“Conservatives” Against “Conservatives”: Brazilian President Bolsonaro Is Called a “Homophobe” by U.S. “Conservative” Fox News

By Julio Severo

“Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro’s comment that the country must not become a ‘gay tourism paradise’ sparked concern that LGBTQ people will avoid traveling to the country, fearing the possibility of violence, according to advocates and industry representatives,” said Fox News on Sunday.

By the way, Bolsonaro’s comment sparked concern also in Fox News.

The Fox News report was titled “Homophobic remarks by Brazil's president could harm tourism industry, advocates say.”

You could measure Fox News as more conservative because U.S. President Donald Trump has given preference to Fox News instead of CNN, a liberal channel whom he accuses of FakeNews. So if Fox News accuses Bolsonaro of being a “homophobe,” is this accusation accurate?

In his March trip to the U.S., Bolsonaro also preferred to be interviewed by Fox News instead of CNN, because he also thinks that Fox News is more conservative and because he is against FakeNews.

So, again, is Fox News’s accusation of him being a “homophobe” correct?

Fox News said,

“During a talk with reporters on Thursday, Bolsonaro said that the Latin American country should avoid being known as a gay destination because ‘we have families.’”

I see no problem in his comment, because there is no pride in being known as a modern Sodom, filled of homosexual orgies.

But then Fox News added a troubling comment by Bolsonaro,

“He said that tourists were more than welcome to ‘come here and have sex with a woman.’”

It seems that in this point Fox News aligned itself with homosexualists, who basically complained that if Bolsonaro is ok with tourists coming to Brazil to have sex with women, why not with men too?

Actually, the additional comment by Bolsonaro cannot be considered conservative. To say that tourists are more than welcome to come to Brazil to have sex with women is to treat Brazilian women as whores.

But such offensive comment was not criticized by Fox News, which seems to understand that if Brazilian women are entitled to be treated as whores of tourists, Brazilian men and boys have the same right.

I add boys because Brazil has a massive problem with tourists looking for prostitution, including with underage girls. Homosexual tourism involving prostitution, including with underage boys, has never been assessed by experts.

Fox News said,

“Bolsonaro’s homophobic remarks will have social and economic repercussions for Brazil,” John Tanzella, president of the International LGBTQ+ Travel Association, an organization with members in 75 countries, told Thomson Reuters Foundation.

 While there is no official data on how much revenue LGBTQ tourism generates in Brazil, major events like Sao Paulo’s annual LGBTQ Pride Parade, and Rio de Janeiro’s gay-friendly Carnival, fill hotels nearly to maximum capacity.

“It’s going to have an impact,” Alfredo Lopes, Rio’s regional president of the Brazilian Association of Hotels, told the news agency.

Why cannot Fox News and others see other impacts? Brazilian hotels are known to have scandals of, against the law, allowing underage girls being made available to tourists. Are not Brazilian boys made available to tourists in hotels too?

Also, why see only the alleged positive financial impact, and ignore the negative impacts?

Homosexuality is linked to a host of evils and sexual diseases. What is the impact of these evils and diseases in the Brazilian society? Who pays for the medical bills of the sexual exploitation by homosexual tourists?

So homosexual tourists come without leaving any cheque to cover medical expenses for the burden of their sexual proclivities. Hotels also do not pay for the medical bills, which are billed to the Brazilian taxpayers. This is the reason I am complaining here. Why am I, a Brazilian taxpayer with seven children, forced to pay for the medical bills in government hospitals of men and boys used by homosexual tourists? Why not add this financial impact in the consequences of homosexual tourism? Why have I to pay for the burden of this pervert tourism?

“Conservative” Fox News said,

Bolsonaro, a self-proclaimed “proud homophobe,” has made numerous negative comments about the LGBTQ community over the years.

On Friday, a Brazilian bank commercial highlighting the country’s diversity was pulled following a demand from Bolsonaro. The campaign featured black and transgender actors and it began running at the beginning of the month before it was pulled on April 14, according to Yahoo! News.

What Fox News did not say is that the bank is federal. So I and other Brazilian taxpayers pay for the homosexual commercial. Is it fair? Brazilian conservatives should not be forced to pay for a homosexual commercial from a federal institution imposing values against the Brazilian family.

If to remove a commercial glorifying homosexuality makes Bolsonaro a “homophobe,” I am too, and proudly. But if the definition of “homophobia” is violence against homosexuals, Bolsonaro is not a “homophobe,” because he has never committed any violence to homosexuals. I am not a “homophobe” too, because I have never committed any violence to homosexuals.

In spite of accusations of “homophobia” from “conservative” Fox News, the Bolsonaro administration has decided to keep laws and federal homosexual departments created by the former administrations of socialist presidents Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva and Dilma Rousseff. Homosexual directors of federal homosexual agencies appointed by Rousseff will be kept in their posts, by Bolsonaro’s decision. So how can Fox News accuse him of being a “homophobe” if he is keeping homosexualists in federal posts?

I am the author of “O Movimento Homossexual” (The Homosexual Movement), published originally by the Brazilian branch of Bethany House Publishers in 1998. This was the first book to expose the homosexual agenda in Brazil.

As a conservative evangelical who has been fighting against the homosexual agenda for over 20 years, including during the terms of Lula and Rousseff, I cannot understand and accept that “homophobe” Bolsonaro has decided to keep federal homosexual agencies in his administration, forcing me and other taxpayers to pay the salaries of homosexualists in the federal government.

I cannot also accept Bolsonaro’s comment that tourists are more than welcome to come to Brazil to have sex with women, who should not be treated as whores. This comment was very offensive to Brazilian women, and Fox News should have condemned it, but it did not do it.

There is some conservatism in Bolsonaro. Some fake conservatism. And some confusion. Much of this confusion is because he is very poorly advised.

Yet, how can “conservative” Fox News help him if it condemns him for removing a homosexual commercial but does not condemn him for keeping federal homosexual agencies in his administration and for disrespecting Brazilian women?

Portuguese version of this article: “Conservadores” contra “conservadores”: Bolsonaro é chamado de “homófobo” pelo canal de TV “conservador” Fox News dos EUA

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Confirmed: Olavo de Carvalho is the Rasputin of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. Leader of Bolsonaro’s party says that he is in love with Carvalho

Brazilian televangelist Silas Malafaia says that it is just ridiculous to discard evangelicals to credit Bolsonaro’s victory to astrologer Olavo de Carvalho

Steve Bannon, expelled by Trump for leaking information and self-promotion, will be the special guest of Jair Bolsonaro on the eve of the Brazilian president’s meeting with President Trump at the White House

Evangelical Leaders Vent Criticism of Brazil’s Bolsonaro Administration for Giving Them Very Little Space

Reading the Far Left: Left-Wing Wingnuts Call Conservatives What They Are

By Julio Severo

Out in far-left media land, there’s a whole lotta homosexual paranoia going on.

Yes, in the past week, The Advocate called conservatives “wingnuts,” and HotSpots, the most important homosexual magazine in Florida, gloatingly announced: “Creep of the Week: Brazilian Writer & Blogger Julio Severo.”

Actually, several other U.S. homosexual websites, Facebook pages and magazines have also made the same announcement.

If I call a homosexual activist a creep, these same websites, Facebook pages and magazines will sue me and call me “homophobe” for “reviling” one of them.

In fact, my Facebook account has been blocked for 30 days immediately after my post on a news report about Brazilian neighbors being ordered to pay thousands of dollars for calling a homosexual a “fag.” My post was very clear that I am opposed to name-calling and foul language. Even so, Facebook censored me.

Homosexual activists call me “creep” even on Facebook pages and there is no censorship. No court orders them to pay me thousands of dollars for reviling me. They have been free to revile me. Conclusion: If I want to be free to revile, I should embrace homosexuality. If Facebook would try to block me, I could use the homosexual card and cry “homophobia.” If some magazine or website would call me a “creep,” I could also use the homosexual card and cry “homophobia.” All the media and authorities would support me against the “homophobes.” And I could sue all of “homophobes.”

But what really stands out on extreme left-wing sites are virulently anti-Christian columns, which portray homosexual activists as “victims,” even though the alleged victims are busy attacking Christians — and not attacking Muslims.

Again, The Advocate attacked BarbWire, an evangelical Christian website.

The Advocate is the biggest gay magazine in America and is, in its own words, “The World’s Leading News Source for LGBT.”

The Advocate said,

Speaking of BarbWire, one of its contributors has been reading this column. Julio Severo even played off the title of one of our recent entries; his column is headlined “Reading the Far Left and Its Attack on Breitbart and BarbWire: Gay Perversion, Veiled and Overt.” The illustration was a rainbow flag with a hammer and sickle — for you youngsters out there, the hammer and sickle were on the flag of the former Soviet Union. Nice touch, BarbWire!

Severo noted that we took issue with a Breitbart column that essentially said the LGBT movement used to be OK but has now gone too far left. We expressed a doubt that Breitbart writer Joel B. Pollak would ever actually have supported LGBT rights, but Severo contended that Breitbart cannot truly be conservative because it once employed Milo Yiannapoulos, a gay man.

“Genuine U.S. conservatism, especially evangelical conservatism (which is the most prevalent Christian conservatism in America), sees nothing conservative in homosexuality,” Severo wrote. However, the reason Yiannopoulos found fans at Breitbart was most likely his willingness to at least appeal to racism, transphobia, and other prejudices that are rejected by both liberals and mainstream conservatives. He went too far by appearing to endorse relationships between men and teenage boys, though, leading to the loss of his job as Breitbart tech editor.

Severo went on to defend a BarbWire column The Advocate found objectionable because the author, Robert Oscar Lopez, claimed LGBT people are out to “recruit” children. “The homosexual movement is always preying on children,” Severo asserted. He further defended anti-LGBT columns by himself and other BarbWire contributors, and said Christian churches that accept LGBT people are driven by Satan.

What have I written that The Advocate read that “LGBT people are driven by Satan”? In response to The Advocate saying that there are Christian churches supportive of the homosexual sin, I said,

“Apparently, The Advocate ignores the word apostasy, which is guided by a wicked and sick worldview. The Advocate ignores that the author of apostasy and the acceptance of homosexuality among Christian churches is Satan and his demons. The Advocate also ignores that the Author of all condemnation of homosexuality in the Bible is not man. It is God.”

Christian churches that welcome and love homosexuals to help them find Christ’s deliverance are guided by God, who wants homosexuals delivered from their sin. But Christian churches that welcome the homosexual sin, which is clearly condemned by God, are guided by Satan.

I also said,

“If The Advocate is concerned about real radicalism against homosexuals, it should make a list of Islamic nations that kill homosexuals. It should pressure Trump and his State Department to do to Saudi Arabia and other Muslim nations that kill homosexuals just as what Obama’s State Department did to Russia and what Trump’s State Department does to Russia: sanctions, sanctions and more sanctions.”

The Advocate answered,

“We do not hesitate to condemn any violence based in religious fanaticism. However, we do not condemn the religion itself, be it Islam, Christianity, or anything else.”

Obviously (and this is massively obvious) The Advocate has never sarcastically announced some Saudi Muslim leader as “Person of Year.” But it has sarcastically announced Vladimir Putin as its 2014 “Person of the Year” immediately after Russia approved a law banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents. Russia is the largest Christian Orthodox nation in the world.

It is easy to lambast evangelicals, Catholics and Orthodox Christians. Why not lambast Muslims?

I have never seen a homosexual announcement saying: “Creep of the Week: The Saudi Islamic Dictator.”

It very easy for The Advocate to spare some “Christian” churches from attacks, because apostate churches twist the Bible to say that God approves the homosexual sin. Yet, homosexual activists attack the real, non-apostate churches that do not kill homosexuals and that preach, according to the Bible, that God condemns homosexuality.

In contrast, Muslim nations that champion murder of homosexuals are never blacklisted by homosexual activists.

The Advocate has been free to advocate the homosexual sin in the United States, the largest Protestant nation in the world. But would The Advocate be free to advocate the same sin in Saudi Arabia, the most Islamic nation in the world?

Sadly, current America grants excessive freedom to homosexualists — a nonsense never imagined by the U.S. Founders, including the first U.S. president, George Washington, who loathed homosexuality and expelled homosexuals, but never killed them.

As recorded in “The Writings of George Washington” (March 10, 1778, 11:83-84, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1934), George Washington ordered: “At a General Court Marshall … Lieutt. Enslin of Colo. Malcom’s Regiment tried for attempting to commit sodomy, with John Monhort a soldier … and do sentence him to be dismiss’d the service with Infamy. His Excellency the Commander-in-Chief approves the sentence and with Abhorrence and Detestation of such Infamous Crimes orders Liett. Enslin to be drummed out of Camp tomorrow morning by all the Drummers and Fifers in the Army never to return.” (information from William Federer.)

In the other extreme, Saudi Arabia grants no freedom to homosexuals and, additionally, kills them.

So, before attacking allegedly “homophobic” Christians who do not kill homosexuals, I challenge The Advocate and all its supporters to travel to Saudi Arabia and protest in loco homophobic Muslims killing homosexuals. They should hold up signs calling the Saudi dictator a creep. Next, they should return to the U.S. to report if they were successful — of course, if they are allowed to exit Saudi Arabia alive.

Portuguese version of this article: Entendendo a extrema Esquerda: doidos esquerdistas chamam conservadores do que eles são

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Reading the Far Left and Its Attack on Breitbart and BarbWire: Gay Perversion, Veiled and Overt

Facebook, Censorship, Profanity, Name-Calling and Foul Language

Why Is Right Wing Watch, of People for the American Way, Worried about Julio Severo?

How to Help Julio Severo through the PayPal Account of the Jewish Institute for Global Awareness

The Advocate criticizes Julio Severo’s efforts to defend child and her mother against homosexual predator

The Advocate names Vladimir Putin Person of the Year

Pedophilia Advocacy Knocks Down Prominent “Conservative” Gay

Exposing Pedophilia Scandals and Hiding Homosexual Scandals in the Catholic Church

The Left-Winger, the Right-Winger and the Cake

Reading the Far Left and Its Attack on Breitbart and BarbWire: Gay Perversion, Veiled and Overt

By Julio Severo

Breitbart and BarbWire have been accused of being “homophobic.” I know what is this because I am not strange to such attacks. Between The Lines News, a gay publication in Michigan, made a selection last week (in its printed and online publication): “Creep of the Week: Julio Severo.” (Originally published in its printed version 6/15/2017, Issue 2524, Between The Lines News.)

Its reason for naming Julio Severo a “creep”? Between The Lines News said,

“In a June 12 piece on Barbwire, a website named for its unique ability to make a thinking person’s brain bleed, Severo writes, ‘The homosexual movement became active in Brazil by direct cultural effect from America, including her politics and Hollywood.’”

The U.S. homosexual Facebook page “Pride USA” also posted: “Creep of the Week: Julio Severo.” (Link: http://archive.is/LEI72)

If the accusation from Between The Lines News is local and reaches only people in Michigan, other U.S. homosexual activists have made sure that Julio Severo and other “far right-wingers” may not escape national and international attention.

In an article titled “Reading the Far Right: Homophobia, Veiled and Overt,” The Advocate focused on Breitbart and BarbWire and their columnists. Breitbart and BarbWire are websites prominent among U.S. conservatives.

The Advocate is the biggest gay magazine in America and is, in its own words, “The World’s Leading News Source for LGBT.”

Is there a “homophobic” far-right movement in the United States? According to The Advocate, Breitbart and BarbWire are two examples of American far-right extremism.

The problem The Advocate sees in Breitbart:

“Breitbart, which claims not to embrace homophobia (that claim is questionable, and it certainly is full of transphobia), is basically making the argument that the LGBT rights movement used to be OK but has descended into left-wing insanity.”

The Advocate also said:

“The conversion of the Los Angeles Gay Pride march into the anti-Trump ‘#ResistMarch’ on Sunday marked the effective end of the gay rights movement,” wrote Breitbart senior editor at large Joel B. Pollak. “Once, the gay rights movement stood for tolerance: hence the rainbow flag, which is a symbol not only of pride but also of acceptance. But the message on Sunday was that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) conservatives are unwelcome in that spectrum — and are, in fact, aiding the enemy.”

Pollak contended that the movement has changed “from a force for liberation into a tool for repression.”

Breitbart’s stance defending supposedly “conservative” homosexuals who are not welcome in the homosexual movement is not conservative or even Christian. Even so, The Advocate managed to find “lots of overt homophobia” in its “reading of the far-right media” — Breitbart!

The Advocate has a hard time accusing Breitbart of being “far right,” if this means “far conservative,” because one of Breitbart’s former editors, Milo Yiannopoulos, is openly homosexual.

Breitbart would have a hard time to label itself conservative, because genuine U.S. conservatism, especially evangelical conservatism (which is the most prevalent Christian conservatism in America), sees nothing conservative in homosexuality.

Breitbart’s idea that the LGBT rights movement used to be OK is nonsense. Since the days of Alfred Kinsey, who had malicious intent and helped the homosexual movement more than 60 years ago with his malicious sex “studies” (and his “ten percent population is homosexual” hoax, debunked by Dr. Judith Reisman), malicious intent is an integral part of the gay agenda’s history. So Breitbart is terribly mistaken on his view of homosexuality.

What is The Advocate’s problem with BarbWire?

The Advocate said:

“For a look at homophobic and transphobic religious right ideology, one has to go no further than BarbWire, which purports to offer a biblical worldview. It carried a column last week by Robert Oscar Lopez, pulling out the old canard that LGBT people are out to ‘recruit’ children.”

The Advocate is right about BarbWire offering a biblical worldview. Without such worldview, there is no real conservatism. And, yes, the homosexual movement is always preying on children. Or did we forget how revolted they are when parents try to protect their own children from predatory homosexuality?

In 2013, Russia approved a law banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents. Hell (Obama and his wicked State Department) was unleashed on Russia. There was a massive revolt from homosexual activists in the U.S. and Europe. Their revolt made appear that Russia had approved capital punishment for homosexuals.

After the ban, The Advocate sarcastically announced that its 2014 Person of the Year was Vladimir Putin, seen by Patheos, an American atheist website, as “the horrifically homophobic president of Russia and a committed opponent of all things pro-LGBT.”

For homosexual activists in the U.S. and Europe, a ban on homosexual propaganda to children is akin to killing homosexuals! The homosexual movement cannot see itself away from children.

Even today, Putin is attacked just because of the ban. Last Sunday, one of the world’s largest Gay “Pride” Parades in São Paulo, Brazil, depicted mockingly Putin as a “drag queen.”

In 2014, when I participated in a pro-family event at the Kremlin, Moscow, the American participants were fearful because U.S. homosexual activists were pressuring the Obama’s State Department to investigate them over their participation in this event. After all, Russia was suffering sanctions from Obama and his left-wing administration.

Not much has changed. Trump’s State Department has increased the Obama sanctions against Russia and has recognized June as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) Pride Month — continuing the tradition of Obama’s State Department.

The U.S. government has not changed in its defense of homosexual interests against Russia, which has kept its ban on homosexual propaganda to children.

What did Robert Oscar Lopez say that infuriated The Advocate? He said “that recruiting children into the LGBT identity, and then locking them into it, is fundamental to the LGBT community’s survival.”

A ban on such recruiting is fundamental, but the U.S. coercive homosexual tactics, including with government assistance, have relentlessly chastised Russia. With such attitude, the U.S. government shows clearly that it will never protect children from predatory homosexuality.

The Advocate also said:

“In another column published by BarbWire last week, theology professor John Barber (it’s not clear if he’s related to site founder Matt Barber) asserted that there’s no such thing as a gay Christian — even a gay person who refrains from acting on same-sex desires, he said, can’t be a real Christian, because Jesus would have taken those desires away. ‘Without the dominion of sin being broken, the picture of the gay Christian is equivalent to a unicorn sighting,’ Barber wrote.”

That concept is rejected even by some Christian denominations that don’t approve of same-sex relationships, such as the Roman Catholic Church and the Mormon Church, which say a gay, lesbian, or bisexual person can be faithful to the church’s doctrine by remaining celibate.

Pause. If the Catholic Church really believes this way, this certainly explains the massive numbers of homosexual Catholic priests abusing boys! The Advocate added:

It’s also certainly contrary to the experiences of those who identify as gay and Christian. And some mainline Christian denominations are far more accepting, with the Episcopal Church, Presbyterian Church (USA), Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, and more offering church marriages to same-sex couples.

Apparently, The Advocate ignores the word apostasy, which is guided by a wicked and sick worldview. The Advocate ignores that the author of apostasy and the acceptance of homosexuality among Christian churches is Satan and his demons. The Advocate also ignores that the Author of all condemnation of homosexuality in the Bible is not man. It is God.

I like very much BarbWire’s biblical worldview. Sadly, Breitbart has not such worldview.

The Advocate’s worldview? Its inspiration comes the same author that causes apostasy among Christian churches.

Also, The Advocate did not forget me. It said:

Oh, and yet another BarbWire contributor, Julio Severo, spent a recent column excoriating Secretary of State Rex Tillerson for recognizing June as LGBT Pride Month. And even though Trump hasn’t issued a proclamation for Pride Month or scheduled a reception for it (as Obama did every year of his presidency), Severo saw Trump as complicit in the dreaded “homosexual agenda.”

“The same homosexual principles that drove U.S. diplomacy under Obama now drive the U.S. diplomacy under Trump,” Severo wrote. “The only difference is that while Obama was vocal about these principles, Trump gives a tacit support, by allowing his own administration to speak for himself. If the saying ‘silence means assent’ is correct, Trump’s ‘silence’ is a message.”

Oh, and by “homosexual principles” he seems to mean the condemnation of anti-LGBT persecution around the world. “Obama used the U.S. government to lead the world, by his bad example, into accepting the homosexual lifestyle as normal,” Severo commented. “By tacit or explicit support, the Trump administration is leading the world in the same bad example.” Severo also gave credence to the hate-fueled stereotype that gay people prey on children.

If I condemned Obama’s State Department for its homosexual propaganda, why should I spare Trump’s State Department over the same propaganda?

Regarding a “stereotype that gay people prey on children,” gay “conservative” Milo Yiannopoulos lost his job as a Breitbart editor after his interests in pedophilia were exposed.

Homosexuals, even “conservative” homosexuals, have a special interest in children. Yiannopoulos has proved it.

If there were no connection between homosexuality and sex abuse of boys, the Catholic Church would have no scandal of homosexual priests abusing boys.

This is not the first time The Advocate attacks me. In 2011 The Advocate criticized me because I defended a child and her biological mother against a homosexual predator. You can read the whole story here: “World’s biggest gay magazine: no compassion and tolerance for a former lesbian and her daughter.”

Yet, what is The Advocate’s reason for depicting BarbWire and Breitbart as “far right”? Some 40 years ago a conservative publication hiring open homosexual Milo Yiannopoulos as an editor would be seen as far liberal and far left-wing.

The U.S. culture has changed and rotted so much that homosexualists have become excessively demanding. Forty years ago, you were labeled a leftist and homosexualist if you only supported gay “marriage” without subscribing to every other tenet of the homosexual gospel.

Today, if you subscribe to every homosexual tenet, including on “marriage” and adoption, but disagrees on coercive homosexual tactics, you are labeled “far right-winger,” “fascist” and “Nazi.” For The Advocate’s nasty worldview, if you do not support totally, in every point, the gay agenda, you are not friend. You are enemy. This reality is also applicable to Trump, who has let his State Department promote homosexual propaganda but he disagrees on coercive homosexual tactics. Trump has become an enemy not because he fights the gay agenda (which in fact he does not fight), but just because he has not satisfied all wishes from homosexualists and their agenda.

Even though Breitbart and Trump may hire thousands and thousands of copies of Milo Yiannopoulos, Peter Thiel and other “conservative” homosexuals, The Advocate and other far-left-wing activists will keep accusing them of “homophobic,” “far right-wing,” “fascist” and, of course, their favorite insulting label: “Nazi.”

By the way, according to German author and professor Lothar Machtan, in his book “The Hidden Hitler” (Basic Books, 2001), Adolf Hitler was a homosexual. In his book “The Pink Swastika” (Veritas Aeterna, 1995), author Scott Lively contends that many Nazi leaders were homosexual.

Hitler and his Nazi movement were what the U.S. homosexual movement is today. Oppressive, repressive and dictatorial. But they accuse real conservatives of what homosexualists are.

I disagree with Breitbart’s compromised stance against the gay agenda and I agree with BarbWire’s biblical stance, but if for The Advocate “far right” means radicalism against homosexuals and if BarbWire and Breitbart, which do not kill homosexuals or endorse their killing, are “far right,” what are Saudi Arabia and other Islamic nations that kill homosexuals?

If The Advocate is concerned about real radicalism against homosexuals, it should make a list of Islamic nations that kill homosexuals. It should pressure Trump and his State Department to do to Saudi Arabia and other Muslim nations that kill homosexuals just as what Obama’s State Department did to Russia and what Trump’s State Department does to Russia: sanctions, sanctions and more sanctions.

Yet, Obama had no such concern. Trump also has not. And what has The Advocate done? After condemning BarbWire and Breitbart, and sparing all Islamic nations, The Advocate condemned NRATV — the National Rifle Association’s online video channel — and other conservative channels for saying that a Muslim committed the worst terrorist attack on U.S. homosexuals — the mass shooting at Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando June 12, 2016.

If it was not a Muslim, who was? BarbWire and Breitbart? Julio Severo?

For The Advocate, is it impossible for Muslims to be responsible for terror attacks against homosexuals? In contrast, is it impossible for BarbWire and Breitbart not to be culprit of “homophobia”?

This is sheer insanity and hypocrisy: To condemn the innocent and spare the culprit!

Trump needs to understand what Obama did not understand: the intrinsically dishonest and Nazi nature of the homosexual movement.

He needs BarbWire’s worldview, not Breitbart’s worldview, guiding his administration. And he should stop his administration from doing what Obama did: to bully Russia over its ban on homosexual propaganda to children.

Putin is right. Russia is right. A ban on homosexual propaganda to children is necessary.

BarbWire and its conservative biblical worldview are right. A ban on recruiting children into the LGBT identity is fundamental.

Yet, while Russia under Putin has successfully implemented its ban on homosexual propaganda to children, the Trump administration and its State Department have given no room for implementing BarbWire’s conservative biblical worldview to ban recruiting children into the LGBT identity.

Trump needs BarbWire in his administration. If he embraces BarbWire and its biblical worldview, The Advocate will certainly name him Person of the Year.

Conservative Christians will name him Protector of Children forever!

Breitbart’s worldview, which embraces the illusion of a conservative homosexuality, is insufficient to defeat The Advocate’s far left-wing worldview and its veiled and overt gay perversion. But BarbWire’s worldview, which is biblical, not far right, is more than enough.

Portuguese version of this article: Entendendo a extrema esquerda e seu ataque contra o Breitbart e o BarbWire: a perversão gay, encoberta e pública

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Trump’s State Department Recognizes June as LGBTI Pride Month

Facebook, Censorship, Profanity, Name-Calling and Foul Language

Why Is Right Wing Watch, of People for the American Way, Worried about Julio Severo?

How to Help Julio Severo through the PayPal Account of the Jewish Institute for Global Awareness

The Advocate criticizes Julio Severo’s efforts to defend child and her mother against homosexual predator

The Advocate names Vladimir Putin Person of the Year

Pedophilia Advocacy Knocks Down Prominent “Conservative” Gay

Trump Continues Obama’s Homosexual Imperialism and Frustrates Christian Conservatives

Exposing Pedophilia Scandals and Hiding Homosexual Scandals in the Catholic Church

The Left-Winger, the Right-Winger and the Cake

Trump and Prophecies, and a New Model of National and World Leader