Showing posts with label Jews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jews. Show all posts

Friday, May 29, 2020

Brazilian education minister with Jewish roots in the Bolsonaro administration was criticized by the Israeli government and Jewish groups for comparing police investigation raids against allies to Nazi persecution against Jews


Brazilian education minister with Jewish roots in the Bolsonaro administration was criticized by the Israeli government and Jewish groups for comparing police investigation raids against allies to Nazi persecution against Jews

By Julio Severo
Brazil’s education minister drew criticism from the Israeli government and Jewish groups in the U.S. and Brazil for likening Federal Police raids against allies of the Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro to Kristallnacht — the beginning of the Nazi persecution against Jews.
Abraham Weintraub
“Today was the day of infamy, national shame, and it will be remembered as the Brazilian Night of the Broken Glass,” tweeted on May 27, 2020, Abraham Weintraub, whose Jewish paternal grandparents fled the Nazis.
“They desecrated our homes and are suffocating us. Do you know what the great oligarch/socialist press will say? SIEG HEIL!” continued the minister in his tweet, adding a picture that shows the boycott to Jewish stores in Germany in 1933.
Kristallnacht, or the Night of Broken Glass, refers to the 1938 Nazi persecution marking as the beginning of the Holocaust.
Weintraub was born to a Catholic mother and a Jewish father whose family members were killed in Nazi concentration camps. He is usually mistaken as Jewish due to his name, but, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, he does not identify as a Jew.
Jewish organizations in the U.S. and Brazil harshly criticized his comments.
“The comparison is totally unreasonable and inopportune, unacceptably minimizing those terrible events, the beginning of the Nazi march that culminated in the death of 6 million Jews,” said Fernando Lottenberg, president of the Brazilian Israelite Confederation, the most important Jewish organization in Brazil.
“Enough is enough! The repeated political weaponization of Holocaust language by Brazilian government officials is profoundly offensive to world Jewry and an insult to the victims and survivors of the Nazi terror. It needs to stop immediately,” tweeted the American Jewish Committee, the most important Jewish organization in the U.S.
Even though the Bolsonaro administration is an ally of Israel, especially because evangelicals, Bolsonaro’s most important political base, are traditional supporters of Israel, the Israeli government also criticized Weintraub’s comparison.
The consul general of Israel in São Paulo, Alon Lavi, said:
“The Holocaust, the greatest tragedy in modern history, where 6 million Jews, men, women, elderly and children were systematically murdered by Nazi barbarism, is unprecedented. This episode can never be compared to any political reality in the world.”
With the same critical tone, the Israeli Embassy in Brazil issued a statement:
There was an increase in the frequency of use of the Holocaust in public discourse, which unintentionally trivializes its memory and also the tragedy of the Jewish people, which ended with the extermination of 1/3 of our people out of hatred and ignorance of the Nazis and their collaborators.
In the name of the strong friendship between our countries, which has grown more and more for 72 years, we demand the question of the Holocaust as well as the Jewish people or Judaism to be left out of the daily political dialogue and the disputes between the sides in the ideological game.
This is the first time that Israeli diplomats have publicly criticized the Bolsonaro administration. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Brazil to participate in the inauguration of the Brazilian president in 2019. At the time, Netanyahu said: “We have no better friends in the world than the Evangelical community, and the Evangelical community has no better friend in the world than the State of Israel.”
In January 2020, Brazilian top culture official Roberto Alvim, an adherent of Olavo de Carvalho, was fired for imitating a Nazi speech. At the time, Israel’s ambassador to Brazil, Yossi Shelley, spoke directly with Bolsonaro to express Israel’s concern about Alvim’s speech, who had published a video in which he made use of excerpts from a speech by Joseph Goebbles, minister of propaganda in Hitler’s Germany. Soon after, Alvim was fired.
There were also other conflicts between Jewish groups and the Bolsonaro administration. In April 2020, the American Jewish Committee demanded an apology from Foreign Affairs Minister Ernesto Araújo, who compared social isolation to contain COVID-19 to Nazi concentration camps. It was an unreasonable comparison, as even Israel used social isolation to contain COVID-19.
Weintraub’s comparison was made after on May 27, 2020 Brazil’s federal police held search and seizure warrants against several allies of President Bolsonaro as part of an investigation about threats to Supreme Court’s ministers and the spread of fake news.
Were the political allies worthy of Weintraub’s comparison? The actions of the Brazilian federal police affected several individuals, including Sara Winter, Allan dos Santos and Bernardo Kuster.
Sara Winter became internationally known after LifeSiteNews, the most important international Catholic pro-life website, published a 2015 report on her, presenting her alleged conversion to Catholicism. The report said,
Sara Fernanda Giromini first made herself known to Brazil and to the world under the alias “Sara Winter” in 2012, when she became the founding member of Femen Brazil, and led a trio of girls in a number of topless protests that garnered much media attention. However, only three years later, the young activist has done an about-face and has declared war on feminism and abortion, and is apologizing to Christians for her offensive behavior.
She continues using her nickname, Sara Winter, which is the Portuguese form for “Sarah Winter,” a British Nazi supporter and member of the British Union of Fascists.
In a May 27, 2020 video, Sara said that she would like to “exchange punches” with a Supreme Court minister and stated that this minister “will never again have peace in his life.” She said:
You wait for me, Mr. Alexandre de Moraes. You will never have peace in your life again. We are going to make your life hell, we are going to find out the places you go to, we are going to find out who are the maids who work for you… We are going to find out everything in your life until you ask to leave. Today you made the worst decision of your life.
Sara Winter is the leader of the self-titled group “300 do Brasil” (300 of Brazil), who camped in front of the Brazilian Supreme Court. The group, whose members wear camouflage clothing similar to Army clothing and carry weapons, has already been called an “armed militia” by the Federal Prosecutor’s Office of the Federal District and Territories. It resembles a paramilitary group.
Sara Winter
In an interview with the BBC’s Portuguese news service in London, Sara said the presence of weapons in her camp is “for the protection of the members themselves.” The BBC said:
Sara Winter likes to publish photos holding guns and says on social media that she “shoots very well.”
She has given several versions for the “300 of Brazil.” She says it was Olavo de Carvalho’s idea, who is her guru. She also says, perhaps to please different groups, that the name was chosen based on the “300 of Gideon,” from the Old Testament in the Bible. She also says it was based on the “300 of Sparta.”
Sara has also given other explanations for a tattoo on her shoulder of an Iron Cross, a Germanic symbol that became popular during the Nazi regime and was the main Nazi decoration of war. Sara says that the tattoo was a tribute to the “Knights Templar of the Middle Ages,” but German researcher Carina Book has confirmed that it is the Iron Cross.
About the “300 of Brazil” camp in front of the Supreme Court, she said: “Who asked me to do all this was Professor Olavo.”
It is no surprise then that on May 28, 2020, Olavo asked for the death penalty for the minister who requested the Federal Police’s action against Sara and others. But if he defends the death penalty for the minister who seeks to take away Sara’s right of speech, then why is he the greatest denier of the Inquisition in Brazil? The Inquisition took from its victims not only their right of speech, but also their property and lives.
On some occasions Sara Winter has stated that she received training in Ukraine and that she wants to “Ukrainize” Brazil, a stance difficult for conservatives to understand, as the Ukrainian revolution was largely funded by George Soros, the Obama administration and the neocons.
In the training sessions promoted by Sara for her “300 of Brazil,” photos and videos are prohibited and adequate clothing is required for physical combat training.
Sara Winter with her skull mask, according to the journalist website A Publica
In a photo of “300 of Brazil,” Sara Winter appears with other militants, wearing a skull mask. The mask is very popular in Europe and the United States among neo-Nazis. “The skull mask has become a universal fascist aesthetic,” journalist Jake Hanrahan wrote on Twitter.
Neo-Nazi group Atomwaffen Division and its skull masks
In the film “A Vida de Sara” (Sara’s Life), a biographical documentary produced by the Lumine platform, dubbed “Conservative Netflix,” Sara Winter says that FEMEN sent money so she could be trained in Ukraine and take this training back to Brazil.
The movie was produced by Matheus Bazzo, who also produced the documentary about Olavo de Carvalho, “The Garden of Afflictions.”
In the movie, Sara says that she has already prostituted herself and she appears shooting and handling firearms.
Such a picture seems problematic for the image of conservative Christians who fight against the abortion and homosexuality agenda.
Among the supporters of “300 of Brazil” are Terça Livre journalist Allan dos Santos and psychiatrist Ítalo Marsilli, who declared in one of his videos that women should not be allowed to vote because they are easy to seduce. He said:
“In Greek democracy, the only one in the world that worked, women were not expected to vote. When the vote becomes full, that is, women and everyone else can vote, you see that there is a crisis in the state’s governance. It is very easy for you to convince a woman to vote, you just have to seduce her.”
As for Bernardo Kuster, who together with Sara and Santos was also targeted by the Federal Police, he abandoned the Evangelical Church to follow Carvalho’s syncretic Catholicism. Today Kuster promotes the idea that the Inquisition was a court of mercy — a stance strongly contested by the Israeli government and the Jews. In fact, in 2013, on a visit to the Vatican, Netanyahu gave Pope Francis a copy of a massive book against the Inquisition written by his father.
On Netanyahu’s next visit to Brazil, he should give a copy of this book to each member of the Bolsonaro administration. Some of them, who follow Carvalho, believe that the Inquisition was a lie, although it also tortured and killed Jews in Brazil.
What stops Olavo and his adherents, who make a shameless revisionism of the Inquisition, from someday also making a revisionism the Holocaust? After all, the main victims of both were precisely the Jews.
It is impossible to understand this chaotic situation without understanding that Olavo de Carvalho, who has an occult history, is a member of the Traditionalist School. Recently, American Jewish writer Benjamin R. Teitelbaum released the book “War for Eternity,” published by HarperCollins. The book maps the Traditionalist School and its main representatives in several countries. The representative for Brazil is Olavo. Teitelbaum presents the Traditionist School as an occult cult.
By its very nature, the occult brings chaos.
Despite reprimands from the Israeli government and Jewish organizations in the U.S. and Brazil, Education Minister Abraham Weintraub did not back down in his comparison. In fact, he defended it, in the name of free speech. He said in a tweet of May 28, 2020:
Do not speak on behalf of all Christians or Jews in the world. I SPEAK FOR ME! I had Catholic grandparents and surviving grandparents from the Nazi concentration camps (photo). All were Brazilian. I HAVE THE RIGHT TO SPEAK ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST! I don’t need any more people attacking MY FREEDOM!
Yes, he has a right to talk about the Holocaust. But since he has grandparents who survived the Holocaust, why doesn’t he condemn the signs of fascism in the movement he is supporting?
Olavo de Carvalho is the greatest Brazilian defender of the Inquisition, which tortured and killed thousands of Jews. Carvalho’s Catholic supporters support and spread his radical stance that the Inquisition was myth and legend.
If Weintraub knows how to confront Israel and the Jews in his stubborn stance comparing the Holocaust with the actions of the Federal Police against Sara Winters and other Carvalho supporters, why does he not know or cannot confront Carvalho about the Inquisition? Why doesn’t he know how to confront the signs of fascism and occultism in Carvalho and his adherents?
For example, the Brazilian Foreign Minister openly praises Olavo de Carvalho, René Guénon and Julius Evola. Guénon is the Islamic occult master followed by members of the Traditionalist School, whose most prominent member was Evola, guru of the Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. Evola was radically against Marxism and wrote books defending the right-wing ideology, the occult and black magic.
Why doesn’t Weintraub question and confront this?
And regarding his defense of free speech, is this defense total or limited? In 2019, using lies and slander, Olavo de Carvalho, considered Bolsonaro’s Rasputin, called for the Federal Police to investigate me, in a blatant desire to see the state machine silencing my voice and my evangelical articles against the occult and the Inquisition. You can check everything here: http://bit.ly/2CPK0tX
At the time, Weintraub said nothing against Carvalho’s dictatorial desire to censor me.
But today Weintraub, confronting Israel and Jewish groups, speaks out against the Federal Police acting against an activist who has a Nazi surname and was trained in Ukraine by groups funded by George Soros.
Weintraub also defended Terça Livre, a channel that defends the Inquisition and has already attacked, cursed and defamed me.
Is the free speech that Weintraub advocates for everyone or only for those using Nazi nicknames and for those cursing and slandering?
How would an evangelical writer be in this defense? I don’t know, because when Carvalho called for the Federal Police against me, I didn’t see Weintraub defending free speech. But his brother, Arthur Weintraub, who also has an important position in the Bolsonaro administration, when he came across my tweet criticizing Carvalho, blocked me on Twitter.
For them, even Israel can be confronted. But criticizing Carvalho, the advocate of the Inquisition, is unacceptable.
Weintraub seeks to defend against the Supreme Court Sara and others in the pure logic of free speech, but are not the armed behavior of Sara’s group and her use of symbols so linked to fascism enough red flags that her threats may eventually become violent?
There are three phases in Sara’s history over the past ten years. She was linked to FEMEN in the early 2010s. By the middle of that decade, she was already apparently changed, becoming a pro-life Catholic personality on LifeSiteNews. And there is the most recent Sara, who is connected to Olavo and training a group that has paramilitary characteristics. This is a Sara who wears a fascist mask, swears, uses weapons and threatens ministers of the Supreme Court.
How does not Weintraub confront this, but confronts the Israeli government and Jewish organizations? How does he view this as mere opinion, not as danger signs?
With information from Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Notícias R7, Istoé, Yahoo, CONIB, Correio Braziliense, Estado de Minas, A Publica, BBC, LifeSiteNews, Revista Forum and UOL.
Recommended Reading:

Thursday, April 04, 2019

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro said that Nazism was a left-wing movement after he visited the Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem. But the museum, which is a memorial of the Jewish victims of Nazism, says that Nazism was a right-wing movement. What about now?


Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro said that Nazism was a left-wing movement after he visited the Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem. But the museum, which is a memorial of the Jewish victims of Nazism, says that Nazism was a right-wing movement. What about now?

By Julio Severo
There was a big controversy about Nazism and socialism in the recent visit of the Brazilian president to Israel, and I will let Israelis themselves speak what they think. In a report titled “Brazil’s president says Nazis were leftists following visit to Yad Vashem,” the Jerusalem Post, a prominent Israeli newspaper, said,
President Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil said that Nazism was a leftist movement following his visit to the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial in Jerusalem.
The far-right leader was asked on Tuesday during his visit to Israel if he agreed with the claim by his foreign minister, Ernesto Araujo, that Nazis were leftists.
“There is no doubt, right?” Bolsonaro replied, according to Reuters.
It is widely accepted that Nazism was a far-right movement. Yad Vashem’s website says that a range of factors, including Germany’s defeat in World War I, “created fertile soil for the growth of radical right-wing groups in Germany, spawning entities such as the Nazi Party.”
The Jewish Telegraphic Agency confirmed that Bolsonaro’s visit to the Holocaust Museum was clouded by a controversial remark of his “foreign minister, Ernesto Araújo, who claimed in a blog post that Nazism was a left-wing movement. Yad Vashem’s website says Nazism was a product of ‘radical right-wing groups in Germany.’”
Yad Vashem documents the Holocaust and is a memorial to the 6 million Jews murdered by Nazi Germany during World War Two.
Despite Araújo’s remark directly contradicting information on the museum’s website, Bolsonaro sided with him.
Yet, the Holocaust Museum is not the only Jewish institution portraying Hitler as a right-winger. The Jewish Virtual Library says:
… Hitler would make one of his passionate speeches that encouraged his supporters to carry out acts of violence against Jews and his left-wing political opponents. As this violence was often directed against Socialists and Communists, the local right-wing Bavarian government did not take action against the Nazi Party.
Hitler believed that the Jews were involved with Communists in a joint conspiracy to take over the world. Like Henry Ford, Hitler claimed that 75% of all Communists were Jews. Hitler argued that the combination of Jews and Marxists had already been successful in Russia and now threatened the rest of Europe.
If the Jews, who understand about Nazism as its direct victims, say that Nazism was right-wing, who are we to contradict them? Yet, asked by reporters if he agreed with Araújo, Bolsonaro said, “There is no doubt, right?”
He explained that the Nazi party’s name was the National Socialist Party of Germany, which includes the word “socialist.” The official name was the National Socialist German Workers’ Party.
Araújo’s notion, which is embraced by Bolsonaro, is that “National Socialism” was a leftist movement because it includes the word “socialism.” Political Scientist Kai Michael Kenkel said this connection between Nazis and socialism is akin to saying that the East German Democratic Republic and the People’s Democratic Republic of Korea were indeed democracies.
The same controversy was present in Bolsonaro’s campaign in 2018, when his followers said that Nazism was a left-wing ideology. The German Embassy in Brazil intervened in the controversy. In an interview with the newspaper “O Globo,” the German ambassador to Brazil, Georg Witschel, said it was “complete nonsense” to say that Nazism was a leftist political movement. The diplomat said there was consensus among German and world historians that Hitler was leading a right-wing political movement.
The German Embassy in Brazil posted a video explaining the culture of remembrance over the Holocaust in Germany. The video said that Germans “don’t hide from their past,” adding that “from a young age they’re taught to confront the horrors of the Holocaust.” The post garnered some 776,000 views on the embassy’s Facebook page, not to mention a number of contentious comments.
According to Deutsche Welle, the official broadcaster of the German government, the video was met with unexpected hostility from many Brazilians. Some insisted that Adolf Hitler espoused a left-wing ideology, others sought to deny the Holocaust.
Many of these Brazilians were enraged by the assertion that the Nazi party was a right-wing movement, pointing to its official name, the National Socialist German Workers' Party, as evidence that it was leftist instead.
Other commenters questioned the validity of the Holocaust, where 6 million Jews lost their lives. Brazilian Holocaust deniers took to the post to label the Holocaust a “holofraud,” which prompted the German embassy to respond.
“The Holocaust is a historical fact, with proof and testimony that can be found in many parts of Europe,” the embassy wrote in response to one post.
Deutsche Welle added that “Another argument plays on the statist economic policies of the Nazi regime, but this was also a practice of standard right-wing regimes, such as Spain under Franco and Brazil’s own military dictatorship from 1964 to 1985.”
There is a big controversy when the Brazilian president and his foreign minister said that Nazism was left-wing, but Yad Vashem, the Jewish Virtual Library and the German Embassy in Brazil said that Nazism was right-wing. How to make sense from this controversy?
I like the perspective of Rev. Erwin W. Lutzer, who in his book “Hitler’s Cross: How the Cross of Christ was used to promote the Nazi agenda” (Moody Publishers, 1995), said that Nazism was an occult movement that used anti-Marxist propaganda.
In this sense, everything makes sense. For example, Ernesto Araújo has written a diplomatic essay praising “traditionalism” (conservatism). He said, “To try to understand Trump, you should read the traditionalist master René Guénon, a major influence on Steve Bannon, former chief strategist of the White House and still central in the movement that brought Trump to the presidency.”
For Araújo, all the conservative aspects of the Trump administration were a direct influence of Bannon, who was influenced by the Islamic occultist Guénon. For him, to praise the Trump administration is to praise Bannon and Guénon. Obviously, he is wrong, because the conservative aspects of the Trump administration are evangelical, not Guenonian.
So Araújo tried to credit to Guenonian Bannon the conservatism of the Trump administration.
The most prominent disciple of Guénon was Julius Evola, who advised Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini and Nazism.
Guénon and Evola are prominent references in Araújo’s diplomatic essay against Marxism and defending “traditionalism.”
So, if Nazism was left-wing, as advocated by Araújo, why did it have a prominent anti-Marxist occultist as its adviser?
Occultists provoke confusions and chaos wherever they are.
Araújo is an adherent of self-styled philosopher Olavo de Carvalho, a prominent adherent of Guénon. Even Bolsonaro has propagandized Carvalho as the greatest Brazilian right-winger, even though Carvalho has said that he is not left-winger or right-winger.
You could label Carvalho a left-winger, because many of his methods are clearly left-wing. He reviles his critics in an approach that he himself admits was firstly used by Lenin. He also accuses others of what he does. He lies as a genuine communist. To say that the Inquisition was a myth created by Jews and Protestants and that smoking does not harm are two of his many lies.
Another controversial side of Carvalho is that he is known for his anti-Protestant diatribes, but he chose self-exile as a Brazilian immigrant in the largest Protestant nation in the world. Not different from the hypocrisy of Brazilian socialists who slam the U.S. capitalism, but they choose to immigrate to the U.S.
Araújo became an adherent of Guénon and Evola as the direct influence of Carvalho, who for decades has promoted and recommended Guénon, even though after I have exposed Guénon as occultist, Carvalho has feigned to reject him.
Araújo’s traditionalism or anti-Marxism is not based on Christian principles. It is based on Guénon. And Nazism and fascism were advised by Evola, an anti-Marxist occultist who was a disciple of Guénon.
If Nazism was left-wing, it follows that Evola was too, that Guénon was too, and that Carvalho and Araújo are too.
What can Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro get by being advised by Araújo and Carvalho, whose anti-Marxism is not based on Christianity, but on Guénon?
I commend Bolsonaro for his visit to Israel. I have prayed for many years for Brazil to get aligned with Israel. This is the reason why I and millions of Brazilian evangelicals voted for him. Israel and evangelicals have everything to do with one another. This is the reason why Israeli Prime-Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, in his January visit to Brazil, “We have no better friends in the world than the Evangelical community, and the Evangelical community has no better friend in the world than the State of Israel.”
Despite that evangelicals massively voted for Bolsonaro, he has let Carvalho influence him. In his next visit to Israel, will Bolsonaro say that the Inquisition was a “myth” to please his Guenonian adviser?
What does Carvalho have to do with Israel? He is the most prominent advocate of the Inquisition in Brazil. He advocates its revisionism in the same way Holocaust deniers advocate revisionism. Both the Inquisition and the Holocaust tortured and killed Jews.
By accepting Guenonian advisers, Bolsonaro has put himself and Brazil in danger. The Brazilian right-wing trend of advocating the Inquisition has nothing to do with conservative evangelicals who elected Bolsonaro. This is the reason why I have been leading the evangelical effort to expose this trend.
If the Bolsonaro administration ends in disaster, evangelical voters cannot be blamed. But I fear that future historians will blame evangelicals, who love Israel, and forget about Carvalho, who loves the Inquisition.
After all, how many do historians today remember that Nazism and fascism were influenced by anti-Marxist Guenonian Evola? How many will future historians remember that Bolsonaro was influenced by anti-Marxist Guenonian Carvalho?
By seeing the word “socialism” in Nazism, and seeing Brazilian right-wingers labeling Nazism socialism, I believed it too in the past. But when I saw later the same Brazilian right-wingers vigorously defending the Inquisition, I began to ask: What is behind this movement? The answer I found: Occultism.
Occultism and anti-Marxism are a strange combination, but it has been used before — by René Guénon.
Occultism always provokes confusion and chaos. The same occultism that was behind Nazism is today behind Carvalho, Araújo and other Guenonians hijacking the Bolsonaro administration. They love the Inquisition and are opportunists in the Bolsonaro administration. I use the word “opportunist” because it was this term Trump used against Bannon when he fired him.
We evangelicals love Israel and we hate the Inquisition, the Holocaust, occultism and Marxism. We voted for Bolsonaro for him to support Israel and move the Brazilian Embassy to Jerusalem, not for him to make Guenonians great again.
Since Evola with Mussolini, this is the first time Guenonians have a chance to influence a government again.
Evangelicals, who love Israel, need to pray and watch, because anti-Marxist “traditionalist” occultism is preying again on unsuspecting conservatives. Perhaps Bolsonaro is one of its victims, but certainly he has been its main enabler in Brazil.
With information from Jerusalem Post, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Deutsche Welle, Yad Vashem, Reuters, New York Times and Globo.
Recommended Reading:
Recommended Reading about the Inquisition: