Showing posts with label Peter LaBarbera. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter LaBarbera. Show all posts

Monday, June 03, 2019

Making Sodomy Great Again: Trump becomes first Republican president to celebrate LGBT Pride Month as he launches campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world


Making Sodomy Great Again: Trump becomes first Republican president to celebrate LGBT Pride Month as he launches campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world

By Julio Severo
Donald Trump has surprised left-wingers and disappointed conservative Christians on May 31, 2019, by officially inaugurating June 2019 as LGBT Pride Month as he said, “My Administration has launched a global campaign to decriminalize homosexuality and invite all nations to join us in this effort!”
It is the first time a Republican president has publicly celebrated the LGBT Pride Month, where the 30 days of June are dedicated to celebrate the sexual behavior of homosexuals. If Trump dedicated 30 days of a month to celebrate Christianity, especially Protestantism that founded America, there would be widespread outcries. It would be impossible for him to make such celebration. In fact, in the 500th year of the Protestant Reformation on October 31, 2017, Trump did no mention of it, even though he is the president of the largest Protestant nation in the world. Instead, he celebrated Halloween and its occultism. Obviously, for him the homosexual behavior and Halloween deserve more celebrations than Christianity.
“As we celebrate LGBT Pride Month and recognize the outstanding contributions LGBT people have made to our great Nation, let us also stand in solidarity with the many LGBT people who live in dozens of countries worldwide that punish, imprison, or even execute individuals on the basis of their sexual orientation,” Trump wrote in support of the LGBTI Pride Month. His comment was not different of comments by Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton, who also used the language of human rights and legal punishment, imprisonment and execution of homosexuals as pretexts for their campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world.
U.S. evangelical leaders are already voicing their concerns. Dr. Michael Brown, a U.S. Jewish Pentecostal author and minister, tweeted:
“I’m deeply disappointed in President Trump celebrating gay pride this month. For the first 2 years he broke the trend, but unfortunately has gone in the wrong direction this time. I urge him to reconsider. @realDonaldTrump.”
Robert A. J. Gagnon, a theology professor and author of the book “The Bible and Homosexual Practice: Texts and Hermeneutics,” wrote on his Facebook,
“Terribly misguided tweets by Trump celebrating ‘LGBTQ’ ‘pride.’ He deserves all the criticism he can get from conservatives on this… Trump was never fully reliable to oppose ‘LGBTQ’ incursions. Democrats were always fully ‘reliable’ to support every ‘LGBTQ’ tyranny. Trump must be made to know that supporting the ‘LGBTQ’ agenda will gain him few votes and cost him many.”
Activist Mommy Elizabeth Johnston tweeted,
“Mr. President, w/ all due respect, celebrating sexual deviancy is very unbecoming of the leader of the free world. Furthermore, LGBT community is brazenly anti-free speech (if you disagree w/ them) & anti-religious liberty (if you’re a Christian).”
Rev. Michael S. Heath said,
“I was Trump’s earliest supporter for President. I don’t support him for re-election. The danger of sodomy approval is way beyond politics. If he doesn't relent in his crusading for homosexuality then he will not be re-elected.”
Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for the Truth about Homosexuality, tweeted,
“Was this tweet was written by @RichardGrenell, Trump's openly homosexual & avowed ‘gay Christian’ Amb. to Germany? Why should we celebrate behavior that is clearly called sin by the Bible (Trump’s favorite book)? Moreover no ‘Shining City on the Hill’ promotes sodomy to the world.”
“Shining City on the Hill” is an expression that conservative President Ronald Reagan used, based on Jesus’s words: “You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden.” (Matthew 5:14 ESV) Reagan used it to mean that the U.S. has as its mission to be a “Shining City on the Hill.” But with Obama and now Trump, America is, as far as homosexual sin is concerned, a “Sinning City on the Hill.”
LaBarbera also said,
“Dear @Franklin_Graham, I hope you speak out against this tweet by @realDonaldTrump promoting (homo)sexual immorality and gender rebellion to the world. No president should defy Biblical Truth. Note: I’m generally a strong supporter of President Trump and I’m NOT a Never Trumper.”
Graham is an outspoken critic of the homosexual agenda and an outspoken supporter of pro-family values. He has criticized Hollywood and Democrats for supporting the gay agenda. And when Obama, his administration and the U.S. mainstream media were attacking Russian President Vladimir Putin because of the Russian law banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents, Graham wrote the cover story in the Decision magazine, published by the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, touting the courage of the Russian president to confront the powerful Gay New World Order.
Yet, in regard to Trump, Graham is in a very delicate situation, because Trump has been very nice to his family, including by attending the funeral of his father and praising him. This was one of the nicest things a U.S. president ever did to an evangelist. Graham is also his personal adviser. Probably, he spoke or tried to speak to Trump about all of this. While Trump was tweeting his celebration of the LGBTI Pride Month, Graham tweeted, “I want to remind everyone of the importance of praying for @POTUS @realDonaldTrump…”
If a president had been nice to my family, I would also have a very hard time to confront him openly about his outright homosexual propaganda, even though this was my spiritual duty as a Christian.
It was very easy to leave the comfort zone to confront left-wing Obama over his homosexual propaganda. But it has been very hard, a big challenge, for many conservative evangelicals to leave their comfort zone of political interests to confront right-wing Trump over his homosexual propaganda.
After tweeting his celebration of LGBTI Pride Month, Trump retweeted some messages of Franklin Graham. He knows that Graham has authority and influence to sway evangelicals. And his subtle message is that he does not want Graham influencing evangelicals against his campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world.
For the sake of keeping the communication channels open, Graham should not criticize Trump openly, but let others do it. And Christians should pray for Trump and Graham so that he may use wisely his communication channels to Trump to speak privately what Trump needs to know.
Trump chose U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell in February to lead his international campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world. Grenell, who is married to another homosexual, is the Trump administration’s most high-profile homosexual appointee.
Reached by DailyMail in Berlin, Grenell said “President Trump has never wavered in his support for decriminalizing homosexuality.” Grenell, an open homosexual, told Fox News last month that Vice President Mike Pence is on board with the campaign. Has Pence, again, put politics above conservative and Christian values?
Last February, when Grenell launched his campaign, I denounced it in my article “Trump Administration Seeks Legalization of Homosexuality Around the World While Children and Other Victims of Homosexuality Are Forgotten”. The largest U.S. gay magazine The Advocate reported then that Scott Lively, Family Research Council (FRC) and Julio Severo were prominent evangelical voices opposing such campaign. You can read it in my article “Largest U.S. Gay Magazine Furious Over Evangelical Protest Against U.S. Government Effort to Decriminalize Homosexuality Around the World”.
Yet, while I correctly interpreted that this was a campaign by the Trump administration, FRC had a different interpretation. In its piece titled “Human Rights Are Human Rights,” FRC said that “Grenell wrote in an opinion piece in the German newspaper Bild that ‘government officials must . . . demand that U.N. members decriminalize homosexuality,’” but assuring that “There’s just one problem — besides the ambassador, it doesn’t seem that President Trump — or anyone else in the administration — authorized this ‘campaign.’”
For FRC, Trump was innocent of such campaign, which was a betrayal of Trump’s evangelical supporters. FRC just did not believe that Trump would support Grenell’s campaign. I published in the United States two articles showing that FRC was wrong and that they needed a stronger stance regarding gay issues in the Trump administration. FRC reacted by successfully requesting the removal of these two articles from a prominent U.S. website, but a copy of these articles is also available in my personal blog here:
In spite of FRC’s efforts to deny, the Trump administration was already advancing the homosexual agenda and Trump was only waiting the right time for him to come out on its defense. Meanwhile, he was using departments in his administration to defend the gay agenda on his behalf.
In 2017, the State Department, under Rex Tillerson, celebrated June as LGBTI Pride Month, but those who did not want to see Trump involved in this did not see his voice speaking through Tillerson. A whole month where U.S. government officials celebrated homosexuality in the U.S. and its embassies around the world! How could Trump’s conservative evangelical supporters think that he had no hand on all of this?
In 2018, the State Department, under “evangelical” Mike Pompeo, again celebrated June as LGBTI Pride Month, but those who did not want to see Trump involved in this again did not see his voice speaking through Pompeo. A whole month where U.S. government officials celebrated homosexuality in the U.S. and its embassies around the world! How could Trump’s conservative evangelical supporters think that he had no hand on all of this?
Other prominent figures in the Trump administration, especially U.S. Ambassador to UN Nikki Haley, voiced support for the LGBTI Pride Month, but those who did not want to see Trump involved in this did not see his voice speaking through Haley.
The signs were clear, but they were not seen by those who did not want to see.
As to FRC, even having contact with high-profile Republicans and having privileged information, it misrepresented Trump to its evangelical audiences, as if his voice through his own State Secretaries, U.S. Ambassador to the UN and others were not his strategic voices, as if his homosexual campaign were not a homosexual campaign.
What may have left evangelical supporters of Trump in doubt regarding this clear voice is that sometimes Trump made compromises to them, for example, the ban on transsexuals in the military. But this is a minor compromise in contrast with bigger compromises to homosexualists. For example, Trump kept in his administration the post of the U.S. global homosexual envoy created by Obama.
Trump kept many other homosexual posts created by Obama in the federal government, but his evangelical supporters did not take them seriously because of his minor compromise to them. I call it “cake strategy,” where Trump, to make everybody happy, gave slices of a cake to everybody. Increasingly minor slices (or concessions) to evangelicals and increasingly major slices (or concessions) to homosexualists.
The difference is that while conservatives are satisfied with one or two slices, left-wingers complain all the time. Regardless how many slices he gives to them, they are never satisfied, because they always want the whole cake.
Last year, Trump appointed a conservative judge to make conservatives happy and he appointed a homosexual judge to make homosexualists happy. I criticized Trump’s compromise here: “Trump and His Judges, One for Conservatives and One for Gay Activists”. Not surprisingly, the left criticized me for not accepting Trump’s gay judge.
Trump may be worried, because immediately after he tweeted his tragic celebration of the LGBT Pride Month, he began to retweet evangelical messages, especially from Franklin Graham. Even so, the evangelical pressure on him should continue.
If most Trump supporters were homossexualists or left-wingers, I could understand his stance of giving in to their whims. But this is not so.
Evangelicals are the main political base of Trump, and he is using this base to legalize homosexuality around the world, in an effort calculated to backfire — against evangelicals, because the gay agenda is against Christianity.
There are also other compromises in the Republican Party. The largest “conservative” conference in the U.S. — the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) — has been harboring homosexualists while outrightly rejecting conservative evangelicals opposed to the homosexual agenda.
So as homosexualists advance in the Republican Party and conservative conferences, evangelicals and other conservatives will be more and more antagonized.
Conservatives should not be deceived by Trump’s campaign to make homosexuality legal. The standard, classical way used by left-wingers to begin a campaign to legalize homosexuality is to address human rights and to protect homosexuals from violence. The final result is always the same: Bigger and bigger homosexual privileges resulting in bigger and bigger persecution of Christians.
Even if the push of the Trump administration addressed only violence against homosexuals, why prioritize individuals known for their bad sexual choices?
When I think about violence and homosexuality, the first thought coming to my mind is not individuals suffering violence for their sexual lifestyle. The first thinking is children suffering homosexual violence — physical and psychological. There is a massive effort to cover up the suffering of children in the hands of homosexual predators.
The Catholic Church is a living evidence of the gravity of homosexual violence against children. Young men with hidden homosexual problems enter Catholic seminaries, and even though they are never delivered from their homosexual demons and vices, they become priests and bishops. The natural consequence is that their homosexuality eventually produces sexual violence against children.
If you cannot hinder even a Christian setting where there is homosexuality from committing sexual violence against children, how does the U.S. government expect to protect a homosexual culture known for making children especially vulnerable to sexual abuse?
I have no doubt that George Washington, the first U.S. president known for discharging dishonorably a soldier because of his homosexual behavior, would never accept the U.S. government celebrating a “LGBTI Pride Month.” Instead, he would launch a “Month of Protection of Children Against Homosexual Propaganda and Violence.” He would also launch a push to encourage nations to protect children and teens from homosexual propaganda and its psychological and physical violence.
Putin’s Russia has given a very good example by enacting in 2013 a law banning homosexual propaganda to children. The Obama administration, which was busy celebrating homosexuality in its State Department and engaged in efforts to decriminalize homosexuality around the world, growled at the Russian law and used the Ukrainian issue as a pretext to impose sanctions on Russia.
With Trump, my expectation was that he would use the U.S. government to do much more than Russia against the powerful homosexual agenda and its predatory threat to children. Yet, in many ways and year after year Trump, his administration and his State Department are doing more and more to imitate Obama and his obsession to celebrate homosexuality.
Obama never was worried about children and their protection against the predatory threat of homosexual propaganda. Trump never showed any such worry too. No “Month of Protection of Children Against Homosexual Propaganda and Violence.”
All of them are interested in protecting a predatory sexual behavior that brought God’s judgment to Sodom as an example of societies that would choose homosexuality as their official lifestyle. The U.S., under Obama and Trump, are not only celebrating and protecting this perverted lifestyle, but the Obama administration worked and the Trump administration has been working to spread the celebration and protection of this lifestyle that even today is bringing big curses to the Catholic Church and eventually bring bigger curses and destruction to societies that insist on embracing what God has always condemned.
God has said,
“You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22 ESV)
“What happened to Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities near them is an example for us of the punishment of eternal fire. The people of these cities suffered the same fate that God’s people and the angels did, because they committed sexual sins and engaged in homosexual activities.” (Jude 1:7 GWV)
In an age where 100,000 Christians are slaughtered for their faith a year, it makes no sense to focus on homosexuality. In fact, in the first 6 months of 2018 the Trump administration admitted to the U.S. just 21 Christian refugees. This was a blatant betrayal of Trump’s promises in 2016 that he would be a protector of persecuted Christians. And now does he want to be a protector of homosexuality when there are thousands and thousands of victims of homosexuality, including in the Catholic Church?
Why treat homosexuality as a characteristic of victimhood when is proven that homosexuality is a characteristic of violence, including sexual, especially against boys?
America was called to be a “Shining City on the Hill,” not a “Sinning City on the Hill” to please the globalists of the Gay New World Order.
Trump was elected by evangelicals to Make America Great Again, not to Make Sodom Great Again. People who read the Bible know the story and end of Sodom, whose homosexual practices received the name of “sodomy.” Does Trump want America to experience the same fate of Sodom?
Sodom made sodomy great, and paid a high price. Why would America want to make sodomy great again?
What is the point of making America great for America to lead the world in the celebration of homosexuality, just as Trump is doing on June 2019?
I agree with Franklin Graham that Americans should pray for Trump.
Evangelicals who elected Trump should pray for him to stop imitating Obama. And they should ask him to oust homosexual activist Richard Grenell from his administration and appoint evangelicals who may be able to celebrate a “Month of Protection of Children Against Homosexual Propaganda and Violence” in the State Department and launch an international push with such excellent purpose.
Conservatives and evangelicals, in the U.S. and around the world, expect no less than this from America.
With information from DailyMail.
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Family Research Council: Serving Conservatism or Serving the Republican Party?


Family Research Council: Serving Conservatism or Serving the Republican Party?

By Julio Severo
In an article titled “New Trump push: Make homosexuality legal everywhere,” WorldNetDaily, one of the most prominent conservative websites in the world, said,
“The Trump administration’s highest profile gay person is leading an effort to decriminalize homosexuality in dozens of nations where it’s still illegal.”
The highest profile homosexual is Richard Grenell, U.S. Ambassador to Germany.
Yet, the Family Research Council (FRC) had a different interpretation. In its piece titled “Human Rights Are Human Rights,” FRC said that “Grenell wrote in an opinion piece in the German newspaper Bild that ‘government officials must . . . demand that U.N. members decriminalize homosexuality,’” but assuring that “There’s just one problem — besides the ambassador, it doesn’t seem that President Trump – or anyone else in the administration — authorized this ‘campaign.’”
So while WorldNetDaily reported about an effort of the Trump administration, led by Grenell, to decriminalize homosexuality around the world, FRC reported basically that the case is not so serious.
I will argue that the case is very serious. Grenell is the most prominent homosexual activist in the Republican Party and in the Trump administration. He is married to another homosexual man and he defends many items of the gay agenda, including homosexual “marriage.” No real conservative would ever appoint such gay activist to any government post, but Trump did it. Trump did exactly what Obama would have done. What should a president expect after appointing a gay activist? Pro-family campaigns?
FRC correctly said,
“For the last eight years, President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton bludgeoned foreign capitals with ‘diplomacy’ designed to advance an LGBT agenda around the world and in the United Nations — doing damage to our relations with many countries as a result. The Trump administration should be ending such efforts, not making them a priority.”
Yet, immediately FRC mentioned Secretary of State Mike Pompeo as a good example and that “Now the tide has turned.”
How such did change happened? In the Obama administration, State Secretary Hillary Clinton celebrated June as homosexual pride month in the State Department. If the tide has turned, as FRC said, then today, under Trump, is there no celebration of homosexual pride in the State Department, right? Wrong!
Under Trump, former State Secretary Rex Tillerson proclaimed June 2017 as “LGBT Pride Month.” And again under Trump, current State Secretary Mike Pompeo proclaimed June 2018 as “LGBTI Pride Month.”
So, where has the tide turned?
FRC thinks that a view of Pompeo sums up the best intents. FRC said,
“Now the tide has turned. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo articulated the proper way to think about all this… Pompeo responded: ‘I deeply believe LGBTQ persons have every right that every other person has.’”
By saying that homosexuals have every right that every other person has, Pompeo betrayed the real intent of the Trump administration, because if every person has a right to marriage and adoption of children, Pompeo’s declaration suggested that every homosexual has a right to marriage and adoption of children too.
The tide has not turned as far as celebrations of homosexual pride in the State Department are concerned. But as far as evangelical values are concerned, the tide has turned. Pompeo sees himself as a conservative evangelical. If conservative evangelicals are now celebrating homosexuality in the State Department, the tide has really turned — for the worse.
Then, trying to find a compromise to please gay activists and conservatives, FRC ended its piece saying,
“Let’s find common ground in calling for an end to all forms of physical violence against homosexuals — but refrain from imposing the values of the sexual revolution on the rest of the world.”
So FRC showed that it supports a campaign to end “all forms of physical violence against homosexuals.” Yet, why remember violence against homosexuals, but not violence by homosexuals? Has FRC forgotten that there is an epidemic of homosexual abuse against boys?
When I think about violence and homosexuality, the first thought coming to my mind is not individuals suffering violence for their immoral sexual lifestyle. The first thinking is children suffering homosexual violence — physical and psychological. There is a massive effort to cover up the suffering of children in the hands of homosexual predators.
The interpretation that I have regarding the FRC piece is that FRC tried minimize and protect the Trump administration from the expected effects of the presence of a homosexual activist in the government. FRC essentially minimized the reality of the campaign to decriminalize homosexuality around the world, but at the same time it recognized that it is willing to accept a campaign to end “all forms of physical violence against homosexuals.”
How about a campaign to end all forms of homosexual physical violence against boys? Should not a campaign to protect boys and their innocence be much more important than protecting individuals who chose an immoral and perverse sexual lifestyle?
It makes no sense to support a campaign to end “all forms of physical violence against homosexuals” while thousands and thousands of boys suffer sexual violence from homosexuals.
If I were the State Secretary, the tide would really turn. I would launch a “Month of Protection of Children Against Homosexual Propaganda and Violence.” I would also launch a push to encourage nations to protect children and teens from homosexual propaganda and its psychological and physical violence.
In my view, FRC and its president, Tony Perkins, should be forthright if they really believe in conservative values.
Last year, FRC took part in the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), the oldest and largest annual “conservative” conference in America. Shamefully, CPAC banned pro-family group MassResistance as an exhibitor while permitting the homosexualist group Log Cabin Republicans to remain. Log Cabin Republicans is a wing of homosexual militants in the Republican Party.
Why did not FRC defend the conservative group and denounce the homosexualist group?
“It is unconscionable that a self-styled conservative organization like CPAC would ban a sponsorship table for a leading pro-family group like MassResistance — while allowing the homosexual activist Log Cabin Republicans to sponsor a table at the same conference,” said Peter LaBarbera, founder and president of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH). Interestingly, the precursor of AFTAH was launched at a CPAC gathering 26 years ago.
“This is upside-down,” continued LaBarbera. “It is Log Cabin Republicans, which crusades for homosexual ‘marriage,’ that is undermining conservatism.”
When the ban of MassResistance became a scandal after it was denounced by LaBarbera, LifeSiteNews and other pro-life websites, CPAC invited FRC to have a booth, as a last-minute strategy to cover up its scandalous ban against MassResistance. It was inappropriate for FRC to accept the invitation without denouncing the anticonservative actions of CPAC.
So the tide has not turned in the homosexual celebrations in the State Department, but it has done so in the conservative fight against the homosexual agenda. As LaBarbera rightly said, to ban conservative groups and invite homosexualist groups for the most important conservative event in America shows that everything “is upside-down.”
Even if Trump had not approved the campaign of homosexual activist Richard Grenell, let us remember that Trump nominated a gay judge last October and he himself appointed Grenell. And who else than Trump authorized, in 2017 and 2018, the State Department to celebrate June as homosexual pride month?
Also, in 2017 Trump kept Randy Berry as the Special Envoy for the Human Rights of LGBTI Persons, a post created by the Obama administration. In fact, this U.S. Department of State post, which was a global breakthrough, was pioneered by Obama to promote the acceptance of homosexuality, bisexuality and transgenderism abroad as the official U.S. foreign policy.
Trump kept this most powerful symbol of the former Obama administration’s homosexual imperialism even after evangelical leaders had specifically asked for its immediate demise.
In that time, Tony Perkins said, “Keeping Berry only signals to the world that the extreme agenda of the Obama years is still deeply entrenched in the State Department.” Why does Perkins think that now the State Department has changed for the better?
Why do FRC and Perkins pretend to ignore such homosexual advances in the Trump administration? Why do they refuse to expose these scandals in their cruel reality? Why minimize them?
Proverbs 27:6 teaches that true friends correct us. If FRC is a real friend of Trump and the Republican Party, it should forthrightly correct them. Only this way the tide can turn.
It is not easy to correct friends, and I know what I am talking about: I have been a friend of FRC for over 25 years.
Recommended Reading: