Showing posts with label Martin Luther. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Martin Luther. Show all posts

Thursday, November 19, 2020

Martin Luther, the Father of the Protestant Reformation, Said that the Supernatural Gifts and Manifestations of the Holy Spirit Never Ceased

 

Martin Luther, the Father of the Protestant Reformation, Said that the Supernatural Gifts and Manifestations of the Holy Spirit Never Ceased

By Julio Severo

Martin Luther (1483-1546), the German theologian who was the father of the Protestant Reformation, wrote very much in a time that there was no typewriter and computer. He was unquestionably a great mind, especially because his translation of the Bible into German unified the German language.



While the Catholic Church ordered Latin as official language for Bible reading to keep the German people in ignorance, Luther translated the Bible to their own language, so that all Germans could read and study the Bible.

So the total contempt of perennialist Eric Voegelin for Luther’s intelligence is nonsense. In fact, Voegelin saw the Protestant Reformation as the “Great Confusion” saying that the Reformation was “probably the biggest piece of political mischief concocted by a man [Luther], short of the Communist Manifesto.”

Not much different, Olavo de Carvalho, a Brazilian immigrant self-exiled in the U.S. and an admirer of Voegelin, treated Luther with the same contempt, even saying that Luther was an astrologer, when history points that Luther clearly condemned astrology. He also said that Luther was a a man who committed genocide, but he treats the Inquisition, which tortured and murdered multitudes of Jews and Protestants, as a human-rights court. Such contradiction is proper of lunatic charlatans. And Carvalho is a big charlatan.

Yet, my intent is not to defend Luther from the ridiculous ideas from perennialists Voegelin and Carvalho. Luther’s vast work is more than enough to do it.

As a charismatic evangelical Christian, I will address only what Luther commented about this Bible passage where Jesus said:

“He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned. And these signs will follow those who believe: In My name they will cast out demons; they will speak with new tongues; they will take up serpents; and if they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them; they will lay hands on the sick, and they will recover.” (Mark 16:16-18 NKJV)

Luther lived in a time when the only prevalent religious miracles were Catholic miracles: people allegedly being “healed” by touching the tomb of a Catholic saint or touching a relic. Demon expulsion was a very liturgical act, without much result. It was the famous “exorcism,” where you couldn’t tell if the demon was in the exorcist or in his victim.

Luther knew very much about Catholic miracles, Catholic culture and Catholic interpretation of the Bible, but he was just beginning to know and experience the Gospel, which he could read. Basically, this was his experience — the experience of a man beginning to understand what the Catholic Church had hidden for centuries.

Everything for Luther was completely new: repentance, forgiveness, grace, salvation, etc. It is just natural that many other issues were also new for him because of his total lack of positive experience in the miracles of the New Testament and negative experience in the multitude of Catholic religious “miracles.”

Yet, what he said is charismatically applicable even if he did not know anything of charismatic gifts. For example, Luther said,

“For if we preach only its history, it is an unprofitable sermon, which Satan and the godless know, read and understand as well as true Christians.”

That is, only preaching without a sign is a tremendous void and uselessness. The Apostle Paul also meant this when he said:

“And my speech and my preaching were not with persuasive words of human wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power.” (1 Corinthians 2:4 NKJV)

For Paul, just a sermon filled with philosophy and no demonstration of the Spirit and his power was useless.

Luther also had a view very similar to Christians today who preach victory over all evil. He said,

“What is Christ's inheritance? His heritage is life and death, sin and grace, all that is in heaven and earth, eternal truth, power, wisdom, righteousness; he governs and rules over all, over hunger and thirst, over fortune and misfortune, over everything imaginable, whether in heaven or on earth, not only spiritual but also secular affairs; and the sum total of all is, he has all things in his hand, be they eternal or temporal. Now if I believe on him, I become partaker with him of all his possessions, and obtain not only a part or a piece; but, like him, I obtain all, eternal righteousness, eternal wisdom, eternal strength, and become a lord and reign over all. The stomach will not hunger, sins will not oppress, I will no more fear death, nor be terror-stricken by Satan, and I will never be in want, but will be like Christ the Lord himself.”

He also addressed hunger in his commentary. He said,

“In the light of this we now easily understand the sayings here and there in the prophets and especially in the Psalms; as when David in Ps 34:10 says: ‘The young lions (the rich) do lack, and suffer hunger; but they that seek Jehovah shall not want any good thing.’ And in another Psalm: ‘Jehovah knoweth the days of the perfect; and their inheritance shall be forever. They shall not be put to shame in the time of evil; and in the days of famine they shall be satisfied.’ Ps 37:18-19. And immediately following in verse 25: ‘I have been young, and now am old; yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging bread.’”

The unbelieving individual would have a hard time to believe in what Luther said. During the time of Apostle Paul, a famine hit the Roman Empire and the churches in Israel suffered very much, and in 2 Corinthians 8 Paul begs the churches in Europe to send money and any other assistance.

I mention the unbelieving individual because during the coronavirus pandemic many unbelievers, within and outside the churches, said, “If you Christians have supernatural gifts, heal yourselves and others!” In Paul’s time, they could say, “If you Christians have supernatural gifts and are suffering famine, do as Jesus did: Multiply your food to you and others!”

For his lack of experience on charismatic gifts, Luther’s view went in several directions. For example, he said,

“In passing, be it said, however: We must not suppose that the signs here mentioned by Christ are all the signs that believers will do, neither must we imagine that all the Christians will do them; but Jesus means: All Christians can and may do the signs. Or, if I believe, then am I able to do them; I have the power. Through faith I obtain so much that nothing is impossible to me. If it were necessary and conducive to the spreading of the Gospel, we could do easily the signs; but since it is not necessary, we do not do them. For Christ does not teach that Christians practice the spectacular, but he says they have the power and can do these things. And we have many such promises throughout the Scriptures; for example, in John 14:12, where Christ says: ‘He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do.’ Therefore, we must allow these words to remain and not gloss them away, as some have done who said that these signs were manifestations of the Spirit in the beginning of the Christian era and that now they have ceased. That is not right; for the same power is in the church still. And though it is not exercised, that does not matter; we still have the power to do such signs.”

Even having no experience of charismatic gifts, Luther was careful to warn that “we must allow these words to remain and not gloss them away, as some have done who said that these signs were manifestations of the Spirit in the beginning of the Christian era and that now they have ceased.” Luther made it clear that the false doctrine that the manifestations of the Spirit have ceased is not right. This false doctrine has even a name among its adherents: Cessationism.

For Luther, And though these supernatural and spectacular gifts were not exercised in his time, that did not matter. “We still have the power to do such signs,” he said.

He also said,

“God has always accompanied his Word with an outward sign to make it the more effective to us, that we might be strengthened in heart and never doubt his Word, nor waver.”

Other important sayings of Luther that are helpful for us to reject cessationism and hold fast to the Bible is:

“Therefore, strive not to comprehend, but say: This is Scripture and this is God's Word, which is immeasurably higher than all understanding and reason. Cease your reasoning and lay hold of the Scriptures.”

“Therefore we must disregard our feeling and accept only the Word, write it into our heart and cling to it.”

“Our feelings must not be considered, but we must constantly insist that death, sin and hell have been conquered.”

“Thus faith leads us quietly, contrary to all feeling and comprehension of reason.”

“The more faith increases, the more our feelings diminish, and vice versa.”

“When the heart and conscience cling to the Word in faith, they overflow in works.”

When Christians without supernatural gifts look at their lack of experience, it is very easy to believe in every false teaching, including the doctrine that the supernatural gifts ceased. But we cannot trust in our experience. Even not having such gifts, Luther did not dare to conclude that these gifts ceased.

In his commentary to Mark 16, Luther encouraged Christians to pray, saying,

“A Christian ought to acquire the custom of praying the Lord’s Prayer, firmly crossing himself and saying in thought: Keep me, dear Lord, from the sin against the Holy Ghost, that I may not fall from faith and thy Word, and may not become a Turk, a Jew or a monk and a papal saint, who believe and live contrary to [the Gospel].”

A Christian who does not want to sin against the Holy Spirit will never embrace cessationism and even though he may be used by God to criticize false prophecies and gifts, he will never condemn true prophecies and gifts and he will never say that they ceased.

Luther encouraged Christians not to become Turks, an euphemism to Muslims. About Jews, for Luther the Jewish religiosity did not lead to salvation in Christ, because the Jews totally rejected Christ and His salvation.

He encouraged Christians not to become monks and papal saints, who are individuals involved in extreme religiosity and false piety and false miracles and many empty prayers, but no real contact with God.

Luther also explained that he and even other theologians should never be seen as perfect examples. He said,

“He permits it to happen that many great saints err and stumble, in order that we may not trust in men, though they be many, great, and holy. We must be led to rely upon the Word that is sure and cannot deceive.”

Luther was very humble to confess that he did not understand everything about Mark 16 and supernatural gifts. As the father of the Protestant Reformation, he confessed that he was imperfect and that he had not the final truth, but he pointed God’s Word as the final truth. And this Word is mortal enemy of the false doctrine of cessationism.

Then Luther said,

“And these signs shall accompany them that believe: in my name shall they cast out demons; they shall speak with new tongues; they shall take up serpents, and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall in no wise hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick and they shall recover.”

“How shall we proceed here that we may preserve the truth of the passage: he that believeth shall have power also, and be able to show these signs? For the Lord says all these signs shall accompany them. Now we know that the apostles did not present all the signs, for we read of no other that drank poison than John the Evangelist, and there are no other individual instances. If the passage shall stand literally, then few believers will be cleared and few saints be entitled to heaven; for these signs, one and all, have not accompanied them, though they have had power to work signs, and have exhibited some of them.”

Luther raised an interesting point. All the apostles did not drink poison, but all of them received authority from Jesus to heal the sick and deliver people oppressed by demons. Jesus said,

“Behold, I give you the authority to trample on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall by any means hurt you.” (Luke 10:19 NKJV)

“Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out demons. Freely you have received, freely give.” (Matthew 10:8 NKJV)

Mark 16 probably teaches that the real followers of Jesus should expect signs, miracles and wonders of every kind possible and impossible.

Even though not every Christian will drink poison and raise the dead, every Christian is called to pray and minister for the sick and people oppressed by demons.

Then Luther criticized theologians who having no supernatural experience try to “spiritualize” the miraculous signs that follow a Christian. He said,

“Some rush on here and explain these signs as spiritual, so as to preserve the honor of the saints; but it will not do to strain the words. They do not carry such meaning, therefore they will not bear such an explanation. It puts upon the Scriptures uncertain construction for us.”

Luther also criticized theologians who interpret that the signs and wonders are for the church as a whole, not for individual Christians. He explained:

“Others, with equal heedlessness, say that though not every individual has the power and does the wonders mentioned, yet the church as a whole, the multitude of Christendom, has; one may drive out devils, another heal the sick, and so on. Therefore, they say, such signs are a manifestation of the Spirit; where the signs are, there is also the Christian Church, and so on. But these words do not refer to the Church as a whole, but to each person separately. The meaning is: If there is a Christian who has faith, he shall have power to do these accompanying miracles, and they shall follow him, as Christ says, in John 14:12: ‘Verily, verily, I say unto you, he that believeth on me, the works that I do, shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do,’ for a Christian has equal power with Christ, is a congregation, and sits with him in joint tenure. The Lord has given Christians power, as is written in Mt 10:8, also against the unclean spirits, that they might cast them out and heal every disease. Thus it is written in Ps 91:13: ‘Thou shalt tread upon the lion and the adder; the young lion and the serpent shalt thou trample under foot.’”

Luther also addressed theologians, abundant today among Calvinist cessationists, who interpreted that they have no such supernatural experience because Mark 16 has already been fulfilled. So, according to their interpretation, these gifts ceased 2,000 years ago. Luther said,

“We read also that this has been fulfilled. There was once a patriarch in the wilderness, who, when he met a serpent, took it in both hands and tore it in two, and thought no more about it, but said: O what a fine thing it is to have a clear and guiltless conscience! So, where there is a Christian, there is still the power to work these signs if it is necessary. But no one should attempt to exercise this power if it is not necessary or if need does not compel. The apostles did not always exercise it, but only made use of it to prove the Word of God, to confirm it by the miracles; as is written here in the text: V.20. ‘And they went forth, and preached everywhere, the Lord working with them, and confirming the Word by the signs that followed.’”

In his total lack of experience of supernatural gifts, Luther offered his personal view that “there is no need of working miracles as in the apostles’ times.” I would dispute such view with the fact that the Book of Revelation, which addresses the last days — our days —, is filled with demons working fake wonders and miracles and God working even bigger real wonders and miracles.

In the New Testament, especially in Corinth and other European cities, there was much witchcraft. The apostles, empowered by the supernatural gifts, met witches and mediums. The Bible says:

“Now it happened, as we went to prayer, that a certain slave girl possessed with a spirit of divination met us, who brought her masters much profit by fortune-telling. This girl followed Paul and us, and cried out, saying, ‘These men are the servants of the Most High God, who proclaim to us the way of salvation.’ And this she did for many days. But Paul, greatly annoyed, turned and said to the spirit, ‘I command you in the name of Jesus Christ to come out of her.’ And he came out that very hour.” (Acts 16:16-18 NKJV)

“Now God worked unusual miracles by the hands of Paul, so that even handkerchiefs or aprons were brought from his body to the sick, and the diseases left them and the evil spirits went out of them. Then some of the itinerant Jewish exorcists took it upon themselves to call the name of the Lord Jesus over those who had evil spirits, saying, ‘We exorcise you by the Jesus whom Paul preaches.’ Also there were seven sons of Sceva, a Jewish chief priest, who did so. And the evil spirit answered and said, ‘Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are you?’ Then the man in whom the evil spirit was leaped on them, overpowered them, and prevailed against them, so that they fled out of that house naked and wounded. This became known both to all Jews and Greeks dwelling in Ephesus; and fear fell on them all, and the name of the Lord Jesus was magnified. And many who had believed came confessing and telling their deeds. Also, many of those who had practiced magic brought their books together and burned them in the sight of all. And they counted up the value of them, and it totaled fifty thousand pieces of silver.” (Acts 19:11-19 NKJV)

Witches were able to work fake wonders and miracles, which had much destructive power. How did the apostles counter their fake wonders and miracles? Through bigger real wonders and miracles.

It is nonsense to think that today there is less witchcraft and less fake wonders and miracles than in the days of the New Testament. Such dark reality should be countered by the name of Jesus and supernatural gifts, which are spiritual weapons.

Luther said,

“But since the Gospel has now been spread abroad, and made known to all the world, there is no need of working miracles as in the apostles’ times. If need should arise, and men were to denounce and antagonize the Gospel, then we verily should have to employ wonder-working rather than permit the Gospel to be derided and suppressed. But I hope such a course will not be necessary, and that such a contingency will never arise. For another example: That I should here speak in new languages is not at all necessary, since you all can well hear and understand me; but if God should send me where the people could not understand me, he could easily grant me their speech or language, that I might be understood.”

His way of seeing the gift as tongues as mere learned human tongues just shows his total lack of experience with supernatural gifts. If in his view there is no need of working miracles as in the apostles’ times, why does no one say to Satanists, witches and sorcerers that they have no need to work demonic miracles to make people oppressed, possessed and destroyed?

Why deactivate supernatural weapons of the Holy Spirit when all demonic weapons, including demonic signs and wonders, are fully active and deceiving millions of young people?

In another example, Luther did not recommend the ministry of casting out demons. Why? Because the only experience he had was seeing Catholic priests doing it. He said,

“I know not what I shall say about those who venture to do signs where they are not necessary. For example, some drive out demons. But I know that it is a dangerous undertaking. The devil, indeed, lets himself be driven out, but he does not intend to suffer for it; he allows it only that he may strengthen the sign-worker in such error. I would not like to trust him. We have many such instances in our times. I know also of many that happened not long ago.”

Therefore, because of his negative experience with Catholic exorcists, Luther said that the deliverance ministry was unnecessary and dangerous. He used his negative experience with Catholic exorcists to interpret the Bible. His lack of experience is the contrary of Jesus and his apostles, who spent most of their ministries preaching the Gospel, healing the sick and casting out demons. In no way Jesus saw the ministry of casting out demons as unnecessary.

If Luther saw Jesus casting out demons, he would understand this ministry as extremely necessary. But his only experience about this was Catholic exorcists.

I cannot blame Luther. I have seen Catholic exorcists who seemed so demonically oppressed as the victims they were supposedly trying to help. But I am sure that if Luther lived today and saw charismatics and Pentecostals casting out demons he would say, “Wow! This is very different from what I saw in the Catholic Church!”

I have expelled demons for years. It is a hard ministry, but in the name of Jesus all demons are subjected to us.

Luther mentioned that in his time many Christians “have brooded over the question of signs, vainly asking why they do not accompany our preaching and whether they no longer can be expected.” Cessationists found their own human answer to this question.

Many of the issues of Luther are centered in the fact that he knew nothing of the New Testament way of casting out demons, healing the sick and working signs and wonders. Such case is similar to a man who wants to teach others to drive a truck when he himself never drove any car.

To drive a truck, it is not enough for you to have driving experience with a simple car. You need much official experience with truck driving.

I wonder about the stupidity of a man teaching others to drive trucks when he has never driven any car. In the same way, I am marveled at the stupidity of theologians with no experience with supernatural gifts and manifestations of the Holy Spirit posing as theological experts who know everything about every supernatural gift.

We can excuse Luther, because he was brought up in a Catholic culture filled with religious “miracles” and miraculous relics very different from the New Testament experience. Luther was trying to understand and explain the new things he was seeing or not seeing.

Even doubting the need of supernatural gifts today, Luther made it very clear that they did not cease. So when cessationist heretics use Luther, the father of the Protestant Reformation, to support their heresy, they are committing another heresy.

Luther finished his commentary on Mark 16 by saying:

“The wicked world shall not see nor heed such signs and wonders, but with open eyes and hardened hearts shall pass by and blaspheme them, just as it always despises God's works, blaspheming even the public and indisputable miracles of Christ and the apostles. The world would but the more despise such signs, were they done by us… The Jews so fared when they despised the signs by which Christ manifested his proffered help and blessings. They looked for and demanded other signs. Then he refrained and would give them no other sign than the sign of Jonah, lying, after his crucifixion, for three days in the grave in weakness and death. Afterward he came forth from death and the grave, demonstrating his power by his resurrection and ascension. Now he mightily rules over all the world, and will overthrow and destroy it, together with all its power and glory.”

Therefore, when in doubt about the interpretation of theologians, do just as Luther said:

“Therefore, strive not to comprehend, but say: This is Scripture and this is God's Word, which is immeasurably higher than all understanding and reason. Cease your reasoning and lay hold of the Scriptures.”

I do not understand why many Calvinists today embrace the cessationist heresy. In 1990 I read “The Christian in Complete Armour,” a book written by the Calvinist and Puritan theologian William Gurnall (1617-1679). In his extensive book, Gurnall said,

“It was a heroic speech of Luther, who foresaw a black cloud of God’s judgments coming over the head of Germany, but told some of his friends, ‘That he would do his best to keep it from falling in his days’—yea, he believed it should not come—‘and,’ said he, ‘when I am gone, let them that come after me look to it.’”

So, according to Gurnall, Luther saw prophetically a big tragedy coming over Germany. Undoubtedly, this was Nazism, which was the biggest tragedy and judgement in the history of Germany. Luther saw it and did his best to keep such tragedy from happening in his time and he asked that after his death German Christians did also their best to keep such tragedy from happenin0067.

Luther gave serious attention to a prophecy he received from the Holy Spirit. Yet, most Lutheran citizens in the Nazi Germany did not believe in prophecies and other supernatural gifts and manifestations of the Holy Spirit. Satan took full advantage of their ignorance.

Let us not allow Satan to take advantage of our ignorance. We live in the last days, as the Book of Revelation confirms. Satan is working great deceptive and destructive signs and wonders to lead young people astray. Let us counter Satan’s signs and wonders with God’s signs and wonders.

If Christians in Germany had prayed, watched and kept Luther’s prophecy, Nazism would have been destroyed. Let us pray and watch and keep the necessary prophecies, because we live in prophetic times.

Luther’s quotes in this article were taken from Luther’s Works available in English.

Portuguese version of this article: Martinho Lutero, pai da Reforma protestante, disse que os dons e manifestações sobrenaturais do Espírito Santo nunca cessaram

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Slave minds working to enslave the minds of children in Brazil

Luther and the Jews

Martin Niemöller, the anti-Nazi Lutheran minister who warned how Christians should speak out when people are persecuted. But how valid was his advice?

Nazism: Nationalism and Socialism at the Service of Occultism

Jewish Perspective: Hitler and Socialism

Hitler’s Strident Anti-Marxism

The Miracle of the Simplicity of the Gospel

Christians need to seek the baptism and supernatural gifts of the Holy Spirit

Theological Zombie Tries to Turn Author of the Gospel of Luke into Zombie

Swimming and Driving Is Dangerous… for Those Who Cannot Swim and Drive

Rev. Larry Christenson, a Charismatic Lutheran Pioneer

Rex Humbard, Premier Televangelist Who Blessed Millions

Spiritual Gun Control Is Not God’s Idea

Demon-Expelling: Truths and Confusions

The Perfect Revival?

Julio Severo seeks to move Christians to daily prayer with ‘Prophetic Prayers’

Monday, October 19, 2020

Slave minds working to enslave the minds of children in Brazil

 

Slave minds working to enslave the minds of children in Brazil

By Julio Severo

On Teacher’s Day on October 15, 2020, the Brazilian government published a video with several references and quotes from writers recommended by Olavo de Carvalho, considered the Rasputin of President Jair Bolsonaro. Carvalho is a self-exiled Brazilian immigrant to the United States since 2005.


The video was prepared by Carlos Nadalim, National Literacy Secretary in the Ministry of Education who is a staunch adherent of Carvalho. The video was shared on the profile of the Special Communication Secretariat (SECOM) of the Presidency of the Republic.

According to SECOM, the video is part of the Masters of Brazil series, which will pay homage to “some of the most exemplary luminaries of knowledge in Brazil, who, in different ways, have made this country their classroom.”

Among the mentions in the video are Mario Ferreira dos Santos and Eric Voegelin, names often cited and praised by Carvalho, who used to quote more frequently René Guénon, the Islamic occultist who founded the Traditionalist School and a prominent figure in perennialism.

Voegelin is also part of perennialism. Considering that there are connections between Carvalho and Guénon, it is not surprising to find such connections between Voegelin and Guénon. A Voegelin website unites the two who, although of different styles, did not differ in their occult soul. Apparently, the same maze of confusions and contradictions that was present in Guénon was also present in Voegelin. And it is undoubtedly present in Carvalho.

According to the Cambridge University Press in its work “An Agnostic View of Voegelin’s Gnostic Calvin,” written by William R. Stevenson, Voegelin believed that “the ‘Gnosticism’ of the Modern age had its roots in the Christian experience, and that the Protestant Reformation most explicitly nourished its growth.”

Since Voegelin saw communism and Nazism as the greatest forms of Gnosticism, he was accusing Protestantism of having produced communism and Nazism.

But Stevenson makes it clear that “Voegelin’s characterizing John Calvin’s project in particular as Gnostic anti-intellectualism manifesting an obvious will to power has no sound basis in Calvin’s writings.”

Voegelin saw the Protestant Reformation as the “Great Confusion” saying that the Reformation was “probably the biggest piece of political mischief concocted by a man [Luther], short of the Communist Manifesto.”

He did not spare attacks on Luther, saying that with the Reformation “Luther destroyed the balance of human existence.” Although Luther wrote a lot and had many books published, having been the great unifier of the German language through his translation of the Bible, Voegelin did not hide his total contempt for Luther’s intelligence.

Voegelin attacked Luther for his “antiphilosophism.” That is, for him Luther was against philosophy. He mentioned “[Luther’s] almost incredible lack of wisdom.”

He also said:

“Luther did not possess the powers of intellect that enable a man to grasp the essence of a problem… he was singularly lacking in intellectual insight and imagination.”

In the defense of Voegelin, Carvalho and his adherents claim that he fought Gnosticism. But Voegelin’s interpretation of Gnosticism was pure fanaticism: He saw Protestantism as the greatest producer of Gnosticism and accused that Protestantism’s anti-Gnosticism was anti-intellectualism. It is like a witch accusing Christians of witches and claiming that witchcraft is true intellectualism and accusing that any attack on witchcraft is anti-intellectualism.

Voegelin’s views are of an incredible intellectual vulgarity, not to mention, intellectual dishonesty. How can he dishonestly attack Protestantism when the largest Protestant nation in the world, the United States, is also the most capitalist and anti-Marxist nation in the world? When Voegelin needed political asylum, the United States granted it to him. This is the great weakness of the U.S.: To give shelter to the enemies of the American bases. Communists receive such shelter, and even Carvalho received it.

The historic capitalism that made the United States great had Protestant bases. Still, Carvalho considers Voegelin to be a conservative greater than all American conservatives. He recommends as a model an esoteric opposite to the main bases of American conservatism and capitalism.

So, thanks to Nadalim’s idolatry for Olavo de Carvalho, the Bolsonaro administration is honoring as an intellectual model for Brazil an esoteric who dishonestly portrayed:

* Luther as a man without any intelligence.

* The Protestant Reformation as the Great Confusion.

* The evangelical movement as virtually the mother of communism and Nazism.

Voegelin’s confused views, whom Carvalho elevates as a “conservative” greater than all American conservatives, are a total insult to all evangelicals who elected Bolsonaro.

Nadalim’s video shared by SECOM is a slap in the face of Bolsonaro’s evangelical supporters, as Voegelin’s occult connections make him a suspicious character, but his slander and accusations against the evangelical movement make him a man disqualified to be used as a model by a government elected mainly by evangelicals.

Occultists accumulate a lot of knowledge, but as they have not the fear of the Lord, all their knowledge and practice turn into chaos and confusion.

Voegelin has the distinction of posing as a man who fought some forms of the occult. But this distinction was not unique to him. Although Guénon’s name is known among occultists, he also posed as a man who fought some forms of the occult. Carvalho inherited from Guénon that same pose and characteristic.

Carvalho’s taste is essentially occult and when he recommends a writer, it is almost impossible not to find anything occult. A genuine conservative Christian recommends genuine conservative Christians. But what to expect from an occultist? If a fish cannot be expected to leave its fish nature to stop swimming, it cannot be expected that an occultist will stop exuding occultism, even when speaking of philosophy.

For years, Carvalho recommended Guénon’s books in his “philosophy classes.” In fact, Guénon’s first book in Portuguese was translated by Carvalho, who studied Guénon through Guénon’s direct disciples, including Martin Lings and Michel Veber, whom Carvalho treated as “my teacher.”

As for Mario Ferreira dos Santos, Carvalho said in 2017 that “It is ok that people are interested in the writings of the so-called ‘traditionalist school,’ but everything that René Guénon, Titus Burckhardt and ‘tutti quanti’ wrote about the symbolism of numbers — the essential language of all esotericism — it’s just a kindergarten game when compared to what Mário Ferreira dos Santos did.”


So Carvalho placed Mario Ferreira dos Santos as an occultist above Guénon himself. And, unlike what he recommended, it is not at all okay for people to be interested in the writings of the Traditionalist School, an occult movement that includes Guénon, Julius Evola, Steve Bannon and Alexander Dugin.


The minds of Carvalho and his adherents are enslaved to occultism disguised as philosophy and they do nothing without enslaving others to their own intellectual and spiritual slavery.

For lack of culture and investigative spirit, many Brazilians seem to have difficulty understanding Carvalho’s occult nature. For several years he maintained an Inter-American Institute in the U.S., whose American evangelical members, attracted by an apostate Calvinist, could not understand the real Carvalho for one reason: They could not read Portuguese and all the controversial writings of Carvalho are in Portuguese.

So I gave them a great help: I sent them my translation of the controversial writings and they questioned who Carvalho was. Result: The institute closed.

While Nadalim extols Carvalho as a great intellect, Americans question everything about Carvalho, an attitude that any intelligent person has.

Although Carvalho says he is much persecuted, the vast majority of reports and articles about him in English accurately present him as a man with an occult history. One of the greatest books against the occult, “War For Eternity: Inside Bannon's Far-Right Circle of Global Power Brokers,” by Benjamin R. Teitelbaum, presents the main names of Guénon’s Traditionalist School, including Steve Bannon, Julius Evola, Alexander Dugin and Carvalho, who was only mentioned, albeit rarely, because of the much propaganda Bolsonaro does for him.

Teitelbaum is an American Jewish writer and his book deals with occultism on the right in the U.S., Russia and Brazil.

Carvalho has not threatened Teitelbaum and other Americans who exposed their occult connections, but he has, in several videos, threatened me, asking the Bolsonaro government and the Federal Police to investigate me. His claim is that my exposés against him involving the Inquisition and esotericism are a threat to Brazil’s national security.

The difference between him and me is big. He says he is persecuted when the U.S. press exposes his occult connections, while for years I have been attacked by the leftist press in the United States solely because of my conservative evangelical stances against abortion and homosexual sin.

While Carvalho is “persecuted” for his occult connections, I am persecuted by the left and by Carvalho himself for my Christian connections. All criticism of the U.S. press against Carvalho is not because of Christianity, but because of occultism and extremist rightism. All criticism of the U.S. press against me is because of Christianity.

If Nadalim were an intelligent man like the Americans who investigate what Carvalho says, he would see that it makes no sense for Carvalho to defend the Inquisition in the 21st century. Carvalho is the greatest Brazilian revisionist of the Inquisition, who tortured and killed thousands of Jews and Protestants.

Revisionism is an essentially Marxist method seeking to rewrite history. Leaning on revisionist authors, Carvalho rewrites the history of the Inquisition, claiming that the tortures and murders of the Inquisition for centuries are lies invented by American evangelicals. He portrays the Inquisition as a human rights court that never tried, condemned, tortured and killed Jews and Protestants.

It was not difficult for me to refute Carvalho’s lies about the Inquisition. I used the 1911 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, considered the most conservative and the most used in the homeschooling movement.

Obviously, his revisionism is as much a lie as it is Marxist. Nadalim is not intellectually prepared to deal with his master’s aberrations, limiting himself to propagandize him everywhere and at all times.

It is nonsense to think that only Marxism is a source of mental slavery. What is happening in the Ministry of Education of Brazil, where the greatest revisionist of the Inquisition and one of the greatest occultists in Brazil has been exalted, goes against true intellectual knowledge. Such revisionism is as harmful as Marxism itself.

A Ministry of Education or government that exalts an Inquisition revisionist and occultist has problems of an intellectual nature.

Carvalho used to quote Guénon frequently, and only stopped after my constant exposés. Even so, on October 17, 2020, he said:

“If there is one thing I learned from René Guénon once and for all it is: ‘The secret is OF THE SAME ESSENCE of power.’”


For Carvalho, secrecy and power have the same essence. And he skillfully makes use of secrecy (which is the essence of the occult) to gain power. It is an occult skill that he learned from Guénon.

In fact, he learned many things from Guénon, including the art of being an occultist posing as an intellectual who fights the occult. This is one of the shrewdest arts that an occultist could practice, and Carvalho practices it extremely well. But not well enough for the minds of American readers. Despite Carvalho’s many efforts to hide and disguise his occultism, the U.S. press has not been convinced and continues to expose his dark side.

It is possible that now that I am denouncing the occult connections of Mario Ferreira dos Santos and Eric Voegelin that Carvalho will do with them what he did with Guénon after my exposés and quote them infrequently.

As for Carlos Nadalim, he is under total intellectual slavery to Carvalho, serving only as Carvalho’s echo chamber in the Ministry of Education. He also uses the homeschooling movement as a mere echo chamber of Carvalho’s ideology. He was, until 2019, partner of the owner of the Brasil Sem Medo website, launched by Carvalho and self-proclaimed as the “largest conservative newspaper on the Brazilian internet.”

Nadalim is not really at the service of homeschooling or Christian conservatism, but only placing homeschooling and conservatism at the service of Carvalho’s ideology.

There is a saying, “Empty mind is Satan’s workshop.” Nadalim’s mind is merely Carvalho’s workshop. In this sense, Nadalim and other adherents of Carvalho seek to transform the Bolsonaro administration into the Great Workshop of Carvalho.

The most tragic of all is that the current Brazilian government was elected largely by votes from conservative evangelicals. And now, riding on the conservative evangelical wave, Carvalho’s extremist adherents suck at the tits of the State and pose as saviors — a salvation full of confusion.

It is not the first time that evangelicals have been exploited. Paulo Freire (1921-1997), a Brazilian Marxist who became famous after “creating” a Marxist literacy method, plagiarized the literary method of the U.S. evangelical missionary Frank Charles Laubach (1884–1970), who visited Brazil in 1946, where he launched the Laubach Method Literacy.

According to Dr. David Gueiros Vieira, the Paulo Freire Method is nothing more than a perverted pirate copy of the Laubach Method.

In an article on the Escola Sem Partido website entitled “Paulo Freire Method or Laubach Method?” Vieira explained that the Laubach Method was created by Laubach to help illiterate populations in the Third World to read the Bible.

In 1915, Frank Laubach had been sent by an evangelical mission to the island of Mindanao, in the Philippines, which was then under American rule — since the United States defeated Spain in a war. Spanish Catholic domination had left the Filipino population with a legacy of total illiteracy and hatred of Americans. Laubach used his method to teach Filipinos how to read the Bible.

After 1915, the Laubach Method was used with great success throughout Asia and in various parts of Latin America, for almost the entire 20th century.

Vieira said:

In Brazil, this [method] was introduced by Laubach himself, in 1943, at the request of the Brazilian government. That year, this educator came to Brazil to explain his methodology, as he had done in several other Latin American nations.

I remember that visit well, because even though I was very young, attending the third year of high school, all of us students knew that illiteracy in Brazil was still close to 76% — which we were ashamed of — and that this was the biggest impediment to the country’s development.

Laubach’s visit to Pernambuco caused great repercussion in student circles. He gave numerous lectures at schools and colleges.

There was also extensive distribution of Laubach Method booklets, in Spanish, as the Portuguese version was not yet ready. At that time, the Readers Digest magazine published an article about Laubach and his method — widely read and commented on by all Brazilians at the time, who, due to the war, had that magazine as their only literary contact with the outside world.

At the same time, suddenly, booklets similar to those of Laubach began to appear in Pernambuco, but with a totally different philosophical content. Laubach’s, of an evangelical nature, emphasized citizenship, social peace, personal ethics, Christianity and the existence of God. The new booklets, using identical methodology, emphasized the class struggle, propaganda of Marxist theory, atheism and the awareness of the masses about their “status of oppressed.” The author of these other booklets was Paulo Freire, who lent his name to this “new methodology” — from the use of portraits and words in adult literacy — as if it were his own.

The truth then is that the struggle of an American evangelical missionary to teach the Brazilian population to read the Gospel was pirated and corrupted by Paulo Freire on behalf of the propaganda of Marxism. This is called opportunism.

If Paulo Freire’s opportunism at the expense of an American evangelical was terrible, what could result from Olavo de Carvalho’s opportunism at the expense of the victory that evangelicals gave Bolsonaro? What kind of education could his ideological indoctrination bring to children?

What Freire did was to remove Christian and biblical bases from the Laubach Method and introduce Marxist bases instead. It was leftist plagiarism for ideological interest.

What Carlos Nadalim has done is to introduce as references and official educational models only Mario Ferreira dos Santos, Eric Voegelin and other names recommended by Carvalho. Brazil freed itself from Paulo Freire’s opportunism against the evangelical Laubach and embraced Carvalho’s opportunism against evangelicals. Riding on the conservative evangelical wave, Nadalim promotes Carvalho, who attacks this wave.

The Freire case shows that Marxists know how to take advantage of evangelicals. The Carvalho case shows that esoteric right-wingers also know how to take advantage of evangelicals. Both cases are an aberration, as both Marxists and esoteric right-wingers know that conservative evangelicals have important knowledge and influence, but instead of recognizing this, they prefer to exploit evangelicals for their own ideological purposes.

Only after Carvalho’s nominations failed at the Ministry of Education did Bolsonaro remember to honor representatives of the conservative evangelical wave. He eventually appointed an evangelical pastor as Minister of Education.

But how could Carvalho’s nominations be successful? What does he understand about homeschooling? What does he understand about education?

A good way to assess his educational capacity is to see the fruits of this education in the lives of his own children. Two of his children are Muslims. His eldest daughter had been forced by him, when she was a minor, to marry a Muslim in a mosque. Carvalho himself received an award from the Islamic dictatorship of Saudi Arabia for a biography of Muhammad that he wrote.

Carvalho’s history is saturated with esotericism, astrology and esoteric Islam. Even today, he continues with very strong esoteric connections. No well-known U.S. philosopher praises and recommends Carvalho, but Wolfgang Smith, an esoteric American adherent to Guénon, has praised and recommended Carvalho and vice versa.

One of Carvalho’s sons, in a post on October 12, 2018 just before Brazil’s presidential election, recommended Bolsonaro for Islamic reasons. Luiz Gonzaga de Carvalho Filho, a self-styled teacher who teaches astrology and esoteric classes, said:

“Now if you want to be able to have real freedom to create independent Islamic cultural institutions or to do Islamic homeschooling for your children and have true cultural and religious independence from the government, vote for Bolsonaro.”


I voted for Bolsonaro, like millions of Brazilian evangelicals. But I did not vote for him so that his administration would be taken over by adherents of an esotericist whose confused children live and preach Islam and esotericism.

Why doesn’t Nadalim, who seeks to distort homeschooling and education in Brazil, use Carvalho’s own Islamic children as educational models?

If Carvalho’s ideological indoctrination brought confusion to his own children, who became Muslims and astrologers, could it miraculously generate conservatism through the Ministry of Education? Could it generate genuine conservatism in the Brazilian homeschooling movement? Carvalho himself said:

“I have already decided: whoever wants to see in conservative politics the purpose and essence of my writings is a square beast, a son of a bitch and a shit across the board.”


So do not be surprised when Nadalim promotes an alleged “homeschooling” and “conservatism” that in the end will cause confusion for millions of children. His “homeschooling” and “conservatism” are not centered on Jesus Christ and the Gospel, but on an extremely confused and contradictory man who has a mouth that speaks many dirty words daily.

In one thing Laubach was absolutely right: People need to learn to read and write in order to get to know the Bible and its Author better. Only then will they be able to get rid of indoctrination, illiteracy and ideological idolatry — from any source and abyss where they come from.

Woe to anyone who falls into the tale of Carvalho. Those who have already fallen have gained nothing. Early in his administration, Bolsonaro appointed Ricardo Vélez as Minister of Education, who failed. Bolsonaro confessed that he blindly named him, trusting Carvalho, who later did not accept any responsibility, simply saying that he had had no contact with Velez for 20 years.

The fact is that there is so much indigence of genuine intelligence in Carvalho’s movement that he himself has not found a single competent name among his adherents to occupy the Ministry of Education. He had to search through his old contacts for someone who could be much better than his current intellectually slave “students,” and the chosen one was Velez, who has a history of attacking Trump and praising the leftist Hillary Clinton.

To avoid the intellectual confusions of his current adherents, Carvalho sought out an old friend and student, but to no avail, as the result was chaos and confusion.

Another attempt by Bolsonaro to name a “superior intellect” of the Carvalho movement was the choice of Roberto Alvim for the highest position in the Ministry of Culture. Like Nadalim, Alvim is a hard-core adherent of Carvalho. He fell after praising Hitler’s Nazi German propaganda minister.

If an adherent is the result of his master, here are the results.

Even so, fanatics are blind and prefer to flatter to the end. On Teacher’s Day, former Minister of Education Abraham Weintraub compared Carvalho to Jesus Christ, saying about Carvalho: “A teacher is the one who teaches, who is really concerned with passing on knowledge. An activity so sacred that it was what the Apostles called Jesus (rabbi or rabbi = teacher or master). Happy Teacher’s Day!”


One of his strangest acts as a minister was to launch an astrology campaign on the Ministry of Education’s own website.

After witnessing the fanaticism of Carvalho’s adherents in the government, any intelligent person would conclude that in their trail there is much confusion and disaster — normal elements in the trail of any occultist.

Voegelin made a big mistake. It is not in the evangelical movement that there is a lack of intelligence and Gnosticism. It is in the Carvalho movement, where its adherents demonstrate remarkable intellectual slavery.

There must be a lack of intelligence in the Brazilian government, and there must be a lack of prayers from the people of God for God to grant intelligence to the members of the government, because even after Nadalim put Carvalho and Voegelin as “educational models,” few people in the government are seeing, or confessing, that the ideas pf Carvalho are causing confusion and disaster.

With information from Voegelin View.

Portuguese version of this article: Mentes escravas trabalhando para escravizar a mente das crianças do Brasil

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Understanding Brazil’s New Right and Its Homosexual Grandfather and Its Occult Father

Olavo de Carvalho and Julius Evola, parallels of two prominent right-wing occultists of the Traditionalist School

Beware the Traditionalist School, the Esoteric Sect that Uses Anti-Marxism to Promote Religious Syncretism and the Personality Cult of Its Leaders

The Atlantic Introduces the Intellectual and Spiritual Founder of Brazil’s Esoteric Far Right

Olavo de Carvalho asks Brazil’s Bolsonaro administration to launch investigation against evangelical author Julio Severo

Astrologer Olavo de Carvalho calls for Brazilian Federal Police to investigate Julio Severo on the allegation that accusations against him involving the Inquisition and occultism are collusions paid by the Russian government that threaten the Brazilian national security

Inter-American Institute was closed because of Julio Severo, accuses Olavo de Carvalho, who asked his adherents to write against Severo

Brazilian televangelist Silas Malafaia calls Olavo de Carvalho a coward and bankrupt astrologer after Olavo threatened to topple Bolsonaro administration

After calling Brazil’s Bolsonaro administration “sh*t,” Olavo de Carvalho says he can overthrow it

Brazilian President Says He Believes in Jesus in Evangelical Event

“Idiotic astrologer”: Response from Brazilian televangelist Silas Malafaia to Olavo de Carvalho, who said that “Every evil that happens in Brazil comes from evangelical churches”

Olavo de Carvalho says, including other institutions, that “every evil that happens in Brazil comes from Evangelical churches,” which he equated with the Communist Party

Olavo de Carvalho accuses Philip Melanchthon of being a greater astrologer than he is

Supported by Evangelicals Angry with the Left and Its Anti-Family Attacks, Jair Bolsonaro Is Elected Brazilian President

Brazilian televangelist Silas Malafaia says that it is just ridiculous to discard evangelicals to credit Bolsonaro’s victory to astrologer Olavo de Carvalho

Brazilian Presidential Election: Fernando Haddad Acknowledges that the Biggest Responsible for His Defeat at the Polls Was “Evangelical Phenomenon”

Julio Severo seeks to move Christians to daily prayer with ‘Prophetic Prayers’

Steve Bannon’s Occult Movement, Brazil and Conservative Evangelicals

How the Powerful Union of Trump with Evangelicals Saved the U.S. from Steve Bannon and His Occult Plan of a “Traditionalist” Government

Guenonian Influence in Brazil’s Bolsonaro Administration

“Right-Wing” Philosopher with a Sophisticatedly False and Lying Bifurcated Tongue

Brazil’s new Education Minister is a Presbyterian minister and is already drawing the fury from the left by preaching that children need the discipline rod