The Hijacking of Homosexuality by the Right, a Challenge for Christians

By Julio Severo

The right has been preaching that homosexuals and their demands have been hijacked by the left. This preaching generally includes the idea that any restriction or condemnation of homosexuality is of a communist nature and that all homosexual freedom is the fruit of American capitalism.

Homosexual Milo Yiannopoulos, invited as keynote speaker for CPAC in 2017

While this idea appeals to nominal Christians longing for a right that confronts socialism, such preaching is at least misleading.

If any restriction or condemnation of homosexuality is of a communist nature, then is God, who in the Bible condemns homosexuality in the strongest terms, a communist?

The idea that capitalism is synonymous with homosexual freedom is not an honest one, unless only capitalism without Christian values is taken into account. Actually, capitalism without Christian values is China’s greatest strength and economic partner, the largest communist nation in the world.

The largest capitalist nation in the world is the U.S. But the freedom and debauchery that homosexuals have in the United States today was not due to the original American capitalism of Protestant values. It was due to a capitalism without Christian values, which gave excessive freedom to the furious and aggressive actions of homosexual groups aided by leftists.

The U.S. is famous for being the largest Protestant and conservative country in the world. Within this reality, U.S. laws have always criminally condemned sodomy (homosexuality). These laws were only abolished under pressure from homosexualist groups in the 1990s by a majority of Catholic judges in the U.S. Supreme Court.

So the freedom and debauchery of homosexuals today in the United States is not the result of capitalism of Christian values. It is the result of the efforts of leftists and homosexualist groups, which seek to advance to many other aberrations. They use the system of capitalism without Christian values, which favors everything and everyone, including Chinese Communists and Sunni Muslims.

China has so much economic prosperity that Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, when he visited it during the anniversary of the communist revolution, declared: “I am in a capitalist nation.”

Saudi Arabia has modern buildings and is the largest buyer of U.S. arms.

However, capitalist progress has not improved the savage ethics of Chinese Communists and Saudi Muslims. They remain as violent and undemocratic as before, because the capitalism that has brought them progress is capitalism without Christian values.

It is the adherents of this capitalism without Christian values that are promoting the idea that homosexuals can be conservative and even Christian. To some extent, they are right: If Chinese Communists and Saudi Muslims can be capitalists, why can’t gay activists be conservative and Christian?

U.S. capitalism without Christian values has made communist China and Saudi Arabia great. And that same capitalist mindset without Christian values can also make “conservative homosexuality” great.

CPAC (Conservative Political Action Conference) held its first conference in Brazil in 2019, where Eduardo Bolsonaro held prominently the gay flag in support of “conservative homosexuality.” Who can blame him? For its 2017 event, CPAC invited as its key note speaker Milo Yiannopoulos, the most prominent “conservative” gay in the United States, in a big effort to make “conservative homosexuality” great. Yet, the scandal of a video of Yiannopoulos defending homosexual pedophilia eventually knocked down him and his conservative homosexual greatness.

Did CPAC learn some lesson? By no means. For its 2018 event, CPAC banned a pro-family group and approved a homosexualist group. So it is no wonder that Eduardo Bolsonaro, a fervent adherent of occultist Olavo de Carvalho, held the gay flag in the first CAPC event in Brazil.

CAPC, which is considered the most prominent “conservative” conference in the world, is already hijacking homosexuality and leading the very bad example that conservatives around the world should also hijack homosexuality for the sake of the right-wing ideology.

Therefore, Christians should be wary of a pro-homosexual right, especially if it appears in Christian language that homosexuals can be as good Christians and conservatives as anyone else. As far as I know, occultists are behind this idea, and occultism and homosexuality have always gone together, publicly or not.

Steve Bannon, who is considered an important right-wing voice, has no stances on homosexuality that conservative Christians have, even though he claims to be a Catholic. Likewise, Bannon’s Brazilian counterpart, Olavo de Carvalho, does not have the same stances on homosexual behavior as conservative Christians do, although he also presents himself as a Catholic. In fact, one of the biggest influences in Carvalho’s life was a former homosexual prisoner with AIDS. Both Bannon and Carvalho, who were influenced by Islamic occultist René Guénon, support “conservative” homosexual behavior.

Homosexual ideology and leftist ideology are fully compatible with each other, because of their rebellion against God. So, to say that homosexuals and their ideologies were hijacked by the left is at least a fraudulent and occult strategy. What is quite obvious is that the right, to the detriment of its conservative Christian supporters, is trying at all costs to hijack homosexuality for the sake of the right-wing agenda. This hijacking is already taking place among U.S. right-wingers, in the Republican Party itself. In Israel, the right has also hijacked the gay agenda.

The right-wing hijacking has the sole purpose of using and exploiting homosexuals politically to advance the right. It is a cheap imitation of what the left has done for a long time.

Such hijacking will eventually lead right-wing hijackers to accuse American evangelicals of “communists” for their effort to fight laws that have been tampered with to support homosexual sin and also because throughout American history they have managed to maintain laws against sodomy.

It is not known whether Sodom was right-wing or left-wing. In fact, the terms “right-wing” and “left-wing” do not exist in the Bible. It is only known that the inhabitants of Sodom had the same sexual practices that today leftist and rightist homosexuals have.

I just hope that the right that is seeking to hijack homosexuality for the sake of the rightist agenda, including through the accusation that restriction or condemnation of homosexuality is synonymous with communism, eventually does not condemn God as “communist” for having destroyed Sodom because of homosexual sin.

Portuguese version of this article: O aparelhamento direitista da homossexualidade, um desafio para os cristãos

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Steve Bannon and his views on homosexuality

Olavo de Carvalho was influenced by a former homosexual prisoner with AIDS

How can evangelical leaders criticize homosexual activism in the Trump administration if they are involved in sex scandals?

Benjamin Netanyahu, Right-Wing Jews and the Gay Agenda in Israel

Largest U.S. Gay Magazine Furious Over Evangelical Protest Against U.S. Government Effort to Decriminalize Homosexuality Around the World

Pedophilia Advocacy Knocks Down Prominent “Conservative” Gay

Top U.S. conservative conference bans pro-family Christian group and approves homosexualist group

“Conservatives” Against “Conservatives”: Brazilian President Bolsonaro Is Called a “Homophobe” by U.S. “Conservative” Fox News

By Julio Severo

“Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro’s comment that the country must not become a ‘gay tourism paradise’ sparked concern that LGBTQ people will avoid traveling to the country, fearing the possibility of violence, according to advocates and industry representatives,” said Fox News on Sunday.

By the way, Bolsonaro’s comment sparked concern also in Fox News.

The Fox News report was titled “Homophobic remarks by Brazil's president could harm tourism industry, advocates say.”

You could measure Fox News as more conservative because U.S. President Donald Trump has given preference to Fox News instead of CNN, a liberal channel whom he accuses of FakeNews. So if Fox News accuses Bolsonaro of being a “homophobe,” is this accusation accurate?

In his March trip to the U.S., Bolsonaro also preferred to be interviewed by Fox News instead of CNN, because he also thinks that Fox News is more conservative and because he is against FakeNews.

So, again, is Fox News’s accusation of him being a “homophobe” correct?

Fox News said,

“During a talk with reporters on Thursday, Bolsonaro said that the Latin American country should avoid being known as a gay destination because ‘we have families.’”

I see no problem in his comment, because there is no pride in being known as a modern Sodom, filled of homosexual orgies.

But then Fox News added a troubling comment by Bolsonaro,

“He said that tourists were more than welcome to ‘come here and have sex with a woman.’”

It seems that in this point Fox News aligned itself with homosexualists, who basically complained that if Bolsonaro is ok with tourists coming to Brazil to have sex with women, why not with men too?

Actually, the additional comment by Bolsonaro cannot be considered conservative. To say that tourists are more than welcome to come to Brazil to have sex with women is to treat Brazilian women as whores.

But such offensive comment was not criticized by Fox News, which seems to understand that if Brazilian women are entitled to be treated as whores of tourists, Brazilian men and boys have the same right.

I add boys because Brazil has a massive problem with tourists looking for prostitution, including with underage girls. Homosexual tourism involving prostitution, including with underage boys, has never been assessed by experts.

Fox News said,

“Bolsonaro’s homophobic remarks will have social and economic repercussions for Brazil,” John Tanzella, president of the International LGBTQ+ Travel Association, an organization with members in 75 countries, told Thomson Reuters Foundation.

 While there is no official data on how much revenue LGBTQ tourism generates in Brazil, major events like Sao Paulo’s annual LGBTQ Pride Parade, and Rio de Janeiro’s gay-friendly Carnival, fill hotels nearly to maximum capacity.

“It’s going to have an impact,” Alfredo Lopes, Rio’s regional president of the Brazilian Association of Hotels, told the news agency.

Why cannot Fox News and others see other impacts? Brazilian hotels are known to have scandals of, against the law, allowing underage girls being made available to tourists. Are not Brazilian boys made available to tourists in hotels too?

Also, why see only the alleged positive financial impact, and ignore the negative impacts?

Homosexuality is linked to a host of evils and sexual diseases. What is the impact of these evils and diseases in the Brazilian society? Who pays for the medical bills of the sexual exploitation by homosexual tourists?

So homosexual tourists come without leaving any cheque to cover medical expenses for the burden of their sexual proclivities. Hotels also do not pay for the medical bills, which are billed to the Brazilian taxpayers. This is the reason I am complaining here. Why am I, a Brazilian taxpayer with seven children, forced to pay for the medical bills in government hospitals of men and boys used by homosexual tourists? Why not add this financial impact in the consequences of homosexual tourism? Why have I to pay for the burden of this pervert tourism?

“Conservative” Fox News said,

Bolsonaro, a self-proclaimed “proud homophobe,” has made numerous negative comments about the LGBTQ community over the years.

On Friday, a Brazilian bank commercial highlighting the country’s diversity was pulled following a demand from Bolsonaro. The campaign featured black and transgender actors and it began running at the beginning of the month before it was pulled on April 14, according to Yahoo! News.

What Fox News did not say is that the bank is federal. So I and other Brazilian taxpayers pay for the homosexual commercial. Is it fair? Brazilian conservatives should not be forced to pay for a homosexual commercial from a federal institution imposing values against the Brazilian family.

If to remove a commercial glorifying homosexuality makes Bolsonaro a “homophobe,” I am too, and proudly. But if the definition of “homophobia” is violence against homosexuals, Bolsonaro is not a “homophobe,” because he has never committed any violence to homosexuals. I am not a “homophobe” too, because I have never committed any violence to homosexuals.

In spite of accusations of “homophobia” from “conservative” Fox News, the Bolsonaro administration has decided to keep laws and federal homosexual departments created by the former administrations of socialist presidents Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva and Dilma Rousseff. Homosexual directors of federal homosexual agencies appointed by Rousseff will be kept in their posts, by Bolsonaro’s decision. So how can Fox News accuse him of being a “homophobe” if he is keeping homosexualists in federal posts?

I am the author of “O Movimento Homossexual” (The Homosexual Movement), published originally by the Brazilian branch of Bethany House Publishers in 1998. This was the first book to expose the homosexual agenda in Brazil.

As a conservative evangelical who has been fighting against the homosexual agenda for over 20 years, including during the terms of Lula and Rousseff, I cannot understand and accept that “homophobe” Bolsonaro has decided to keep federal homosexual agencies in his administration, forcing me and other taxpayers to pay the salaries of homosexualists in the federal government.

I cannot also accept Bolsonaro’s comment that tourists are more than welcome to come to Brazil to have sex with women, who should not be treated as whores. This comment was very offensive to Brazilian women, and Fox News should have condemned it, but it did not do it.

There is some conservatism in Bolsonaro. Some fake conservatism. And some confusion. Much of this confusion is because he is very poorly advised.

Yet, how can “conservative” Fox News help him if it condemns him for removing a homosexual commercial but does not condemn him for keeping federal homosexual agencies in his administration and for disrespecting Brazilian women?

Portuguese version of this article: “Conservadores” contra “conservadores”: Bolsonaro é chamado de “homófobo” pelo canal de TV “conservador” Fox News dos EUA

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Confirmed: Olavo de Carvalho is the Rasputin of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. Leader of Bolsonaro’s party says that he is in love with Carvalho

Brazilian televangelist Silas Malafaia says that it is just ridiculous to discard evangelicals to credit Bolsonaro’s victory to astrologer Olavo de Carvalho

Steve Bannon, expelled by Trump for leaking information and self-promotion, will be the special guest of Jair Bolsonaro on the eve of the Brazilian president’s meeting with President Trump at the White House

Evangelical Leaders Vent Criticism of Brazil’s Bolsonaro Administration for Giving Them Very Little Space

Abortion in Israel: Why Is There No Public Outcry from Pro-Life Christians?

By Julio Severo

Israel, a nation that receives strong support from evangelical Christians around the world because of God’s promises to the Jewish people and their Promised Land, boasts of having one of most liberal abortion laws in the world, but such sacrifice of babies on the altar of Moloch and Baal barely causes a ripple among right-wingers and pro-life Christians.

Each woman in the Israeli military, the Israel Defense Forces, is given at least one “free” abortion if she wants one. “Free” for the woman, but not for the tax-payer.

Furthermore, while all Israeli women who want a “free,” publicly funded abortion must go before a government panel before having an abortion, the Israeli newspaper Times of Israel reports 98 percent of abortions are approved.

In 2012, Israel legally performed 20,063 “free” abortions — approximately 10% of all known pregnancies in Israel — at the expense of tax-payers. These numbers do not include non-recorded abortions performed in private offices without government funding.

So it is no surprise that in 2014 The Times of Israel run the headline “Israel’s abortion law now among world’s most liberal.”

Israel’s liberal abortion laws have been approved under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is the leader of the most right-wing coalition government in Israel’s history.

The Israeli Right is not as worried about abortion — and for that matter, the homosexual agenda — as the American Right has been.

The Netanyahu government has also been an advocate of the global warming ideology, even criticizing the Trump administration for rejecting it, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

Even though Netanyahu is known among American conservatives as a Jewish leader who encourages people to read the Bible and fiercely fights for the Promised Land — and he has my full support on these positions —, his anticonservative stances are less known, including his support for the homosexual agenda.

So Israel under Netanyahu has been no better than the most rebel Israeli governments in the Old Testament.

Writing in the progressive website “Patheos,” Catholic author Mark Shea raised an interesting point in his 2014 article titled “The Zealously Pro-Abort Politician ‘Prolife’ Christian Conservatives Staunchly Support.” He said,

“The Dems may have soured on Obama, but there is still one ardently pro-abortion politician that Americans love and support without question. Curiously, he is, if anything more intensely and unquestioningly supported by ‘prolife’ conservative Christians than by the left. Indeed, for many ‘prolife’ Christian conservatives, to question this zealously pro-abortion politician is like questioning the will of God himself. His name: Benjamin Netanyahu, whose administration enacted some of the most fanatically pro-abortion laws on the planet. Imagine conservative prolife Christians regularly declaring ’We must stand with President Obama as never before!’ and you get something of the disconnect. Only Obama has never enacted abortion policies as radical as Israel’s under Netanyahu. And with our tax monies, we are helping to subsidize them, all while Christian conservatives have been almost entirely silent, because many of them hold to a theology of ‘Touch not God’s Anointed’ when it comes to Israel.”

For conservative Americans, Israel in the Bible and Israel as a modern state with its pro-abortion and pro-sodomy policies are morally separate. In fact, they think that they should treat modern pro-abortion Israel with the same holy attitude Israel is treated in the Bible. Because Israel is abundantly mentioned in the Bible, they are incapable of criticizing modern Israel over its abortion and sodomy advocacy.

Their inconsistency is also demonstrated by their attitude of supporting pro-sodomy and pro-abortion Netanyahu when in no way they would tolerate similar version of pro-sodomy and pro-abortion right-wing politician in America.

Yet, not only conservatives are inconsistent regarding Israel.

You would expect left-wing groups around the world to hail Israel for its liberal abortion law. After all, these groups are in the forefront of the worldwide abortion advocacy in the United States, UN, etc.

You would expect these groups to follow their particular leftist common sense: “If Israel has liberal abortion and Arab nations do not have it, so we side with Israel!”

You would expect these groups to defend pro-abortion Israel and attack the antiabortion neighboring Muslim nations of Israel. But this is not so. Even when Israel insanely embraces abortion and gay parades and other homosexual perversions (rejected by all its Muslim neighbors), these groups keep supporting anti-sodomy and anti-abortion Muslim nations and attacking pro-abortion and pro-sodomy Israel.

Why do they behave this way? Cannot they appreciate the many leftist affinities of the Jewish state with the interests of the global Left? Cannot they remember that Karl Marx was a Jew? Do not they know that Israel is the most successful socialist nation in the world?

They seem to fear that if you begin to remember the Jewish component in Marx or in the pro-abortion Israel, people will be led to prominent Jewish qualities that are superior to Marx and the pro-abortion Israel.

Moses and the Jewish Scriptures (the Christian Old Testament) are superior to any leftist trendy law in Israel.

The Jewish Jesus is infinitely superior to the Jewish Marx.

The Jewish people are engraved with eternal values (this is why we say Jewish-Christian values) and these values are above Marx and pro-abortion Israel. Lead people to think in Jewish people, and they will inevitably think in the Jewish Scriptures. So is it any wonder that leftists prefer to defend Arabs and Muslims?

The Jewish state spends millions to subsidize abortion — and subsidy is the socialist way to take your money to fund services you do not approve, including abortion. If the liberal abortion law in Israel doesn’t anger Israeli right-wingers, it should anger conservative Christians around the world and lead them to take an intelligent stance on Israel: To support Jews’ exclusive right to their Promised Land, but not their sins.

Abortion is a very serious sin and crime. In fact, the Bible says that blood-shedding defiles a nation. In the case of Israel, its liberal abortion law defiles the Promised Land. And if God’s Word is correct, the only atonement for the blood of babies killed by abortion shed on the Promised Land is by the blood of the Jews who have shed it. God said,

“You shall not pollute the land in which you live; for blood pollutes the land, and the land can have no expiation for blood that is shed on it, except by the blood of him who shed it.” (Numbers 35:33 The Jewish Study Bible: Second Edition. Oxford University Press. 2014)

Pro-life groups should protest taxpayer funding of abortions in Israel. There is no inconsistency between to support the Jewish right to the Promised Land and to protest the sacrifice of innocent Israeli babies. In fact, Israeli prophets, who believed the fundamental right of the Jews to their land, protested abundantly the sacrifice of babies in the worship of Baal in the old government of Israel.

Prophets’ protests are abundantly recorded in the Jewish Scriptures, which are the Christian Old Testament.

So if God’s servants denounced Israel’s sins in the past, why are God’s servants today so silent and fearful of denouncing the defilement of the Promised Land by the sins of sodomy (homosexuality) and sacrifice of babies (abortion) committed by the Jews in Israel? Or has Israel today an exclusive right to sin — a right God did not give to the old Israel?

What is the point of a Christian defending the Jews’ right to their land if they, by their sins, are losing the most important “land” — the eternal Promised Land in the Heaven?

Christians have an obligation to defend the exclusive Jewish right to the Promised Land. But they have a much bigger responsibility: to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the Jews in Israel and around the world, to save them from their sins, including their adherence to abortion, sodomy, socialism, etc.

Not every Christian leader disagrees with Israel’s abortion law. In Brazil, the founder of the Universal Church of the Kingdom of God (UCKG) is an enthusiastic supporter of Israel and abortion.

Bishop Edir Macedo is a so big supporter of Israel that he and other UCKG leaders often visit Israel. He inaugurated in São Paulo a gigantic replica of the temple of Solomon. But, at the same time, he is the most pro-abortion and cessationist neo-Pentecostal leader in Brazil.

He became pro-abortion after several years living in the United States in contact with pro-abortion Protestants. And the Israeli pro-abortion culture only hardened his stance. Ultimately, he is following Israel’s sins.

What is the point of a Christian visiting Israel — just as Macedo and UCKG leaders frequently do — without preaching the Gospel or even do as the old prophets did by denouncing the blood-shedding of innocent babies defiling the Promised Land?

Why cannot pro-Israel Christians as Macedo denounce Israel’s sins?

Israel’s sins to be denounced do not include their conflict with Palestinians usurpers, because the Promised Land is just for Jews. Palestinians, who are mostly Muslim Arabs, should seek somewhere else to live.

The pro-life stance Christians have came from the Scriptures God gave to Israel, and Christians should work to give the Scriptures back to Israel, in its essence of obedience.

God said about the old Israel, with words that are similarly relevant to the modern pro-abortion Israel:

“Their own sons and daughters they sacrificed to demons. They shed innocent blood, the blood of their sons and daughters, whom they sacrificed to the idols of Canaan; so the land was polluted with bloodguilt. Thus they became defiled by their acts, debauched through their deeds. The LORD was angry with His people and He abhorred His inheritance.” (Psalm 106:37-40 The Jewish Study Bible: Second Edition. Oxford University Press. 2014)

According to the Jewish Scriptures, God abhors child sacrifice and He abhors even His inheritance, Israel, when His people sheds innocent blood, the blood of their sons and daughters.

Child sacrifice to the god Baal in the old Israel

The Jews have an exclusive right to the Promised Land. But this right does not include filling the Promised Land with innocent blood and sodomy.

Yet, U.S. conservative Christians have had toward modern Israel a sacred silence on child sacrifice and sodomy that Israeli Prophets in the past never had toward the old Israel for the same sins.

As a right-winger, Benjamin Netanyahu is right when he denounces the Inquisition and the Holocaust and their Jewish victims. He was courageous by giving Pope Francis “The Origins of the Inquisition in Fifteenth Century Spain,” a book written by his own father that largely revolves about Spanish Catholics questioning, torturing, punishing and burning Jews. Pope Francis, who in his turn should give Netanyahu a book on how Jews are cowardly aborting their babies in Israel, has never done it.

Famous evangelical leaders who visit Israel and meet Netanyahu have had the same “courage” as the pope: They have never given Netanyahu any book showing how Israel is sinning against God by killing its own babies and celebrating sodomy.

Netanyahu gave a very beautiful example by giving a book on the crimes of the Inquisition. Now who will give him a book on the crimes of abortion?

The abortion holocaust needs to be exposed. When U.S. Christian leaders shut their eyes to abortion in Israel under Netanyahu, they are not behaving prophetically. They are behaving cowardly.

Above all, Christians should remember that the earthly Promised Land is not the ultimate destiny of the Jews. So they have the urgent mission to prepare the Jews for the heavenly Promised Land. And the only way to prepare them is by preaching the Gospel.

Without spiritual conversion, earthly Jews will keep filling the Promised Land with the blood of aborted babies and the abominable stains of sodomy. With such sins, they have no right to enter the heavenly Promised Land.

They need to know the Jewish Jesus, who is against the Inquisition and abortion and gives abundant life. Who will introduce Him to them?

With information from Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, LifeSiteNews, Daily Beast and Jewish Virtual Library.

Portuguese version of this article: Aborto em Israel: Por que não há protestos públicos generalizados de cristãos pró-vida?

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Benjamin Netanyahu, Right-Wing Jews and the Gay Agenda in Israel

Benjamin Netanyahu gives Pope Francis book against the Inquisition

Christian Freedom in the U.S., Russia, Israel and Brazil

Brazilian Homosexualist Politician Jean Wyllys Is Criticized for Israel Trip

The Holocaust and the Misdirected Criticism of a Brazilian Jew against Conservatives in Europe and America

Jewish Issues: A Clarification to Christians about Their Perception on the Jews

Why Is Israel Saving Islamic Terrorists?

Israel Condemns Iran, Not Saudi Arabia, for Persecuting Christians

What every Christian should know about Israel

Right Wing Watch, of People for the American Way, After Julio Severo, Again… 2

By Julio Severo

Right Wing Watch, a major American socialist group, has “exposed” me last week, again, to its U.S. leftist audience for politically incorrect views. 

Right Wing Watch said:

Julio Severo asserts that Obama’s state department fomented “culture war on behalf of the homosexual agenda” all over the world that was carried out by that “pro-sodomy neocon,” Hillary Clinton.

Right Wing Watch exposed, at the same time, James Dobson, Cindy Jacobs, Lou Engle, Lance Wallnau and Rick Joyner just for expressing conservative views hated by the U.S. left.

Other prominent conservative leaders frequently attacked by Right Wing Watch are: Scott Lively, Pat Robertson, Peter LaBarbera, Tony Perkins, Matt Barber, Linda Harvey, Bill Federer, Michael Savage, Alex Jones, Joseph Farah, Jerry Falwell Jr., Jane Chastain, Erik Rush, Bryan Fischer, Michele Bachmann, James Dobson, Dinesh D’Souza, Family Research Council, Barbara Simpson, Mat Staver and many others.

This is not the first time Right Wing Watch exposed me. Last October Right Wing Watch said:

Julio Severo proclaims that “neocon Hillary and her Catholic vice want to purge America from real Christian conservatives …The real Founding Fathers of America, including the first American president George Washington, were white, Protestant and conservative. They were not pro-abortion, pro-sodomy and neocon. They would never support neocon Hillary.”

In that same month, Right Wing Watch said:

Matt Barber’s BarbWire website posted a story on Monday by frequent contributor Julio Severo, who was alarmed by a “bisexual community briefing” at the White House last month and, in particular, the speech of a self-described bisexual Sioux man who began his presentation by calling on “the Great Spirit, Wakan Tanka, to guide our words and thoughts so that we can speak true and strong.”

In a column titled “Bisexual Indian Invokes Demons At White House,” Severo wrote that the man had invoked “homosexual spirits,” thereby infesting the White House with demons that can only be expelled by “people who know and use the authority of Jesus’ name.”

“A homosexual culture is a culture of demon possession,” he wrote. “Has the White House turned into a haunt of demons?”

The prominent atheistic website Patheos also criticized my Christian view on demons. They do not believe in any God and demon activity in this world. In an article titled “The White House Must Be Exorcised Of Bisexual Native American Demons, Says Christian Writer,” Patheos said, “Severo described the spirits/gay demons as being ‘invisible, lethal and destructive’ — which is fascinating given that, as far as anyone knows, no one has ever actually been murdered by one…”

The Patheos article generated 110 comments from raging atheists against Severo.

In another post this month, Right Wing Watch said: “Julio Severo warns that if ‘Hillary is elected, everyone in the United States and around the world will pay a high cost for her aggressive abortion and sodomy agenda.’”

They also “exposed” in September 28, 2015:

Finally, Julio Severo is not happy with the nomination of Eric Fanning to serve as Secretary of the Army: “I am sure that in Obama’s and Fanning’s case, the Father of America would approve sentence on them and he would treat, with abhorrence and detestation, their sodomy and sodomy advocacy as an infamous crime. In the least, Obama would be expelled from the U.S. presidency and Fanning would be expelled from Army, both with dishonor, never to return. Both have committed treason against the Father of America.”

They also “exposed” me in June 30, 2015:

Julio Severo warns that “homosexuality brought destruction to Sodom, and it will bring destruction to any city or superpower embracing it. A remnant of Christians faithful to God should warn about the danger of sodomy and support efforts to protect children and their families from it.”

In June 18, 2015, Right Wing Watch again “exposed” me by saying:

Finally, Julio Severo wants to see Scott Lively appointed “as a U.S. Special Envoy for the Human Rights of Children and their Protection against the LGBT Agenda.”

Again, Right Wing Watch read my politically incorrect view on Barbwire.

What does Right Wing Watch, which is owned by People for the American Way, want?

According to WND, People for the American Way (PFAW) is “an atheist socialist organization which, through publications like its ‘Right Wing Watch,’ dedicates itself to the destruction of conservatives in general.”

According to its website, Right Wing Watch has a special mission to attack conservatives opposed to the gay agenda, abortion and Muslim ideology.

Right Wing Watch has “exposed” my view other times too, and I answered here: “People for the American Way’s Leftist Diatribe Against a Brazilian Conservative.”

And here: “American Left Hates Julio Severo!”

What do they intend to do?

In 2011, WND had reported on surveillance by the Homeland Security Department against my blog. What did they intend to do?

In the same year, WND reported in a headline on PayPal cutting my account after a campaign by a U.S. homosexual organization.

Why is Goliath (Right Wing Watch, Homeland Security Department, etc.) monitoring and worried about a small David?

Portuguese version of this article: Observatório da Direita, da entidade esquerdista People for the American Way, está atrás de Julio Severo, de novo… 2

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

The Left and Atheists Are Watching…

Atheist Socialist Right Wing Watch “exposes” Julio Severo, again…

In the Leftist Black List, Again

Atheist Ed Brayton: Julio Severo is a Brazilian ‘wingnut’

How to Help Julio Severo through the PayPal Account of the Jewish Institute for Global Awareness