Showing posts with label Richard Grenell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Richard Grenell. Show all posts

Thursday, August 20, 2020

Trump Is the “Most Pro-Gay President in American History,” According to Republican Richard Grenell


Trump Is the “Most Pro-Gay President in American History,” According to Republican Richard Grenell

By Julio Severo
On August 17, 2020, I published my article “Trump Is the Most Pro-Sodomy Republican President in the U.S. History.” Certainly, among Republican presidents, U.S. President Donald Trump is the most pro-homosexuality. At least, this was my thought.
Yet, I was surprised when in a video of August 19, 2020 Richard Grenell said that Trump is “most pro-gay president In American history. I can prove It.” Unintentionally, he corrected me: Trump is the most pro-sodomy president in the U.S. history, among Democratic and Republican presidents.
Grenell knows what he said. He is a Republican homosexualist who had been appointed by Trump as the U.S. ambassador to Germany and Acting Director of National Intelligence.
Grenell’s statement was made in a video released by Log Cabin Republicans, a group of Republican homosexualists who work to advance the gay agenda, but they want conservatives to believe that Republican homosexualists are also conservative.
The video was intended to the homosexual population, to convince them that if they want a presidential candidate to do their will, Trump is the right man.
“President Trump has done more to advance the rights of gays and lesbians in three years than Joe Biden did in forty-plus years in Washington,” Grenell said. “For four decades, Joe Biden has attacked the LGBT community; as a U.S. senator, Biden supported ‘Don’t Ask; Don’t Tell’ and the Defense of Marriage Act. Biden voted to cut off federal funds to any school that teaches acceptance of homosexuality. Biden said again and again that he was against marriage equality.”
So Grenell, who received from Trump the mission to legalize homosexuality around the world, is saying to the homosexual population not to vote for Democrat (socialist) Joe Biden because Biden voted to cut off federal funds to any school that teaches acceptance of homosexuality and said again and again that he was against gay “marriage.”
The video showed Biden answering, “No,” when asked if he supported gay “marriage,” and another clip of Biden saying, “Marriage is between a man and a woman.”
“I know firsthand that President Trump is the strongest ally that gay Americans have ever had in the White House. Donald Trump is the first president in American history to be pro-gay marriage from his first day in office,” Grenell said.
Conservative evangelicals do not need to be highly intelligent to understand what Grenell means. Eventually, Trump’s global campaign to legalize homosexuality will also legalize gay “marriage,” fund acceptance of homosexuality in schools and make homosexualists free to indoctrinate and adopt children.
Grenell concluded, “Well, I love this country and I’m not going to be silent. There are tens of thousands of gay conservatives just like me who also won’t be silent. Gay people don’t have to vote Democrat because Donald Trump is the most pro-gay president in American history.”
I would never vote for Joe Biden or other Democrat because they are socialists, but Grenell, as a Republican homosexualist married to another homosexual man, has actually proved that by voting for Trump (whom I admire in many other respects), evangelicals will have a president promoting an agenda totally contrary to their moral and biblical values. They will embrace in Trump what they never embraced in socialists.
Conservative Christians, especially evangelicals, opposed Bill Clinton, Barack Hussein Obama and did not vote for Hillary Clinton exactly because they promoted homosexual activism. Why now should they tolerate a Republican more engaged in homosexual activism than Democrats do?
Evangelicals, who are the main political base of Trump, should not make their votes a cheap product. They should make their voices and values very clear. They should value their support of Trump by clearly saying to him “no more homosexual propaganda and imperialism,” especially in the U.S. foreign policy. Trump is pushing internationally the homosexual agenda at the expense of his evangelical voters.
If the homosexual activism of Bill Clinton, Obama and Hillary Clinton was very troubling for conservative evangelicals, why should the same activism by Trump and his administration be less troubling for evangelicals?
Thanks to Richard Grenell for correcting me. I was actually wrong when I said that Trump is the most pro-sodomy Republican president. He is actually the most pro-sodomy president in the U.S. history, beating Democrats and Republicans.
Grenell confirmed and expanded everything I said about homosexual activism in the Trump administration. Yet, while as a homosexualist he is very glad with such activism, as a conservative evangelical I am very sad.
With information from DailyWire.com
Recommended Reading:

