Showing posts with label capitalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label capitalism. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 16, 2021

Capitalist South Korea and socialist Argentina legalized abortion in the late 2020, but only one of these nations got special focus from right-wingers

 

Capitalist South Korea and socialist Argentina legalized abortion in the late 2020, but only one of these nations got special focus from right-wingers

By Julio Severo

Most right-wingers make appear that abortion is an ideology exclusively connected to socialism. So when Argentina, a socialist nation in South America, legalized abortion in the late 2020, no one of them was surprised and all of them condemned socialism in Argentina for sacrificing their babies on the altar of feminism. The condemnation was absolute.



Yet, when South Korea in Asia legalized abortion in the late 2020, there was no special focus. There was condemnation, but it was small in comparison to the Argentinian tragedy. After all, right-wingers know that South Korea has been for decades embracing comprehensive capitalism and battling the communist threat from North Korea.

Why did not right-wingers condemn massively, as they did in the Argentinian case, abortion legalization in South Korea?

Argentina is known by its socialism and rampant poverty. In contrast, South Korea is known by its capitalism and rampant prosperity.

Regardless if a socialist or capitalist nation is legalizing abortion, conservative Christians should not follow right-wingers who target and politicize abortion in socialist nations, but “forget” abortion in capitalist nations.

In fact, the abortion radicalism in North Korea is not different from abortion in the United States, the most capitalist nation in the world. Both the communist nation and the capitalist superpower are known by imposing abortion on babies during every month of pregnancy.

South Korea was known by its strong Christian and anti-communist stances. But after abortion, South Korea will have a hard time to defend both stances.

If it is a shame for a socialist nation to legalize abortion, what is it when a capitalist Christian nation does it?

Portuguese version of this article: Coreia do Sul capitalista e Argentina socialista legalizaram o aborto no final de 2020, mas apenas uma dessas nações recebeu atenção especial dos direitistas

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Who Will Blame America for Genocide?

Who Cares About Babies’ Lives?

Far-Leftist Female Pastor Says Christmas Is about a Woman Leading a Feminist Revolution

Lesbian Minister Becomes President of National Abortion Federation

Protestant Church Founded by George Washington Rejects Him and Embraces Feminism and Liberation Theology

Lesbian who murdered her former lover’s daughter, 2, and attempted to kill her son, 10, left a note explaining she was inspired to do it by a sermon in a homosexual church

Two Brazilian lesbians stab a boy one year after cutting off his sex organ to make him a “girl,” but the press and psychologists refuse to link the crime to homosexual behavior

First case of criminal activity in space: Lesbian astronaut is accused of accessing the bank account of her estranged lesbian “wife” from the International Space Station during their messy divorce

Number of legal abortions rises in the Israeli Army as coexistence of male and female soldiers has increased their sexual activity

Disney Threatens to Boycott Georgia Over Abortion Ban

Abortion, the Inquisition and Revisionism in the Encyclopedia Britannica

Pope Francis compares abortion to “hiring a hitman” and he says it can never be condoned

Trump suggests pro-lifers have gone too far in Alabama with near-total abortion ban as he says he is pro-life but believes in abortion for babies conceived in rape and incest

Conservative televangelist Pat Robertson says Alabama “has gone too far” in its “extreme” anti-abortion law because it does not include capital punishment for babies conceived in rape and incest

Everyone Should Remember the Holocaust

Leading Causes of Death in the United States, and Gun Homicides Are Not One of Them

Anti-Baby Vegans Preach It’s Morally Wrong for People to Have Babies and Revile Those Who Disagree with Them

The folly of man’s planning

Exposing the Global Population Control Agenda

Anthony Comstock: the first pro-life activist in the modern history

Blood in the Rivers: the Contraceptive Culture and Prophecies in Revelation

Trump Has Broken His Promise of Defunding the American Abortion Holocaust

Abortion in Israel: Why Is There No Public Outcry from Pro-Life Christians?

Holocaust, Abortion and Sodomy

Tom Parker: the Biggest Threat to Abortion in this Generation, According to Pro-Abortion Critic

Friday, October 16, 2020

George Soros Funds Jesuit Organizations

 

George Soros Funds Jesuit Organizations

By Julio Severo

“In the past four years, Jesuit institutions have received at least $1.7 million in donations from the Open Society Foundations (OSF) that are funded by plutocrat George Soros,” said Catholic website ChurchMilitant.


