Muslims Defeat Gay Curriculum in UK School

By Julio Severo

To defeat a homosexual curriculum in a public school in the West is virtually impossible today, especially if you are a Christian parent concerned about the moral, spiritual and psychological well-being of your children. Try as hard as you can, any kind of civilized protest by you will face accusations such as “anti-gay,” “homophobic,” “intolerant,” etc.

In the United States, a father was arrested and prosecuted for protesting homosexuality being taught in his son’s kindergarten class in 2005.

So the clear message is: Protest homosexuality being taught to your children and you will be reviled, arrested and prosecuted, facing a risk of losing the custody of your own children.

Such sad fact may be reality to Christians in the United States and in the United Kingdom, but it seems not to apply to Muslims.

LGBTQ lessons have been stopped at the Parkfield Community School in Birmingham, England, following weeks of protests from angry Muslim parents, who withdrew their children from school. The withdraw involved 600 students, about 80% of the school population. You can read more in my article: Furious Muslim parents withdraw children from British school because their children are being brainwashed about gay rights and, phenomenally, the British government does not punish the parents

The LGBTQ lessons were being given by Andrew Moffat, assistant headteacher at the Parkfield Community School. Moffat, who is married to another homosexual man, is the author of Challenging Homophobia in Primary Schools and currently shortlisted for a world’s best teacher award.

Fascinatingly, he was able to challenge “homophobia” in primary schools attended predominantly by Christian children, who were taught by their parents and churches to love homosexual sinners and hate the homosexual sin. But he was not so successful in challenging “homophobia” in schools attended by Muslims, who are taught to hate and kill homosexual whenever possible.

Any Christian parent who would dare to protest, without threat and anger, such homosexual activist would face legal threats, arrest and prosecution. But Muslims parents did much more than Christian parents would do. They made furious protests.

Moffat said he tried to meet the Muslim parents, but stopped when they became aggressive. He has described receiving threats from parents online. He told the BBC: “I have felt very threatened.”

Protesters said Islam does not accept homosexuality, and the police, homosexual militants and government officials did not accuse the Muslim parents of “homophobia.”

The result was that the same “conservative” British government that does not tolerate Christian protests against the homosexual agenda just succumbed to the furious Muslim protests. The gay lessons were stopped, and the homosexual teacher was removed.

Interestingly, the “conservative” British government of Prime-Minister Theresa May was elected by conservative Christians to counter anti-conservative ideologies, including the homosexual and Islamic ideologies. But such “conservative” government has been unable or unwilling to fulfill its promises to defend Christian conservatism. Yet, it has been fully able to defend the gay and Islamic ideology in detriment of Christians and even directly against Christians.

There is no doubt that the “conservative” British government wants Christians to embrace the homosexual ideology.

But, contradictorily, it seems that the “conservative” British government wants also its Christian population to embrace Islam if they want to protect their children from homosexual indoctrination.

Parkfield Community School has 750 students and 98 percent of them are from an Islamic background. About 600 pupils, aged between 4 and 11, had been withdrawn from school in protest against homosexual lessons being taught by a homosexual activist.

The “conservative” British government took no measure against the furious Muslim parents who threatened the homosexual activist indoctrinating their children. On the contrary, the gay lessons were stopped.

If 98 percent of the students at the Parkfield Community School were Christian and about 600 pupils, aged between 4 and 11, had been withdrawn from school in protest by Christian parents for Christian reasons, would the “conservative” British government react without fury?

Conservative Christians in the United Kingdom elected a “conservative” British government that ultimately protects furiously homosexuality and Islam against Christians.

With information from The Guardian.

Portuguese version of this article: Muçulmanos derrotam currículo gay em escola do Reino Unido

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading about England:

Furious Muslim parents withdraw children from British school because their children are being brainwashed about gay rights and, phenomenally, the British government does not punish the parents

Christians suffered an increase in persecution last year with 245 MILLION facing Islamic violence or oppression around the world — 30 million more than a year ago, while Great Britain rejects persecuted Christians and appoints Muslim as special envoy on freedom of religion

British false flags, again? Theresa May expels Russian diplomats, but not Islamic rapists

Was the Royal Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle a Christian Example?

British State Cruelty to Children and a Controversial Conservative Prime Minister Who Can Hinder It But Does Not It

British Artists Boycott Israel As One Million British Girls Are Raped by Muslim Gangs

Muhammad tops as the most popular baby boy name in Britain

Fast Islamization of Europe, with Christian Assistance

Furious Muslim parents withdraw children from British school because their children are being brainwashed about gay rights and, phenomenally, the British government does not punish the parents

By Julio Severo

An estimated 600 Muslim children have been withdrawn from a British school in protest against lessons about homosexuality and gender equality.

The pupils, aged between 4 and 11, are being kept home from Parkfield Community School in Birmingham, England, to protest a school program that teaches children about LGBT lifestyles.

Parkfield Community School has 750 pupils and 98 percent of them are from an Islamic background. The children involved in the mass exodus represent about 80 percent of the school.

The interesting point is not the exodus, but that Muslim parents are not being punished by the government. When Christian parents try to protest homosexual indoctrination to their children, they are quickly threatened by government officials and the more they complain, the more they are threatened. In the case of Muslims, they are complaining and threatening more and more school officials.

They are complaining that the school is undermining parental rights and aggressively promoting homosexuality.

Some Muslim demonstrators said they would rather leave the UK than allow their children to continue attending Parkfield Community School.

Some protests had placards reading: “Education, not indoctrination.”

One child carried a handwritten sign which said: “Let kids be kids.”

England, which has a strong Christian background, reached a point where Muslims have much more voice and freedom to protest than Christians.

Muslim parents’ anger is aimed at the school’s assistant head Andrew Moffat, who is behind the homosexual lessons. Moffat is a homosexual activist married to another homosexual man. He is currently shortlisted for a “World’s Best Teacher” award.

One Muslim father at the school, whose six-year-old daughter attends the school, said his wife wanted to leave the country rather than let her daughter attend the lessons.

Protesters said Islam does not accept homosexuality, and the police, homosexual militants and government officials are not accusing the Muslim parents of “homophobia.”

Moffat said he tried to meet the Muslim parents, but stopped when they became aggressive. He has described receiving threats from parents online. He told the BBC: “I have felt very threatened.”

If Christians had protested the homosexual indoctrination from Moffat, they would have been threatened by government officials. If they had threatened homosexual Moffat, they would have been jailed! But in modern England, Muslims go unpunished for acts that Christians never go unpunished.

Why don’t Christian parents also withdraw their children from British schools over homosexual indoctrination? Because they fear that the British government will take away their children.

Christians are today second-rate citizens while Muslim immigrants are first class citizens in England.

British Prime Minister Theresa May’s government brags about being “conservative.” But you should call it neocon government, because it acts harshly against anything Russian, but allows homosexual activists and Muslim invaders virtually to rule in England. When English children are not being psychologically raped by homosexual indoctrination classes, they are being physically raped by Islamic invaders who call English girls “white trash.”

Neocons’ main concern is Russia, Russia and Russia. This is the concern of the British government.

May’s “conservative” government does nothing to protect British girls, perhaps because it also sees them as “white trash.” And it also does nothing to protect children from homosexual indoctrination, perhaps because it sees all British children as “trash.”

It is very strange that May’s “conservative” government rejects everything Russian in a time when Russia has totally banned homosexual propaganda to children and teenagers and never lets Muslims have more voice than Christians and never lets Muslims treat Russian girls as “white trash.”

With information from the DailyMail.

Portuguese version of this article: Pais muçulmanos furiosos tiram filhos de escola britânica porque seus filhos estão sofrendo lavagem cerebral em relação a direitos gays e, fenomenalmente, o governo britânico não pune os pais

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading about England:

Christians suffered an increase in persecution last year with 245 MILLION facing Islamic violence or oppression around the world — 30 million more than a year ago, while Great Britain rejects persecuted Christians and appoints Muslim as special envoy on freedom of religion

British false flags, again? Theresa May expels Russian diplomats, but not Islamic rapists

Was the Royal Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle a Christian Example?

British State Cruelty to Children and a Controversial Conservative Prime Minister Who Can Hinder It But Does Not It

British Artists Boycott Israel As One Million British Girls Are Raped by Muslim Gangs

Muhammad tops as the most popular baby boy name in Britain

Fast Islamization of Europe, with Christian Assistance

What Is Neoconservatism? Who are the Neocons?

Was the Royal Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle a Christian Example?

By Julio Severo

While all the left-wing and right-wing media showed a remarkable consensus and unity in their praises for the royal wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, there was a point that deserved special attention and worry. One of the Protestant ministers, Bishop Michael Curry, chosen by Harry and Meghan to officiate their wedding, is a known advocate of the homosexual agenda.

Curry, the first African-American to preside over the Episcopal Church, is a fighter for gay “marriage.”

Yet, advocacy of homosexuality is not an exclusive problem of Curry. Harry and Meghan also adhere to the same advocacy.

In a report titled “Meghan Markle and Prince Harry: LGBT Issues Are ‘Basic Human Rights,’” the Hollywood Reporter said, “Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are putting LGBT rights at the forefront of their royal agenda.”

The homosexual website Pink News said, “the royal couple will continue to proudly promote LGBT issues.”

Yet, without feminism, homosexuality cannot advance, and feminism is exactly Meghan’s turf.

According to the left-wing website Vanities, Markle has a history of activism with U.N. Women, the most pro-abortion organization within the United Nations. In a U.N. speech in 2015, she mentioned her activism began when she saw a Procter & Gamble ad that portrayed women in home work. She wrote letters to the feminist writer Gloria Allred and then First Lady Hillary Clinton complaining. After the feminist pressure, P&G changed the ad.

Feminism destroys women’s role in marriage, hindering them from being healthy wives and mothers, and homosexuality destroys men’s role, hindering them from being husbands and fathers.

Homosexuality is essentially against marriage and family.

God created man and woman to join together in marriage and have children. Or you support marriage or you support homosexuality. You cannot support both at the same time, for both are mutually antagonistic. One is normal and ordained by God, and the other is abnormal and hated by God.

God calls the sexual union between a man and a woman within marriage a blessing. But He calls the sexual union between a man and another man repugnant and detestable, according to his Word, which commands,

“You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22 ESV)

In marriage, man is the leader and God’s calling to a wife is to be submissive to her husband. Meghan is a known feminist. Also, she is a divorced woman. British royal traditions did not allow their royal men to marry divorced women. Royal traditions are being broken.

This in no way excuses Harry and his former sexual behavior, which was not so chaste as his alleged Christian profession requires.

The royal wedding was some sort of scheme to break old royal traditions. A marriage imprisoned by homosexual and feminist activism, including with divorce and sexual irresponsibility, is not a real marriage as God intended. It is an ideological alliance intended to bring a message and a model to the population. Intends to break its most conservative values.

Could it also be a subtle message for British white natives to intermix in marriage with non-white immigrants, who are, by coincidence, largely Muslim?

While the British royalties are playing with Christianity, marriage, family and values, Islam is advancing in the United Kingdom. London is now under Islamic control.

U.K. forgot what Winston Churchill said,

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.”

U.K., which successfully resisted Nazism, is being defeated by feminism, homosexuality and Islam, promoted often by its own royalties.

In the old times, the British people would say, “God save the Queen!” Really! May God save her and her family from their own efforts to break their old conservative values. And while they are not saved, may God save the good British people from their Queen, their royal family and their activism.

Portuguese version of this article: O casamento real do príncipe Harry e Meghan Markle foi um exemplo cristão?

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

British false flags, again? Theresa May expels Russian diplomats, but not Islamic rapists

British State Cruelty to Children and a Controversial Conservative Prime Minister Who Can Hinder It But Does Not It

British Artists Boycott Israel As One Million British Girls Are Raped by Muslim Gangs

Muhammad tops as the most popular baby boy name in Britain

Fast Islamization of Europe, with Christian Assistance

British false flags, again? Theresa May expels Russian diplomats, but not Islamic rapists

By Julio Severo

In a report titled “UK to expel 23 Russian diplomats over spy poisoning,” CNN said,

“The UK will expel 23 Russian diplomats from the country after concluding that the Russian state is responsible for the attempted murder of a former Russian spy and his daughter on British soil, a step that marks a serious escalation of hostilities between London and Moscow.”

The British media has praised Prime Minister Theresa May for her diplomatic punishment on Russia. It is very interesting that the left-wing press, including CNN, has sided with U.K and opposed Russia.

Theresa May

The CNN report, which is hostile to Russia and favorable to U.K., added a statement by May, who said,

“For those who seek to do us harm, my message is simple. You are not welcome here.”

Who else is not welcome in U.K.?

This week, May’s conservative government banned from U.K. a conservative journalist for criticism of Islam. See the Daily Mail report “Right-wing journalist Lauren Southern denied entry to UK, purportedly over criticism of Islam.”

Why are critics of Islam denied entry to U.K.? Why are not they welcome?

Currently, little British girls are suffering an epidemic of rapes by Muslim immigrants, and Theresa May and her supposedly conservative government are able to do… nothing to protect them. See the Gatestone Institute’s report “British Girls Raped by Muslim Gangs on ‘Industrial Scale.’”

Are rapists of British girls welcome in U.K.? So why does not May expel them?

By orientation of May’s “conservative” government, Facebook banned Britain First pages and the profiles of all its leaders, because they are critical of Islam. See the WND report “Facebook bans Britain First pages.”

Months ago, Trump shared a video of Britain First about Islamic violence. Now, Britain First has been banned, because the priority of Theresa May and her “conservative” government is cowardice and submission to Islam.

There are vastly bigger problems in U.K. than a Russian spy being supposedly attacked by the nation that trained him.

The attack on the spy was too brazen, too obvious, and U.K. has proved that they are capable of using false flags and protecting real criminals, including Islamic rapists.

Does U.K. ignore false flags tactics?

A large false flag attack may have occurred in World War II. The US did not want to go to war to help England. Then the British secret service detonated a bomb in New York, simulating a Nazi terrorist attack. That was enough for the US to dispatch, for free, many armaments to England. See the Daily Mail report “Did the British plant a bomb at the 1940 World's Fair to kill two NYPD officers and bring the U.S. into World War II? The unsolved case of how the real-life James Bond was dispatched to New York City by Churchill to beat the Germans at any cost.”

Even if the attack on a Russian spy was really Russian, Trump recognized last year that in the same way Russians kill people, Americans also do. Obviously, he meant that CIA and other intelligence agencies know how to exterminate real and perceived enemies. The Daily Mail report said, “You think our country is so innocent?”: Trump doubles down on “respect” for Putin and says “US has a lot of killers” when told Russian president is “a killer” for murdering journalists.

Is this not true also regarding U.K.? Do not British intelligence agencies also exterminate real and perceived enemies?

In fact, the Israel newspaper Ynet ran an interesting headline: “Russian lawmaker: US had access to nerve agent.” If this is true, both U.K. and U.S. intelligence agencies could have made a false flag attempted murder of the former Russian spy.

In the past, I could believe U.K., even without knowing about its alleged false flag attack in New York.

Now, under Muslim domination (with London occupied by a Muslim mayor), and U.K. protecting Muslims and silencing critics of Islam and not protecting thousands of little British girls whom Muslim rapists call “white trash,” is U.K. credible yet?

I do not think so.

There is a toxic Muslim domination in U.K., and Theresa May is unable to see it.

I cannot send this comment to British newspapers that attack Russia, because my comment contains criticism of Islam and it will be automatically banned. The largest U.K. newspaper, Daily Mail, has systematically banned all my comments critical of Islam. Yet, if I criticize Christians, Daily Mail is very likely to approve my comments!

A toxic Muslim domination is reality in London, in raped British girls and in Theresa May’s cowardice. I am not even allowed to mention in Daily Mail about such Islamic rapes, because cowardly U.K. does not recognize the suffering of its little girls. For U.K., respect for violent Islam is more important than protecting its little girls.

In the case of Muslims, it is not necessary to use false flags to indicate that they are violent and rapists. Muslims are more violent than all the false flags that U.K. has ever used. British victims of rape are witnesses of its violence.

So, instead of attacking Russia, with false flags or not, why does not Theresa May attack Muslims who are raping British girls and punish the British media that censor and banish conservative content exposing Islamic violence and rapes?

Why cannot May say to Islamic rapists “For those who seek to do harm to our daughters, my message is simple. You are not welcome here”?

Cannot she also expel diplomats from Saudi Arabia and other Islamic nations that arm and fund ISIS, al-Qaida and other terror groups that rape and slaughter Christians?

Portuguese version of this article: Bandeiras falsas inglesas, de novo? Theresa May expulsa diplomatas russos, mas não estupradores islâmicos

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

British Artists Boycott Israel As One Million British Girls Are Raped by Muslim Gangs

Muhammad tops as the most popular baby boy name in Britain

Why the American Left Hates Russia

What Is Neoconservatism? Who are the Neocons?

Fast Islamization of Europe, with Christian Assistance

British Artists Boycott Israel As One Million British Girls Are Raped by Muslim Gangs

By Julio Severo

In an initiative called “Artists for Palestine,” some 700 British artists, including Roger Waters, Brian Eno, Mike Leigh, Ken Loach and Richard Ashcroft, made a pledge, February 14, to boycott Israel in reaction to what they termed “the Palestinian catastrophe,” according to the Jerusalem Post.

Catastrophe? It is what is happening around Israel. Syria, Iraq and other Islamic nations around Israel are suffering: Muslims are killing Christians. In all the Muslim nations in the Middle East, the same pattern has repeated itself in a greater or lesser degree: Muslims killing Christians.

Why in the sea of violence in the Middle East are Muslims the aggressors and have an upper hand against Christians, but not against Israel?

Because Israel is the only Middle East non-Muslim nation able to defend herself.

Why are British artists annoyed at Israeli defense, but not worried or distressed about Christians being raped, tortured and slaughtered in Muslim nations around Israel? Is not U.K. a nation with Christian roots? Is U.K. unable to feel compassion for Christians oppressed by Muslims?

Why are British artists annoyed at Israel? Are Jews raping British girls? In fact, if the British people were informed in World War II that Nazi soldiers intended to invade U.K. to rape British girls, the British population would react and fight in rage for their girls.

If the British people were told today that Jews intend to invade U.K. to rape British girls, the British population would react and fight in rage for their girls.

Yet, this is exactly what is happening. U.K. is being invaded, but not by Nazis or Jews. According to a gut-wrenching exposé by FrontPage Magazine, Muslim gangs are inflicting sexual exploitation on British girls, and British officials believe that as many as one million girls may have been victimized, describing it as a “national disaster” that requires some response to deal with the “horror.”

So, when are British artists going to press the British government to pledge to boycott all immigration of Islamic rapists?

When are they going to launch an “Artists for British Girls” initiative?

When are they going to react in rage to the national disaster and horror of Islamic sexual exploitation of British girls?

Or to protect British girls is less important than being labeled a bigot, racist or Islamophobe by the liberal media?

Whenever Israel defends herself against Palestinian Muslims, the same labels are used against the Jews.

The apathetic British government and its people, who have not protected their daughter from Muslims, have no right to condemn Israel for protecting her people and their daughters.

If you want to win the war against Islamic terror, to protect British girls and to protect Christians and Israel from Islamic enemies, you should be ready for the war of labels waged by liberals.

Portuguese version of this article: Artistas ingleses boicotam Israel enquanto 1 milhão de meninas inglesas são estupradas por gangues muçulmanas

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

“Palestinian Messengers”: How Christ and Christians Are Used for the Palestinian Cause

Palestinian Gays Want World Boycotts against Israel

Lausanne, Theology of Integral Mission and Israel

Jewish Issues: A Clarification to Christians about Their Perception on the Jews

The U.N. Year of Solidarity With the Palestinian Cause

Muhammad tops as the most popular baby boy name in Britain

From Muslim cradle to British grave

By Julio Severo

There is a surge in Islamic names in the U.K. in 2014, according to the Daily Mail.

Mosque in Britain

The champion is Muhammad, which is now the most popular male baby name in Britain.

Predictably, Muslims will outnumber the ethnic British people in a few decades, and U.K. will be officially Islamic.

Today, many “English” Muslims, who are not ethnic British, are joining Islamic terrorist groups in the Middle East. Usually, they were born to immigrant parents.

In the past, U.K. sent Christian missionaries to Muslim lands. Now, U.K. sends Muslims to kill Christians in Syria and Iraq. This is a foretaste of what ethnic British will experience from their fake ‘compatriots’ in the next years.

From a Christian hotbed U.K. is becoming an Islamic hotbed.

Why is this happening? The British people do not like babies and large families. When U.K. was Christian, they knew that God likes babies and large families and that the natural law fosters them.

Now Britain loves the contraceptive culture, with its bonus of death culture. But the natural law has no respect for both destructive cultures.

U.K. has no respect for their Christian heritage or the natural law.

Any culture that maintains marriage, family and babies will survive. Any culture that despises them will die away. So it just natural that the British culture is giving place to the Islamic culture.

A bigger and bigger Muslim cradle spells a bigger and bigger British grave.

Britain has lost in the cradle, and soon Muslims will give them a cultural, religious and ethnic grave.

Portuguese version of this article: Maomé se torna o nome mais popular para bebês na Inglaterra

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Rivers of Blood: A Brazilian pro-life Evangelical writes about the contraceptive culture and prophecies in Revelation

The folly of man’s planning

Christian Persecution Follows US, UK and France in Kosovo, Libya, Iraq and Syria