Wednesday, March 04, 2020

Trump Praised Gay “Marriage” on Eve of India Visit


Trump Praised Gay “Marriage” on Eve of India Visit

Homosexualist population control as a new NSSM 200 can be behind Trump’s insistence on praising gay “marriage” and other gay issues

By Julio Severo
President Donald Trump provoked confusion among his conservative supporters on February 21, 2020 after he praised a Bollywood movie defending gay “marriage” before his trip to India.
“Great!” Trump tweeted in response to homosexualist activist Peter Tatchell, who wrote on Twitter that the gay “marriage” movie, titled “Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan,” was intended to persuade Indians to support the “normalization” of homosexuality.
Trump’s tweet surprised many of his supporters when he simultaneously retweeted the post from the homosexualist activist and supported gay “marriage” because most of his supporters, who are conservative evangelicals, do not support gay activism and gay “marriage.” See the WND article “President Trump's most dangerous error” by Scott Lively.
There is a massive problem of boys preyed on and raped by homosexuals, but Trump has ignored their plight. And when India has a massive problem of Christians being persecuted and killed by Hindus, he focused on same sex perversion. He praised a fake marriage made by sexual perversion. Why not focus on homosexual violence and predatory gay indoctrination against boys?
If conservative evangelicals wanted gay activism and gay “marriage,” they would have voted for Hillary Clinton, who had promised to support these issues. In fact, they voted for Trump because they were tired of former President Barack Hussein Obama already doing these same things.
They were tired of seeing the Obama administration praising and even pushing to decriminalize homosexuality in countries around the world. But what do they see now? The same things.
Even then, Perkins seemed not to believe that Trump was behind the effort, because he said “it doesn’t seem that President Trump – or anyone else in the administration — authorized this ‘campaign.’”
Perkins showed a willingness to support such effort only to end violence against homosexuals, not raising any questions about why to put violence against homosexuals above homosexual violence against children, through sexual violence or predatory indoctrination, and not questioning if there was more than the eyes can see.
My criticism of the soft stance of Perkins and the Family Research Council (FRC) on this issue drew the attention of Right Wing Watch, a left-wing organization that monitors conservatives, which sided with Perkins and FRC against me.
As I suspected, there was more than the eyes can see. According to LifeSiteNews,
In a video interview with a fellow gay, Dave Rubin of the Rubin Report, published this week, Grenell perhaps admitted that he might be seeking more than just the decriminalization of homosexuality:
We’re making so much progress [with the decriminalization campaign].  Granted, this is going to be a long fight, trying to convince sixy-nine countries to do a change in domestic laws, to not criminalize homosexuality.
Grenell did not stop there.  He added:
And that’s all this is is ‘step one,’ is just to work on criminalization. Others are working on steps two to twenty.
Grenell did not explain what steps 2–20 might be, leaving plenty of room for interpretation by pro-marriage and pro-family conservatives.
So, in the words of Grenell, the most promoted and praised homosexualist by Trump, decriminalization is just the first of many other “unknown” steps in the ladder of homosexualist expansionism.
When Obama and Hillary talked about decriminalization of homosexuality around the world, conservatives understood that there was a strategy and decriminalization was just the beginning. Why in Trump’s case do they want to believe that there is no strategy? They should be more prudent, because Trump has a history of supporting conservatives and liberals at the same time. As a billionaire, he used to donate to Billy Graham and abortion and homosexual groups, perhaps to please both conservatives and liberals.
The fact is, just as Obama had a strategy to use decriminalization as a launching pad for many other gay issues, Trump has the same strategy, and his strategist is a hardline homosexualist. And probably there are bigger strategies behind decriminalization. After all, how explain that left-wing Obama and right-wing Trump have the same obsession to decriminalize homosexuality around the world?
While the U.S. government promoted gay “marriage” through the efforts of the left-wing president Obama, now the U.S. government, under Trump, is promoting the same fake marriage. As far as gay “marriage” is involved, left and right in the United States are two sides of the same coin.
