Trump Has Broken His Promise of Defunding the American Abortion Holocaust

By Julio Severo

With sweat and tears, conservative Americans gave the Republicans: a majority in the House, a majority in the Senate and the ultimate victory and crown: the White House. They did it because they believed their conservative promises.

If some years ago Republicans could not defund Planned Parenthood (the largest network of abortion and family planning clinics in the U.S.) because socialist Democrats had a majority in the House, in the Senate and had the White House, now the upper hand belongs to Republicans. If formerly Democrats could fund abortion, now Republicans can defund it… if they want.

Yet, it seems that they do not want, even though they have been elected by their conservative constituents just for standing against abortion.

Last week, the GOP-controlled Congress passed an Omnibus Spending Bill (Omnibus Bill) valued at $1.3 trillion in order to keep the U.S. government from shutting down.

Yet, was it worthwhile not to shut it down?

Actually, Trump’s signature did much more than just hindering the U.S. government from shutting down. It hindered the abortion industry from shutting down too.

The Omnibus Bill preserves Medicaid “reimbursements” and Title X funding for “family planning.” This is to say, it maintains America’s $500 million annual contribution to Planned Parenthood, America’s largest abortion mill.

Basically, when Trump approved the Omnibus Bill, he applied capital punishment on all his promises of defunding abortion.

Does a government funding abortion deserve not to shut down?

Trump’s approval of the Omnibus Bill is especially tragic because last January he delivered a historic pro-life speech.

The big victors have been pro-abortion activists.

Abortion was not the only tragedy in the bill Trump signed.

The Omnibus Bill funds abortions and does not fund the building a Border Wall, which is essential for the U.S. security.

It funds war on babies on American soil and wars on foreign soil, by increasing military expenses. Even though the main responsibility of a military force is to guard the borders of its own nation, U.S. expenses support the U.S. Global Police, including 800 U.S. military bases around the world. It is hard to imagine a more ridiculous and hypocritical case than a nation that can guard its military ambitions around the world but is unable to guard its own backyard!

The big victors have been neocons.

Conservative columnist and author Ann Coulter late Tuesday accused President Trump of being an "ignoramus" who is "not giving us what he promised" during a speech at Columbia University.

“I knew he was a shallow, lazy ignoramus, and I didn’t care,” Coulter told the audience, which was largely comprised of College Republicans.

“It kind of breaks my heart,” she added. “He’s not giving us what he promised at every single campaign stop.”

Still, Coulter contended that Trump’s campaign was vastly preferable to those of his competitors, whom she likened to escaped mental patients.

“We had 16 lunatics being chased by men with nets running for president—and Trump,” Coulter explained. “So of course I had to be pedal-to-the-metal for Donald Trump. I’d been waiting 30 years for someone to say all these things,” probably referring to his promise to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border and also his promise to stop neocons’ military meddling in other nations.

In 2016, Coulter published the e-book “In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome!” to challenge America to vote in Trump.

The book praises Trump’s promises of

1. Building a Wall. Coulter said, “Trump announced he was running for president in a speech talking about Mexican rapists, pledging to deport illegal aliens and build a wall.” After over one year in office, Trump has not built yet even an inch of the wall.

2. Not meddling in Syria. Coulter said, “Trump was the only Republican—other than Rand Paul—who did not propose starting a slew of new wars in the Middle East.” Yet, last year she had to criticize him for breaking his promise on Syria.

3. Not arming Ukraine against Russia. In her book Coulter pointed that all candidates, except for Trump, had promised to arm Ukraine. She remarked, “How many Americans wake up every night in a cold sweat in anguish about Ukraine? Even people afraid of global warming aren’t worried about that. Ukraine was part of Russia for most of its history. It would be as if Putin sent fighter jets to force America to give Texas back to Mexico. Most Americans not only don’t care if Putin takes Crimea and the Ukraine.” Yet, Trump broke his promise.

4. Getting along with Putin. Coulter added, “Most Republicans seek to prove their conservative bona fides by having an itchy trigger finger—particularly toward Russia. These days, there’s no one to oppose them. The American left used to be totally fine with the Soviet Union—the gulags, the invading Eastern Europe, the show trials. Until the anti-gay stuff. Now the Russkies are walking on the fighting side of liberals!” Even Trump has embarked the anti-Putin train.

Coulter is right. Trump is not giving America what he promised at every single campaign stop — at least, not on foreign policy, where Trump used to disgust neocons, but now he pleases them on every at every single point.

The vital mission of the military is to protect its own backyard. The U.S. military is failing horribly in this mission, because they are too busy in neocons’ military adventures in other nations.

Before Trump approving the Omnibus Bill, pro-life leaders pleaded with him to veto it.

“Mr. President, Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion business in the U.S., making them one of the largest abusers of human beings in the world,” said Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue and one of the founding members of the Center for Medical Progress. “It is currently under investigation by your Department of Justice for engaging in the illegal sale of aborted baby remains for profit, as revealed in a series of authenticated undercover videos that shook the nation in 2015.”

“During your 2016 Presidential Campaign, you promised to defund Planned Parenthood,” he reminded Trump. “I urge you now to keep your promise and veto the Omnibus bill until it no longer provides any of our tax money to Planned Parenthood.”

Yet, Trump broke his promise. He did not veto the Omnibus Bill.

If a foreign force were slaughtering over 500,000 innocent American babies a year, the U.S. military would work to defeat the perpetrator. Such high numbers of innocent lives are actually being destroyed on American soil, and the perpetrator is not China and not even America’s favorite bogeyman: Russia. The perpetrators are abortion mills, especially Planned Parenthood. Abortion is today the leading cause of murder in the United States.

The U.S. military is doing nothing to destroy this enemy.

President Trump, who for so many times has promised to defund Planned Parenthood and its abortion holocaust, signed the Omnibus Bill. In the past, the U.S. Abortion Holocaust had the assistance of socialist Democrats to keep killing. Now the U.S. Abortion Holocaust needed Trump’s assistance, and it received.

No government deserves to continue operating by delivering its innocent babies on the medical altar of slaughter.

No government deserves to continue operating by abandoning the protection of its borders to invest in the military meddling of other nations’ borders, just to satisfy neocons.

It just sad that conservatives vote for politicians to save America from abortion, and then politicians need to keep funding abortion to save the government from shutting down.

What is the point for conservative constituents to elect “conservative” politicians if they eventually approve funding for abortion?

“I say to Congress, I will never sign another bill like this again,” Trump said earlier this month. An insightful cartoon portrays Trump about to jump from a plank from a skyscraper and promising to his advisers “Ok, but I’m never doing this again.” There will no second chance.

For the sake of innocent babies condemned to medical and government slaughter, could American conservatives just shut down the U.S. government? Or will they wait for God to do it?

With the information from “Chronicles, a Magazine of American Culture,” “In Trump We Trust,” The Hill and LifeSiteNews.

Portuguese version of this article: Trump quebrou sua promessa de suspender o financiamento do holocausto do aborto nos EUA

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Leading Causes of Death in the United States, and Gun Homicides Are Not One of Them

Holocaust, Abortion and Sodomy

Trump Delivers Historic Pro-Life Speech But Goofs As He Congratulates Homosexual Republicans

What Is Neoconservatism? Who are the Neocons?

Constituent sues GOP, accusing the party of fraud

Why Is Trump Helping Obama’s Islamists in Syria?

By Julio Severo

U.S. President Donald Trump took the world by surprise when he ordered the U.S. military to launch a cruise missile strike on a Syrian airbase Thursday in reaction to a deadly chemical attack, allegedly by the Syrian government, on Islamic rebels formerly supported by Obama and now by Trump.

Dozens of rebels were killed, and at least 10 children. Republican neocons led by Senator John McCain used the attack to push Trump to attack the Syrian government. Hillary Clinton called for bombing of Assad’s airfields hours before Trump’s airstrike. 

The major problem that Trump faces in foreign policy is neocons, and he clearly identified it before his election. But now he does not recognize this problem anymore.

Yet, the reason for Trump’s attack on Syria has been disputed.

Former senator Ron Paul said:

“[I]t doesn’t make any sense for Assad under these conditions to all of a sudden use poison gasses. I think there is a zero chance he would have done, you know, this deliberately.”

Joseph Farah, WorldNetDaily (WND) chief, said:

“I strongly disagree with President Trump’s decision to attack Syria… There are two warring parties in Syria – the Syrian government, which is attempting to repulse an invasion and partial occupation of Syrian territory, and ISIS, a terrorist plague on the entire world, not just Assad’s regime… Both of those parties have been accused of deploying sarin weapons against civilians, though I have yet to see any proof that Assad ever did… ISIS is the primary opposition to Assad.”

According to Infowars:

“The White Helmets, a al-Qaeda affiliated group funded by George Soros and the British government, reportedly staged the sarin attack on civilians in the Syrian city of Khan Shaykhun to lay blame on the Syrian government.”

The Syrian government has been in a deadly war against two enemies: ISIS and Islamic rebels supported formerly by Obama and now by Trump. In 2015 Obama gave to these rebels $500 million for “training.” A multimillion dollar investment against a government fighting ISIS.

To fight only against ISIS is a huge challenge. How to fight at the same time against two enemies facilitated or trained by the U.S.? Even Trump recognized last year that ISIS was founded by Obama. But he never attacked ISIS as he is attacking Syria. By attacking Syria, he is automatically helping ISIS.

Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Lindsay Graham, Paul Ryan and leftists have praised Trump’s attack on Syria. Incidentally, all of them were or are in George Soros’s payroll.

But praises are not coming from conservatives.

Michael Savage, a powerful anti-neocon writer, had called Trump the “Winston Churchill of our time” in July 2015. But now, on his Thursday radio show, Savage complained, “The generals have gotten to him and turned him from peace with Russia. And the people standing in the way of war, like Steve Bannon, are being shown the door. This beating of the war drums with Russia has to stop.”

Alex Jones, of Infowars, said in February that he was “ready to die for Trump.” Now that Trump launched airstrikes against Syria, Jones said on a Friday livestream, “Trump is really disintegrating in my eyes on many levels.”

Ann Coulter, U.S. conservative author and political commentator who had been an ardent Trump supporter and wrote a book titled “In Trump We Trust” last year, has used social media to criticize the Trump’s decision. “Those who wanted us meddling in the Middle East voted for other candidates,” she wrote on Twitter in the early hours of Friday morning, adding:

“Trump campaigned on not getting involved in Mideast. Said it always helps our enemies & creates more refugees. Then he saw a picture on TV.”

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) April 7, 2017

“Christians who live in Syria are terrified of what will happen if Assad is gone.”

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) April 7, 2017

“What follows Assad? What followed Saddam? Gaddafi? 15 yrs, 6k lost heroes 500k massacred Christians $5 Trill--for what?”

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) April 7, 2017

Coulter and a number of Trump’s well-known supporters have expressed their surprise — and fear — at Trump’s hasty decision, which is totally at odds with his previous stance on interventionism. As a presidential candidate, Trump campaigned against military exploits abroad, often railing against Bush and his war in Iraq. In December, shortly after winning election, he said “we will stop racing to topple foreign regimes that we know nothing about, that we shouldn’t be involved with.”

When Obama was considering military action against Syria in 2013, Trump strongly urged him not to do it.

In one September 5, 2013 all-caps criticism, Trump tweeted, “AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA – IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING!”

“Don’t attack Syria – an attack that will bring nothing but trouble for the U.S. Focus on making our country strong and great again!” Trump tweeted four days later.

During the presidential campaign, Trump also bashed Hillary Clinton for her disastrous foreign policy, tweeting, “Crooked Hillary Clinton’s foreign interventions unleashed ISIS in Syria, Iraq and Libya. She is reckless and dangerous!”

What has made Trump change his mind and act as Hillary would have done, by helping ISIS in Syria? What has made him listen to neocons?

After all, what is the point of being pro-life within the United States and not being pro-life for Christians directly threatened by ISIS in Syria?

What is for sure is that the Trump who attacked Syria and helped ISIS is not the same Trump who lambasted neocons last year. Where is the original anti-neocon Trump?

With information from Charisma, Breitbart, DailyWire, DailyMail, Time and WND.

Portuguese version of this article: Por que Trump está ajudando os islamistas de Obama na Síria?

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

What Is Neoconservatism (Neocon)?

Syria Condemns Invasion of U.S. Troops in Its Territory

Trump and Prophecies, and a New Model of National and World Leader

America, Conservative Christians and Third World Expectations

By Julio Severo

Evangelicals are “fighting an uphill battle of demographics” on issues such as gay “marriage”, Focus on the Family President Jim Daly told the Los Angeles Times after the election.

Last month, he said evangelicals and social conservatives were “rowing against the tide” with their focus on traditional values issues such as abortion and gay “marriage” in their political messaging.

His call for “moderation” basically was a plea for Christians to stop their political opposition to such issues in light of Obama’s recent electoral victory.

His admonition implies that after decades, Democrats (referred to as socialists hereinafter) have achieved victory through a mass change of mind in the American people, who now want abortion and gay “marriage.” In part, this is true in regard to native-born Americans who became liberal after long-term exposure to mass indoctrination camps (aka public schools). Thanks to this indoctrination, they see, speak and dream socialism (aka Democratic Party).

And yet, there are not enough native-born liberal Americans to decide elections. In this point, enters the fantastic Democratic plan, and Ann Coulter explained it very well by saying that Democrats have profoundly changed the US demographics. She writes:

Most Americans don’t realize that, decades ago, the Democrats instituted a long-term plan to gradually turn the United States into a Third World nation. The country would become poorer and less free, but Democrats would have an unbeatable majority!

It should also be added that as a result of this plan, America is today a less Christian nation. A recent AP story said that “For the first time in its history, the United States does not have a Protestant majority.” Evidently, an aggressive and mindless liberalism in the mainline Protestant churches that is scaring members away has been fundamentally helpful to the socialist plan, but immigration is changing not only the ethnic face of America, but also her Christian demographics and influence.

Coulter says,

Under Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act, our immigration policy changed from one that replicated the existing ethnic population to one that strictly favored unskilled immigrants from the Third World. Since 1968, 85 percent of legal immigrants have come from what is euphemistically called “developing countries.”

America can’t admit computer scientists from Europe fleeing their failing socialist continent, and she definitely can’t admit Christians fleeing Islamic persecution even from Muslim nations invaded by her because she has to make room for Muslim immigrants. The socialist (Democratic) plan demands that the Christian demographics of America be changed. Christians out, Muslims in.

William J. Murray, chairman of Religious Freedom Coalition, told me recently, “Muslims are being moved into the Bible Belt as they come in. Nashville and Atlanta are the immigration hubs for Obama to dump Muslims into the US. On top of that Mexican cartels are moving Muslims that can’t get visas because of their associations in through the border.”

Coulter writes,

Because recent immigrants have no skills, they arrive in dire need of government assistance. Their desperation has been an enormous boon to the Democratic Party.

It’s not that poor immigrants think differently about most issues from conservatives. Try asking a recent immigrant:

How do you feel about abortion?
It’s taking a life.

What should we do about criminals?
Lock them up and throw away the key.

Do you support raising taxes?
No, the government takes too much already.

How do you feel about overpaid, well-pensioned government workers with no-show jobs?
It ticks me off.

Do you support gay marriage?
Absolutely not.

How are you going to vote?
Democratic.

Yes, because Democrats give gifts!

This is true, for example, of Latin American immigrants, the most faithful Democratic supporters. US Catholic bishops have been vocally pro-life, but over 70% Catholics, most Latin Americans, voted for Obama and Democrats.

Latin American immigrants most certainly oppose abortion and gay “marriage”. The problem is that poor, uneducated people — the Democratic base — like free stuff that socialists with a D give them.

Brazilian people are not different. They usually vote for the most generous givers. And they have replicated their behavior in America. A Brazilian friend living in America told me that most of her Brazilian friends in America supported Obama. They are evangelicals who oppose abortion and homosexuality. But they like the privileges and gifts offered by socialists. In short, they will sacrifice any important value to get privileges and gifts. America would lose nothing if she deported Brazilians and other immigrants that put their personal comfort above traditional family values.

So Jim Daly has fundamentally misunderstood the current American reality. A conservative candidate does not need to “tone down” his opposition to gay “marriage” and abortion. If all he wants is to please a multitude of voters, he should do what any Third World dictator does: to promise lots and lots of free stuff.

After all, considering that most of the immigrants to America come from Third World nations, they have Third World aspirations: they want government to feed them, help them, etc.

Yet, to insist on lots and lots of largesse is not the Christian way to do things. The Bible way is:

“We urge you, brothers, to do this more and more, and to aspire to live quietly, and to mind your own affairs, and to work with your hands, as we instructed you.” (1 Thessalonians 4:10-11 ESV)

Conservative Christians should never tone down their opposition to gay “marriage” and abortion for the sake of electoral gains.

If immigrants, Brazilians included, voted according to moral and Christian principles, Obama and the Democrats would never win. But this raises a serious issue: what is the alternative?

The candidates facing Obama did not mirror the moral or Christian values of immigrants. They actually “moderated” and “toned down” their opposition to gay “marriage,” abortion and other major moral issues, exactly as Jim Daly proposed. And it did not work.

As a Christian, I could never vote for Obama or the opposing candidates and their “moderate” stances, which are immoral too.

It is too late for conservative Christians to stop the massive immigration caused by Democrats. These immigrants, who oppose gay “marriage” and abortion, are deciding American elections merely by choosing the guy offering the most handouts.

If a candidate said “we have to work very hard to build our nation,” he would have been elected by Americans two or three hundred years ago, but not today.

Yet, if he said “if you choose me, you will receive a lot of gifts,” his election would be guaranteed today, but probably not two or three hundred years ago.

Socialists have been successfully changing American demographics unopposed since the 1960s. Perhaps Republicans or conservatives should fight fire with fire and bring conservative immigrants from other nations. In this case, socialists would do what they have never done before: fierce opposition to immigration policies!

But where would Republicans or conservatives get millions of conservative immigrants? Even many Christians in Brazil and other nations are tainted by socialist expectations: they want government to do everything for them.

There is little hope for American social conservatives and their political survival.

How should American conservative Christians respond to the Third World change in their nation?

If they cannot go to the ends of the earth to preach the Gospel, people from these ends are being brought by socialists (aka Democrats) to receive the Gospel — not the Social, Marxist and liberal Gospel that is destroying mainline Protestant churches in America, but the real Gospel, which delivers people from every evil, including socialism (aka Democratic Party).

At least, this is my view as a Brazilian Christian.

With information from the Washington Times and WND. Reviewed by Don Hank.

Portuguese version of this article: EUA, cristãos conservadores e expectativas do terceiro mundo

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Recommended Reading:

Changing demography and waning Christian influence in politics: the future of America

Has Obama failed to advance leftism in America?

Anthony Comstock: the first pro-life activist in the modern history