Glenn Beck Says that Electing Hillary Clinton “Is a Moral, Ethical Choice”

By Julio Severo

The Blaze founder Glenn Beck, a Mormon who is very popular among American conservatives, last Saturday urged his followers to abandon support of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Hillary Clinton

“If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice,” Beck wrote.

Beck’s latest attack on Trump was in response to the release of a private vulgar comment by Trump 11 years ago.

Beck is lucky that he is not in Brazil, because some controversial Brazilian conservatives use vulgar and filthy language, not in a private form, but openly, allegedly to “spread conservatism,” and they are praised, not condemned. Perhaps the Brazilian conservative culture is more rotten than in America.

Yet, if Beck is offended by an old private vulgar comment by Trump, why is not he offended by the many public immoral stances of Hillary Clinton? Piggish language really deserves opposition, but such opposition should never be an excuse to support Hillary or another pro-abortion, pro-sodomy, socialist warmonger.

Glenn Beck

Beck’s opposition to Trump has been unrivaled in its vociferous invective. He regularly describes Trump as a Hitler-like psychopath with supporters Beck has compared to Nazi Brownshirts.

Beck has also given high visibility to anti-Trump individuals, including Trevor Loudon, whose blog said, “If Trump is elected, you will have the Russians… in the White House. Trump’s advisers are very connected to Vladimir Putin and Russia. Trump himself has many ties as well and is friends with Putin. This is why Putin will try to sabotage Clinton with leaked emails, etc.”

With information from Breitbart.

Portuguese version of this article: Glenn Beck diz que eleger Hillary Clinton “é uma escolha moral e ética”

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

If Brazilian Immigrants in the U.S. Are Accused of Being “Pigs,” Why Blame Trump?

A Brazilian Neocon?

Is Trump a KGB Agent?

If Brazilian Immigrants in the U.S. Are Accused of Being “Pigs,” Why Blame Trump?

By Julio Severo

Brazilians, especially their immigrants in the United States, are receiving (and wildly spreading) an article titled, “Trump Says Brazilian Immigrants Are Latin Pigs.”

Veterans Memorial Stadium after a Brazilian festival

In the article, produced Oct. 6 by the Brazilian website “Brasil Verde Amarelo,” the Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is quoted as saying that Brazilians look like Latin pigs, “messing up everything in front of them, they are so disorderly as the Brazilian economy.”

Many Brazilian evangelical immigrants, including ministers, were offended and upset by Trump’s alleged words and promised not to vote for him.

But Trump’s alleged offensive words against Brazilians are not, according to my Google search, his words, and probably were made up with the malicious intent to disaffect Brazilian immigrants from voting for Trump.

So Trump has no offensive words against Brazilians immigrants, who are really worried and “offended” for another reason: because Trump intends to restrict immigration.

Brazilian immigrants, and also many other immigrants, seem to see themselves as entitled to live in the United States and enjoy its affluence as if the U.S. were their house. So they want open borders for them, their relatives and friends.

But, what would they think about their own houses open? There is nothing wrong about it, if this is their choice. But what about if their friends or mere visitors said, “I like your house. I want to live here”? Even though they have a big desire to live in your house, it is not up for them to decide this. Only you can decide this.

An open house is an unsafe house.

An open nation is an unsafe nation.

Sadly, both leftist and conservative Brazilian immigrants appreciate very much open frontiers for the U.S. I understand left-wing Brazilians with such attitude. But why do even Brazilian conservative immigrants, who oppose socialism, appreciate a socialist policy of facilitated immigration for the U.S.?

Usually when the U.S. facilitates immigration, immigrants largely vote for U.S. socialists. This is the reason that U.S. socialists champion facilitated immigration for Brazilians and others.

Besides, there are cases of Brazilian immigrants who despise the U.S. and its Protestant culture. They despise the U.S. Christian culture, but they love the U.S affluence.

So probably the false accusations against Trump saying that Brazilian immigrants are pigs were produced by Brazilians discontent with his immigration ideas.

Yet, what about if Trump had really said that Brazilian immigrants are pigs? Would he have been wrong?

Last week, Brazilian immigrants were in U.S. headlines, including in CBS and Fox. They were bad headlines. These immigrants had a Brazilian festival in the Veterans Memorial Stadium in Lawrence, Mass., and they left the football field littered with trash.

According to CBS, “Mountains of empty beer cans, bottles, and food were left on the football field after the one-day festival.”

The Lawrence mayor said, “We’re disgusted, and just shocked that this would be left this way. We are shocked and dismayed at the level of uncleanliness they left it... the amount of damage...”

I am a Brazilian and I can say that even decent Brazilians would have a very hard time not calling these immigrants “pigs,” because their behavior was piggish.

So Trump would not be wrong if he had called them “pigs.”

Piggish is not limited to their behavior. Many Brazilians are foul-mouthed creatures. Americans were appalled and horrified by some past private vulgar words by Trump exposed recently. Americans are very, very lucky! In America they have a Republican who used privately vulgar language infrequently in the past, and he is being lambasted and criticized for it. In Brazil, there are self-styled conservative leaders who use very vulgar and crude language every day and abundantly on Facebook, and they are praised for their piggish language.

In Brazil, “pigs” are not confined to the Left. They are also abundant in the Right. And while Trump is apologizing for his past vulgar words, self-styled conservative leaders in Brazil, including Brazilian immigrants in the U.S., brag about their abundant daily vulgar and crude words. Even though Brazilian immigrants have no courage to use their filthy language among American conservatives, they spill them among Brazilian conservatives through Facebook.

One of these immigrants, Olavo de Carvalho, says to his Brazilian public on Facebook that the big disadvantage of U.S. conservatives is that they do not use filthy language. He said, “In the U.S. only the Left utters profanity. This is enough to explain why U.S. conservatives, even when they are the majority, are always disadvantaged.”

His hope, as a Brazilian immigrant in the U.S., is to change the U.S. conservative culture to accept filthy language as a tool to advance conservatism. He hopes also to deliver America from the “myth” of the Inquisition.

Many Brazilian immigrants are “pigs” and ignore it. But they are extremely offended and horrified if you call them according to their piggish behavior and language.

If Trump were in Brazil, he would have no need to apologize for any vulgar language. In fact, he could expand and use any crude and lewd words he wanted, even among “conservatives.”

But in the U.S., many Republicans and conservatives are asking Trump to quit for his past filthy words. So should Brazilian immigrants leave the U.S. for their piggish behavior? Should self-styled Brazilian conservatives leave the Brazilian conservatism for importing from the Left the same piggish behavior and language?

If Brazilians, and their immigrants in the United States, are not “pigs,” why be offended by Trump’s alleged accusation against them? Why brag about piggish language?

Portuguese version of this article: Se os imigrantes brasileiros nos EUA são acusados de “porcos,” por que culpar Trump?

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Immigration: A Weapon of Mass Cultural Destruction in Liberal Hands

Why Call Names? An Answer to Olavo de Carvalho

A Brazilian Neocon?

Is Trump a KGB Agent?

Vladimir Putin publicly accused by U.S. government of plot to interfere in presidential election against Hillary Clinton and her party

By Julio Severo

The U.S. government for the first time on Friday formally accused Russia of a campaign of cyber attacks against the socialist Democratic Party and political organizations connected to the socialist presidential candidate Hillary Clinton ahead of the Nov. 8 presidential election.

Hillary Clinton

In an extraordinary joint public statement, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said it was confident that Russia’s “senior-most officials” ordered the attacks. (For more information on DHS, see: “Homeland Security: More Insecurity for Christians?” See also: “Homeland Security surveillance detected on Julio Severo website”)

The statement amounts to an accusation that Vladimir Putin ordered interference in the American political system.

The Obama administration’s decision to blame Russia for the attacks is the latest downward turn in Washington’s relations with Moscow, which are under strain over Russia’s actions that are upsetting U.S. interference in Syria and Ukraine.

“This is a huge deal,” said Michael Morell, the former director of the Central Intelligence Agency. “I can’t think of any time in our history where we have blamed another government for trying to interfere with our elections. ... This is unprecedented across the board.”

Morell has publicly endorsed Hillary and Muslims in CIA. He has characterized Trump as Putin’s agent.

Yet, contrary to what Morell said, it is not “unprecedented.” Some weeks ago DCLeaks, a group of hackers, exposed the immensity of the Soros-funded Left’s campaign that included Soros plans to “counter Russian foreign policy and subvert traditional Russian values.” Soros is a Hillary supporter.

The Obama administration and its agencies have had no interest in denouncing Soros, a U.S. citizen, and his campaigns to undermine Russian policies and values.

As ever, the U.S. government is very fast and comfortable with pointing fingers, blaming, accusing and mocking Russia. For what? For exposing Hillary, who is pro-abortion and pro-sodomy and is the only candidate formally supported by the U.S. Communist Party. Yet, 15 years after over 3,000 Americans were killed in the Saudi Islamic terror attack on the World Trade Center, the U.S. is not able to point any finger at Islam or Saudi Arabia. On the contrary, Bush, Obama and Hillary have said that “Islam is a religion of peace” —perhaps because they enjoy treating Islam peacefully. This feeling is not reciprocal.

They have never dared to provoke Islam and Saudi Arabia the way they provoke Russia, even though Islam and Saudi Arabia have showed very clearly that they are against the Christian America. Russia? Russians have showed very clearly that they are against Hillary and they stand with Trump, who has antagonized Muslims and Saudi Arabia. Is this bad?

U.S. intelligence officials concluded weeks ago that the Russian government was conducting or orchestrating cyber attacks against the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, to disrupt or discredit Hillary and her campaign.

High-level officials in Hillary’s party applauded Obama’s decision to formally accuse Russian hackers of political cyber attacks against Hillary’s organizations.

Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein said in a statement that “[t]he administration’s acknowledgement that Russian intelligence agencies are attempting to influence the U.S. election and undermine public confidence conveys the seriousness of the threat.”

Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff said in a statement on Friday that “I applaud the administration’s decision to publicly name Russia as the source of hacks into U.S. political institutions.”

If they had been told that the nation behind the cyber attacks was Saudi Arabia, all of them, including Obama and Hillary, would apologize for provoking hard feelings in the Saudis. The disparity of U.S. attitude toward Saudis and Russians is blatantly shocking. Saudi Arabia kills Christians and homosexuals. Russia does not kill homosexuals, but bans homosexual propaganda to children and regulates religious activity outside its official Orthodox Christian Church — just as Israel regulates religious activity outside its official Judaism. Whom the U.S. government and press systematically criticize and condemn? Saudi Arabia? No. Russia.

The Democratic National Committee publicly disclosed intrusions into its systems in June, blaming Russia for the attacks.

Only organizations connected to Hillary were attacked. No organization connected to Donald Trump was attacked.

U.S. government officials emphasized that it would be difficult for Russian hackers to alter the results of the Nov. 8 election because each U.S. state runs its own election system. Even so, a senior U.S. official said the Obama administration is considering retaliatory steps against Russia.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissed the U.S. government statement but didn’t deny Russia’s involvement.

“Every day there are tens of thousands of attacks on Putin’s website. Many of the attacks can be traced to the U.S.,” Peskov was quoted as telling the Interfax news agency. “We’re not blaming the White House or Langley every time,” he added, referring to the Virginia city where the CIA is based.

Friday’s official accusation of Russian involvement adds to campaign-year fodder stoked this summer by Donald Trump, who encouraged Russia to find — and make public — missing emails supposedly deleted by Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said in July. He referred to emails on Hillary’s private server that she said she deleted. These messages involved the State Department affairs and their use in a private server constitutes crime. But Hillary has been spared prosecution.

After all, who is the criminal? Hillary, who has lied about her criminal abuse of official government messages? Or Russia, which is exposing her secret scandals, including scandals of her political organizations?

Could the accusations against Russia be a smokescreen to deflect attention from Hillary’s crimes?

With information from DailyMail, Reuters and Associated Press.

Portuguese version of this article: Vladimir Putin publicamente acusado pelo governo dos EUA de conspiração para interferir na eleição presidencial contra Hillary Clinton e seu partido

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Ronald Reagan: A Christian Example against Communism

Trump, Obama, Hillary and NATO

Olavo de Carvalho and His Nonsense on Trump and Russia

A Brazilian Neocon?

Left-Wing Billionaire George Soros and His Plan of Global Chaos

Top Anti-Russia Journalist Presents a Dossier Suggesting Trump May Be a Russian Agent

Former CIA director endorses Hillary Clinton, supports Muslims in CIA and characterizes Trump as Putin’s agent

A Trap for Trump

Russia Suspected in Cyber Attack on Campaign of Pro-Sodomy Hillary Clinton

Trump and the Pope: a Right-Wing Populist (Today) Clashing with a Left-Wing Populist

Putin Loves Hillary!

Is Trump a KGB Agent?

Bisexual Indian Invokes Demons at White House

By Julio Severo

At the White House’s Bisexual Community Briefing that took place on Sept. 26 to honor “Bisexual Awareness Week,” one of the speakers called upon a Native American deity to look over the presentation, which was recorded by the White House website.

Bisexual Community Briefing at White House

BiNet organizer Victor Raymond introduced himself “as an out bisexual two-spirit man” and a member of the Rosebud Sioux tribe. “Two-spirit” is an Indian term for a male-female spirit. 

“Today, we are here at the White House, and I call upon the ancestors to witness our presence, and for the Great Spirit, Wakan Tanka, to guide our words and thoughts so that we can speak true and strong,” he said.

Raymond continued, saying, “As bisexual people, we have always been here. Amongst my people, the Lakota Sioux, two-spirit people, bisexual, gay, lesbian people, as they are now known, transgender people, were given the gift of medicine to share with the members of the tribe. It was Wanka, a mystery. But it was proper and it was part of our community.”

“Now we are faced with new times, when bisexual people, two-spirit people, others that we now know as LGBQ, are not recognized and our place in the community questioned. But bi and trans people — and particularly now amongst many tribes and communities, by bisexual, transgender, Native American women in particular — face challenge and discrimination. We stand with them and with all people whose place is no longer recognized.”

Raymond also said members of the bisexual community need to support Black Lives Matter (a black-oriented socialist movement) as part of standing for “other communities.” Socialist ideology in partnership with homosexual demons.

An interaction between spirits of homosexuality and Indian religions is not uncommon. In Brazil, the most prominent homosexualists are adherents of African and Indian religions, very similar to voodoo. These religions embrace all forms of homosexuality as a gift from their “gods.” Such deities are considered demons in the Christian worldview.

In Christianity and Judaism, homosexuality is accepted only when there is apostasy in those religions. But in Indian religions, heavily affected by witchcraft, no apostasy is necessary for a homosexual presence in their practices, because homosexuality is active among their witchdoctors and other adherents.

A homosexual culture is a culture of demon possession.

Has the White House turned into a haunt of demons?

The first step for a “visitation” of such spirits is invocation — which was made at the White House. Homosexual spirits heard. Their presence is in the place where they were invoked, until their expelling, which can be done only by people who know and use the authority of Jesus’ name.

The Bisexual Community Briefing focused on “policy and cultural issues of significance for the American bisexual community.” Spirits focused on the invisible, lethal and destructive.

With information from MRCTV.

Portuguese version of this article: Índio bissexual invoca demônios na Casa Branca

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Theological Faggoting: Liberation Theology and Theology of Integral Mission Environment Producing Gay Theology in Brazil

U.S. Urges U.N. to Push for Global Gay Rights

US Names First Global Envoy for Homosexual Agenda

U.S. Homosexual Envoy Wants Brazil in New International Pro-Sodomy Coalition to Deflect Accusations of US “Cultural Imperialism”

Global Homosexual Envoy Talks about Republicans, Russia and Saudi Arabia

Global Home Education Conference in Russia

By Mike Donnelly

Commentary by Julio Severo: The Home School Legal Defense Association, the largest homeschool organization in the world, will be holding a global homeschool conference in Russia in 2018. In the Soviet times, homeschooling was not only impossible in Russia, but severely punished. Homeschooling continues banned in communist nations. Actually, it is under persecution even in non-communist Europe. But in today’s Russia homeschooling is allowed. In fact, CBN, headed by Pat Robertson, said that Russia is now is a homeschooling haven! Homeschooling freedom is a powerful indicator of strong pro-family values. Read the following report by Dr. Donnelly, who is helping organize the world’s largest homeschool event in Russia:

In 1984 the Cold War—as a struggle between the global forces of democracy, represented by the United States and NATO, and of communism, represented by the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact—was a foundational understanding of global politics. As a young soldier at the time and then later as an officer, I trained to meet the massive military force of the Soviet Union on the battlefield of Europe.  During Operation Desert Storm, I led a platoon of tanks against the Iraqi Army who had been equipped with Soviet weaponry and operated under Soviet battle tactics.

State Control

During its longstanding history, the USSR appeared to be a world-dominating force for communism—a system that was predicated on total state control of most areas of common life. Thirty years ago no one could have imagined that home education would ever be possible, let alone legal, in the USSR.  The education system under communism was premised on a totalitarian ideology.

In 1919 Nikolai Bukharin, one of the Bolshevik revolutionaries, said the “task of the new communist schools is to impose upon bourgeois children a proletarian mentality … it is the task of the new school to train up a younger generation whose ideology shall be deeply rooted in the soil of the new communist society.” 

In 1955 Nicholas DeWitt of the National Science Foundation wrote “It is not the individual around whom the educational system is built, but the state, which, by identifying itself with pursuits of the common good, attempts the ruthless subordination of the individual—his rights, tastes, choices, privileges, and his training—to its own needs.” 

Welcome Changes

Traditional Russian history and culture places a high value on the family and education. It is exciting to see that 70 years of communism was not able to totally erase these cultural values.  After the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, some Russians have become critical that changes to their education system has made it too Western.  However, the legalization of home education in Russia is a positive development. Family Education, as it is known in the Russian Federation, is growing.  Like many countries with nascent home education movements, the Russian home education community resembles the small movement that started in the United States about 40 years ago.

Advocates for home education in Russia are encouraged by the growing interest, and Russia was selected as the next location for a Global Home Education Conference. GHEC2018 will be held in Moscow and St. Petersburg during the week of May 21-25, 2018.  The conference will gather researchers, policy makers, parents and organizations with the purpose to support the Russian home educating community and to provide a platform for advancing the rights of families to choose home education.

Taking the Lead

Russia’s policy in favor of home education is a positive example on the Eurasian continent where many home educating communities are just starting. Russia’s policy stands in stark contrast to that of other western European countries, such as Germany and Sweden, which do not tolerate home education.

GHEC2018 will offer a unique experience to participants to visit the historical cities of Moscow and St. Petersburg, to interact with global leaders, to encourage and support a growing home education community in Russia, and to continue our advocacy for the rights of parents and children to choose the kind of education they want to experience. The organizers continue to adhere to the original vision of the global conferences that home education ought to be a choice for all families everywhere—regardless of their motivation or methodology.

To stay informed about the conference, we invite you to sign up for email updates specifically about the GHEC 2018 at www.ghec2018.org.

Source: Home School Legal Defense Association, via Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Americans Warned: Home-Schoolers Stripped of Rights

Homeschooling in Brazil: Where Is it Headed?

Trump, Obama, Hillary and NATO

Gay “Marriage”: A Hero in Alabama

By Julio Severo

Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore built his career on loyalty to the U.S. Constitution and to God’s Constitution, the Bible, and it has cost him his job — twice.

Roy Moore

At the behest of the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center, the Judicial Inquiry Commission suspended Moore Friday for upholding the U.S. Constitution against gay “marriage.”

The same commission had removed him from office 13 years ago over a Ten Commandments monument. Left-wing activists wanted the monument removed from the Alabama Supreme Court. Moore defended its stay. And he was chastised and removed.

The Ten Commandments in the U.S. Supreme Court façade

Why cannot a Ten Commandments monument remain in a state court when the federal Supreme Court has an image of Moses carrying Ten Commandments engraved in its façade? This is a powerful reminder, left by past Americans, that the United States was not founded on an Islamic, Buddhist, esoteric, atheistic, humanistic or homosexualist foundation. Its foundation is the Bible and its laws, especially the Ten Commandments.

Moore is a West Point graduate who loves to recite from memory long passages of the Bible and many U.S. historical documents that defend the Bible.

There is no inconsistency between the Bible and the U.S. Constitution, overwhelmingly drafted by men who read and lived by the Bible. All of them did not believe in gay “marriage.”

There is total inconsistency between gay “marriage” and the U.S. Constitution, because its framers had in mind the well-being of their families and nation, not the advancement of the gay ideology.

Last year, on defiance of the Ten Commandments embraced by the U.S. Constitution framers, the U.S. Supreme Court imposed gay “marriage” on the United States. Moore chose not to defy the U.S. Constitution and especially the moral and spiritual foundation of its framers.

He passionately embraces conservatism. He reacted when Facebook launched an app called “Let’s Celebrate Pride,” which allowed users to overlay an image of the homosexual rainbow over their profile picture. The Facebook celebration was in honor of the U.S. Supreme Court decision creating gay “marriage.”

The strongest resistance came from conservative Russians, as reported by me in my article “Conservative Russians Give Moral Lesson to Facebook’s Homosexual Propaganda,” published in Barbwire.

As a good conservative, Justice Moore spread my article on his Facebook profile. His message was clear: He was against the pro-sodomy judicial activism from the U.S. Supreme Court. He was supportive of the Russian resistance to this activism and to the Facebook celebration.

His resistance to gay “marriage” imposed by the Supreme Court cost him his job.

No one was surprised when a Christian lost his job in the Soviet Union. After all, the Soviet government was communist and officially atheistic. It was expected to persecute Christians.

Yet, the U.S. Supreme Court was founded to respect officially the Ten Commandments, not the gay ideology, atheism, etc.

The United States was founded to respect the Ten Commandments, not the gay ideology.

Moore was removed from his job for respecting the Ten Commandments, not the gay ideology. He was removed not in the Soviet Union, but in the United States, which is theoretically the most Protestant nation in the world.

How did the United States come to begin treating Christians as the Soviet Union did to them?

The Soviet Union was defeated for its anti-Christian atheism. But Sodom, which promoted sodomy, including gay “marriage,” was totally destroyed.

With Moore’s suspension, the message is clear: The modern U.S. has no moral and spiritual connection to its Founders and no American judge is allowed to challenge the law of the land. And this law is gay “marriage.”

In a statement, Moore called his suspension “a politically motivated effort by radical homosexual and transgender groups to remove me as chief justice of the Supreme Court because of outspoken opposition to their immoral agenda.”

Moore gave his Christian testimony. And the Ten Commandments in the U.S. Supreme Court façade are also a powerful testimony against gay “marriage.” At its own peril, the United States is imitating the Soviet Union and Sodom.

With information from the Associated Press.

Portuguese version of this article: “Casamento” gay: Um herói no Alabama

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Gay “Marriage”: Alabama Fights Against Judicial Activism from the U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. Homosexual “Marriage” Will Affect Other Countries

Manifest Destiny in the Bible? America Is Modern Babylon, Said David Wilkerson

Homosexual “Marriage” and the Last Days

UN Appoints First Investigator on LGBT “Discrimination”

By Julio Severo

The U.N. Human Rights Council has appointed Vitit Muntarbhorn of Thailand as the first U.N. investigator charged with investigating “homophobic” policies, including “violence” and “discrimination” based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

Vitit Muntarbhorn

The initiative is the result of a U.N. resolution pioneered by a past Brazilian socialist administration.

Muntarbhorn’s appointment has been celebrated and praised by homosexual activists around the world. ILGA (International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association) said, “For us, it is particularly fitting that he should be appointed to this position in the tenth anniversary year of the Yogyakarta Principles which he helped co-chair in 2006. As ILGA holds its 28th World Conference in Thailand later this year, it seems very appropriate that we should be commemorating this in his home country as he now takes up this new office.”

The Yogyakarta Principles promote the gay agenda by using the ideological rhetoric of human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity. Besides having been the Yogyakarta co-chair, Muntarbhorn was a technical adviser to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) on LGBTQ issues in Asia.

Yet, not everyone is celebrating. Brazilian magazine Istoe said the appointment was heavily criticized by Russia and added, “Many governments have already indicated that they are going to make every effort to hinder the investigator’s work. The Russian government accused the initiative of money waste. ‘This is about private lives and there is no need of a system of special protection,’ said the Kremlin. Vladimir Putin’s diplomacy made it clear that it is not satisfied with the way the U.N. has addressed the issue of human rights. Alexey Borodavkin, Russian Ambassador at the U.N., said that he expects Muntarbhorn’s investigation to ‘take into consideration tradition and religion’ of nations.”

The attack on a Orlando gay nightclub, which was committed by an Islamic terrorist, has been used as the most important example that homosexuals need protection and intervention from the U.N. In fact, this example was specifically mentioned on the appointment of Vitit Muntarbhorn, who will establish contacts with LGBT advocates and organizations around the world and engage with governments and civil society to make recommendations for combating “violence” and “discrimination” against homosexuals.

Even though the U.N. investigator’s mission uses words about combating “violence” and “discrimination,” the same words have been used around the world to force same-sex marriage, cross-gender bathroom use, LGBT “rights” to indoctrinate children at schools, and much more.

The U.N. investigator has the mission to collect reports and complaints from homosexual groups and individuals worldwide and he will then use these complaints along with the full arsenal of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to pressure governments to overturn their laws protecting marriage, family, children and religious and cultural values.

Typically, homosexual groups and individuals worldwide treat as “violence” and “discrimination” all effort to bar a legal disfigurement of marriage and attempts to ban homosexual indoctrination on children. Rev. Scott Lively, a Pentecostal minister, has been legally persecuted because gay groups, with the assistance of George Soros’ socialist legal machine, interpreted that his preaching against homosexuality equates violence. They are accusing Lively of “Crimes Against Humanity”! Will the U.N. investigator grant victory to anti-Lively activists and label ministers, priests and preachers as “Criminals Against Humanity”?

Russia was vigorously condemned and ostracized by the U.S. government and the European Union since the approval of a Russian law banning homosexual propaganda to children and teens. Will the U.N. investigator officially condemn as “criminal,” “violence” and “discrimination” the Russian efforts to protect their children and teens from homosexual propaganda?

In 2011, PayPal closed my account definitively, after a campaign orchestrated by U.S. homosexualist group AllOut. To me, PayPal explained that I am ineligible to receive donations from my friends and readers because “you are not a registered non-profit organization.” To AllOut, PayPal explained that it closed my account because “We take very seriously any cases where a user has incited hatred, violence or intolerance because of a person’s sexual orientation.” My case was denounced by WND (WorldNetDaily), which run this headline: “PayPal blacklists Christian writer.” It was reported also by a U.S. Catholic TV (in this link: https://youtu.be/fSSjmMwQNn4) The ChristianPost, a major evangelical media, also covered my case (in this link: https://youtu.be/oZ8fzSkiB5A)

Will the U.N. investigator not only side with AllOut, but also recommend the same denial of transactional services to Christians as punishment for their “homophobia” — biblical views opposed to homosexual practices?

This scenario is not impossible to happen. Last year, the U.S. appointed homosexualist Randy Berry as the First Global Envoy for the homosexual agenda. In a very short time, he talked about Russia and Saudi Arabia in a trip to Brazil. Brazilian magazine Istoé asked him: “The U.S. has criticized Russia for being so authoritarian with women and homosexuals, but, at the same time, the U.S. keeps close relations to nations as Saudi Arabia, whose acts are worse. Are you uncomfortable about this situation?”

In his answer, Berry refrained from condemning the Saudi dictatorship, which murders homosexuals. Even though Istoé portrayed Russia in a bad light in the homosexual issue, the only “crime” of Russia is to have a law banning homosexual propaganda to children. Is a crime to protect children from such propaganda? It seems so, because the U.S. government has used all effort to condemn systematically the Russian law, which does not order the murder of homosexuals. But Saudi Arabia has been spared such U.S. systematic condemnations for killing homosexuals.

If even the U.S. has not been fair and honest in the issues involving the gay agenda, how could the U.N. be fairer and more honest?

The U.N. investigator’s appointment was approved by socialist nations, including nations members of the “Core LGBT Group,” a group within U.N. of eleven countries committed to “concerted action” for LGBT rights. The “Core LGBT Group,” led by the U.S., is composed by the European Union, Israel and Brazil.

Since the attack on the Orlando gay nightclub, the Obama administration, with the full arsenal of the U.S. government, and the “Core LGBT Group” have been pressuring the United Nations to lead a global effort to advance the gay agenda around the world. The appointment of a U.N. investigator is result of their effort.

The Orlando attack should be used by the U.S. government to press the U.N. to condemn global Islamic violence, but it is being used to build a global legal machine to harass and censor moral and Christian views opposed to homosexual behavior.

With information of Istoe, ILGA, Human Rights Campaign and Family Watch International.

Portuguese version of this article: ONU nomeia primeiro investigador de “discriminação” LGBT

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

U.S. Urges U.N. to Push for Global Gay Rights

US Names First Global Envoy for Homosexual Agenda

U.S. Homosexual Envoy Wants Brazil in New International Pro-Sodomy Coalition to Deflect Accusations of US “Cultural Imperialism”

Global Homosexual Envoy Talks about Republicans, Russia and Saudi Arabia