Brazilian education minister with Jewish roots in the Bolsonaro administration was criticized by the Israeli government and Jewish groups for comparing police investigation raids against allies to Nazi persecution against Jews

By Julio Severo

Brazil’s education minister drew criticism from the Israeli government and Jewish groups in the U.S. and Brazil for likening Federal Police raids against allies of the Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro to Kristallnacht — the beginning of the Nazi persecution against Jews.

Abraham Weintraub

“Today was the day of infamy, national shame, and it will be remembered as the Brazilian Night of the Broken Glass,” tweeted on May 27, 2020, Abraham Weintraub, whose Jewish paternal grandparents fled the Nazis.

“They desecrated our homes and are suffocating us. Do you know what the great oligarch/socialist press will say? SIEG HEIL!” continued the minister in his tweet, adding a picture that shows the boycott to Jewish stores in Germany in 1933.

Kristallnacht, or the Night of Broken Glass, refers to the 1938 Nazi persecution marking as the beginning of the Holocaust.

Weintraub was born to a Catholic mother and a Jewish father whose family members were killed in Nazi concentration camps. He is usually mistaken as Jewish due to his name, but, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, he does not identify as a Jew.

Jewish organizations in the U.S. and Brazil harshly criticized his comments.

“The comparison is totally unreasonable and inopportune, unacceptably minimizing those terrible events, the beginning of the Nazi march that culminated in the death of 6 million Jews,” said Fernando Lottenberg, president of the Brazilian Israelite Confederation, the most important Jewish organization in Brazil.

“Enough is enough! The repeated political weaponization of Holocaust language by Brazilian government officials is profoundly offensive to world Jewry and an insult to the victims and survivors of the Nazi terror. It needs to stop immediately,” tweeted the American Jewish Committee, the most important Jewish organization in the U.S.

Even though the Bolsonaro administration is an ally of Israel, especially because evangelicals, Bolsonaro’s most important political base, are traditional supporters of Israel, the Israeli government also criticized Weintraub’s comparison.

The consul general of Israel in São Paulo, Alon Lavi, said:

“The Holocaust, the greatest tragedy in modern history, where 6 million Jews, men, women, elderly and children were systematically murdered by Nazi barbarism, is unprecedented. This episode can never be compared to any political reality in the world.”

With the same critical tone, the Israeli Embassy in Brazil issued a statement:

There was an increase in the frequency of use of the Holocaust in public discourse, which unintentionally trivializes its memory and also the tragedy of the Jewish people, which ended with the extermination of 1/3 of our people out of hatred and ignorance of the Nazis and their collaborators.

In the name of the strong friendship between our countries, which has grown more and more for 72 years, we demand the question of the Holocaust as well as the Jewish people or Judaism to be left out of the daily political dialogue and the disputes between the sides in the ideological game.

This is the first time that Israeli diplomats have publicly criticized the Bolsonaro administration. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Brazil to participate in the inauguration of the Brazilian president in 2019. At the time, Netanyahu said: “We have no better friends in the world than the Evangelical community, and the Evangelical community has no better friend in the world than the State of Israel.”

In January 2020, Brazilian top culture official Roberto Alvim, an adherent of Olavo de Carvalho, was fired for imitating a Nazi speech. At the time, Israel’s ambassador to Brazil, Yossi Shelley, spoke directly with Bolsonaro to express Israel’s concern about Alvim’s speech, who had published a video in which he made use of excerpts from a speech by Joseph Goebbles, minister of propaganda in Hitler’s Germany. Soon after, Alvim was fired.

There were also other conflicts between Jewish groups and the Bolsonaro administration. In April 2020, the American Jewish Committee demanded an apology from Foreign Affairs Minister Ernesto Araújo, who compared social isolation to contain COVID-19 to Nazi concentration camps. It was an unreasonable comparison, as even Israel used social isolation to contain COVID-19.

In March 2019, Araújo said in an interview that Nazism was a left-wing movement. The Jews say it was a right-wing movement, and their view has weight, as they were the biggest victims of Nazism and many of them were left-wingers. On a trip to Israel that same month, Bolsonaro supported Araújo’s view, but was challenged by the Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem, which declared that Nazism was a right-wing movement.

Weintraub’s comparison was made after on May 27, 2020 Brazil’s federal police held search and seizure warrants against several allies of President Bolsonaro as part of an investigation about threats to Supreme Court’s ministers and the spread of fake news.

Were the political allies worthy of Weintraub’s comparison? The actions of the Brazilian federal police affected several individuals, including Sara Winter, Allan dos Santos and Bernardo Kuster.

Sara Winter became internationally known after LifeSiteNews, the most important international Catholic pro-life website, published a 2015 report on her, presenting her alleged conversion to Catholicism. The report said,

Sara Fernanda Giromini first made herself known to Brazil and to the world under the alias “Sara Winter” in 2012, when she became the founding member of Femen Brazil, and led a trio of girls in a number of topless protests that garnered much media attention. However, only three years later, the young activist has done an about-face and has declared war on feminism and abortion, and is apologizing to Christians for her offensive behavior.

She continues using her nickname, Sara Winter, which is the Portuguese form for “Sarah Winter,” a British Nazi supporter and member of the British Union of Fascists.

In a May 27, 2020 video, Sara said that she would like to “exchange punches” with a Supreme Court minister and stated that this minister “will never again have peace in his life.” She said:

You wait for me, Mr. Alexandre de Moraes. You will never have peace in your life again. We are going to make your life hell, we are going to find out the places you go to, we are going to find out who are the maids who work for you… We are going to find out everything in your life until you ask to leave. Today you made the worst decision of your life.

Sara Winter is the leader of the self-titled group “300 do Brasil” (300 of Brazil), who camped in front of the Brazilian Supreme Court. The group, whose members wear camouflage clothing similar to Army clothing and carry weapons, has already been called an “armed militia” by the Federal Prosecutor’s Office of the Federal District and Territories. It resembles a paramilitary group.

Sara Winter

In an interview with the BBC’s Portuguese news service in London, Sara said the presence of weapons in her camp is “for the protection of the members themselves.” The BBC said:

Sara Winter likes to publish photos holding guns and says on social media that she “shoots very well.”

She has given several versions for the “300 of Brazil.” She says it was Olavo de Carvalho’s idea, who is her guru. She also says, perhaps to please different groups, that the name was chosen based on the “300 of Gideon,” from the Old Testament in the Bible. She also says it was based on the “300 of Sparta.”

Sara has also given other explanations for a tattoo on her shoulder of an Iron Cross, a Germanic symbol that became popular during the Nazi regime and was the main Nazi decoration of war. Sara says that the tattoo was a tribute to the “Knights Templar of the Middle Ages,” but German researcher Carina Book has confirmed that it is the Iron Cross.

About the “300 of Brazil” camp in front of the Supreme Court, she said: “Who asked me to do all this was Professor Olavo.”

It is no surprise then that on May 28, 2020, Olavo asked for the death penalty for the minister who requested the Federal Police’s action against Sara and others. But if he defends the death penalty for the minister who seeks to take away Sara’s right of speech, then why is he the greatest denier of the Inquisition in Brazil? The Inquisition took from its victims not only their right of speech, but also their property and lives.

On some occasions Sara Winter has stated that she received training in Ukraine and that she wants to “Ukrainize” Brazil, a stance difficult for conservatives to understand, as the Ukrainian revolution was largely funded by George Soros, the Obama administration and the neocons.

In the training sessions promoted by Sara for her “300 of Brazil,” photos and videos are prohibited and adequate clothing is required for physical combat training.

Sara Winter with her skull mask, according to the journalist website A Publica

In a photo of “300 of Brazil,” Sara Winter appears with other militants, wearing a skull mask. The mask is very popular in Europe and the United States among neo-Nazis. “The skull mask has become a universal fascist aesthetic,” journalist Jake Hanrahan wrote on Twitter.

Neo-Nazi group Atomwaffen Division and its skull masks

In the film “A Vida de Sara” (Sara’s Life), a biographical documentary produced by the Lumine platform, dubbed “Conservative Netflix,” Sara Winter says that FEMEN sent money so she could be trained in Ukraine and take this training back to Brazil.

The movie was produced by Matheus Bazzo, who also produced the documentary about Olavo de Carvalho, “The Garden of Afflictions.”

In the movie, Sara says that she has already prostituted herself and she appears shooting and handling firearms.

Such a picture seems problematic for the image of conservative Christians who fight against the abortion and homosexuality agenda.

Among the supporters of “300 of Brazil” are Terça Livre journalist Allan dos Santos and psychiatrist Ítalo Marsilli, who declared in one of his videos that women should not be allowed to vote because they are easy to seduce. He said:

“In Greek democracy, the only one in the world that worked, women were not expected to vote. When the vote becomes full, that is, women and everyone else can vote, you see that there is a crisis in the state’s governance. It is very easy for you to convince a woman to vote, you just have to seduce her.”

Santos and Marsilli are also adherents of Olavo de Carvalho. Santos was a prominent speaker at CPAC Brazil in 2019, an event that was held with taxes and used to glorify Olavo.

As for Bernardo Kuster, who together with Sara and Santos was also targeted by the Federal Police, he abandoned the Evangelical Church to follow Carvalho’s syncretic Catholicism. Today Kuster promotes the idea that the Inquisition was a court of mercy — a stance strongly contested by the Israeli government and the Jews. In fact, in 2013, on a visit to the Vatican, Netanyahu gave Pope Francis a copy of a massive book against the Inquisition written by his father.

On Netanyahu’s next visit to Brazil, he should give a copy of this book to each member of the Bolsonaro administration. Some of them, who follow Carvalho, believe that the Inquisition was a lie, although it also tortured and killed Jews in Brazil.

What stops Olavo and his adherents, who make a shameless revisionism of the Inquisition, from someday also making a revisionism the Holocaust? After all, the main victims of both were precisely the Jews.

It is impossible to understand this chaotic situation without understanding that Olavo de Carvalho, who has an occult history, is a member of the Traditionalist School. Recently, American Jewish writer Benjamin R. Teitelbaum released the book “War for Eternity,” published by HarperCollins. The book maps the Traditionalist School and its main representatives in several countries. The representative for Brazil is Olavo. Teitelbaum presents the Traditionist School as an occult cult.

By its very nature, the occult brings chaos.

Despite reprimands from the Israeli government and Jewish organizations in the U.S. and Brazil, Education Minister Abraham Weintraub did not back down in his comparison. In fact, he defended it, in the name of free speech. He said in a tweet of May 28, 2020:

Do not speak on behalf of all Christians or Jews in the world. I SPEAK FOR ME! I had Catholic grandparents and surviving grandparents from the Nazi concentration camps (photo). All were Brazilian. I HAVE THE RIGHT TO SPEAK ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST! I don’t need any more people attacking MY FREEDOM!

Yes, he has a right to talk about the Holocaust. But since he has grandparents who survived the Holocaust, why doesn’t he condemn the signs of fascism in the movement he is supporting?

Olavo de Carvalho is the greatest Brazilian defender of the Inquisition, which tortured and killed thousands of Jews. Carvalho’s Catholic supporters support and spread his radical stance that the Inquisition was myth and legend.

If Weintraub knows how to confront Israel and the Jews in his stubborn stance comparing the Holocaust with the actions of the Federal Police against Sara Winters and other Carvalho supporters, why does he not know or cannot confront Carvalho about the Inquisition? Why doesn’t he know how to confront the signs of fascism and occultism in Carvalho and his adherents?

For example, the Brazilian Foreign Minister openly praises Olavo de Carvalho, René Guénon and Julius Evola. Guénon is the Islamic occult master followed by members of the Traditionalist School, whose most prominent member was Evola, guru of the Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. Evola was radically against Marxism and wrote books defending the right-wing ideology, the occult and black magic.

Why doesn’t Weintraub question and confront this?

And regarding his defense of free speech, is this defense total or limited? In 2019, using lies and slander, Olavo de Carvalho, considered Bolsonaro’s Rasputin, called for the Federal Police to investigate me, in a blatant desire to see the state machine silencing my voice and my evangelical articles against the occult and the Inquisition. You can check everything here: http://bit.ly/2CPK0tX

At the time, Weintraub said nothing against Carvalho’s dictatorial desire to censor me.

But today Weintraub, confronting Israel and Jewish groups, speaks out against the Federal Police acting against an activist who has a Nazi surname and was trained in Ukraine by groups funded by George Soros.

Weintraub also defended Terça Livre, a channel that defends the Inquisition and has already attacked, cursed and defamed me.

Is the free speech that Weintraub advocates for everyone or only for those using Nazi nicknames and for those cursing and slandering?

How would an evangelical writer be in this defense? I don’t know, because when Carvalho called for the Federal Police against me, I didn’t see Weintraub defending free speech. But his brother, Arthur Weintraub, who also has an important position in the Bolsonaro administration, when he came across my tweet criticizing Carvalho, blocked me on Twitter.

For them, even Israel can be confronted. But criticizing Carvalho, the advocate of the Inquisition, is unacceptable.

I certainly do not agree with the Supreme Court’s views on abortion and homosexuality. In fact, the so-called “homophobia” was criminalized in Brazil in 2019 after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a homosexualist organization that filed a complaint against me with federal prosecutors years ago.

Weintraub seeks to defend against the Supreme Court Sara and others in the pure logic of free speech, but are not the armed behavior of Sara’s group and her use of symbols so linked to fascism enough red flags that her threats may eventually become violent?

There are three phases in Sara’s history over the past ten years. She was linked to FEMEN in the early 2010s. By the middle of that decade, she was already apparently changed, becoming a pro-life Catholic personality on LifeSiteNews. And there is the most recent Sara, who is connected to Olavo and training a group that has paramilitary characteristics. This is a Sara who wears a fascist mask, swears, uses weapons and threatens ministers of the Supreme Court.

How does not Weintraub confront this, but confronts the Israeli government and Jewish organizations? How does he view this as mere opinion, not as danger signs?

With information from Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Notícias R7, Istoé, Yahoo, CONIB, Correio Braziliense, Estado de Minas, A Publica, BBC, LifeSiteNews, Revista Forum and UOL.

Portuguese version of this article: Ministro da Educação com raízes judaicas no governo Bolsonaro foi criticado pelo governo israelense e organizações judaicas por comparar batidas da Polícia Federal contra aliados à perseguição nazista contra judeus

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Beware the Traditionalist School, the Esoteric Sect that Uses Anti-Marxism to Promote Religious Syncretism and the Personality Cult of Its Leaders

Brazilian Minister of Education Abraham Weintraub and His Right-Wing Socialism or Right-Wing Statism

Nazism: Nationalism and Socialism at the Service of Occultism

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro said that Nazism was a left-wing movement after he visited the Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem. But the museum, which is a memorial of the Jewish victims of Nazism, says that Nazism was a right-wing movement. What about now?

Brazilian top culture official fired after quoting Nazi Goebbels while talking about nationalist art in a video as Hitler’s favorite composer played in the background

Brazil’s Ministry of Education launches astrology campaign for students on the internet, but it deletes posts shortly after criticism from readers that such a campaign was born of the influence of Olavo de Carvalho, who has a history of astrologer, on the Minister of Education

Olavo de Carvalho says, including other institutions, that “every evil that happens in Brazil comes from Evangelical churches,” which he equated with the Communist Party

The Atlantic Introduces the Intellectual and Spiritual Founder of Brazil’s Esoteric Far Right

Steve Bannon and Olavo de Carvalho Together: Two Occultists Promoting an Occult “Conservatism”

Steve Bannon’s Occult Movement, Brazil and Conservative Evangelicals

Astrologer Olavo de Carvalho calls for Brazilian Federal Police to investigate Julio Severo on the allegation that accusations against him involving the Inquisition and occultism are collusions paid by the Russian government that threaten the Brazilian national security

How the Powerful Union of Trump with Evangelicals Saved the U.S. from Steve Bannon and His Occult Plan of a “Traditionalist” Government

Guenonian Influence in Brazil’s Bolsonaro Administration

“Idiotic astrologer”: Response from Brazilian televangelist Silas Malafaia to Olavo de Carvalho, who said that “Every evil that happens in Brazil comes from evangelical churches”

Evangelical group World Vision joins 34 Brazilian left-wing groups to declare that homeschooling “poses risks” to children and adolescents

By Julio Severo

With the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) and children unable to attend school in Brazil, many parents are opting for homeschooling. In reaction, Brazilian left-wingers prepared a manifesto on May 14, 2020 against homeschooling. The manifesto, entitled “In addition to being unconstitutional, homeschooling poses risks to children and adolescents, say 35 organizations in a technical note,” was signed by 35 Brazilian left-wing organizations, including World Vision.

The Brazilian branch of World Vision, which was founded by evangelicals, should fulfill an evangelical mission, and not ally with left-wing groups that constantly attack evangelicals and their values.

What are the complaints from the 35 left-wing groups, including World Vision, against homeschooling?

The manifest complains that “there is no legal support for the practice of homeschooling in Brazil” and that homeschooling “presents other serious risks for the protection of children and adolescents,” adding that “the risks are based on high rates of violence and sexual abuse and child labor occur within the family environment.”

The manifest explains:

According to data from the Ministry of Health, 68% of cases of sexual violence against children and adolescents occur in the home. And most victims of sexual violence are children and adolescents (0 to 17 years old) and female.

With data from the 2019 Brazilian Public Security Yearbook, the technical note shows that every hour, four girls up to 13 years old are raped. And that 66% of male children raped in Brazil are between zero and 15 years old.

The manifesto then blames all this sexual violence in the family environment, without explaining exactly what that environment is. The 35 left-wing groups see the family environment as a “serious risk” environment.

While the normal homeschooling environment is composed of conservative married parents (meaning they are not divorced or remarried because most homeschoolers are practicing Christians), the “family environment” vaguely described by the manifesto does not always have this conservative profile.

If the manifesto were honest, especially with the presence of a large evangelical group that has an international operation, it would praise homeschooling and denounce relationships outside of marriage. But the manifesto does the opposite: it uses the obvious higher violence of relationships outside of marriage, so defended by the left, but prone to abuse, as evidence that homeschooling would be bad.

Traditionally, the left defends relationships outside of marriage, with all its dangers and violence.

And the left traditionally attacks the traditional family, because a conservative married father and mother who educate their children threaten the hegemonic ideological indoctrination of the left in schools. For this reason, the left fights to take children out from families and place them directly under the left-wing indoctrination of schools. A child is much more likely to become a lefty by attending school than by studying in a conservative home.

The left finds easier to monitor and inspect children at school than in homes. One of these inspections includes the issue of physical discipline of children. According to the Spanking Law, passed by socialists in 2014, Brazilian parents are prohibited from physically disciplining their children for disobedience. According to this socialist law, such a discipline constitutes “violence.” So, when a socialist manifesto mentions “child abuse,” that abuse includes what without socialism is not abuse, but a natural right of parents.

The manifesto concludes:

Regulating the practice of homeschooling can aggravate cases of exploitation, abuse and violence against children and adolescents. “It is to prioritize the agenda of a minority — in many cases fundamentalist — to the detriment of the right of the majority. It is, therefore, extremely irresponsible from the point of view of not only education but also the protection of children and adolescents.”

The language of the manifesto, shamefully supported by World Vision, reveals the center of its concern by saying that the legalization of homeschooling prioritizes the agenda of a “fundamentalist” minority. This term is often used not to describe unhealthy family environments, but Christian families following biblical and conservative principles. In no way does homeschooling harm most people, as the document points out, because homeschooling is never imposed on anyone. But, of course, it brings huge losses to the left.

The manifesto considers the conservative home to be an unsafe environment — for socialist indoctrination, of course — and the school environment to be safe — for socialist indoctrination, of course.

As a homeschooling advocate in Brazil for over 20 years (I am the translator of the book They Way Home, by Mary Pride), the only risk I see is the hijacking of the homeschooling banner. In the administration of Jair Bolsonaro, many occult adherents hold important positions, including in the area of education. These occultists were appointed by Olavo de Carvalho, Bolsonaro’s guru. Carvalho is a member of the Traditionalist School, whose most prominent member was Julius Evola, guru of the Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini.

Although Bolsonaro has been elected mainly by evangelicals, he chose to fill his administration with adherents of Carvalho, who use conservatism, including homeschooling, to promote his occult “traditionalist” agenda.

However, the manifesto attacks all homeschooling supporters in Brazil, whether they do it for Christian reasons or for esoteric and “traditionalist” reasons.

Among the 35 groups that signed the socialist document are:

* Geledés Instituto da Mulher Negra, a black supremacist organization that advocates abortion and homosexuality.

* Agenda 2030 Working Group in Brazil, a radically socialist group.

* Paulo Freire Institute, a radically socialist group.

* MST (Landless Rural Workers Movement), a radically socialist group.

* And World Vision.

How does a huge evangelical group like World Vision sign a document that attacks the conservative home as an unsafe environment — for socialist indoctrination — and the school environment as safe — for socialist indoctrination?

Thousands of evangelicals in the U.S. and other countries send donations to World Vision to feed children, not to feed left-wing anti-family fanaticism.

The natural family environment is the greatest protection for the child. To place the school, especially the public school, as a greater protection than the family is something that only socialists do, and something that World Vision is doing by joining 35 radical left-wing groups.

It is time for Christians who send their donations to World Vision to ask questions of this organization that should be at the service of the Gospel and the welfare of children, not the welfare of socialism.

Portuguese version of this article: Entidade evangélica Visão Mundial se une a 34 organizações esquerdistas para declarar que a educação escolar em casa “traz riscos” para crianças e adolescentes

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

A New Reformation to Counter-Attack the Great Gates of Hell?

Homeschooling in Brazil: Where Is it Headed?

An Undercover Agent of the Inquisition in Brazil’s Ministry of Education?

Bolsonaro defends birth control and says that “more educated people have fewer children”

By Julio Severo

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro underwent a vasectomy on January 30, 2020, a sterilization surgical procedure for men who wish to have no children or stop having children.

Although during the 2018 presidential campaign Bolsonaro had, in reaction to feminist groups that preach sterilization and abortion, said, in an emotional tone, that he undid a vasectomy so that his third wife, Michelle, could get pregnant, he decided to get sterilized again.

For Bolsonaro, who considers himself a Catholic, sterilization is problematic, as the Catholic Church prohibits this procedure. Maybe that’s why he asked for secrecy about his new vasectomy.

If example is the greatest of all sermons, Bolsonaro only did regarding his personal birth control procedure what he has defended for a long time.

It is not the first time that Bolsonaro’s attitudes clash with Catholic conservatism. In 2019, the Brazilian president defended family planning policies saying that “more educated people have fewer children.”

He said:

“It is not control… Family planning. You see that more educated people have fewer children. I am an exception to the rule, I have five, okay? But this is the rule.”

Bolsonaro has a history of defending birth control, which he calls “family planning,” ignoring that Margaret Sanger, who founded the International Planned Parenthood Federation (the largest family planning, sex education and abortion organization in the world), coined the term “birth control.” There is therefore no difference between family planning and birth control. Both came from the same source.

As a congressman, Bolsonaro is the author of Bill 4322, of 1993, which proposes “the realization of tubal ligation and vasectomy for the purposes of family planning and birth control.” If he hadn’t been serious about it, he wouldn’t have had a vasectomy himself.

At least, even though Bolsonaro is a contraceptive-minded Catholic, he is democratic. He has allowed his administration, amidst the constellation of birth control methods offered in health services and sex education for teenagers, to also present the option of sexual abstinence.

Typical propaganda by population control activists is to show images of wealthy Europeans and Americans with two children compared to poor Africans with ten children. If population control were not so loved by left-wingers, it would not be difficult to see racism in the comparison between rich white Europeans and poor black Africans.

Probably, seeing the propaganda of the population control promoters Bolsonaro came to the conclusion that having many children is synonymous with poverty. But, as he made clear, he is an exception — although his exception was having 5 children with three different wives, which means he practiced a lot of birth control.

However, why use poor Africans as a standard of large families? Are Africans the only example and standard? Of course not. American Christian families historically had an average of 8 children, and were not poor. They read a lot, especially the Bible, and worked hard. Large families in the U.S. helped to preserve their culture and religion, which was predominantly Protestant. The U.S. Republic was founded by a 98 percent Protestant population.

Large families have always been the norm and standard of the U.S. for centuries. The U.S. of the past, with large families who read the Bible and worked hard, created today’s U.S. with its enormous wealth. You don’t create wealth without work. And you cannot have blessings on your work without God and the Bible. All the wealth accumulated today in the U.S. is the result of generations of large families from the past who, in large part, valued the Bible and hard work.

With the growth of the contraceptive mindset and the consequent decrease of families, the U.S. was getting farther and farther from its old big family pattern and became more and more dependent on immigration, with an increasing number of Muslim immigrants taking advantage of the space left by millions of Americans who were prevented from being born by birth control or deliberately killed before being born in abortion clinics.

The obvious consequence of the decline of American families is that the original culture and religion of the U.S. is declining. Today Protestants are less than 50 percent of the U.S. population while Catholics are less than 25 percent.

So, instead of comparing today’s rich small American families with numerous poor African families, you should compare modern American families, who are no longer large enough to preserve their culture and religion, with American families of 100, 200 and 300 years ago who were numerous enough to preserve their culture and religion.

The men and women who built the United States with their best values and wealth had large families. Therefore, it makes no sense to accept population control propaganda that chooses only large poor families from India or Africa when the best example is the millions of large families that built the United States, lifting their nation out from spiritual, cultural and financial poverty and making it great and Christian.

Despite having a lot of wealth, the United States is already facing demographic problems with low birth rates. But Brazil, which has not even reached the level of wealth in the United States, is also already facing similar demographic problems.

NPR said,

“Brazil has undergone a demographic shift so dramatic that it has astonished social scientists. Over the past 50 years, the fertility rate has tumbled from six children per woman on average to fewer than two — and is now lower than in the United States.”

NPR mentioned preference changes, especially of women, as the cause of the Brazilian low birthrate, but it did not explain what caused them.

What happened 50 years ago, according to NPR, that changed Brazil so much demographically that it reduced its population?

In the 1970s the CIA created a document called NSSM 200 for the U.S. government, classifying Brazil as one of the main nations that should be the target of secret population reduction policies. Among these policies were widespread dissemination of birth control and cultural stimuli so that girls and women might spend as much time as possible studying, as a way to avoid marriage and pregnancy.

The CIA plan worked so perfectly that today even a Brazilian president defends and practices birth control without the slightest pain in his conscience. President Jair Bolsonaro does exactly what the CIA planned 50 years ago.

Brazil is already in the process of a demographic crisis, but Bolsonaro and other advocates of birth control do not realize the danger. Sooner or later Brazil will be forced to import millions of immigrants, as the Brazilian population is already suffering demographic aging, and the nations that have these millions of immigrants to send are the Muslim nations.

From the point of view of demography and Catholicism, it is a mistake for Bolsonaro to accept birth control policies for himself and for Brazil.

As a follower of Jesus, what do I think? Those who follow the Bible know that children are blessings. A large family is God’s will. From this perspective, any method of birth control disrupts God’s plans to multiply blessings in Christian families.

However, whoever does not follow Jesus and the Bible seriously is obliged to see children as blessings and have a large family? No. In fact, the Bible says that the offspring of people who do not know God will disappear. From this perspective, birth control in these people’s lives only helps to fulfill God’s will.

Christians should follow the beautiful model of the large families in the Bible and the United States in their past Protestant generations who were hardworking, ethical and had many children.

Those who do not follow Jesus and the Bible should be free to sterilize themselves.

Portuguese version of this article: Bolsonaro defende controle da natalidade e afirma que “pessoas que têm mais cultura têm menos filhos”

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading on Birth Control:

Churches Closing and Mosques Opening in The United States

Muhammad is one of the top 10 baby names for first time in the U.S. history

In Germany, the Catholic Church and Protestant churches lost more than 430,000 members in 2018

Blood in the Rivers: the Contraceptive Culture and Prophecies in Revelation

The folly of man’s planning

Anti-Baby Vegans Preach It’s Morally Wrong for People to Have Babies and Revile Those Who Disagree with Them

John Calvin: Women Will Be Saved by Having Babies

Anthony Comstock: the first pro-life activist in the modern history

Recommended Reading on Population Control:

Ideological Scam: Scientists Use “Climate Change” to Call for Population Control

Exposing the Global Population Control Agenda

Donald Trump Has Designated Churches and Mosques as Essential

By Julio Severo

President Donald Trump declared on 22 May 2020 that churches, synagogues, mosques and other houses of worship are “essential services” and must reopen.

“Today I’m identifying houses of worship — churches, synagogues and mosques — as essential places that provide essential services,” Trump said in the White House briefing room.

Because of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, all non-essential services have been closed. Churches have been put in this category, but abortion clinics not. Abortion, which was legalized in the United States in 1973 and kills about 4,000 American unborn babies, has been deemed an “essential service.”

“Some governors have deemed a liquor stores and abortion clinics as essential, but have left out churches and other houses of worship. It’s not right. So I’m correcting this injustice and calling houses of worship essential,” Trump said, reading from a statement.

“Many millions of Americans embrace worship as an essential part of life. The ministers, pastors, rabbis, imams and other faith leaders will make sure that their congregations are safe as they gather and pray,” Trump said.

“We need more prayer not less,” concluded Trump, who believes that the prayers of evangelical ministers, Catholic priests, Jewish rabbis, Islamic imams and other faith leaders — including witchcraft leaders — can do a lot of good to the U.S. It is in this belief that he inaugurated, days ago, a totally new multifaith National Day of Prayer. While the National Day of Prayer was launched by evangelicals in the 1950s and was always prominently evangelical, now Trump turned it into a multifaith event, with evangelical ministers, Catholic priests, Jewish rabbis, Islamic imams and many other leaders of different non-Christian and anti-Christian religions.

Trump’s intent is to correct some states, which keep liquor stores, abortion clinics and homosexual clubs open because are deemed “essential.” By declaring churches and mosques essential, Trump has showed that states should grant to churches and mosques the same importance they have granted to liquor stores, abortion clinics and homosexual clubs.

I do not know if George Washington, the first U.S. president, would be happy that someday churches would be granted the same importance as mosques, liquor stores, abortion clinics and homosexual clubs. But I doubt that he would not be shocked.

And I doubt that when Islamic imams make their strange prayers, they are praying for the good of the U.S and its Christian foundation. But I would not doubt if they are praying for their Islamic brothers to be successful in all their efforts to spread Islam — including by sword and bombs.

To make churches and mosques as equally essential is a sign that the U.S. has become a religious Babylon. To make churches and abortion clinics as equally essential is a sign that the U.S. has become an opportunistic Babylon.

So in the current U.S., or Babylon, as David Wilkerson used to call America, if you want to open churches, you have to open abortion clinics too. If you consider churches important, you have to consider mosques equally important, for the sake of sacred equality, which is above God and the Bible in America. In fact, in America’s equality, God and Satan are… exactly equal in religious and legal worth! So you should not be surprised if someday a Satanist offers his prayers at the National Day of Prayer.

Perhaps this confusion explains why on the date celebrating the landmark 500 years of the Protestant Reformation (October 31, 2017), Trump not only did not celebrate it, but he did celebrate Halloween, a date traditionally connected to occultism. Perhaps aware that multiculturalism forces him to celebrate equally the special dates of other religions, he discarded the most important date of Protestantism in the largest Protestant nation in the world.

There is just one problem. Trump has celebrated special dates of other religions at the White House itself.

* In 2018, Trump host his first White House Ramadan dinner.

* Also in 2018, Trump host a pagan Hindu Festival at the White House.

* And Trump’s State Department has officially “blessed” Islamic holidays.

While Trump and his administration celebrate Islamic holidays at the White House, let us ask a very simple question: “Does Saudi Arabia, the capital of Islam and the most important Islamic ally of the U.S., celebrate Protestant holidays?”

So why does the U.S., the largest Protestant nation in the world, celebrate Islamic holidays?

What has the U.S. received by flattering Islam? A multitude of Islamic attacks, including the 9/11 — most of them with Saudi connections.

Could it be that celebration and flattery of Islam draw more hatred and terrorist attacks from Muslims? If this logic is correct, it could explain why Saudi Arabia does not celebrate Protestant holidays. Perhaps Saudi Arabia fears that by flattering and celebrating Protestantism they might eventually draw hatred and terrorist attacks from U.S. Protestants!

Can you imagine if such approach is used to deal with other criminals? To rapists? Incidentally, Saudi students who rape American women go unpunished by fleeing the U.S. under the protection of Saudi Arabia. The U.S. cannot be hard with Saudi rapists fleeing to Saudi Arabia because it could lose billions and billions and billions of dollars. After all, Saudi Arabia is the biggest purchaser of U.S. weapons.

So the U.S. apparently flatters Islam and does not punish Saudi rapists because they have a very good economic and military deal. Has ever Saudi Arabia flattered Protestantism and not punished American criminals just for the sake of this deal?

But Trump is not the first Republican president to flatter Islam.

Immediately after the 9/11, Republican President George W. Bush said that Islam is a “religion of peace,” to make sure that no one had some wrong idea that Islam and Saudi Arabia could be somewhat involved in this horrible attack.

And in the 1950s Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower inaugurated a mosque in Washington and in his speech, he said that Islam has for centuries contributed to the building of civilization. Could he have read, because of a visual impairment, “building” where there was “destruction” in his history books?

Remember the difference: Republicans are conservative and Democrats are socialists following a multicultural agenda. Republicans are different from Democrats. Now repeat it to yourself several times a day until you eventually believe it!

White evangelical Christians have been among the most loyal members of the Trump’s political base, because they are conservative and voted to have a conservative administration, not a multifaith Babylon, with non-Christian and anti-Christian religions having the same worth as the Christian religion that was the bedrock of the U.S. civilization.

With information from Daily Mail and Associated Press.

Portuguese version of this article: Donald Trump designou igrejas e mesquitas como essenciais

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Churches Closing and Mosques Opening in The United States

Muhammad is one of the top 10 baby names for first time in the U.S. history

Christian Freedom in the U.S., Russia, Israel and Brazil

Conservative Babylon in “Persecuted”: Hybrid Televangelist Framed by Pagan Neocon, and the Free Speech or Patriotic or Equality “Gospel” Replacing the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Donald Trump inaugurated totally new multifaith National Day of Prayer, especially against coronavirus, with his charismatic adviser Paula White prophesying “you will recover all”