Far-Leftist Female Pastor Says Christmas Is about a Woman Leading a Feminist Revolution

By Julio Severo

On December 1, 2020, a United Church of Christ feminist pastor was criticized after suggesting that Christmas is ultimately about feminist empowerment over the traditional Christian celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ, the Son of God and Savior of the world.

In the Christian tradition of Christmas, Jesus is glorified as a Baby and the motherhood of Mary is honored. Yet, the feminist pastor thinks that her version of feminist Christmas destroys the “outdated” tradition. She honored feminism and despised the role of motherhood that God gave wives.

The feminist pastor, Rev. Jes Kast, said on Twitter: “Christmas season is about God choosing a woman to lead a revolution of re-organizing the structures of societal power by her leadership, tenderness, and faith.”

The problem is that if Mary were from the Protestant denomination of Kast, she would never have had Jesus. She would have aborted Jesus!

In 1972, the United Church of Christ (UCC), the denomination of Kast, ordained “the first openly gay person as a minister in a historic Protestant denomination: the Rev. William R. Johnson.”

The UCC later defended that homosexuality and normal sex between men and women are equivalent after the general synod passed a resolution in 2005.

Abortion and reproductive agenda is also a belief of the far-leftist denomination.

The problems is that abortion kills babies. And the reproductive agenda is anti-baby.

The Bible does not present an anti-baby God. In fact, the Bible presents a God who deeply loves babies and deeply loves to give lots and lots of babies to married couples. Whoever loves God loves what He loves.

Feminist pastor Kast said, “We need to unlearn broken patterns of thinking.”

That is, as a feminist she wants women to unlearn broken patterns of thinking that marriage, home and children are God’s ideal plan for women.

She wants women to unlearn broken patterns of thinking that homosexuality, contraception and abortion are against God’s plan.

How does this feminist intend to change Mary? Into a rebellious feminist?

Mary called herself the servant of the Lord. She was servant to serve God, her marriage, her husband, her children and her marital role. What did Kast want? Mary as a servant of feminism?

While Mary’s faith was important for the birth to Christ, she knew that she was still a sinner in need of a Savior. As a sinner, she watched her heart against demons putting demonic thoughts in her head. Sadly, feminist Kast let demons fill her heart with demonic thoughts of feminism.

A big difference between Mary and Kast is that Mary was a wife and mother (not a female minister!), and she was very contented. Kast is a far-leftist minister at the service of Satan.

Christianity is filled of misconception of Mary. While the Catholic Church transforms her into a strange pagan goddess or sinless super-saint (which has no base in the Bible), far-left Protestant denominations transform her in a revolutionary feminist. Sheer blasphemy.

Yet, it is a sin to transform Mary in a feminist revolutionary woman. Even though Mary was never revolutionary or feminist, during one of his teachings, Jesus said that obedience to God’s Word was more important than praising the woman who gave birth to Him.

“As he said these things, a woman in the crowd raised her voice and said to him, “Blessed is the womb that bore you, and the breasts at which you nursed!” (Luke 11:27-28 ESV)

With information from ChristianHeadlines.

Portuguese version of this article: Pastora de extrema esquerda diz que o Natal é sobre uma mulher liderando uma revolução feminista

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Lesbian Minister Becomes President of National Abortion Federation

Protestant Church Founded by George Washington Rejects Him and Embraces Feminism and Liberation Theology

Lesbian who murdered her former lover’s daughter, 2, and attempted to kill her son, 10, left a note explaining she was inspired to do it by a sermon in a homosexual church

Two Brazilian lesbians stab a boy one year after cutting off his sex organ to make him a “girl,” but the press and psychologists refuse to link the crime to homosexual behavior

First case of criminal activity in space: Lesbian astronaut is accused of accessing the bank account of her estranged lesbian “wife” from the International Space Station during their messy divorce

Number of legal abortions rises in the Israeli Army as coexistence of male and female soldiers has increased their sexual activity

