages in their platforms. BLM and Antifa, which are Marxist terrorists, spread terror for many months in 2019 and 2020 in the U.S. when their rioters, in rampage after rampage, looted and killed.

In spite of their violent actions, even destroying government property, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube never punished them.

Those who invaded the U.S. Congress taking advantage of the patriotic demonstration should be held accountable to the law enforcement just as BLM and Antifa should be.

However, it is very troubling that Twitter, Facebook and YouTube think that they are more powerful than the president of the United States.

So if even an anti-Marxist president is not safe from censorship of Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, who is? I can speak from experience: Just before the U.S. election, Facebook permanently banned my official personal account exclusively because of my conservative evangelical stances.

I have no power to oppose the Twitter, Facebook and YouTube tyranny. Even Trump has not this power.

So we should support those who are fighting. Russian President Vladimir Putin is trying to prevail over such powerful virtual tyranny. Recently, he signed a law enabling sanctions on Facebook and other U.S. social media that restrict and censor Russian content.

Twitter, Facebook and YouTube think that they are above law and block and ban anyone they want, especially conservatives and specifically conservative Christians. They are becoming an invisible government tyrannizing people around the world who do not follow the left-wing ideology.

If even Trump is not safe in Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, who is?

With information from Daily Mail.

Portuguese version of this article: Donald Trump é BANIDO do Facebook por 24 horas e do Twitter por 12 horas, depois que seus tuítes são excluídos pela primeira vez e o YouTube remove o vídeo onde ele elogia os milhares de patriotas que protestaram contra fraude nas eleições dos EUA

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Global Virtual Dictatorship “Made in US”

Censorship and termination of my account, the Facebook answer to my Christian conservatism

Putin signs law enabling sanctions on Facebook and other U.S. social media that restrict and censor Russian content

Fraud in The U.S. Presidential Election and the Inaction of the U.S. Armed Forces

 

Twitter Censored President Trump and His Campaign 436 Times, But Applied No Censorship to Far-Leftist Joe Biden

By Julio Severo

Twitter is in war with conservatives and as President Donald Trump was largely supported by conservative evangelicals, Twitter hates both.

LifeNews said,

Since Monday, Nov. 30, Twitter has slapped 111 labels on Trump’s tweets and the tweets from his official campaign count, Team Trump. Many of these tweets included videos from Fox News, OAN, and Newsmax. In one instance, a tweet from Team Trump questioning why a label had been placed on another tweet was also given a label: “This claim about election fraud has been disputed.” Since May 31, 2018, Trump and his campaign have been censored by Twitter at least 436 times. Meanwhile, former Vice President Joe Biden and his campaign have been censored 0 times. President Trump tweeted a Breitbart piece that was simply a write-up of his rally in Georgia, and this tweet still received a label, “This claim about election fraud is disputed.”

In contrast, Joe Biden, who was elected by fraud, has not been censored by Twitter. But you cannot say that he was elected by fraud because Twitter censor you.

In the past, to suffer censorship, you needed to live in Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union. Today, if you want live under censorship, you can choose China and Saudi Arabia. However, unfortunately, the United States has become another option in this menu of censorship dictatorships.

Twitter and all its directors and staff should be shipped to China, which has the censorship they love.

Portuguese version of this article: Twitter censurou o presidente Trump e sua campanha 436 vezes, mas não aplicou nenhuma censura ao esquerdista radical Joe Biden

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Global Virtual Dictatorship “Made in US”

Censorship and termination of my account, the Facebook answer to my Christian conservatism

An Empire Launched by U.S. Socialists

The Transcendent Power of Neoconservatism in the U.S. Media and among Left-Wingers and Right-Wingers

What Is Neoconservatism? Who are the Neocons?

Conservative Babylon in “Persecuted”: Hybrid Televangelist Framed by Pagan Neocon, and the Free Speech or Patriotic or Equality “Gospel” Replacing the Gospel of Jesus Christ

God Is Good to Israel: How Providence Hindered Franklin Roosevelt from Hindering the Birth of the Modern State of Israel

Mike Pompeo: Chinese Communism is “the Central Threat of Our Times”

Manifest Destiny in the Bible? America Is Modern Babylon, Said David Wilkerson

Trump: “The United States cannot continue to be the policeman of the world”

Unilever threatens to pull advertising from Facebook, Google and Twitter if they don’t tackle “toxic” content and “fake news”

The problem is when left-wingers define what is toxic content and fake news

By Julio Severo

Unilever, one of the world’s largest advertisers, is threatening to pull its investment and marketing from tech giants such as Google, Facebook and Twitter if the platforms fuel “hate” and create “division” — a suspicious accusation considering the accuser’s left-wing motivation.

“As one of the largest advertisers in the world, we cannot have an environment where our consumers don’t trust what they see online,” said Unilever’s chief marketing officer Keith Weed.

Executives from Facebook and other tech companies have admitted that they could do more to combat “hate,” “abuse” and “extremism” on their platforms. Considering that these terms are never leveled at left-wing activity, the accusation of “hate,” “abuse” and “extremism” speaks volumes about the accuser. Of course, this is not to deny that there are hate, abuse and extremism among some right-wingers — the Catholic effort to rehabilitate the Inquisition through a Marxist revisionism is an example. But such extremism is rejected by the overwhelming majority of conservatives, while among left-wingers hate, abuse and extremism — the worship of Che Guevara and other communist killers — are not rejected.

“Unilever will not invest in platforms or environments that do not protect our children or which create division in society, and promote anger or hate,” Weed said. “We will prioritize investing only in responsible platforms that are committed to creating a positive impact in society.”

Weed called on the technology industry “to improve” their actions against “fake news” and “toxic” online content. The problem always is that Facebook and Unilever, dominated by left-wingers, never apply such terms to left-wing news and content.

Unilever said it is committed to tackling “gender stereotypes” in advertising and will only partner with organizations that are committed to creating “better” digital infrastructure. Better for whom? As ever, for their left-wing ideology.

“Gender stereotypes” is, in Unilever’s view, an excuse to protect children from Bible and conservative views. Actually, Unilever thinks that the lack of homosexual indoctrination makes children “unprotected.”

When Unilever says that it “will not invest in platforms or environments that do not protect our children,” it means that the only protection children need is from conservative ideas.

It is a miracle the conservative presence in Facebook, because this left-wing company is doing everything in its power to censor conservatives. And now Unilever wants Facebook to increase censorship.

Unilever was heavily criticized last year for a Dove advert, massively denounced by Facebook users, biased against mothers.

The Dove advert celebrated what Unilever sees as real moms “whose diverse parenting styles shatter stereotypes about motherhood and prove that there are no rules about how to be a parent today.”

The “real mothers” in the Dove advert were two biological men who identified as women. For Unilever, such propaganda “creates a positive impact in society.” For Unilever, two homosexual men are just as capable of being mothers as biological females are and to be a real woman is not a requirement for being a mom.

The Dove advert faced a massive backlash from users, who used extensively Facebook, Google and Twitter to denounce, through conservative articles and posts, Unilever’s propaganda against real mothers.

Now, in vengeance, Unilever is pressuring Facebook, Google and Twitter to tackle users’ backlash tools against its pro-homosexuality propagandas by banning conservative posts and the share of conservative articles.

Facebook, Google and Twitter would be more than happy to do as Unilever wishes. When these digital platforms complain of “hate,” “abuse” and “extremism” among their users, in no way they mean pictures of Muslims beheading Christians, homosexual activists reviling and mocking Christians or left-wing bigots attacking Christians who support Trump’s conservative stances. In an Orwellian misrepresentation, they mean Muslims, homosexual militants and left-wingers being attacked by Christians!

Just as a case in point, right now I am blocked on my own Facebook profile. Facebook’s justification for the block was that two posts, of 5 years ago, are now deemed “offensive,” because they had links to two articles on my blog. One article against Islamic invasion in Europe, denouncing Islamic violence. And another article exposing how homosexual groups in Brazil explore taxpayers by receiving millions to spread their immoral lifestyle.

You can read Facebook’s blatant censorship here: Why Does Facebook Harass and Censor Christians?

I have been banned for thirty days. This is the third time, in just six months, that Facebook has imposed a 30-day ban on my personal profile.

If, as Unilever wants, Facebook should do much more to tackle users who backlash against Unilever’s immoral propaganda, then will conservative users be censored, banned and expelled from Facebook?

In 2015, Faith Driven Consumer — representing 41 million Christian consumers who spend $2 trillion annually — labeled Unilever, with Microsoft and Apple, one of the companies most disrespectful to biblical worldview.

As a Facebook user, I strongly disagree with Unilever’s propaganda portraying two homosexual men as “real mothers.” I will do everything in my power, as a user on Facebook, Google and Twitter, to express my view against such perversion. And Unilever is doing everything in its power to ban my view.