What is behind this? My take is that some sort of modernized and sophisticate NSSM 200 is in play. The United States National Security Council, the highest decision-making body on foreign policy in the United States, promulgated, on December 10, 1974, a top secret document entitled National Security Study Memorandum 200, also called The Kissinger Report. Its subject was “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” This document was the result of collaboration among the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Departments of State and Defense.
NSSM 200 is the most comprehensive and important document on population control ever devised by a government.
NSSM 200 continues to be the foundational document on population control issued by the United States government. It therefore continues to represent official United States policy on population control.
NSSM 200 is critically important to pro-life workers all over the world, because it completely exposes the unsavory and unethical motivations and methods of the population control movement.
If the goal of the CIA, USAID, the State Department and the Department of Defense is to reduce the world population, what method is better than homosexuality, which is the perfect “birth control”?
Some could say that only left-wing presidents in the White House, presidents from the Democratic Party, could advance anything similar to NSSM 200. Actually, the original NSSM 200 was made by the CIA, USAID, the State Department and the Department of Defense under the Republican conservative administration of Gerald Ford. So NSSM 200, as a population control strategy, is a product 100 percent Republican.
Both left-wingers and right-wingers in the White House are committed to the mission, probably pressured by some higher objective of the U.S. government, to reduce the world population. There is no other reason why left-wing Obama and right-wing Trump would engage in the infamous global effort to decriminalize homosexuality while thousands of boys are raped, psychologically and physically, by predatory homosexualists.
Probably because of bigger strategies of a sophisticate homosexualist NSSM 200, with his global effort to decriminalize sodomy Trump dispelled the false notion among conservatives that Obama had the monopoly on the advocacy of gay “marriage.” No, the monopoly belongs to the U.S. government, under left-wingers and right-wingers.
Gay “marriage” totally fulfills the objective of NSSM 200. This fake marriage is infertile and destroys the mission of real marriage: childbearing.
NSSM 200 seeks reduction of births. Gay “marriage” successfully does it.
Under left-wingers and right-wingers, generously backed by Hollywood, America has become a propaganda machine for gay “marriage.” With Trump is not different, even though he has a very special relationship with evangelicals, who are his main political supporters and they are against such fake marriage. In this issue, their relationship is marked by silence. Trump has remained silent about LGBT persecution against evangelist Franklin Graham, his most prominent evangelical supporter, while Graham has remained silent about Trump supporting gay “marriage” and other homosexual issues.
If the CIA, USAID, the State Department and the Department of Defense had not perverted the mission of the U.S. government with NSSM 200, Trump would understand that much more important than valuing, praising and protecting homosexuality is to protect children from predatory homosexual indoctrination and violence. Protection of children, not homosexuality, should be priority.
Today’s conservative evangelicals run the risk of being labeled hypocrites by future generations of conservative evangelicals. If Obama was never spared for praising a gay “marriage” movie of Bollywood, why is Trump spared? Why are many evangelical conservatives silent? Why cannot they see the bigger plan, a homosexualist NSSM 200, behind Obama and Trump?
The same Bible that condemns Obama for praising gay “marriage” also condemns Trump for the same sin. Evangelical conservatives should never forget that.
Liberals do not praise Trump’s praise for gay “marriage” because they hate him in other issues where he shows conservative stances. For example, liberal Christianity Today criticized Trump over everything, even saying that he should be impeached, but it spared him in one thing: sodomy.
If behind the propaganda of affordable family planning services the U.S. government had a much darker agenda of population control through NSSM 200, should it be any surprise if behind the propaganda of “decriminalization of homosexuality” is a much darker agenda of homosexualist expansionism and imperialism for the purpose of population control?
Hopefully, Tony Perkins, the Family Research Council and other evangelical groups will not say this time, “it doesn’t seem that President Trump authorized himself to praise the gay ‘marriage’ movie of Bollywood.”
It is past time for Tony Perkins and the Family Research Council to denounce Trump’s non-authorized praise of gay “marriage.”
With information from the DailyMail and FoxNews.
Recommended Reading:

Monday, June 03, 2019

Making Sodomy Great Again: Trump becomes first Republican president to celebrate LGBT Pride Month as he launches campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world


Making Sodomy Great Again: Trump becomes first Republican president to celebrate LGBT Pride Month as he launches campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world

By Julio Severo
Donald Trump has surprised left-wingers and disappointed conservative Christians on May 31, 2019, by officially inaugurating June 2019 as LGBT Pride Month as he said, “My Administration has launched a global campaign to decriminalize homosexuality and invite all nations to join us in this effort!”
It is the first time a Republican president has publicly celebrated the LGBT Pride Month, where the 30 days of June are dedicated to celebrate the sexual behavior of homosexuals. If Trump dedicated 30 days of a month to celebrate Christianity, especially Protestantism that founded America, there would be widespread outcries. It would be impossible for him to make such celebration. In fact, in the 500th year of the Protestant Reformation on October 31, 2017, Trump did no mention of it, even though he is the president of the largest Protestant nation in the world. Instead, he celebrated Halloween and its occultism. Obviously, for him the homosexual behavior and Halloween deserve more celebrations than Christianity.
“As we celebrate LGBT Pride Month and recognize the outstanding contributions LGBT people have made to our great Nation, let us also stand in solidarity with the many LGBT people who live in dozens of countries worldwide that punish, imprison, or even execute individuals on the basis of their sexual orientation,” Trump wrote in support of the LGBTI Pride Month. His comment was not different of comments by Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton, who also used the language of human rights and legal punishment, imprisonment and execution of homosexuals as pretexts for their campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world.
U.S. evangelical leaders are already voicing their concerns. Dr. Michael Brown, a U.S. Jewish Pentecostal author and minister, tweeted:
“I’m deeply disappointed in President Trump celebrating gay pride this month. For the first 2 years he broke the trend, but unfortunately has gone in the wrong direction this time. I urge him to reconsider. @realDonaldTrump.”
Robert A. J. Gagnon, a theology professor and author of the book “The Bible and Homosexual Practice: Texts and Hermeneutics,” wrote on his Facebook,
“Terribly misguided tweets by Trump celebrating ‘LGBTQ’ ‘pride.’ He deserves all the criticism he can get from conservatives on this… Trump was never fully reliable to oppose ‘LGBTQ’ incursions. Democrats were always fully ‘reliable’ to support every ‘LGBTQ’ tyranny. Trump must be made to know that supporting the ‘LGBTQ’ agenda will gain him few votes and cost him many.”
Activist Mommy Elizabeth Johnston tweeted,
“Mr. President, w/ all due respect, celebrating sexual deviancy is very unbecoming of the leader of the free world. Furthermore, LGBT community is brazenly anti-free speech (if you disagree w/ them) & anti-religious liberty (if you’re a Christian).”
Rev. Michael S. Heath said,
“I was Trump’s earliest supporter for President. I don’t support him for re-election. The danger of sodomy approval is way beyond politics. If he doesn't relent in his crusading for homosexuality then he will not be re-elected.”
Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for the Truth about Homosexuality, tweeted,
“Was this tweet was written by @RichardGrenell, Trump's openly homosexual & avowed ‘gay Christian’ Amb. to Germany? Why should we celebrate behavior that is clearly called sin by the Bible (Trump’s favorite book)? Moreover no ‘Shining City on the Hill’ promotes sodomy to the world.”
“Shining City on the Hill” is an expression that conservative President Ronald Reagan used, based on Jesus’s words: “You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden.” (Matthew 5:14 ESV) Reagan used it to mean that the U.S. has as its mission to be a “Shining City on the Hill.” But with Obama and now Trump, America is, as far as homosexual sin is concerned, a “Sinning City on the Hill.”
LaBarbera also said,
“Dear @Franklin_Graham, I hope you speak out against this tweet by @realDonaldTrump promoting (homo)sexual immorality and gender rebellion to the world. No president should defy Biblical Truth. Note: I’m generally a strong supporter of President Trump and I’m NOT a Never Trumper.”
