“God cannot bless sin,” said Pope Francis regarding LGBT unions receiving “blessings” from Christians. But he is criticized by LGBT singer Elton John because the Vatican invested in his LGBT movie

By Julio Severo

While Pope Francis was praised by the United Nations for voicing support for legal civil unions in 2020, he signed a Vatican document released March 15, 2021, decreeing the Catholic Church cannot bless same-sex unions because God “cannot bless sin.”

The document said Catholic clergy should treat gay people with “respect and sensitivity” but ruled that blessing their unions would “approve and encourage a choice and a way of life that cannot be recognized as objectively ordered to the revealed plans of God.”

Francis hasn’t always been as clear on the issue. In 2020, he backed civil union and he said “homosexual people have the right to be in a family… they are children of God.”

There are two problems in these stances. To have a “right” to be a family can be easily interpreted as homosexuals having a legal right to marry and adopt. The second problem is obvious: only people who accept Jesus as their Savior are children of God. All the other people are God’s creatures.

Yet, it is not just I, a Brazilian evangelical, who have disagreements with Francis and his strange stances. The homosexual singer Elton John condemned the pope for ruling that same-sex unions cannot be blessed by the Catholic Church, accusing the Vatican of hypocrisy because the Vatican itself invested in his biographical movie “Rocketman,” which was co-produced by his homosexual husband David Furnish.

“How can the Vatican refuse to bless gay marriages,” asked the 73-year-old homosexual singer, “yet happily make a profit from investing millions in Rocketman — a film which celebrates my finding happiness from my marriage to David?”

The Italian media reported in 2019 that around one million euros (£860,000) of Vatican funds had been invested in the film.

The Rocketman film led to political controversy in 2019 when its gay sex scenes were “censored” by Russia and Elton slammed the Russian government for not letting the Russian public to see gay sex.

Many could argue that the Vatican under Pope Francis invested in a movie of the homosexual singer Elton John because Francis is a progressive. But Rush Limbaugh, considered the iconic leader of American conservatism by many U.S. conservatives, also invested in Elton. When Limbaugh had one of his remarriages, he invited Elton to sing for his wedding. He paid US$1 million dollars to Elton.

Since Elton John is a bold propagandist of his homosexual lifestyle, both Limbaugh and the Vatican invested in the propaganda of this lifestyle. Both gave 1 million dollars to John. They gave such huge amount to homosexual propaganda.

If God cannot bless sin, why did the Vatican give 1 million dollars to a homosexual movie?

If God cannot bless sin, why did conservative Rush Limbaugh give 1 million dollars to a homosexual singer?

It is actually a sin that God does not bless, but it has been financially blessed by the progressive Vatican and the U.S. conservatism.

With information from DailyMail and WND.

Portuguese version of this article: “Deus não pode abençoar o pecado,” disse o Papa Francisco sobre uniões LGBT recebendo “bênçãos” dos cristãos. Mas ele é criticado pelo cantor LGBT Elton John porque o Vaticano investiu em seu filme LGBT

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Marriage or Not Marriage for Catholic Priests and Gays? Here Is the Question the Pope Can Answer about Gays, But Not About Priests

United Nations praises the Pope for backing same-sex unions: secretary-general of the U.N. welcomes Francis’s remarks that homosexuals “have a right to a family” in move which has enraged conservative Catholics

Francis became 1st pope to endorse same-sex civil unions, saying: “Homosexuals are children of God and have the right to be in a family”

Pope Compares Politicians Opposed to Gays, Jews To Hitler

In his effort to produce a film exposing homosexuality in the Vatican to make Pope Francis renounce, Steve Bannon caused backlash from conservative Catholic leaders and was exposed for his own involvement with two notorious pedophiles

The Hijacking of Homosexuality by the Right, a Challenge for Christians

Spotlight: Exposing Pedophilia Scandals and Hiding Homosexual Scandals in the Catholic Church

Brazilian LGBT leader Luiz Mott saved Catholic Church from suffering mega pedophilia scandal

CPAC is not Church and Church is not CPAC

Winning or Losing? The War, or ex-War, against Predatory Homosexuality and Its Profane “Marriage”

 

Winning or Losing? The War, or ex-War, against Predatory Homosexuality and Its Profane “Marriage”

By Julio Severo

In the 1990s, when I wrote my book “O Movimento Homossexual” (The Homosexual Movement), originally published by the Brazilian branch of Bethany House Publishers in 1998, there was a consensus among conservative evangelicals and other conservatives that homosexuality was a threat to health, children, families and society.

The Family Research Council and Focus on the Family, then chaired by Dr. James Dobson, were leaders in the fight against predatory homosexuality. These organizations warned that homosexual activists wanted the legalization of gay “marriage.”

The fight of Focus on the Family against predatory homosexuality and its profane marriage was effectively neutralized when Dobson was unfairly removed from his leadership.

From 2009 to 2016, the United States was ruled by the Protestant-Muslim hybrid Barack Hussein Obama, and it was exactly under this radical socialist that gay “marriage” was legalized. Activists and pro-family groups protested, but to no avail.

In 2017 Donald Trump came with promises of change, and it’s no wonder that his biggest voters were evangelicals, who hoped that Trump would reverse all of Obama’s anti-family and abortion policies. Although Trump did a good job of reversing some abortion policies, mysteriously, he left gay “marriage” intact. With Trump’s support for gay “marriage,” the vast majority of evangelical pro-family organizations stopped attacking this kind of profane marriage. Effectively, Trump neutralized the evangelical opposition to gay “marriage.”

However, Trump did not restrict his betrayal just by supporting profane “marriage.” He launched a global campaign to legalize homosexuality worldwide. But instead of denouncing this betrayal, the Family Research Council, led by Tony Perkins, appealed for denial, not believing that this campaign was authored by Trump. Perkins tried to blame others, but in the end, according to the Republican Party’s official statement, it was Trump himself who launched the international homosexual campaign. Disclaiming Perkins, Republican Richard Grenell confirmed that Trump was the author of the homosexual campaign around the world.

Despite the many evangelical prophecies guaranteeing Trump’s re-election, he lost. And who can guarantee that the cause was not homosexuality? God is under no obligation to elect those who promote abominations, and homosexuality is one of the greatest abominations.

Sodomy destroyed not only Sodom, a region in Israel thousands of years ago. It destroyed also Trump’s reelection.

Today, the U.S. president is the radical socialist Joe Biden, who also believes in the propaganda of predatory homosexuality. The problem is that how will evangelicals, who fought Obama’s homosexual campaigns so well, manage to fight Biden’s homosexual campaigns if during the Trump administration they remained silent while Trump promoted the same homosexual campaigns worldwide?

Obama and Biden have sinned and sin in promoting abortion and predatory homosexuality. Although Trump has not sinned to some extent in promoting abortion, he has sinned in promoting predatory homosexuality. During his rule, he did not condemn homosexual “marriage” once. On the contrary, he praised this kind of marriage, which is an abomination in the eyes of God.

In the U.S., the left and the right are, to a greater or lesser extent, promoting predatory homosexuality. If evangelicals follow this trend, and follow socialists and right-wingers, the Bible will lose its value to them, as it is the very Word of God that states categorically:

“You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22 ESV)

For the first time in U.S. history, left and right come together to promote what God sees as abominable.

It is impossible for a nation to last a long time by affronting God. The only real resistance to predatory homosexuality and its profane homosexual “marriage” are conservative Christians.

To a greater or lesser extent, left and right have become allies of the homosexual revolution.

The life of unborn babies is sacred and deserves total protection. Likewise, the marriage between a man and a woman is sacred and deserves total protection. Divorce should be criminalized. If when a man buys a house or car and breaks his contract, the law punishes him. Why is there no punishment when someone breaks the marriage contract, which is the most important contract in this life?

When marriage is violated, either through divorce or contraception, it becomes much easier to assault and destroy the life of unborn babies through abortion.

God created marriage as sacred and created his most sacred creation — unborn babies — to be generated in marriage.

The legal and social desacralization of marriage inevitably leads to the legal and social desacralization of the life of unborn babies and the legal and social sacralization of sodomy and abortion — which is what is already happening: sodomy and abortion have been treated as sacred today. Therefore, the homosexual war to legalize its counterfeit and profane marriage is a war against the marriage that God created. It is a war against the legal and social sacralization of marriage and its fruits.

The answer is neither on the left nor on the right. Only conservative Christians will be able to proclaim to society that marriage and its fruits are sacred and that contraception and abortion are the greatest threats to the legal and social sacralization of marriage and unborn babies.

Portuguese version of this article: Ganhando or Perdendo? A Guerra, ou ex-Guerra, contra a Homossexualidade Predatória e Seu “Casamento” Profano

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Who Cares About Babies’ Lives?

Blood in the Rivers: the Contraceptive Culture and Prophecies in Revelation

The Hijacking of Homosexuality by the Right, a Challenge for Christians

Steve Bannon and his views on homosexuality

Olavo de Carvalho was influenced by a former homosexual prisoner with AIDS

How can evangelical leaders criticize homosexual activism in the Trump administration if they are involved in sex scandals?

Benjamin Netanyahu, Right-Wing Jews and the Gay Agenda in Israel

Largest U.S. Gay Magazine Furious Over Evangelical Protest Against U.S. Government Effort to Decriminalize Homosexuality Around the World

Pedophilia Advocacy Knocks Down Prominent “Conservative” Gay

Top U.S. conservative conference bans pro-family Christian group and approves homosexualist group

 

Marriage or Not Marriage for Catholic Priests and Gays? Here Is the Question the Pope Can Answer about Gays, But Not About Priests

By Julio Severo

The Catholic Church is facing a major challenge as Pope Francis has suggested approval for homosexual civil unions. The United Nations, under the leadership of left-wing Catholic Antonio Guterres, praised the pope’s stance on such unions.

Yet, while the Catholic Church under Francis is advancing to make easy a kind of gay “marriage” there is no sign to make easy marriage for priests, bishops, cardinals and popes.

It is so wrong to approve marriage to gays as it is wrong to forbid Christian male leaders to marry women.

The Catholic Church has committed a very big sin against God by forbidding marriage for their priests, bishops, cardinals and popes. They should marry, because this is God’s first commandment to man.

The Apostle Paul warned us:

“Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who forbid marriage…” (1 Timothy 4:1-3 ESV)

So Paul said that one of the signs of people departing from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons is exactly by forbidding marriage. The Catholic ban on marriage for its leaders perfectly fits this.

It is abnormal for a large number of men to remain single solely by religious votes. God never commanded such extreme sacrifice. Pagan religions do it, with disastrous consequences — the same consequences we see in the Catholic Church.

It is normal, and commanded by God, for men to marry to women. In a few cases, some will not marry. But this is very, very rare and should never be imposed as a Christian doctrine.

To forbid marriage draws “naturally” men to unnatural problems. So when a Christian church demands abnormal things from men, what should it expect? Normalcy?

The traditional Catholic ban on gay “marriage” is approved by the Bible. In contrast, the traditional Catholic ban on marriage for priests, bishops, cardinals and popes is not approved by the Bible — unless they are homosexuals.

 The Apostle Paul, who by Catholic standards would be a pope or cardinal, said:

“Do we not have the right to take along a believing wife, as do the other apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas?” (1 Corinthians 9:5 ESV)

He could also say today to the Catholic Church:

“Do we not have the right to take along a believing wife, as do the other priests, bishops, cardinals and popes?”

Yes, every Christian leader has the right to have a believing wife.

If a priest, a bishop, a cardinal and even the pope made a vow against marriage but later their sexual urges began to manifest, there is no sin in marrying. They can marry and stay in their religious posts, just as Paul said.

If a priest made a vow not to marry, but later he wants to marry a woman, his marriage should be embraced and celebrated as a pro-family decision, and efforts to expel him from his post should be seen as an anti-family attack. There should be no ban for him to be promoted to bishop, cardinal and pope.

But if he is a homosexual, he should leave any Christian post he occupies.

The Catholic Church has some good stances on marriage. What better way to demonstrate the Catholic stance in defense of family than letting their priests, bishops, cardinals and popes marry women?

If marriage is a blessing, it is a curse to forbid it. In fact, the Bible has expressly warned Christians against forbidding marriage.

If gay “marriage” is a curse, it is a curse to approve it.

Marriage for gays is a curse and should be forbidden by all laws.

The Catholic Church should repeal its unbiblical ban on marriage for priests, bishops, cardinals and popes and should keep its ban on homosexual “marriage.”

Marriage for priests would be a blessing. It would be a curse only if Steve Bannon is right. He said that 90 percent of priests and cardinals in the Vatican are homosexuals. So if priests, bishops and cardinals are mostly gay, what kind of marriage will they choose?

If they are really men, they should not fear marriage to women.

If Apostle Paul were alive today, he would say that one of the signs of people departing from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons is exactly by forbidding men to marry woman and allowing men to marry men.

Portuguese version of this article: Casamento ou não casamento para padres católicos e gays? Essa é a pergunta que o papa sabe como responder sobre gays, mas não sobre padres

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

United Nations praises the Pope for backing same-sex unions: secretary-general of the U.N. welcomes Francis’s remarks that homosexuals “have a right to a family” in move which has enraged conservative Catholics

Francis became 1st pope to endorse same-sex civil unions, saying: “Homosexuals are children of God and have the right to be in a family”

Pope Compares Politicians Opposed to Gays, Jews To Hitler

In his effort to produce a film exposing homosexuality in the Vatican to make Pope Francis renounce, Steve Bannon caused backlash from conservative Catholic leaders and was exposed for his own involvement with two notorious pedophiles

The Hijacking of Homosexuality by the Right, a Challenge for Christians

Spotlight: Exposing Pedophilia Scandals and Hiding Homosexual Scandals in the Catholic Church

Luiz Mott saves Catholic Church from suffering mega pedophilia scandal 

Trump Praised Gay “Marriage” on Eve of India Visit

Homosexualist population control as a new NSSM 200 can be behind Trump’s insistence on praising gay “marriage” and other gay issues

By Julio Severo

President Donald Trump provoked confusion among his conservative supporters on February 21, 2020 after he praised a Bollywood movie defending gay “marriage” before his trip to India.

“Great!” Trump tweeted in response to homosexualist activist Peter Tatchell, who wrote on Twitter that the gay “marriage” movie, titled “Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan,” was intended to persuade Indians to support the “normalization” of homosexuality.

Trump’s tweet surprised many of his supporters when he simultaneously retweeted the post from the homosexualist activist and supported gay “marriage” because most of his supporters, who are conservative evangelicals, do not support gay activism and gay “marriage.” See the WND article “President Trump's most dangerous error” by Scott Lively.

There is a massive problem of boys preyed on and raped by homosexuals, but Trump has ignored their plight. And when India has a massive problem of Christians being persecuted and killed by Hindus, he focused on same sex perversion. He praised a fake marriage made by sexual perversion. Why not focus on homosexual violence and predatory gay indoctrination against boys?

If conservative evangelicals wanted gay activism and gay “marriage,” they would have voted for Hillary Clinton, who had promised to support these issues. In fact, they voted for Trump because they were tired of former President Barack Hussein Obama already doing these same things.

They were tired of seeing the Obama administration praising and even pushing to decriminalize homosexuality in countries around the world. But what do they see now? The same things.

Richard Grenell, an open gay “married” to another gay promoted and appointed by Trump recently as the intelligence czar, was chosen by Trump in February 2019 to lead a global effort to decriminalize homosexuality. In that time, The Advocate, the largest gay magazine in the world, mentioned Scott Lively, Tony Perkins and me, Julio Severo, as critics of such effort.

Even then, Perkins seemed not to believe that Trump was behind the effort, because he said “it doesn’t seem that President Trump – or anyone else in the administration — authorized this ‘campaign.’”

Perkins showed a willingness to support such effort only to end violence against homosexuals, not raising any questions about why to put violence against homosexuals above homosexual violence against children, through sexual violence or predatory indoctrination, and not questioning if there was more than the eyes can see.

My criticism of the soft stance of Perkins and the Family Research Council (FRC) on this issue drew the attention of Right Wing Watch, a left-wing organization that monitors conservatives, which sided with Perkins and FRC against me.

As I suspected, there was more than the eyes can see. According to LifeSiteNews,

In a video interview with a fellow gay, Dave Rubin of the Rubin Report, published this week, Grenell perhaps admitted that he might be seeking more than just the decriminalization of homosexuality:

We’re making so much progress [with the decriminalization campaign].  Granted, this is going to be a long fight, trying to convince sixy-nine countries to do a change in domestic laws, to not criminalize homosexuality.

Grenell did not stop there.  He added:

And that’s all this is is ‘step one,’ is just to work on criminalization. Others are working on steps two to twenty.

Grenell did not explain what steps 2–20 might be, leaving plenty of room for interpretation by pro-marriage and pro-family conservatives.

So, in the words of Grenell, the most promoted and praised homosexualist by Trump, decriminalization is just the first of many other “unknown” steps in the ladder of homosexualist expansionism.

When Obama and Hillary talked about decriminalization of homosexuality around the world, conservatives understood that there was a strategy and decriminalization was just the beginning. Why in Trump’s case do they want to believe that there is no strategy? They should be more prudent, because Trump has a history of supporting conservatives and liberals at the same time. As a billionaire, he used to donate to Billy Graham and abortion and homosexual groups, perhaps to please both conservatives and liberals.

The fact is, just as Obama had a strategy to use decriminalization as a launching pad for many other gay issues, Trump has the same strategy, and his strategist is a hardline homosexualist. And probably there are bigger strategies behind decriminalization. After all, how explain that left-wing Obama and right-wing Trump have the same obsession to decriminalize homosexuality around the world?

While the U.S. government promoted gay “marriage” through the efforts of the left-wing president Obama, now the U.S. government, under Trump, is promoting the same fake marriage. As far as gay “marriage” is involved, left and right in the United States are two sides of the same coin.

What is behind this? My take is that some sort of modernized and sophisticate NSSM 200 is in play. The United States National Security Council, the highest decision-making body on foreign policy in the United States, promulgated, on December 10, 1974, a top secret document entitled National Security Study Memorandum 200, also called The Kissinger Report. Its subject was “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” This document was the result of collaboration among the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Departments of State and Defense.

NSSM 200 is the most comprehensive and important document on population control ever devised by a government.

Dr. Brian Clowes, of Human Life International, said,

NSSM 200 continues to be the foundational document on population control issued by the United States government. It therefore continues to represent official United States policy on population control.

NSSM 200 is critically important to pro-life workers all over the world, because it completely exposes the unsavory and unethical motivations and methods of the population control movement.

If the goal of the CIA, USAID, the State Department and the Department of Defense is to reduce the world population, what method is better than homosexuality, which is the perfect “birth control”?

Some could say that only left-wing presidents in the White House, presidents from the Democratic Party, could advance anything similar to NSSM 200. Actually, the original NSSM 200 was made by the CIA, USAID, the State Department and the Department of Defense under the Republican conservative administration of Gerald Ford. So NSSM 200, as a population control strategy, is a product 100 percent Republican.

Both left-wingers and right-wingers in the White House are committed to the mission, probably pressured by some higher objective of the U.S. government, to reduce the world population. There is no other reason why left-wing Obama and right-wing Trump would engage in the infamous global effort to decriminalize homosexuality while thousands of boys are raped, psychologically and physically, by predatory homosexualists.

Probably because of bigger strategies of a sophisticate homosexualist NSSM 200, with his global effort to decriminalize sodomy Trump dispelled the false notion among conservatives that Obama had the monopoly on the advocacy of gay “marriage.” No, the monopoly belongs to the U.S. government, under left-wingers and right-wingers.

Gay “marriage” totally fulfills the objective of NSSM 200. This fake marriage is infertile and destroys the mission of real marriage: childbearing.

NSSM 200 seeks reduction of births. Gay “marriage” successfully does it.

Under left-wingers and right-wingers, generously backed by Hollywood, America has become a propaganda machine for gay “marriage.” With Trump is not different, even though he has a very special relationship with evangelicals, who are his main political supporters and they are against such fake marriage. In this issue, their relationship is marked by silence. Trump has remained silent about LGBT persecution against evangelist Franklin Graham, his most prominent evangelical supporter, while Graham has remained silent about Trump supporting gay “marriage” and other homosexual issues.

If the CIA, USAID, the State Department and the Department of Defense had not perverted the mission of the U.S. government with NSSM 200, Trump would understand that much more important than valuing, praising and protecting homosexuality is to protect children from predatory homosexual indoctrination and violence. Protection of children, not homosexuality, should be priority.

Today’s conservative evangelicals run the risk of being labeled hypocrites by future generations of conservative evangelicals. If Obama was never spared for praising a gay “marriage” movie of Bollywood, why is Trump spared? Why are many evangelical conservatives silent? Why cannot they see the bigger plan, a homosexualist NSSM 200, behind Obama and Trump?

The same Bible that condemns Obama for praising gay “marriage” also condemns Trump for the same sin. Evangelical conservatives should never forget that.

Liberals do not praise Trump’s praise for gay “marriage” because they hate him in other issues where he shows conservative stances. For example, liberal Christianity Today criticized Trump over everything, even saying that he should be impeached, but it spared him in one thing: sodomy.

If behind the propaganda of affordable family planning services the U.S. government had a much darker agenda of population control through NSSM 200, should it be any surprise if behind the propaganda of “decriminalization of homosexuality” is a much darker agenda of homosexualist expansionism and imperialism for the purpose of population control?

Hopefully, Tony Perkins, the Family Research Council and other evangelical groups will not say this time, “it doesn’t seem that President Trump authorized himself to praise the gay ‘marriage’ movie of Bollywood.”

It is past time for Tony Perkins and the Family Research Council to denounce Trump’s non-authorized praise of gay “marriage.”

With information from the DailyMail and FoxNews.

Portuguese version of this article: Trump louvou “casamento” gay na véspera de visita à Índia

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Trump Administration Uses Left-Wing Language to Rebuke Zambia For Its Laws Against Homosexuality

Trump Administration Pushing LGBT Agenda on Country of Georgia, But the People Fight Back

Making Sodomy Great Again: Trump becomes first Republican president to celebrate LGBT Pride Month as he launches campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world

Largest U.S. Gay Magazine Furious Over Evangelical Protest Against U.S. Government Effort to Decriminalize Homosexuality Around the World

Who Is Bothered that I Asked More Conservative Energy from the Family Research Council against the Gay Agenda? Right Wing Watch, of the left-wing group People for the American Way!

Family Research Council: Serving Conservatism or Serving the Republican Party?

Trump Supports Gay “Marriage” While His Conservative Christian Supporters Remain Silent

Trump Administration Seeks Legalization of Homosexuality Around the World While Children and Other Victims of Homosexuality Are Forgotten

For Second Year, Trump’s State Department Recognizes June as LGBTI Pride Month

What Will America Gain by Making Sodomy Great?

U.S., European Union, Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Israel Pressure Romania to Embrace Homosexual Activism

Trump Delivers Historic Pro-Life Speech But Goofs As He Congratulates Homosexual Republicans

Trump’s State Department Recognizes June 2017 as LGBTI Pride Month

Ivanka Trump posts message of support for LGBTQ Pride Month

U.S. Embassies Under Trump Advance LGBT Agenda

Trump Continues Obama’s Homosexual Imperialism and Frustrates Christian Conservatives

Trump and Obama: What Has Changed Between Them on Homosexuality and Saudi Arabia?

Trump Administration Shows Progressive Response to the Gay Agenda

The Left-Winger, the Right-Winger and the Cake

Trump and Prophecies, and a New Model of National and World Leader

An Open Letter to President Donald Trump