Will Unilever prevail over the conservative public’ will?

Will Facebook, Google and Twitter prevail over their conservative users?

With information from FoxNews, Reuters, Charisma and BusinessInsider.

Portuguese version of this article: Unilever ameaça retirar anúncios do Facebook, Google e Twitter se não atacarem conteúdo “tóxico” e “notícias falsas”

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Why Does Facebook Harass and Censor Christians?

Facebook excludes Israel and Includes Palestine

Facebook and Twitter have been accused by Muslims in U.K. of allowing ‘Islamophobia’ from users

Anti-Islamic posts have been reported as ‘racist’

By Julio Severo

Are you shocked and horrified by watching beheadings, tortures and slaughters of Christians by ISIS and other Islamic groups? You are not alone. Islamic groups in the Western nations, especially in U.K., are also ‘shocked’ and ‘horrified’ — by anti-Muslim comments by users shocked and horrified by Islamic violence!

According to the DailyMail, Muslim groups in U.K. have been recording online anti-Islamic speech and reporting it to Twitter and Facebook.

They have reportedly brought many anti-Muslim messages to the attention of the social-media companies.

Fiyaz Mughal, director of Faith Matters, which runs a helpline called Tell MAMA, for victims of anti-Muslim ‘violence,’ said he was disappointed the sites were not taking a stronger stance.

He said, “It is morally unacceptable that social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter, which are vast profit-making companies, socially engineer what is right and wrong to say in our society when they leave up inflammatory, highly socially divisive and openly bigoted views.”

Mughal said that Tell MAMA regularly receives reports of anti-Muslim rhetoric and ‘hate’ from Muslim Facebook and Twitter users.

For Muslims, any anti-Muslim comment is ‘violence.’

In a statement Facebook said, “We take hate speech seriously and remove any content reported to us that directly attacks others based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation…”

Facebook said that it is working with Faith Matters to find a solution against anti-Muslim posts from its users.

The DailyMail report used the grossest examples of anti-Islamic views to justify censorship. But even when there is no gross anti-Islamic rhetoric, Facebook has censored. Some Christian Facebook users who have posted YouTube videos of Christians being beheaded by Muslims, just to draw attention to their horrible plight, have had their accounts blocked for several days. Their “anti-Muslim” posts, which included no dirty words or anti-Islamic violence, have been removed.

In the U.K., the pro-Islamic madness is out of control. There has been a wave of Islamic rapes of British ethnic girls and young women, but the English people, who were courageous to protect their land from Nazi enemies decades ago, today hand over their daughters to Islamic rapists. They are more fearful of being accused of ‘racism’ than seeing their daughters unprotected from Islamic rapists.

If Obama, Bush and Clinton are right in their frequent messages and propaganda that Islam is a “religion of peace,” so the many YouTube videos from ISIS beheading Christians are not what we see. They could be Christians beheading Muslims! In this case, Muslims in U.K. are right to report anti-Muslim speech.

In this case, Facebook and Twitter would be right to remove any speech against the propaganda of Islam as a “religion of peace.”

Yet, the reality does not follow the messages of Obama, Bush, Clinton and Islamic propagandists in the West.

Islam is the leading cause of oppression, persecution and martyrdom of Christians around the world. However, these poor people are supposed to die without complaining in Muslim lands. And we in Western lands have no right to complain about Muslims bringing suffering to them.

Anti-Christian censorship is rampant in Muslim lands, and the West wants to follow suit.

By the way, if Muslims in the West have their way, sooner or later this article will be labeled ‘racist’ or anti-Muslim ‘hate.’

With information of the DailyMail.

Portuguese version of this article: Facebook e Twitter estão sendo acusados por muçulmanos na Inglaterra de permitir ‘islamofobia’ dos usuários

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Germans Protest Islam, Leftwing Media Denounces Putin

Islamic terror in Australia and Christians as second-class citizens

Muhammad tops as the most popular baby boy name in Britain

Obama Using Marxist Experience to promote Muslim Expansion

Pope says equating Islam with violence is wrong

Rising Turkish Menace: U.S. and NATO Ally Wants Islamic Advance in Latin America

Main threat to US, Russia: Radical Islam, not each other

Hillary Clinton: America should “empathize” and “show respect” to her enemies

Interview with Don Hank: Interpreting What is Happening in the U.S., Europe and Russia today