Disney Threatens to Boycott Georgia Over Abortion Ban

Abortion, the Inquisition and Revisionism in the Encyclopedia Britannica

Pope Francis compares abortion to “hiring a hitman” and he says it can never be condoned

Trump suggests pro-lifers have gone too far in Alabama with near-total abortion ban as he says he is pro-life but believes in abortion for babies conceived in rape and incest

Conservative televangelist Pat Robertson says Alabama “has gone too far” in its “extreme” anti-abortion law because it does not include capital punishment for babies conceived in rape and incest

Everyone Should Remember the Holocaust

Leading Causes of Death in the United States, and Gun Homicides Are Not One of Them

Anti-Baby Vegans Preach It’s Morally Wrong for People to Have Babies and Revile Those Who Disagree with Them

The folly of man’s planning

Exposing the Global Population Control Agenda

Anthony Comstock: the first pro-life activist in the modern history

Blood in the Rivers: the Contraceptive Culture and Prophecies in Revelation

Trump Has Broken His Promise of Defunding the American Abortion Holocaust

Abortion in Israel: Why Is There No Public Outcry from Pro-Life Christians?

Holocaust, Abortion and Sodomy

Tom Parker: the Biggest Threat to Abortion in this Generation, According to Pro-Abortion Critic

 

Thirty-Two Nations Sign Statement Declaring There is “No Right to Abortion,” But the Statement Puts Feminism Before Babies

By Julio Severo

The United States, Brazil, Egypt, Hungary, Indonesia and Uganda on October 23, 2020 co-sponsored a nonbinding international pro-life declaration, in a rebuke of United Nations human rights bodies that have sought to increase abortion access.

The statement was signed by 32 countries in total, representing more than 1.6 billion people, and was titled “Geneva Consensus Declaration.”

“There is no international right to abortion,” said U.S. State Secretary Mike Pompeo.

The declaration states the signing countries “emphasize that ‘in no case should abortion be promoted as a method of family planning’” and that “the child… needs special safeguards and care… before as well as after birth.” It also says states have no obligation to finance or facilitate abortion.

Pompeo said in his remarks, “Under President Trump’s leadership, the United States has defended the dignity of human life everywhere and always. He’s done it like no other President in history. We’ve also mounted an unprecedented defense of the unborn abroad… Today, we’re taking the next step, as we sign the Geneva Consensus Declaration. At its very core, the Declaration protects women’s health, defends the unborn, and reiterates the vital importance of the family as the foundation of society.”

In September 2020, Trump told the UN General Assembly, “America will always be a leader in human rights” and he added, “My administration is advancing religious liberty, opportunity for women, the decriminalization of homosexuality, combating human trafficking, and protecting unborn children.”

Trump put religious liberty in first place. But in a misguided decision, the Trump administration gave its highest religious freedom award to a Brazilian left-wing sorcerer who has persecuted conservative evangelicals, including black evangelicals, in Brazil. It was one of the most absurd awards I ever saw, even after years witnessing many absurdities from the left-wing Obama administration.

And Trump put the decriminalization of homosexuality before protection of unborn children. To put decriminalization of homosexuality in a conservative speech is by itself a nonsense, but to put it before protection of unborn babies is a greater nonsense. Is it any wonder that gay activists say that Trump is the most pro-gay president in the U.S. history? Even so, his evangelical supporters are reluctant to criticize it.

This is not the only controversy. Trump also believes that unborn children victims of a rape deserve no legal protection.

Even though the Geneva Consensus Declaration presents a pro-life defense against abortion, it never called abortion murder. It said,

“Reaffirm that there is no international right to abortion, nor any international obligation on the part of States to finance or facilitate abortion, consistent with the long-standing international consensus that each nation has the sovereign right to implement programs and activities consistent with their laws and policies.”

Murder is always inconsistent with the right to life. If abortion had been mentioned clearly as murder, nations would understand that “programs and activities consistent with their laws and policies” would never condone any murder, including abortion.

Besides, in a feminist tone, the document put women and their rights before family, even saying,

“Improve and secure access to health and development gains for women, including sexual and reproductive health.”

“Sexual and reproductive health” is a UN jargon for the feminist, homosexualist and even abortion agenda. So how can a pro-life document condemn abortion and at the same time uses one of its UN jargons?

Then how “improve” “sexual and reproductive health” for women? Under “sexual and reproductive health,” girls have received plenty of immoral sex education and birth control around the world, resulting in abundant sexual activity, with many girls concluding that there is no need for marriage. Under “sexual and reproductive health,” girls are led to feminism, not marriage and family. And does the document propose to increase all of this?

The document was signed by Pompeo and Alex Azar, Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). If abortion is a matter of human rights and murder, why did a health secretary sign a pro-life document? After all, is abortion really murder or a health issue? If it is a health issue, it follows that pro-abortion feminists are right because they have managed to frame abortion as a health issue.

The pro-life document should never be signed by the HHS secretary. It should be signed by the Attorney General, because abortion is not a health issue, but a criminal and legal issue.

Among seven important items, the statement put family in the sixth place. Abortion was put in the third place. The other items were dedicated to the advancement of women — when clearly it should have dedicated to the advancement of the rights of unborn children.

The document mentions women 13 times, family 7 times and children 2 times. In fact, the first item of the “pro-life” document says,

“Ensure the full enjoyment of all human rights and equal opportunity for women at all levels of political, economic, and public life.”

This is a fulfilled feminist dream or nightmare. In the vision of this document, which represents the feminist vision, if men can be generals, women have equal right to be general and occupy any other male job.

While in a feminist document there is no room for pro-life words, in a pro-life document should there be plenty of feminist words?

So in a pro-life document, which should be dedicated totally to defend unborn life, there is feminist advocacy.

The Geneva Consensus Declaration is much more feminist than pro-life.

Feminist papers address not only abortion, but also the advancement of women. In contrast, a pro-life document addresses abortion without mentioning murder and promotes feminist issues putting family in second place. This is a feminist victory among pro-lifers. The Geneva Consensus Declaration did not also show any importance to the role of authority God gave to men in family and society.

NSSM 200, a paper prepared by the CIA in 1974 for a Republican administration, had guidelines and plans for the U.S. government to implement around the world to reduce the population of several nations, including Brazil, for the purpose to increase U.S. influence. One of these plans was to make the United Nations and the nations promote the advancement of women to reduce families and children.

For women, their advancement in male jobs reduces their chances to form families and have many children.

For men, their advancement in homosexuality equally reduces their chances to form families and have many children. In fact, when women occupy men’s jobs and roles, the only role left for men is… to be “women.”

So even though the Geneva Consensus Declaration condemns abortion without saying that it is murder, it contains many suspicious mentions of advancement of women, which contributes to population control and its natural effect sooner or later: abortion.

With information from LifeNews, HHS and UPI.

Portuguese version of this article: Trinta e duas nações assinam declaração afirmando que “não existe direito ao aborto,” mas a declaração coloca o feminismo na frente dos bebês

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Trump Became First U.S. President to Attend March for Life

President Donald Trump Proclaims January 22nd “National Sanctity of Human Life Day”

Trump Has Broken His Promise of Defunding the American Abortion Holocaust

Exposing the Global Population Control Agenda

Tom Parker: the Biggest Threat to Abortion in this Generation, According to Pro-Abortion Critic

Trump suggests pro-lifers have gone too far in Alabama with near-total abortion ban as he says he is pro-life but believes in abortion for babies conceived in rape and incest

Trump and Prophecies, and a New Model of National and World Leader

While US Navy SEALs are banned from treating men as men because of feminism, famous Italian brand Gucci launches female dress for men

By Julio Severo

A lot of men and boys are choosing homosexuality. Largely, sexual abuse is the factor. But the propaganda abuse, in several forms and kinds, has also played a powerful role in the change.

And even fashion companies are doing their propaganda — through their clothes.

According to DailyMail:

“Italian luxury brand Gucci is selling a £1,700 orange check dress which features satin bow detail in a bid to fight the ‘toxic stereotypes that mold masculine gender identity.’”

So it is ok for men to wear women’s clothes. What is not ok for men in this ideologically anti-male pro-feminist environment? To be men in a traditionally male military setting.

According also to DailyMail:

“US Navy SEALs go gender neutral: References to ‘brotherhood’ and ‘man’ are removed from its official ethos to include more gender neutral terms such as ‘warrior’ and ‘citizen.’”

The trend is to glorify masculine strength in women and feminine characteristics in men.

The trend is to masculinize women and feminize men.

The trend is desensitize and “defeminize” women and desensitize and “demasculinize” men.

Only by defeminizing women and demasculinizing men it is possible to create unnatural “families” that are unable to embrace their natural mission of “Be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28). This is the goal of population control efforts. What we are seeing is its tragic result.

The population control goal of “Be unfruitful and do not multiply” is universal today. For the sake of this goal, men have to be feminine and women have to be masculine.

Portuguese version of this article: Enquanto soldados da elite da Marinha dos EUA estão proibidos de tratar homens como homens por causa do feminismo, a famosa marca italiana Gucci lança vestidos femininos para homens

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading Feminism:

Voyage to the Bottom of Emasculation

Terminator’s Dark Feminist Fate

Inclusion of women and homosexuals has brought serious sex problems in the U.S. military as sexual assaults are getting worse every year with no end in sight

Leaked Army document reveals 84 percent of women have FAILED the new rigorous combat fitness test

Number of legal abortions rises in the Israeli Army as coexistence of male and female soldiers has increased their sexual activity

Recommended Reading on Birth Control:

Churches Closing and Mosques Opening in The United States

Muhammad is one of the top 10 baby names for first time in the U.S. history

In Germany, the Catholic Church and Protestant churches lost more than 430,000 members in 2018

Blood in the Rivers: the Contraceptive Culture and Prophecies in Revelation

The folly of man’s planning

Anti-Baby Vegans Preach It’s Morally Wrong for People to Have Babies and Revile Those Who Disagree with Them

John Calvin: Women Will Be Saved by Having Babies

Anthony Comstock: the first pro-life activist in the modern history

Recommended Reading on Population Control:

Ideological Scam: Scientists Use “Climate Change” to Call for Population Control

Exposing the Global Population Control Agenda

Bolsonaro defends birth control and says that “more educated people have fewer children”

United Nations Condemns Male Leadership, Not Communism, over COVID-19

By Julio Severo

United Nations Secretary General António Guterres said on September 6, 2020:

“The COVID19 pandemic is demonstrating what we all know: millennia of patriarchy have resulted in a male-dominated world with a male-dominated culture which damages everyone – women, men, girls & boys.”

Guterres used the COVID-19 pandemic to condemn male leadership, when he should have condemned Chinese communism, because it was exactly from China and its communist leadership that COVID-19 came.

Why did Guterres condemn male leadership, not communism? The answer is simple: António Guterres was, from 1999 to 2005, the president of the Socialist International. He was also Secretary-General of the Socialist Party of Portugal, from 1992 to 2002.

So he speaks as a socialist.

Obviously, male leadership is not by itself wicked, even though socialists demonize all male leadership. There is good male leadership and wicked male leadership.

God ordained male leadership on earth because this is the heavenly standard. God is male and supreme leader.

Socialists are usually atheists. Even if they believed in God, they would rebel against God, because if they reject male leadership on earth, how will they accept male leadership on heaven?

Christians believe and submit themselves to the Trinity: Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. There is no female leadership in the Trinity and on heaven.

Even though Catholics believe that Mary occupies on heaven some kind of leadership post, such theory is not supported by the Bible. There is no female leader on heaven.

On earth, God created women as helpers of men — more specifically, He created women to be wives and helpers for their husbands. There is no calling more important, after salvation in Jesus Christ, than union in marriage to have, train and educate children in the Lord.

Male leadership is wrong when is carried on by wicked men. For example, Muslims and communists do wicked things not because they are men, but because of their ideology. Islam and communism would do wicked things even if all their leaders were female.

Male leadership is the correct leadership. The example comes from heaven: All heavenly leadership is male. Why should be different on earth?

Socialism is a rebellion against family, marriage, natural sex, sexual roles and God and his male authority and leadership. But how can we Christians defeat socialism in society when in our churches male authority and leadership have not been preserved, trained, respected and defended from the socialist onslaughts of the world and Satan?

Portuguese version of this article: ONU condena liderança masculina, não o comunismo, por causa da COVID-19

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Voyage to the Bottom of Emasculation

Terminator’s Dark Feminist Fate

Inclusion of women and homosexuals has brought serious sex problems in the U.S. military as sexual assaults are getting worse every year with no end in sight

Leaked Army document reveals 84 percent of women have FAILED the new rigorous combat fitness test

Number of legal abortions rises in the Israeli Army as coexistence of male and female soldiers has increased their sexual activity

Voyage to the Bottom of Emasculation

By Julio Severo

One of the most famous and successful TV series was “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea,” with a cast of commanders and sailors 100 percent male.

The public never complained about such all-male crew in a nuclear submarine in this TV series of the early 1960s. But then the public had not been desensitized by feminist indoctrination.

Men and women just loved to watch men in a submarine fighting earthly and supernatural evil forces. But today, “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea” would not survive a greater evil: Feminism.

The 2018 movie Megalodon has a submarine with an all-female crew. As all feminist movies, it was a failure and sheer boredom.

A female crew in military submarines in fantasy and in reality makes no sense. But feminist pressure does not allow anymore all-male crews in military submarines, and this same pressure does not allow the revelation of what happens when females are in a military environment that is traditionally male.

While in “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea” only military men did daring deep trips, in “Voyage to the Bottom of Emasculation” men and women now do such trips, but only men are emasculated. Only women are entitled to masculinization.

Emasculation means castration and the loss of male power and masculinity. Masculinization means make more masculine or male.

It is not natural to emasculate men for the sake of feminism and socialism. It is not natural to masculinize women for the sake of feminism and socialism. It is not natural to put in the military women and lesbians for the sake of feminism and socialism.

While “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea” had an end, the bottom of the sea, the emasculation of men and the masculinization of women seem to have no end. It is a cultural voyage with no bottom.

In fantasy at least women escape the realities of a life among military men. But in real life, there is no escape.

In fantasy, women are militarily as strong as men as. In reality, they are not. Leaked Army document reveals 84 percent of women have FAILED the new rigorous combat fitness test.

In fantasy, inclusion of women among military men poses absolutely no problem. In reality, inclusion of women and homosexuals has brought serious sex problems in the U.S. military as sexual assaults are getting worse every year with no end in sight.

In 1991, 36 women fell pregnant aboard the Navy ship Acadia that served in Persian Gulf.

Statistics of 2016 from the Navy reveals that 16 of 100 women serving among men fell pregnant.

Because of integration of women with men in the Navy, military ships are known as “Love Boats.”

Even in Israel, which boasts of a socialist system where women are fully integrated with men in the military, sexual realities have prevailed. The number of legal abortions rises in the Israeli Army as coexistence of male and female soldiers has increased their sexual activity.

In “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea,” with an all-male crew in the submarine, there was no sex, no pregnancy and there was much action.

In Megalodon, with an all-female crew in the submarine, there was no sex, no pregnancy, but much boredom. And if a man were introduced in such female environment, there would be another kind of action.

Even though male sailors would love to have female sailors near, not as fighting pals, but for the obvious reasons, what is the usefulness, except for sex, of a military female crew integrated with military male crew? To distract or entertain men?

If America in the early 1960s was so emasculated as she is today, “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea” would have been a “love submarine.” Yet, love means today free sex. Real love does not use women for fun. Real love protects babies from abortion and never puts women in risky situations, especially combat situations. Real love never integrates women with men in the military.

What integrates women with men in the military is not love. It is socialism. In Israel, such socialist integration has produced increased sex and abortion in the military. In the U.S., Navy ships are “love boats.”

What cost is society paying for emasculating men for the sake of socialist integration?

The pressure to conform to socialism is so trendy the Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, known for defending some conservative causes, has made a point to have as the pilot of his presidential plane the first military woman to do it. She is a captain in the Brazilian Air Force. It was a strange choice, because Bolsonaro has filled his administration with “traditionalists.” For most people, traditionalism would mean to protect men and women in their traditional sex roles. It would mean to reject women as military pilots.

Yet, “traditionalists” in the Bolsonaro administration are not connected to Christian traditionalism. They are connected to the Traditionalist School, whose most prominent member was Julius Evola, who was an adviser and guru for the Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini.

This kind of “traditionalism” does not defeat socialism and feminism. But evangelical conservatism, when it was predominant in America, defeated it.

Without Christian conservatism, how will America protect her military from becoming “love” boats and submarines of emasculated men and masculinized women?

Portuguese version of this article: Viagem ao Fundo da Emasculação

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading on feminism:

Terminator’s Dark Feminist Fate

Inclusion of women and homosexuals has brought serious sex problems in the U.S. military as sexual assaults are getting worse every year with no end in sight

Leaked Army document reveals 84 percent of women have FAILED the new rigorous combat fitness test

Number of legal abortions rises in the Israeli Army as coexistence of male and female soldiers has increased their sexual activity

Terminator’s Dark Feminist Fate

By Julio Severo

Not surprisingly, the movie “Terminator: Dark Fate” was a total box office failure at its release in November 2019, even though Arnold Schwarzenegger is a Hollywood icon.

The movie featured women — Linda Hamilton, Mackenzie Davis and Natalia Reyes — as armed warriors fighting with the same physical strength as men against killing humanoid machines.

One of the women, a Mexican, was chosen by Hollywood fate to form a future androgynous army of men and women armed against these machines.

Macho women, and men as mere subordinates to Hollywood feminists. As villains, men are disposable. As characters on the good side — on the side of Hollywood feminists —, they are also disposable, that is, they are easily terminated. The movie makes it appear that women can by themselves solve everything on the basis of muscular strength and weapons against male villains. It is a feminist movie to please feminists’ tantrums and ideological greed.

It is not surprising the feminist flood in Terminator, as its producer, James Cameron, is considered a feminist, who takes pleasure in glorifying women in male roles. He is best known for writing, directing and producing the leftist environmental movie Avatar (2009).

Terminator was therefore created, with its masculinized women, according to the image and likeness of the feminism promoted by Cameron.

Another characteristic in the movie is profanity. There is a lot of foul language — which is the typical behavior of left-wingers. But what to expect from a movie by Cameron, a left-winger?

Cameron was raised in a traditional Protestant home (not open to the supernatural manifestations of the Holy Spirit), and later he became an atheist who seeks to attack Christianity. According to The Hollowverse website:

“Cameron has since attempted to debunk any claims of supernatural miracles in Christianity with his documentary film, The Lost Tomb of Jesus. The film claims to have found the remains of Jesus Christ, Mary Magdalene, and their children. Citing the names on the tombs and DNA evidence, the film seeks to show that Jesus was a regular guy who died and was not resurrected.”

Politically, Cameron is a left-winger who loves the militarism of the neocons in the Republican Party. Arnold Schwarzenegger is the contrary, but basically the same thing. He, who was the governor of ultra-liberal California, is a Republican neocon who likes leftism.

Apparently, then, women in Terminator are neocon left-wing feminists. But why did not Cameron give the central role in his movie to the queen of neocons, Hillary Clinton? As Cameron, Hillary is a left-wing who loves the militarism of neocons. When conservative Republican President George W. Bush invaded Iraq (an action condemned by Trump), then left-wing Democrat Senator Hillary supported the invasion.

With its feminist flavor, “Terminator: Dark Fate” does not once present marriage, family and husband and wife as even remote options for human beings in the future. Nor would it be possible for Cameron to present marriage in a favorable light, since he himself had 4 divorces.

Although he promotes feminism as a way of showing that he respects women’s rights, his 4 divorces are more than enough evidence that he has no respect for them.

His personal relationship with them is as distorted as his propaganda for them in male roles.

Reality is less generous and politically correct. It is, in the view of the male and female feminists, cruel. According to the scenario of the movie itself, the future will have no pharmacies and pharmaceutical companies to produce “contraceptive” drugs — which often cause micro-abortions. Women will then have their sexuality day and night free and open to pregnancy, which is a natural result of sexual activity.

So, the futuristic woman who wants to live the Hollywood style of free sex will have several pregnancies during her lifetime, making it impossible for her to live completely as macho soldiers and other male roles.

A woman who tries to live without marriage in a future without contraceptives will be a prostitute for several men, with pregnancies and children from each of them.

Women who choose marriage will be occupied with the traditional (and fully supported and defended by the Bible) role of caring for their husbands, children and home.

“Terminator: Dark Fate” twists the role of women. If women could be macho by punching men and leading armies of men, God would not have created Eve for Adam. He would have created another Adam.

If men were virtually disposable, as the movie shows, God would have created another Eve for Eve, completely dispensing with Adam.

In the ideologically charged view of Hollywood, women can play the role of boxers very well. And to elevate women to male positions, Hollywood is weakening or even terminating men from all their traditional male roles, especially leadership. For Hollywood, the time has come for women to lead the world in everything, including muscular strength and military actions.

However, God is not dependent on Hollywood and its spiritual and moral failures. Before Hollywood, there was God — Jesus Christ — and long after Hollywood disappears into the dust of oblivion, God will continue as King of the Universe.

In Hollywood’s dying vision, women are neocons, real war machines with no time for home, husband and children, but with plenty of time to have sex with men and punch them. But in God’s view, women can play the role of wife and mother very well without time to be neocons.

“Terminator: Dark Fate” had a deserved failure. It terminated the reality of the differences between women and men. It terminated the reality of marriage for the future. And in the process, it terminated itself as a work of public utility. It has become useless.

I am not surprised, as its director, who loves feminism and divorces against women, has a particular war against Christianity. In fact, the whole of Hollywood is at war with Christianity.

No matter how much Hollywood and its terminators fight against marriage and the differences between men and women to terminate the biological reality that God created, the Creator is greater.

It is impossible to terminate what has already been determined by God. Hollywood will pass away, but God and His Word will remain forever.

Portuguese version of this article: Destino Feminista Sombrio do Exterminador do Futuro

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading on Hollywood:

In Hollywood’s Blacklist: Allah Is Loving, But Non-Acceptance of Homosexuality Leads to Violence, Sadism and Terror

“London Has Fallen” through Muslims Who Cannot Be Identified as Muslims

Recommended Reading on feminism:

Inclusion of women and homosexuals has brought serious sex problems in the U.S. military as sexual assaults are getting worse every year with no end in sight

Leaked Army document reveals 84 percent of women have FAILED the new rigorous combat fitness test

Number of legal abortions rises in the Israeli Army as coexistence of male and female soldiers has increased their sexual activity