Graham is an outspoken critic of the homosexual agenda and an outspoken supporter of pro-family values. He has criticized Hollywood and Democrats for supporting the gay agenda. And when Obama, his administration and the U.S. mainstream media were attacking Russian President Vladimir Putin because of the Russian law banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents, Graham wrote the cover story in the Decision magazine, published by the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, touting the courage of the Russian president to confront the powerful Gay New World Order.
Yet, in regard to Trump, Graham is in a very delicate situation, because Trump has been very nice to his family, including by attending the funeral of his father and praising him. This was one of the nicest things a U.S. president ever did to an evangelist. Graham is also his personal adviser. Probably, he spoke or tried to speak to Trump about all of this. While Trump was tweeting his celebration of the LGBTI Pride Month, Graham tweeted, “I want to remind everyone of the importance of praying for @POTUS @realDonaldTrump…”
If a president had been nice to my family, I would also have a very hard time to confront him openly about his outright homosexual propaganda, even though this was my spiritual duty as a Christian.
It was very easy to leave the comfort zone to confront left-wing Obama over his homosexual propaganda. But it has been very hard, a big challenge, for many conservative evangelicals to leave their comfort zone of political interests to confront right-wing Trump over his homosexual propaganda.
After tweeting his celebration of LGBTI Pride Month, Trump retweeted some messages of Franklin Graham. He knows that Graham has authority and influence to sway evangelicals. And his subtle message is that he does not want Graham influencing evangelicals against his campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world.
For the sake of keeping the communication channels open, Graham should not criticize Trump openly, but let others do it. And Christians should pray for Trump and Graham so that he may use wisely his communication channels to Trump to speak privately what Trump needs to know.
Trump chose U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell in February to lead his international campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world. Grenell, who is married to another homosexual, is the Trump administration’s most high-profile homosexual appointee.
Reached by DailyMail in Berlin, Grenell said “President Trump has never wavered in his support for decriminalizing homosexuality.” Grenell, an open homosexual, told Fox News last month that Vice President Mike Pence is on board with the campaign. Has Pence, again, put politics above conservative and Christian values?
Last February, when Grenell launched his campaign, I denounced it in my article “Trump Administration Seeks Legalization of Homosexuality Around the World While Children and Other Victims of Homosexuality Are Forgotten”. The largest U.S. gay magazine The Advocate reported then that Scott Lively, Family Research Council (FRC) and Julio Severo were prominent evangelical voices opposing such campaign. You can read it in my article “Largest U.S. Gay Magazine Furious Over Evangelical Protest Against U.S. Government Effort to Decriminalize Homosexuality Around the World”.
Yet, while I correctly interpreted that this was a campaign by the Trump administration, FRC had a different interpretation. In its piece titled “Human Rights Are Human Rights,” FRC said that “Grenell wrote in an opinion piece in the German newspaper Bild that ‘government officials must . . . demand that U.N. members decriminalize homosexuality,’” but assuring that “There’s just one problem — besides the ambassador, it doesn’t seem that President Trump — or anyone else in the administration — authorized this ‘campaign.’”
For FRC, Trump was innocent of such campaign, which was a betrayal of Trump’s evangelical supporters. FRC just did not believe that Trump would support Grenell’s campaign. I published in the United States two articles showing that FRC was wrong and that they needed a stronger stance regarding gay issues in the Trump administration. FRC reacted by successfully requesting the removal of these two articles from a prominent U.S. website, but a copy of these articles is also available in my personal blog here:
In spite of FRC’s efforts to deny, the Trump administration was already advancing the homosexual agenda and Trump was only waiting the right time for him to come out on its defense. Meanwhile, he was using departments in his administration to defend the gay agenda on his behalf.
In 2017, the State Department, under Rex Tillerson, celebrated June as LGBTI Pride Month, but those who did not want to see Trump involved in this did not see his voice speaking through Tillerson. A whole month where U.S. government officials celebrated homosexuality in the U.S. and its embassies around the world! How could Trump’s conservative evangelical supporters think that he had no hand on all of this?
In 2018, the State Department, under “evangelical” Mike Pompeo, again celebrated June as LGBTI Pride Month, but those who did not want to see Trump involved in this again did not see his voice speaking through Pompeo. A whole month where U.S. government officials celebrated homosexuality in the U.S. and its embassies around the world! How could Trump’s conservative evangelical supporters think that he had no hand on all of this?
Other prominent figures in the Trump administration, especially U.S. Ambassador to UN Nikki Haley, voiced support for the LGBTI Pride Month, but those who did not want to see Trump involved in this did not see his voice speaking through Haley.
The signs were clear, but they were not seen by those who did not want to see.
As to FRC, even having contact with high-profile Republicans and having privileged information, it misrepresented Trump to its evangelical audiences, as if his voice through his own State Secretaries, U.S. Ambassador to the UN and others were not his strategic voices, as if his homosexual campaign were not a homosexual campaign.
What may have left evangelical supporters of Trump in doubt regarding this clear voice is that sometimes Trump made compromises to them, for example, the ban on transsexuals in the military. But this is a minor compromise in contrast with bigger compromises to homosexualists. For example, Trump kept in his administration the post of the U.S. global homosexual envoy created by Obama.
Trump kept many other homosexual posts created by Obama in the federal government, but his evangelical supporters did not take them seriously because of his minor compromise to them. I call it “cake strategy,” where Trump, to make everybody happy, gave slices of a cake to everybody. Increasingly minor slices (or concessions) to evangelicals and increasingly major slices (or concessions) to homosexualists.
The difference is that while conservatives are satisfied with one or two slices, left-wingers complain all the time. Regardless how many slices he gives to them, they are never satisfied, because they always want the whole cake.
Last year, Trump appointed a conservative judge to make conservatives happy and he appointed a homosexual judge to make homosexualists happy. I criticized Trump’s compromise here: “Trump and His Judges, One for Conservatives and One for Gay Activists”. Not surprisingly, the left criticized me for not accepting Trump’s gay judge.
Trump may be worried, because immediately after he tweeted his tragic celebration of the LGBT Pride Month, he began to retweet evangelical messages, especially from Franklin Graham. Even so, the evangelical pressure on him should continue.
If most Trump supporters were homossexualists or left-wingers, I could understand his stance of giving in to their whims. But this is not so.
Evangelicals are the main political base of Trump, and he is using this base to legalize homosexuality around the world, in an effort calculated to backfire — against evangelicals, because the gay agenda is against Christianity.
There are also other compromises in the Republican Party. The largest “conservative” conference in the U.S. — the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) — has been harboring homosexualists while outrightly rejecting conservative evangelicals opposed to the homosexual agenda.
So as homosexualists advance in the Republican Party and conservative conferences, evangelicals and other conservatives will be more and more antagonized.
Conservatives should not be deceived by Trump’s campaign to make homosexuality legal. The standard, classical way used by left-wingers to begin a campaign to legalize homosexuality is to address human rights and to protect homosexuals from violence. The final result is always the same: Bigger and bigger homosexual privileges resulting in bigger and bigger persecution of Christians.
Even if the push of the Trump administration addressed only violence against homosexuals, why prioritize individuals known for their bad sexual choices?
When I think about violence and homosexuality, the first thought coming to my mind is not individuals suffering violence for their sexual lifestyle. The first thinking is children suffering homosexual violence — physical and psychological. There is a massive effort to cover up the suffering of children in the hands of homosexual predators.
The Catholic Church is a living evidence of the gravity of homosexual violence against children. Young men with hidden homosexual problems enter Catholic seminaries, and even though they are never delivered from their homosexual demons and vices, they become priests and bishops. The natural consequence is that their homosexuality eventually produces sexual violence against children.
If you cannot hinder even a Christian setting where there is homosexuality from committing sexual violence against children, how does the U.S. government expect to protect a homosexual culture known for making children especially vulnerable to sexual abuse?
I have no doubt that George Washington, the first U.S. president known for discharging dishonorably a soldier because of his homosexual behavior, would never accept the U.S. government celebrating a “LGBTI Pride Month.” Instead, he would launch a “Month of Protection of Children Against Homosexual Propaganda and Violence.” He would also launch a push to encourage nations to protect children and teens from homosexual propaganda and its psychological and physical violence.
Putin’s Russia has given a very good example by enacting in 2013 a law banning homosexual propaganda to children. The Obama administration, which was busy celebrating homosexuality in its State Department and engaged in efforts to decriminalize homosexuality around the world, growled at the Russian law and used the Ukrainian issue as a pretext to impose sanctions on Russia.
With Trump, my expectation was that he would use the U.S. government to do much more than Russia against the powerful homosexual agenda and its predatory threat to children. Yet, in many ways and year after year Trump, his administration and his State Department are doing more and more to imitate Obama and his obsession to celebrate homosexuality.
Obama never was worried about children and their protection against the predatory threat of homosexual propaganda. Trump never showed any such worry too. No “Month of Protection of Children Against Homosexual Propaganda and Violence.”
All of them are interested in protecting a predatory sexual behavior that brought God’s judgment to Sodom as an example of societies that would choose homosexuality as their official lifestyle. The U.S., under Obama and Trump, are not only celebrating and protecting this perverted lifestyle, but the Obama administration worked and the Trump administration has been working to spread the celebration and protection of this lifestyle that even today is bringing big curses to the Catholic Church and eventually bring bigger curses and destruction to societies that insist on embracing what God has always condemned.
God has said,
“You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22 ESV)
“What happened to Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities near them is an example for us of the punishment of eternal fire. The people of these cities suffered the same fate that God’s people and the angels did, because they committed sexual sins and engaged in homosexual activities.” (Jude 1:7 GWV)
In an age where 100,000 Christians are slaughtered for their faith a year, it makes no sense to focus on homosexuality. In fact, in the first 6 months of 2018 the Trump administration admitted to the U.S. just 21 Christian refugees. This was a blatant betrayal of Trump’s promises in 2016 that he would be a protector of persecuted Christians. And now does he want to be a protector of homosexuality when there are thousands and thousands of victims of homosexuality, including in the Catholic Church?
Why treat homosexuality as a characteristic of victimhood when is proven that homosexuality is a characteristic of violence, including sexual, especially against boys?
America was called to be a “Shining City on the Hill,” not a “Sinning City on the Hill” to please the globalists of the Gay New World Order.
Trump was elected by evangelicals to Make America Great Again, not to Make Sodom Great Again. People who read the Bible know the story and end of Sodom, whose homosexual practices received the name of “sodomy.” Does Trump want America to experience the same fate of Sodom?
Sodom made sodomy great, and paid a high price. Why would America want to make sodomy great again?
What is the point of making America great for America to lead the world in the celebration of homosexuality, just as Trump is doing on June 2019?
I agree with Franklin Graham that Americans should pray for Trump.
Evangelicals who elected Trump should pray for him to stop imitating Obama. And they should ask him to oust homosexual activist Richard Grenell from his administration and appoint evangelicals who may be able to celebrate a “Month of Protection of Children Against Homosexual Propaganda and Violence” in the State Department and launch an international push with such excellent purpose.
Conservatives and evangelicals, in the U.S. and around the world, expect no less than this from America.
With information from DailyMail.
Recommended Reading: