London Muslim killer, 28, was jailed for eight years in 2012 for plotting to bomb the London Stock Exchange and build an Islamic terror training camp, but was released in 2018

By Julio Severo

Two people were killed on November 28, 2019, and up to twelve were injured after a Muslim pulled the knives on innocent people on the north side of London Bridge.

Several people were stabbed before he was stopped in his tracks on London Bridge. He was shot by police officers and he died at the scene.

Scotland Yard has named the terrorist responsible for the attack on London Bridge as 28-year-old Usman Khan.

Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu confirmed that the Islamic terrorist killed a man and a woman in the attack.

He confirmed Khan had a prior terrorism conviction and had been jailed for eight years in 2012.

He was released on license in December 2018 and was still wearing a monitoring tag.

Islamic terrorist Usman Khan

Commissioner Basu confirmed Khan had been attending a seminar to help offenders reintegrate into society following their release from jail.

The killer had previously been arrested on December 20, 2010, four days before he and his nine-strong Al-Qaeda-inspired gang had planned to plant a bomb in the toilets of the London Stock Exchange.

Khan’s Islamic gang in London

Police found a handwritten list of targets which included the U.S. Embassy and the homes of London Mayor Boris Johnson, the Dean of St Paul’s Cathedral and two rabbis.

The gang also carried out surveillance of other possible targets including Big Ben, Westminster Abbey, the Palace of Westminster and the London Eye.

The group planned to send five bombs in the post to London synagogues.

Their plot was foiled after the security services bugging their homes and cars heard discussions of a ‘Mumbai’ atrocity on the streets of Britain, mirroring the 2008 attack in India.

The United Kingdom has a legislation compatible with its English Christian culture and civilization. It is completely incompatible to deal with Muslims from violent Third World Islamic nations.

In its new reality, the United Kingdom, which in the past was harsh with Nazis, should understand that it can be no less harsh with Muslim criminals. The history itself of Khan, involving terrorism, shows that he deserved no less than the death penalty. When it was not applied to him and his associate terrorists, the result was eventually freedom for him to kill innocent people.

When terrorists and other murderers are not condemned to death, innocent people are condemned to death by their hands.

Yet, it is a hard time for London to punish Muslim terrorists the way they deserve. Even though the United Kingdom has not a Muslim majority, London has fallen: its mayor is a Muslim.

The United Kingdom, which did not surrender to Nazis, has surrendered to the “religion of peace,” and the result of this surrender is that the British people has no peace anymore.

With information from DailyMail

Portuguese version of this article: Assassino muçulmano de Londres, de 28 anos, ficou preso por oito anos em 2012 por conspirar um atentado a bomba na Bolsa de Valores de Londres e construir um campo de treinamento de terroristas islâmicos, mas foi solto em 2018

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

“London Has Fallen” through Muslims Who Cannot Be Identified as Muslims

Boris Johnson’s Conservative Party expelled several conservatives for criticism of Islam

Beware of False Conservatives! Neocons and Their Leftist Mistreatment of Christians

Western Leaders, Including Boris Johnson and Mike Pompeo, “Bless” Islamic Holiday

In Hollywood’s Blacklist: Allah Is Loving, But Non-Acceptance of Homosexuality Leads to Violence, Sadism and Terror

Christians suffered an increase in persecution last year with 245 MILLION facing Islamic violence or oppression around the world — 30 million more than a year ago, while Great Britain rejects persecuted Christians and appoints Muslim as special envoy on freedom of religion

British false flags, again? Theresa May expels Russian diplomats, but not Islamic rapists

British Artists Boycott Israel As One Million British Girls Are Raped by Muslim Gangs

Muhammad tops as the most popular baby boy name in Britain

Fast Islamization of Europe, with Christian Assistance

“London Has Fallen” through Muslims Who Cannot Be Identified as Muslims

By Julio Severo

If I told you that the biggest Islamic propaganda machine is in Saudi Arabia, you would probably answer that it is normal for an Islamic nation to propagandize Islam.

But it is not Saudi Arabia or its Mecca that, by the way, loves Islamic propaganda.

It is Hollywood.

Take for example “London Has Fallen,” a 2016 Hollywood-produced thriller film packed with action. At first glance, as it was my case, you would think that the movie presents an apocalyptic scenario where London is so under Islamic control that even the U.S. president is not safe there anymore.

In this “at first glance” interpretation, “London Has Fallen” is not far from reality. With an Islamic mayor and the increasing problem of Islamic violence in its streets, who can say that London has not fallen? London is increasingly unsafe — by courtesy of its Muslim invaders. But you cannot describe the reality the way it is, because it is a politically correct crime, duly protected by a presstitute submissive to Islam.

By watching “London Has Fallen,” you cannot find the words “Islamic” and “Muslim” one single time. A terrorist, identified just as Pakistani arms dealer Aamir Barkawi, is tracked by the U.S. intelligence services, whose drone, when targeting him, fails to kill him, but kills his family in a wedding ceremony.

By revenge, Barkawi, who is never identified as a Muslim, kills foreign world leaders when they gather together in London. The U.S. president is hunted by terrorists, who are never identified as Muslims, in the streets of London.

With Muslims dominating London and all the United Kingdom, you would think that this scenario is very possible. In fact, it is increasingly possible.

During the visit of the U.S. President Donald Trump to the United Kingdom on June 2019, he complained about the nasty behavior of the London mayor, who is a Muslim.

Trump tweeted,

“@SadiqKhan, who by all accounts has done a terrible job as Mayor of London, has been foolishly “nasty” to the visiting President of the United States, by far the most important ally of the United Kingdom. He is a stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London, not me......”

I tweeted in answer,

“United Kingdom is COMPROMISED! Muslims dominate London and many other key government posts. Sooner or later UK will be just an appendage of Saudi Arabia.”

While they are just a minority, Muslims in U.K. are not much satisfied to control only London and other U.K. government posts, and they will use the democratic means to be nasty to those who defend the old Western, Christian values. But as soon as they achieve majority, democratic ways will be replaced by Islamic ways.

By the time being, U.S. presidents are not hunted in London, even though it is very doubtful that this is not the dream of the most Muslims in U.K.

In the movie “London Has Fallen,” there is no mention of Islam and Muslims and while British police officers and U.K. government officials are helping Muslims to hunt the U.S. president in the streets of London, it is worthwhile that most of these officers and officials are not Islamic. They are British. They are white. The movie portrays British whites as eager to help Muslims (who are not identified as Muslims) to kill the U.S. president for Islamic reasons!

Even though you may clearly identify the movie as made in Hollywood, you would think that it was directed by a Muslim. Exactly. It was directed by Babak Najafi, a Muslim.

So it is no wonder that “London Has Fallen,” even though with characteristics fitting only Islam and its adherents, it is not about Islamic violence. It is about revenge of a Pakistani arms dealer against the U.S. that killed his family in a drone operation.

The West, especially Hollywood, is giving Islam all the cultural weapons it needs to destroy the Western civilization, especially Christianity.

Hollywood just refuses to present Muslims the way they are. Even if Muslims hunt the U.S. president, Hollywood will present the hunters just as Pakistani arms dealers with no connection to Islam. And Hollywood will make sure that the movie, with many white terrorists, is directed by a Muslim to make sure that the movie is Islamically “balanced.”

If Hollywood cannot or does not want to portray Muslims as terrorists, who will be the scapegoat? Russians, obviously. In Hollywood movies, Russians are portrayed in every negative way Muslims cannot be portrayed: Terrorists, criminals, savages, etc.

As far as it depends on Hollywood, which is at the service of Islamic interests, the world will never know that “London Has Fallen,” that “Stockholm Has Fallen,” that “Berlin Has Fallen” and that “Paris Has Fallen.”

Because “Hollywood Has Already Fallen.”

Portuguese version of this article: “Londres Caiu” através de muçulmanos que não podem ser identificados como muçulmanos

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

In Hollywood’s Blacklist: Allah Is Loving, But Non-Acceptance of Homosexuality Leads to Violence, Sadism and Terror

Christians suffered an increase in persecution last year with 245 MILLION facing Islamic violence or oppression around the world — 30 million more than a year ago, while Great Britain rejects persecuted Christians and appoints Muslim as special envoy on freedom of religion

British false flags, again? Theresa May expels Russian diplomats, but not Islamic rapists

British Artists Boycott Israel As One Million British Girls Are Raped by Muslim Gangs

Muhammad tops as the most popular baby boy name in Britain

Fast Islamization of Europe, with Christian Assistance

A Saudi Candy to America: A Saudi Sculpture and Flag Erected at the World Trade Center, Where 3,000 Americans Were Killed by Saudi Terrorists

Statue of Liberty, a Pagan-Islamic Curse on America?

Fast Islamization of Europe, with Christian Assistance

By Julio Severo

A liberal Muslim who backs homosexual “marriage” was elected the first Islamic mayor of London, the capital of England and one of the most important cities in the West.

Sadiq Khan, the first Islamic mayor of London

Sadiq Khan, the new Muslim mayor of London, said, “This election was not without controversy and I’m so proud that Londoners have today chosen hope over fear and unity over division.”

A Muslim teaching “unity” to a nation with a Christian past and majority?

His election victory was celebrated in a multi-denominational ceremony at an Anglican cathedral accompanied by Protestant, Catholic and Jewish leaders.

G.M. Davis, a PhD from Stanford University and the author of “House of War: Islam’s Jihad Against the World,” called Khan’s victory historic in a WND (WorldNetDaily) report. And he warned about Khan’s supposedly liberal views:

“While Khan advertises himself as a liberal and eschews orthodox Islamic positions such as Shariah law, he nonetheless represents the thin end of the wedge in the mounting political presence of Islam in Europe both within and without conventional political channels. A liberal Muslim candidate will in time give way to more orthodox candidates advocating Islam and all it stands for: polygamy, brutality against women and homosexuals, repression of non-Muslim religious groups, and all the hallmarks of Shariah that have marred Islamic history through the ages.”

The 2011 census reported one in eight residents in London is a Muslim and more than a third of the city’s population was immigrant.

These numbers do not include those born to non-white or Muslim immigrants. To explain this special case, I have interviewed Professor Rodney Atkinson, a British conservative leader who has given speeches in universities and public meetings in England and throughout Europe. He has written a number of books and been an occasional adviser to ministers and MPs, since 1981. Atkinson, whose brother is actor Rowan Atkinson (the famous “Mr. Bean”), runs the conservative British website Free Nations: http://freenations.net/

He said:

The main reason why Khan won in London was demography. London is no longer a British city. The non-white “British” make up about 53% of the population of London. Khan (standing for the Labour Party that have been buying the votes of immigrants by making the rest of us pay for their mass immigration) got 57% of the vote.

First, we lost London demographically. Now we have lost it politically. Next, we will lose it culturally. Then by language.

Muslims alone make up 6% of the population (officially) [of England. But] Muslim gangs have raped, and sexually assaulted thousands of white British children in Rotherham, Oxford and other places over at least 2 decades. As one Pakistani abuser of children said to a mother of one of the girls abused: “They are white trash. That’s all they are good for.” (BBC Radio 4 Today programme 19th September 2014.)

And the former Labour Home Secretary Jack Straw said that Muslim gangs found white children “easy meat.”

Tony Blair’s government and the Labour local authorities in those areas deliberately covered up the abuse.

In 2001 a Home Office researcher in Rotherham was sent on an “ethnicity and diversity awareness course” and told that she must “never, ever” repeat her findings that child molestation on a massive scale was being perpetrated in the town and the culprits were mainly gangs of Muslim men.

Obviously one could write a book on this evil. But never in the history of the world has a country — and a political party, mainly the Labour Party — presided over the cultural and demographic destruction of their own capital city.

G.M. Davis said Western politicians can continue to ignore the immigrant issue, but such sweeping demographic changes will revolutionize politics across the European Continent.

Khan’s victory comes at a time when his Labour Party is gripped in a crisis over anti-Semitism. Several of its members have been suspended for anti-Jewish posts on social media. Former London mayor Kevin Livingstone, a fiery member of the Labour Party nicknamed “Red Ken,” was recently suspended after he alleged Adolf Hitler was a supporter of Zionism before the Holocaust.

“Islam itself is profoundly anti-Jewish,” Davis charged.

While Khan is celebrating his Islamic victory in London, in Saudi Arabia Christians have no reason to celebrate. A Christian mayor of Mecca in a ceremony at its biggest mosque? This is completely out of question. Christians and Jews are not allowed to live in Saudi Arabia.

Why choose then as the mayor of London the representative of a religious ideology championing the worldwide persecution and murder of Christians and Jews?

Conservative candidate Zac Goldsmith said that Khan and his socialist Labour Party considered Muslim terrorists their friends and would handicap police efforts to prevent another attack on London, 11 years after 52 Londoners died in suicide blasts on three subway trains and a bus committed by Muslims. Goldsmith’s appeal, accompanied by a picture of the bomb-ravaged bus, was ignored.

Defense Secretary Michael Fallon said that London’s security would be jeopardized by Khan. His warning was also ignored and even despised by the mass media.

Even Prime Minister David Cameron, a conservative with liberal stances, decried Khan’s links with Islamic extremists on the floor of the British Parliament. His warnings were ignored.

The politically correct insanity is so widespread in the English culture that even the Conservative Party is not so conservative and much less Christian. Leading Muslim activists in this party expressed anger over conservative Goldsmith, saying his attacks on Khan were “racist” and “intolerant.”

Sadiq Khan, who legally defended a 9/11 Muslim terrorist who confessed to being a member of Al Qaeda, becomes as the mayor of London one of the most powerful Muslims in the Western world.

So to choose a Muslim is to choose “unity over division,” a victory against “racism” and “intolerance”?

That union, which is non-existent in Islamic nations, has been also championed by Pope Francis, who accepted the prestigious International Charlemagne Prize for promoting European unity with Muslim immigrant invaders.

Echoing the famous “I have a dream” speech by Martin Luther King, Francis offered his vision of a Europe that welcomes Muslim immigrants.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel praised Francis for sending “very clear messages.”

The pope said the Roman Catholic Church can play a role in “the rebirth of a Europe” with a larger Muslim presence.

Before the ceremony, Francis met privately with Merkel, as well as with European parliament president Martin Schulz, a previous Charlemagne Prize recipient, EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and EU Council President Donald Tusk.

Juncker praised the pope for taking Muslim refugees to Rome with him at the end of his recent visit to Greece, making it clear that the pope gave the example for Europe to follow.

The Charlemagne Prize, consisting of a medal and a citation, is awarded annually for contributions to European unity. Previous winners include former U.S. President Bill Clinton, a notorious pro-abortion activist, and Pope John Paul II, a famous pro-life activist.

In his book “And Into The Fire: Fascist Elements in Post War Europe and the Development of the EU,” Rodney Atkinson says the Charlemagne Prize has original connections with Nazis and their efforts to unify Europe. Nazis, who were united with anti-Semite Muslims, were also anti-Semite. A Europe unified with a larger Muslim population will be a much more anti-Semitic Europe, a Nazi dreaming coming true.

Charlemagne (742-814 A.D.) was a European emperor who to keep Europe united made many wars, including against Muslims. If the pope and even Londoners were following his European unity, they would be fighting, not backing, Muslim invaders.

A true defense and unity of Europe could perhaps be accomplished by NATO, but it has been too busy fighting the fantasy of a communist Soviet Union that does not exists any longer, while multitudes of Muslims invade Europe, win the pope’s heart, get elected as mayor in one of the most important capitals in Europe and change its cultural and religious landscape.

This is the price of a pope, Europe and NATO chasing fantasies.

With pope’s blessing, Europe is under Islamization. Europe does not know what it is any longer and what it will be. But Islamic invaders know their mission, regardless if Europeans care or not.

With information from WorldNetDaily, DailyMail, Associated Press and Middle East Forum.

Portuguese version of this article: Rápida islamização da Europa, com ajuda cristã

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Islam, to surpass Christianity by 2070, will be only major religion to increase faster than world’s population

War between Christian Nations and Muslim Nations: A Table Talk between an American Economist and Young Muslims in Indonesia

Siding with the “religion of peace”: Obama, Bush, Brzezinski…

Germans Protest Islam, Leftwing Media Denounces Putin

Pope says equating Islam with violence is wrong