Its report, titled “Billionaire Atheist Funnels Cash to Jesuits,” also said,

“By examining documents recorded on the internet, it's evident that the Jesuits' biggest recipient of Soros’ largesse is the U.S.-based Jesuit Worldwide Learning. In 2016, the organization received $890,000, while, in 2018, it garnered another $410,000. This was the only one of the three Jesuit institutions to recognize the Soros Foundations as a ‘partner.’”

To be a partner of George Soros is a great tragedy, because Soros is a left-wing billionaire engaged in multiple Marxist revolutions around the world. Even though his organizations were expelled from Russia, he and especially his money have been welcomed among Jesuits. The Church Militant said,

“In 2018, Jesuit Refugee Service received $176,452 in support of migrants from Latin America and the Caribbean region. For its part, Jesuit Service to Migrants (Servicio Jesuita a Migrantes) received $75,000 in 2016 and another $151,125 in 2018, according to ACI Prensa.”

It is no wonder that Soros is funding Catholic Jesuit organizations that help immigrants from Latin America. Most of these immigrants are Catholic, and Catholic Latin America is the cradle of Liberation Theology. In a way or another, Latin American Catholics support several items of Liberation Theology. So to import such immigrants is to help socialism in America.

Yet, Church Militant seems to be surprised that Catholic groups are helping Soros and socialism. There should be no surprise. Brazil, the largest Catholic nation in the world, has a massive presence of Liberation Theology in the Catholic Church.

Besides, Catholic support for Marxist ideas is not a new thing and has been a reality since the late 1800s.

The current pope, Francis, is a supporter of socialist ideas. Even though I support the pro-life stances of Francis, his stances against conservative Christians fighting the gay activism are horrible. But even “Catholic” right-wingers who want to overthrow the pope because of socialism have suspicious stances on homosexuality.

While the left-wing pope seems to appreciate left-wing homosexuals, suspicious Catholic right-wingers seem to appreciate right-wing homosexuals, not perceiving that both stances are wrong because regardless their political ideological preferences, any individual practicing or defending homosexuality is disqualified by the Christian standards.

The homosexual issue has left left-wing Catholics and right-wing Catholics in a state of confusion.

The left-wing pope is a Jesuit who works against capitalism. But this is not the first time Jesuits work against capitalism.

In the early 1600s, Dutch Protestants colonized Northeast Brazil, where they formed the first society with religious tolerance in Brazil. Under their rule, the Jews built the first synagogue in the Americas. The Dutch Protestants built what Brazil had not: Massive theaters, bridges and many other buildings that, after four centuries, remain today.

The Northeast Brazil, traditionally poor, never had so beautiful and stately buildings. Under Dutch rule, this was also the first capitalist society in Brazil.

In the Dutch colony, Jews and Protestants were protected from the Inquisition, which was active in other parts of Brazil, persecuting, torturing and killing Jews.

Yet, Jesuits poisoned the minds of Portuguese Catholics throughout Brazil, portraying the Dutch Protestant settlers as dangerous “heretics” who should be destroyed. After several battles, the Jesuits won and the Dutch had to leave Brazil. As the Jews would be persecuted by the Inquisition if they remained in Northeast Brazil, they chose to follow the Dutch and moved to New York, which belonged to the Dutch in that time.

The first banking system in New York was established by these Brazilian Jews under protection of Dutch Protestant capitalists.

So Jesuits expelled Dutch Protestants, Jews and Dutch capitalism and its progress. And the label “heretic” was so strong against Dutch capitalist Protestants that some Brazilian school books of the 1970s still recorded Dutch as heretic invaders.

Because of the Jews and Dutch Protestant capitalists in Northeast, Brazil could have become a capitalist power, but the Jesuits “saved” Brazil from such capitalist destiny and instead let New York occupy the post of capitalist power.

So Brazil, instigated by Jesuits, has in its history the horrible stain of rejecting and fighting against capitalism.

If Jesuits four centuries ago were persecuting capitalists, why are Catholics today surprised that Jesuits are partners of Soros?

It is not surprise also that Jesuits have a history of persecuting Protestants, who are historically more capitalist. The Catholic Encyclopedia by Charles G. Herbermann (1914 edition) says,

“As the object of the [Jesuit] society was the propagation and strengthening of the Catholic faith everywhere, the Jesuits naturally endeavored to counteract the spread of Protestantism. They became the main instruments of the Counter-Reformation.”

The Counter-Reformation was very successful in Brazil, where Jesuits destroyed the presence of Dutch capitalist Protestants and Jews and established again the Inquisition and total religious intolerance to protect their Catholic non-capitalist non-progress.

What are Jesuits doing today that is different from what Jesuits did in the past? The same Jesuits who were anti-capitalist troublemakers in the past continue committed to their old mission. The traditional anti-capitalist spirit of the Jesuits naturally led to Jesuit support of socialism. In this sense, Pope Francis is not to blame for being a socialist pope who attacks capitalism. After all, he is a Jesuit.

So if in the past Jesuits were persecuting and expelling capitalists and today they are helping George Soros and other socialists, why should any conservative Christian be appalled?

Portuguese version of this article: George Soros financia organizações jesuítas

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Left-Wing Billionaire George Soros and His Plan of Global Chaos

Immigration: A Weapon of Mass Cultural Destruction in Liberal Hands

Pope Francis compares abortion to “hiring a hitman” and he says it can never be condoned

Pope Compares Politicians Opposed to Gays, Jews To Hitler

The Hijacking of Homosexuality by the Right, a Challenge for Christians

In his effort to produce a film exposing homosexuality in the Vatican to make Pope Francis renounce, Steve Bannon caused backlash from conservative Catholic leaders and was exposed for his own involvement with two notorious pedophiles

The Religious War between CIA and KGB in Latin America

End of communism not good for Catholicism?

Wednesday, October 07, 2020

The Hijacking of Homosexuality by the Right, a Challenge for Christians

 

The Hijacking of Homosexuality by the Right, a Challenge for Christians

By Julio Severo

The right has been preaching that homosexuals and their demands have been hijacked by the left. This preaching generally includes the idea that any restriction or condemnation of homosexuality is of a communist nature and that all homosexual freedom is the fruit of American capitalism.

Homosexual Milo Yiannopoulos, invited as keynote speaker for CPAC in 2017

While this idea appeals to nominal Christians longing for a right that confronts socialism, such preaching is at least misleading.

If any restriction or condemnation of homosexuality is of a communist nature, then is God, who in the Bible condemns homosexuality in the strongest terms, a communist?

The idea that capitalism is synonymous with homosexual freedom is not an honest one, unless only capitalism without Christian values is taken into account. Actually, capitalism without Christian values is China’s greatest strength and economic partner, the largest communist nation in the world.

The largest capitalist nation in the world is the U.S. But the freedom and debauchery that homosexuals have in the United States today was not due to the original American capitalism of Protestant values. It was due to a capitalism without Christian values, which gave excessive freedom to the furious and aggressive actions of homosexual groups aided by leftists.

The U.S. is famous for being the largest Protestant and conservative country in the world. Within this reality, U.S. laws have always criminally condemned sodomy (homosexuality). These laws were only abolished under pressure from homosexualist groups in the 1990s by a majority of Catholic judges in the U.S. Supreme Court.

So the freedom and debauchery of homosexuals today in the United States is not the result of capitalism of Christian values. It is the result of the efforts of leftists and homosexualist groups, which seek to advance to many other aberrations. They use the system of capitalism without Christian values, which favors everything and everyone, including Chinese Communists and Sunni Muslims.

China has so much economic prosperity that Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, when he visited it during the anniversary of the communist revolution, declared: “I am in a capitalist nation.”

Saudi Arabia has modern buildings and is the largest buyer of U.S. arms.

However, capitalist progress has not improved the savage ethics of Chinese Communists and Saudi Muslims. They remain as violent and undemocratic as before, because the capitalism that has brought them progress is capitalism without Christian values.

It is the adherents of this capitalism without Christian values that are promoting the idea that homosexuals can be conservative and even Christian. To some extent, they are right: If Chinese Communists and Saudi Muslims can be capitalists, why can’t gay activists be conservative and Christian?

U.S. capitalism without Christian values has made communist China and Saudi Arabia great. And that same capitalist mindset without Christian values can also make “conservative homosexuality” great.

CPAC (Conservative Political Action Conference) held its first conference in Brazil in 2019, where Eduardo Bolsonaro held prominently the gay flag in support of “conservative homosexuality.” Who can blame him? For its 2017 event, CPAC invited as its key note speaker Milo Yiannopoulos, the most prominent “conservative” gay in the United States, in a big effort to make “conservative homosexuality” great. Yet, the scandal of a video of Yiannopoulos defending homosexual pedophilia eventually knocked down him and his conservative homosexual greatness.

Did CPAC learn some lesson? By no means. For its 2018 event, CPAC banned a pro-family group and approved a homosexualist group. So it is no wonder that Eduardo Bolsonaro, a fervent adherent of occultist Olavo de Carvalho, held the gay flag in the first CAPC event in Brazil.

CAPC, which is considered the most prominent “conservative” conference in the world, is already hijacking homosexuality and leading the very bad example that conservatives around the world should also hijack homosexuality for the sake of the right-wing ideology.

Therefore, Christians should be wary of a pro-homosexual right, especially if it appears in Christian language that homosexuals can be as good Christians and conservatives as anyone else. As far as I know, occultists are behind this idea, and occultism and homosexuality have always gone together, publicly or not.

Steve Bannon, who is considered an important right-wing voice, has no stances on homosexuality that conservative Christians have, even though he claims to be a Catholic. Likewise, Bannon’s Brazilian counterpart, Olavo de Carvalho, does not have the same stances on homosexual behavior as conservative Christians do, although he also presents himself as a Catholic. In fact, one of the biggest influences in Carvalho’s life was a former homosexual prisoner with AIDS. Both Bannon and Carvalho, who were influenced by Islamic occultist René Guénon, support “conservative” homosexual behavior.

Homosexual ideology and leftist ideology are fully compatible with each other, because of their rebellion against God. So, to say that homosexuals and their ideologies were hijacked by the left is at least a fraudulent and occult strategy. What is quite obvious is that the right, to the detriment of its conservative Christian supporters, is trying at all costs to hijack homosexuality for the sake of the right-wing agenda. This hijacking is already taking place among U.S. right-wingers, in the Republican Party itself. In Israel, the right has also hijacked the gay agenda.

The right-wing hijacking has the sole purpose of using and exploiting homosexuals politically to advance the right. It is a cheap imitation of what the left has done for a long time.

Such hijacking will eventually lead right-wing hijackers to accuse American evangelicals of “communists” for their effort to fight laws that have been tampered with to support homosexual sin and also because throughout American history they have managed to maintain laws against sodomy.

It is not known whether Sodom was right-wing or left-wing. In fact, the terms “right-wing” and “left-wing” do not exist in the Bible. It is only known that the inhabitants of Sodom had the same sexual practices that today leftist and rightist homosexuals have.

I just hope that the right that is seeking to hijack homosexuality for the sake of the rightist agenda, including through the accusation that restriction or condemnation of homosexuality is synonymous with communism, eventually does not condemn God as “communist” for having destroyed Sodom because of homosexual sin.

Portuguese version of this article: O aparelhamento direitista da homossexualidade, um desafio para os cristãos

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Steve Bannon and his views on homosexuality

Olavo de Carvalho was influenced by a former homosexual prisoner with AIDS

How can evangelical leaders criticize homosexual activism in the Trump administration if they are involved in sex scandals?

Benjamin Netanyahu, Right-Wing Jews and the Gay Agenda in Israel

Largest U.S. Gay Magazine Furious Over Evangelical Protest Against U.S. Government Effort to Decriminalize Homosexuality Around the World

Pedophilia Advocacy Knocks Down Prominent “Conservative” Gay

Top U.S. conservative conference bans pro-family Christian group and approves homosexualist group

Monday, February 10, 2020

Mike Pompeo: Chinese Communism is “the Central Threat of Our Times”


Mike Pompeo: Chinese Communism is “the Central Threat of Our Times”

By Julio Severo
U.S. State Secretary Mike Pompeo has rightly said that Chinese Communism is “the central threat of our times.” He had such conclusion after he saw that China is using capitalism to infiltrate the federal, state and local governments in the United States.
Pompeo said in a speech to the National Governors Association in Washington on February 8, 2020 that China is pursuing a policy of exploiting U.S. freedoms to “gain advantage over us at the federal level, the state level and the local level.” His language was strong: “The Chinese Communist Party presents the central threat of our times.”
His comments contrast with President Donald Trump’s more conciliatory language on China. On January, Trump called Chinese President Xi Jinping a “very, very good friend of mine” and said he planned to visit China in the not-too-distant future. He also visited China in 2017, in the first year of his administration. Trump also congratulated China’s communist revolution that killed millions of innocent Chinese.
To see a threat before its dangers are materialized is vision. To see a threat only after all its dangers are materialized is a lack of vision. Even though Pompeo’s assessment is correct, it fits the latter.
Not seeing the threat of Chinese communism, for decades administration after administration in the U.S., Democrats and Republicans, left-wingers and right-wingers, in a lesser or greater degree, gave China special commercial privileges, which helped thousands of U.S. companies to move to China, where labor is cheap.
The truth is that the U.S. used and abused Chinese labor for its own profits. In return, the Communist Party in China took advantage by profiting from these U.S. companies and Chinese labor to build the biggest communist army in the world. The U.S. government and its companies never cared about slave labor and persecution against Christians in China.
If the U.S. can use — and it really used — communist China for profit, why could not China use the U.S. capitalism for ideological profits?
Capitalism is not a moral tool. It can be a moral tool only if its handlers are moral people. There was a time in America, which is the largest Protestant and capitalist nation in the world, when capitalism and Protestant values walked hand in hand. Later, they divorced, and now the U.S. capitalism is at the mercy and whims of its materialistic, non-Protestant handlers, who do not care about the past marriage of capitalism and Protestantism in the U.S. history.
So, the U.S. handlers, without the original Protestant values, use and abuse capitalism any way they see fit. And China, with its communist values, also uses and abuses capitalism any way it sees fit. But the U.S. is not pleased with this.
Capitalism is sheer materialism. Conservative Protestantism is spiritual vision. Both the U.S. and China want capitalism, but no Protestantism leading capitalism.
For a lack of vision, in the 1970s the U.S. had the idea to turn China in a capitalist power to defeat the Soviet Union. The plan was successful: China actually became a capitalist power recognized by all. Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, when visiting China in the 70th commemoration of its communist revolution, said, “I’m in a Capitalist Nation.”
China is a “Capitalist Nation Made in America” — made in an America that divorced capitalism from Protestantism.
The geopolitical plan of the U.S. was successful by turning China into a capitalist nation to defeat the Soviet Union. The problem is that the Soviet Union died in 1989, Russia has returned to its Christian Orthodox roots, and China has replaced the Soviet Union as “the central threat of our times.” That is, the U.S. plan in the end backfired miserably, because it had a materialist vision, but no Christian, no spiritual, no conservative Protestant vision.
China is not the first example of the U.S. funding communism. The birth of the Soviet Union was funded by American bankers, as discussed by Antony C. Sutton in his 1974 classical book “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution: The Remarkable True Story of the American Capitalists Who Financed the Russian Communists.”
Later, U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt greatly helped the Soviet war machine by giving military equipment and even food to the starving Soviet soldiers during the World War 2, according to General William T. Still in his book “New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies.” Roosevelt’s plan generously gave Eastern Europe and Eastern Germany to Stalin.
No one helped, equipped, funded and fed the Soviet Union more than the U.S. government and U.S. capitalists did.
These are not the first U.S. plans to fail for lacking spiritual vision and prioritizing materialistic goals. To defeat the Soviet Union, the CIA trained its Saudi agent Osama bin Laden in the 1970s and gave him billions of dollars to found and fund al-Qaida. In the end, the Soviet Union died, and al-Qaida and bin Laden became the central threat to the U.S. The U.S. plan backfired.
The U.S. invested heavily in al-Qaida and did not perceive that such investment would be counterproductive. In fact, the U.S. has massively, especially in military terms, invested in Saudi Arabia, and what have Americans received? Saudi terrorists becoming the authors of the largest terrorist attack on U.S. soil in 9/11.
In 2011, to fulfill the U.S. plan to oust the Syrian president, the U.S. government and Saudi Arabia funded and armed Syrian rebels and ISIS. Thousands and thousands of Christians were martyred. In the end, the U.S. had to fight ISIS because, again, the solution became worse than the alleged problem. The U.S. plan backfired.
Even though the U.S. has many military bases in the Middle East, the Christian communities being martyred by ISIS received no help from the U.S. military forces, which were too busy protecting Saudi Arabia and its interests.
In spite of the hard lessons the U.S. was supposed to have learned — the spiritual, Christian, conservative Protestant vision is more important than materialistic plans —, the U.S. insists on seeing Saudi Arabia today in the same way it saw China in the past.
Does it take a big vision to see that the U.S. is creating another threatening monster? The hard lesson not learned is that the U.S. will only see the threat when it is too late.
By now, the U.S. government should be asking itself: “Why have our political and military plans backfired for decades?” The U.S. Founders, who read and valued the Bible, would have some helpful answers. For example, they would say, “Why spend trillions of dollars to maintain over 800 U.S. military bases around the world if our own borders have decrepit protection?”
So instead of saying that the Chinese Communism is “the central threat of our times,” Mike Pompeo should have said, “The U.S. made the Chinese communism the central threat of our times.”
There is a saying that the wise man learns from others’ wrongs. I have learned a lot from the current U.S. wrongs, even though I have learned many more positive lessons from the Protestant U.S. history.
The spiritual, Christian, conservative Protestant view that guided the U.S. Founders is hugely lacking in today’s U.S. domestic and foreign policy. Pompeo, who is an evangelical just as I am, should know it better than I do. He knows the Bible. In fact, on February 9, 2020 he tweeted a Bible verse on his personal Twitter account:
“Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength.” Deuteronomy 6:5
Is not this lack of vision? How can an evangelical love the Lord with all his heart, soul and strength and at the same time celebrate sodomy, which God calls abomination? God says in his Word:
“You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22 ESV)
How can an evangelical with such mixed loyalties have a good vision to address political, geopolitical and military issues without the U.S. historical failures with the Soviet Union, China, Saudi Arabia, al-Qaida, ISIS and Osama bin Laden?
How can God bless a nation where even evangelicals in high government offices bless an abomination?
It is not only China that is exploiting U.S. freedoms to “gain advantage at the federal level, the state level and the local level.” Saudi Arabia has been doing it for decades for the sake of Islamic expansionism. The abortion industry has been doing it for decades profiting billions from the blood of unborn babies. The homosexual movement has been doing it for decades too in its aggressive predatory campaign against families and their children.
As an evangelical, Pompeo was supposed to have a larger vision for large problems.
The Chinese communism is the central threat of our times.
Legal abortion is the central threat of our times.
The homosexual agenda is the central threat of our times.
Islam is the central threat of our times.
To expose one threat and celebrate other two is not a Christian vision, for a normal Christian or a Christian in a high-profile government post.
With information from DailyMail and the Associated Press.
Recommended Reading on Mike Pompeo:
Recommended Reading on China:

Thursday, May 10, 2018

I understand Facebook’s censorship


I understand Facebook’s censorship

Julio Severo
Facebook’s systematic censorship of Christians makes it look like a communist platform owned by some Cuban or an Islamic platform owned by Saudi wealthy dictators. It does not appear even to be a U.S. service.
Although it is 100 percent American, Facebook follows the will of its owner, an American of Jewish extraction who likes the Left.
He does not like the use of his social media to promote conservative ideas.
If we conservatives had a large social media, would we give free space to leftist ideas and the promotion of disgusting figures like Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, Hugo Chavez, Nicolas Maduro and Islamic dictators? Of course not. Our attempt to stop the spread of evil would be labeled “censorship” by left-wingers.
The owner of Facebook, with his leftist vision, is disgusted with conservative ideas. He condemns what he dislikes, and bars in his space the spread of “evil,” which to him are conservative views.
In his left-wing morality, he is right to censor “evil.” And in our conservative morality, we are right to censor the true evil — leftism.
What would be right for each group was that left-wingers had a leftist Facebook and conservatives had their own social media.
Disgraceful news: leftists already have their own Facebook, which is the largest social media, and we conservatives have nothing of the sort. So we occupy their spaces. This is the sad reality.
Unfortunately, all the major social networking services — Google, Facebook and Twitter — and all the big companies we conservatives need to access the internet — Microsoft, Apple, etc. — are of a leftist nature.
The largest capitalist country in the world, the United States, after divorcing capitalism from its old Protestant values, lends itself to serving any ideology that is profitable to it, be it leftism, Islam, or any other lucrative “ism.”
And we conservative Christians have to use all the leftist services and companies that are profitable for American capitalism.
If the marriage of communism to capitalism in China is disgusting, it is even more disgusting the American case where capitalism divorced itself from Protestantism and it has married any ideology making it profitable. American capitalism has become a great prostitute at the service of dangerous clients.
The most important struggle would be to return Protestant values to American capitalism.
But do we have time for this, given Jesus’s urgent call, which is to preach the Gospel, heal the sick and cast out demons among sinners, including socialists, Muslims, atheists, capitalists, Buddhists, witches and even nominal Christians who, realizing it or not, serve to Satan?
We are instructed in the Bible to preach in season and out of season, which can be translated into preaching Jesus Christ on Facebook, Twitter, Google and beyond, whether there is censorship or not, whether there is persecution or not.
The larger mission cannot be forgotten. If leftists do not forget their mission, how can we forget ours?
Portuguese version of this article: Entendo a censura do Facebook
Recommended Reading: