Brazil, the Next (Regional or Global) Threat
to the U.S. Economic Supremacy?
What Chuck Pierce saw about the U.S. and
Brazil
By Julio
Severo
In
2008, I met Chuck Pierce. He told me and a group of evangelical leaders in
Brazil that God had removed his national anointing from the U.S. in 2008. For
me, the confirmation came next year, when Obama (a pro-Islam, pro-sodomy and
pro-abortion creature) became the U.S. president. Under his presidency, the
U.S. has become the biggest exporter of the homosexual
ideology in the
world.
Pierce
also said that God was looking for another nation to grant this anointing. He
told that if Brazil got closer to Israel, God was going to give the anointing
to Brazil. Then he had a vision about what would happen if Brazil began to
develop into an international power: He saw the U.S. government encircling and
stifling Brazil economically and militarily. He saw the U.S. filled with envy.
He saw the U.S. totally determined to hinder Brazil’s economic rise.
What
I understood from his vision is that the U.S., as the only superpower today,
will not accept the rise of any other nation to rival its hegemony. The development
of every nation is to be under the submission of U.S. interests, and these are
wicked interests, because the U.S. government has abandoned the Lord long ago.
The U.S. sees the economic rise of other nations as competing with its power.
I
highly doubt that God is going to give his special national anointing to
Brazil, my nation, because Brazil has not gotten closer to Israel. But I do not
doubt that the U.S. has lost, or rejected, this anointing. As the
anointing-less Saul, it will try, moved by envy, to do everything in its power
to hinder and weaken any nation resembling an emergent, anointed David.
If
Pierce’s prophecy is correct, God will look for another nation, not Brazil.
Yet, if Brazil really changes its ways and gets closer to Israel, honoring the
Jewish nation, which has always been the most honored nation by God, Brazil
will prosper and rise to a superpower status, not to smash nations for economic
ambitions, but to protect and honor Israel.
Probably,
God will have to raise another nation, because currently Brazil is a strong
moral ally of the U.S., always supporting the U.S. in every anti-family agenda
in the UN system. Sadly, on abortion and sodomy, the U.S. can always count on
Brazilian support. If over these reasons the U.S. lost its anointing, Brazil
will not need to worry about losing what it has never gotten.
As
Mary, Jesus’ mother, I kept Pierce’s vision and words in my heart, wondering if
he was right about Brazil, about a U.S. envy against a possible future
Brazilian rise in the global power stage, etc. Then, in 2011, George Friedman
launched his book “The Next Decade: What the World Will Look Like,” by Knopf
Doubleday.
Friedman
is the founder of Stratfor, a Texas-based global intelligence company
whose members have intelligence and military experience. With such experience,
Stratfor makes strategic forecasting.
While
Pierce saw America’s and Brazil’s future and their turbulences (America as an
envious superpower and Brazil being stifled by her) by spiritual revelation,
Friedman “saw” the future by sheer technical analysis of current events and
behaviors, with U.S. intelligence data.
Pierce
saw the U.S. feeling threatened by Brazil as an emerging a global superpower.
Friedman saw the U.S. need to contain the rise of Brazil as a regional power.
Friedman
saw no need to forecast about Brazil rising as a global superpower, because, in
this respect, Brazil represents no immediate threat to U.S. interests.
Actually,
only God can raise Brazil as a global superpower.
So,
as forecasted by Friedman, if the U.S. should get prepared against just a
regional power, what would the U.S. be capable of doing against an emerging
global superpower?
Friedman’s
strategic forecasting vindicates Pierce’s prophecy. Therefore, I mention
several excerpts of Friedman’s book, where he says:
What happens
in Latin America is of marginal importance to the United States, and the region
has rarely held a significant place in American thinking.
During the
Cold War, the United States became genuinely concerned about Soviet influence
in the region and intervened on occasion to block it. But neither the Germans
nor the Soviets made a serious strategic effort to dominate South America,
because they understood that in most senses the continent was irrelevant to
U.S. interests. Instead, their efforts were designed merely to irritate
Washington and divert American resources.
There is only
one Latin American country with the potential to emerge as a competitor to the
United States in its own right, and that is Brazil. It is the first
significant, independent economic and potentially global power to develop in
the history of Latin America,
Right now
Brazil is not a power that is particularly threatening or important to the
United States, nor does the United States represent a challenge to Brazil.
There is minimal economic friction, and geography prevents Brazil from easily
challenging the United States.
The only
challenge that Brazil could pose to the United States would be if its economic
expansion continued enough for it to develop sufficient air and naval power to
dominate the Atlantic between its coast and West Africa, a region not heavily
patrolled by the United States.
Even though
Brazil is not yet in any way a threat to American interests, the underlying American strategy of
creating and maintaining balances of power in all areas requires that the
United States begin working now to create a countervailing power. There is
no rush in completing the strategy, but there is an interest in beginning it.
In the next decade, while maintaining friendly relations with Brazil, the
United States should also do everything it can to strengthen Argentina, the one
country that could serve as a counterweight.
The American goal should be to slowly
strengthen Argentina’s economic and political capabilities so that over the
next twenty to thirty years, should Brazil begin to emerge as a potential
threat to the United States, Argentina’s growth rivals Brazil’s.
The United States
also should be prepared to draw the American military closer to the Argentine
military, but through the civilian government, so as not to incite fears that
the U.S. is favoring the Argentine military as a force in the country’s
domestic politics. The American
president must be careful not to show his true intentions in this, and not
to rush. A unique program for Argentina could generate a premature Brazilian
response, so Brazil should be included in any American program, if it wishes to
participate. If necessary, this entire
goodwill effort can be presented as an attempt to contain [socialist bolivarianism]
in Venezuela. It will all cost money, but it will be much cheaper, in every
sense, than confronting Brazil in the 2030s or 2040s over control of the South
Atlantic.
The American
relation with the hemisphere divides into three parts: Brazil, Canada, and
Mexico. Brazil is far away and isolated. The United States can shape a
long-term strategy of containment, but it is not pressing.
The United
States has a secure position in the hemisphere. The sign of an empire is its
security in its region, with conflicts occurring far away without threat to the
homeland. The United States has, on the whole, achieved this.
Above all else, hemispheric governments must
not perceive the United States as meddling in their affairs, a perception that
sets in motion anti-American sentiment, which can be troublesome. Of course the
United States will be engaged in meddling in Latin American affairs, particularly
in Argentina. But this must be
embedded in an endless discussion of human rights and social progress. In fact,
particularly in the case of Argentina, both will be promoted. It is the motive vis-à-vis Brazil that
needs to be hidden. But then, all presidents must in all things hide their
true motives and vigorously deny the truth when someone recognizes what they
are up to.
Brazil must be worked with and long-term
plans for containment must, if necessary, be laid.
By Friedman’s
analysis, Latin America represents no threat to U.S. interests today. By his
forecasting, Brazil could, in the long run, represent some threat. Yet, by
Pierce’s prophecy, it is certain that if God raises Brazil after Brazilian
leaders embrace Israel, the U.S. will see Brazil as a threat to be immediately
contained.
Israel
is very important to God. When Bush was insisting in a two-state plan against
Israel (the illegal and immoral division of the Promised Land), Pierce was
guided by God’s voice to go to Louisiana and release God’s judgment. After a
few months, came Hurricane Katrina, with devastating consequences.
Those,
even superpowers, who confront God’s plan for Israel suffer the consequences.
Those
who embrace and honor Israel are blessed, even with a superpower status
blessing.
I
envision a nation getting this status after its leaders fully recognize Israel
and Jerusalem as its capital, make many friendship agreements with Israel,
reject the two-state plan against Israel and, officially, recognize “Palestine”
as a terrorist entity putting in peril the Jewish state.
Recommended Reading:
Posts
