Tony Perkins, of Family Research Council, and Emasculated Christian Activism
By Julio Severo
Tony Perkins, the president of the Family
Research Council, should not let conflict of interests to interfere in his higher
Christian calling to do God’s will.
 |
| Tony Perkins |
He could condemn Obama because there was
no conflict of interests. Perkins held no government office in the Obama administration.
But Perkins has held government posts in the Trump administration.
How else explain his inconsistent behavior:
If he could condemn Obama for homosexual imperialism, why cannot he condemn
Trump for the same imperialism?
Instead of condemnation, Perkins praises
Trump. In fact, he has even interviewed and praised State Secretary Mike Pompeo,
who introduces himself as an evangelical, but has celebrated June as Sodomy Month
in the State Department.
Yet, because of his conflict of interests,
Perkins has taken no action against the pro-sodomy stances of Trump and Pompeo.
On the contrary, he took actions against me. In 2019, Perkins contacted BarbWire,
where I was a columnist, and asked my articles on Trump’s pro-sodomy campaign to
be removed. He was complied.
So if Tony Perkins, who is considered a
reliable source of information for powerful conservatives, says that Trump is
not behind any global homosexual campaign, what hope is there that U.S.
conservatives will see the threat over their heads?
I did not slander Perkins. I did not disrespect
him. Even so, he had my articles removed. He is protecting the Trump
administration from their own wicked deeds and, worse, he is keeping
conservatives in the dark.
Because he is an evangelical, he should be
rebuked for this deceptive behavior.
In the months after Tony had my BarbWire
articles removed, Trump increasingly proved that he was behind his global
homosexual campaign. I hope someday Perkins may have the Christian attitude to
correct his error.
If even Tony Perkins protects Trump from
his own homosexual policies, how will U.S. conservative be able to fight them? How
will they be able to rebuke Trump?
Perkins removed my articles to hinder U.S.
evangelicals to know that the Trump administration is so pro-sodomy as the
Obama administration. By removing my articles he expected to hide the reality.
Christians have an obligation to say
clearly to Trump about their beliefs, which by the way are the traditional
beliefs of America, which has never accepted homosexuality.
Tony Perkins had the courage to ask Matt
Barber to remove two of my articles exposing the global homosexual campaign by
Trump to decriminalize homosexuality around the world. I am not new in this
cultural war, but he softened Trump’s stance by trying to portray Trump as
innocent while portraying Richard Grenell as launching this campaign without
Trump’s knowledge. He was wrong. And he was wrong also when he did not rebuke Mike
Pompeo, whom he has interviewed, for celebrating June as homosexual month.
Let me say that a true friend of a ruler
tells him the necessary truth. Nathan
did it to David. Joab, who was a faith servant of David, never confronted David
in anything. A true friend confronts when necessary.
Trump needs to be confronted. If Perkins
does not do it, Muslims, who are advancing in America, will be able to enforce
hard laws against homosexuality and in that time they will call Perkins
emasculated.
While he does not take a stance as Nathan,
Muslims are preparing to take a harder stance, sooner or later.
Perkins’s responsibility is much more
necessary against pro-stances of Trump and Pompeo. He should not target me and
my articles. I have too many problems. He should not target me. He should target
Trump and Pompeo. This is his Christian responsibility.
If I were Trump’s or Pompeo’s adviser, I
would seek to encourage them to reject all item of the gay agenda. Cannot Perkins
do it?
I am not Perkins’ enemy. I am the enemy of
the gay agenda. And if he is really Trump’s and Pompeo’s friend, for God’s
sake, he should tell them the TRUTH just as Nathan did to David. TELL IT!
I only do not tell them because I am not
in their circle of friends, but he can bet that if I were in their circle, they
would certainly hear some truths.
I hate emasculated Christianity, which is
actually cowardly Christianity. We need Elijah, Nathan and John the Baptist,
and I think that God has graced me with some anointing of Elijah.
Richard Grenell, an open gay “married,”
was chosen by Trump in February 2019 to lead a global effort to decriminalize
homosexuality. In that time, The
Advocate, the largest gay magazine in the world, mentioned Scott Lively, Tony
Perkins and me, Julio Severo, as critics of such effort.
Even then, Perkins seemed not to believe
that Trump was behind the effort, because he
said “it doesn’t seem that President Trump – or anyone else in the
administration — authorized this ‘campaign.’”
Perkins showed a willingness to support
such effort only to end violence against homosexuals, not raising any questions
about why to put violence against homosexuals above homosexual violence against
children, through sexual violence or predatory indoctrination, and not
questioning if there was more than the eyes can see.
My criticism
of the soft stance of Perkins and the Family Research Council (FRC) on this
issue drew the attention of Right Wing Watch, a left-wing organization that
monitors conservatives, which sided with Perkins and FRC against me.
As I suspected, there was more than the
eyes can see. According
to LifeSiteNews,
In
a video interview with a fellow gay, Dave Rubin of the Rubin Report, published
this week, Grenell perhaps admitted that he might be seeking more than just the
decriminalization of homosexuality:
We’re
making so much progress [with the decriminalization campaign]. Granted, this is going to be a long fight,
trying to convince sixy-nine countries to do a change in domestic laws, to not
criminalize homosexuality.
Grenell
did not stop there. He added:
And
that’s all this is is ‘step one,’ is just to work on criminalization. Others
are working on steps two to twenty.
Grenell
did not explain what steps 2–20 might be, leaving plenty of room for
interpretation by pro-marriage and pro-family conservatives.
So, in the words of Grenell, the most
promoted and praised homosexualist by Trump, decriminalization is just the
first of many other “unknown” steps in the ladder of homosexualist
expansionism.
When Obama and Hillary talked about
decriminalization of homosexuality around the world, conservatives understood
that there was a strategy and decriminalization was just the beginning. Why in Trump’s
case do they want to believe that there is no strategy? They should be more
prudent, because Trump
has a history of supporting conservatives and liberals at the same time. As
a billionaire, he used to donate to Billy Graham and abortion and homosexual
groups, perhaps to please both conservatives and liberals.
The fact is, just as Obama had a strategy
to use decriminalization as a launching pad for many other gay issues, Trump
has the same strategy, and his strategist is a hardline homosexualist. And
probably there are bigger strategies behind decriminalization. After all, how
explain that left-wing Obama and right-wing Trump have the same obsession to
decriminalize homosexuality around the world?
While the U.S. government promoted gay
“marriage” through the efforts of the left-wing president Obama, now the U.S.
government, under Trump, is promoting the same fake marriage. As far as gay
“marriage” is involved, left and right in the United States are two sides of
the same coin.
It is the responsibility of Perkins,
as an evangelical, show to the evangelical public, including Trump and his
administration, the difference between right and wrong in the homosexual issue.
If he cannot do it, let him invitedme to help him.
Portuguese
version of this article: Tony Perkins, do Conselho de Pesquisa da Família, e ativismo
cristão emasculado
Recommended Reading:
Posts
